Author: Brenon Daly

As candidates brawl, some spending plans get knocked down

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Regardless of the outcome of tonight’s inaugural US presidential debate, this year’s election process has already turned off voters. The prospect of casting a ballot for either of the two mainstream presidential candidates – who are both currently viewed ‘unfavorably’ by a majority of US voters – in an increasingly rancorous campaign is casting a cloud that expands far beyond Washington DC. The electoral disenchantment is also likely to hurt business.

That’s one conclusion of a new survey from 451 Research’s ChangeWave service, which last week asked more than 1,900 consumers what impact the ongoing US presidential election will have on their shopping plans for the next three months. The vast majority of respondents (71%) said the Trump vs. Clinton circus would have no impact on their discretionary spending through the end of the year. However, if we look at the minority-but-still-sizable remaining portion (29%), those respondents overwhelmingly indicated they are putting away their checkbooks. In fact, the number of consumers who forecast they would be decreasing their discretionary purchases (22%) was 11 times higher than those who said they would be increasing their purchases (2%).

We mention the ChangeWave finding because it may (and here we emphasize the word ‘may’) help explain some of the slowdown in recent tech M&A activity. Obviously, some qualifications are needed any time we extrapolate results from a consumer-based survey to the corporate world. To be clear, ChangeWave polled consumers only about their plans for individual discretionary purchases, and did not specifically address corporate M&A. Nor did it focus on tech. However, given that companies are just a collection of people who tend to bring their perceptions with them to the office, and acquisitions can sometimes be viewed as a discretionary purchase, we would make the case that ChangeWave’s finding has relevance to the tech M&A community.

Regardless of whether the presidential election is actually knocking deals off the table, something is slowing down activity. In the first half of 2016, tech acquirers announced an average of 350 transactions each month, according to 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase. Both July and August came in below that level. In fact, last month’s total of just 297 tech deals, representing a 14% decline from the monthly average in the first half of 2016, was the first time since March 2014 that M&A volume failed to top 300. And while September won’t wrap up until the end of this week, this month is tracking even weaker than last month. (We are on pace for about 270 announced transactions for September.) In other words, as we get closer to election day, M&A activity is dropping off.

cw-presidential-election-impact

A public/private split in Apptio’s IPO

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Apptio soared onto Wall Street in its debut, pricing its offering above the expected range and then jumping almost 50% in early Nasdaq trading. The IT spend management vendor raised $96m in its IPO, and nosed up toward the elevated status of a unicorn. However, in a clear sign of the frothiness of the late-stage funding market a few years ago, Apptio shares are currently trading only slightly above the price the institutional backers paid in the company’s last private-market round in May 2013.

That’s not to take anything away from Apptio, which created some $850m of market value in its offering. (Our math: Apptio has roughly 37 million shares outstanding, on an undiluted basis, and they were changing hands at about $23 each in midday trading under the ticker APTI.) That works out to a solid 5.4 times 2016 revenue, which we project at about $157m. (Last year and so far in the first half of 2016, Apptio has increased sales in the low-20% range. That growth rate, while still respectable, is about half the rate it had been growing. We suspect that deceleration, combined with uninterrupted red ink at the company, help explain why Wall Street didn’t receive Apptio more bullishly.)

In midday trading, Apptio’s share price was only slightly above the $22.69 per share that it sold shares to so-called ‘crossover investors’ Janus Capital Group and T. Rowe Price, among other investors, in its series E financing, according to the vendor’s prospectus. A relatively recent phenomenon, crossover investing has seen a number of deep-pocketed mutual funds shift some of their investment dollars to private companies in an effort to build an early position in a business they hope will come public and trade up from there.

However, given the glacial pace of tech IPOs in recent years as well as the overall deflation of the hype around unicorns, that strategy hasn’t proved particularly lucrative. In fact, many of the price adjustments that mutual funds have made on the private company holding have been markdowns.

But the institutional investors would counter that the short-term valuation of their portfolio matters less than the ultimate return. For the most part, we’ve seen conservative pricing of tech IPOs in 2016. (Twilio, for instance, has more than doubled since its IPO three months ago.) Apptio probably doesn’t have the growth rate to be as explosive in the aftermarket as Twilio, but it can still build value. That’s what investors – regardless of when they bought in – are banking on.

Recent enterprise tech IPOs*

Company Date of offering
Pure Storage October 7, 2015
Mimecast November 20, 2015
Atlassian December 10, 2015
SecureWorks April 22, 2016
Twilio June 23, 2016
Talend July 29, 2016
Apptio September 23, 2016

*Includes Nasdaq and NYSE listings only

A tarnished Golden Tombstone

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

In each of the past nine years, 451 Research has surveyed more than 100 corporate development executives to find out which deal announced during that year stood out to them as the most significant transaction. The peer-selected prize, which we call the Golden Tombstone, has gone to companies across the tech landscape. Still, many of those blockbuster transactions haven’t generated the expected returns. The Golden Tombstone, it turns out, can tarnish over time.

We saw that yet again this week, as Intel unwound its full ownership of McAfee, which was voted the most significant transaction of 2010. With that divestiture, the number of Golden Tombstone-winning transactions that have been undone climbed to three, representing an alarming one-third of the annual prize winners. (The others: Hewlett-Packard Enterprises sold off its services business in May, reversing its 2008 acquisition of EDS; and Google unwound its 2011 purchase of Motorola Mobility three years later.) For the record, the ‘exit’ prices for all of those businesses was far less than the ‘entrance’ prices.

Not to jinx the transaction or anything, but we would nonetheless note that last year’s landslide winner was Dell’s acquisition of EMC. That transaction, which was announced last October and officially closed earlier this week, was an obvious vote for the Golden Tombstone. After all, it is the largest pure tech transaction in history. And yet, even though Dell and EMC are only (officially) beginning their corporate life together, there’s already some ominous history lining up against the deal.

Top vote-getter for ‘most significant tech transaction’

Year Deal
2015 Dell’s acquisition of EMC
2014 Facebook’s acquisition of WhatsApp
2013 IBM’s acquisition of SoftLayer
2012 VMware’s acquisition of Nicira
2011 Google’s acquisition of Motorola Mobility
2010 Intel’s acquisition of McAfee
2009 Oracle’s acquisition of Sun Microsystems
2008 Hewlett-Packard’s acquisition of EDS
2007 Citrix’s acquisition of XenSource

Source: 451 Research Tech Corporate Development Outlook Survey

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

Baking in security isn’t a good recipe for Intel

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Intel’s multibillion-dollar experiment in bringing security in-house and baking it into its silicon is over. The chipmaker announced plans to mostly unwind its six-year-old acquisition of McAfee, which stands as the largest information security (infosec) transaction in history. However, Intel’s divestiture of a majority stake of its infosec division is being done at a substantial discount to the original purchase.

Under terms, Intel will retain a 49% stake in the infosec business, which will revert to the McAfee name, with private equity firm TPG Capital acquiring a 51% stake. The buyout shop will pay $1.1bn in cash and assume $1bn in debt. (The co-owners of McAfee plan to raise a total of $2bn in debt, with $1bn of that held by TPG and $1bn held by Intel.) Altogether, the transaction gives McAfee an enterprise value of $4.2bn, compared with an enterprise value of $7bn for McAfee in Intel’s mid-2010 puzzling purchase.

Sales at Intel’s infosec unit totaled $1.1bn in the first half of this year, according to the company. Annualizing that amount would put revenue at $2.2bn, meaning McAfee is valued at less than two times sales in its divestiture. That’s a relatively low multiple for infosec companies. In its 2010 purchase, for instance, Intel paid roughly 3.5 times sales for McAfee. Furthermore, rival Symantec currently trades at roughly the same 3.5x multiple.

Intel’s divestiture of McAfee, which had been rumored for some time, underscores the fact that infosec is an industry in transition. The move means that two of the largest and longest-standing security companies have undergone dramatic corporate overhauls since just the start of the year. Back in January, Symantec sheared off its Veritas storage business so that it could focus entirely on security. It then followed that up in summer by announcing the second-largest infosec transaction, according to 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase. Symantec paid $4.65bn for Blue Coat Systems, an acquisition that, unusually, installed Blue Coat executives into the top three spots at the acquiring company.

Dell-EMC closes, but there’s still dealing to be done

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Whenever a newly joined couple move in together, there are always a few items that just don’t fit as the two houses are merged into one. These things can range from minor overlapping bits (dishes that don’t quite match) to bulky odd-lot items (that rather ugly plaid couch that was hidden away in a corner of the basement). Invariably, the domestically blissed couple has to sort through their stuff to figure out what’s coming and what’s going.

As Dell and EMC officially close their union today, the process of sorting out their combined house assumes a new urgency. (See our full coverage of the transaction.) Of course, the two companies have already begun rationalizing their holdings in anticipation of coming together, most notably with Dell raising more than $5bn over the past half-year by shedding ill-fitting divisions. These divestitures have essentially involved Dell unwinding earlier acquisitions that didn’t deliver promised returns, notably Perot Systems, as well as Quest Software and SonicWALL.

We suspect the next bit of unwinding will likely come from Dell reversing EMC’s previous acquisition of Documentum. (This move has been mulled for several years, but now seems more likely as Dell takes on tens of billions of dollars of debt to pay for the largest-ever acquisition in the tech industry.) Somewhat like Veritas within Symantec, Documentum has never really fit inside EMC. It is even harder to see the strategic rationale for the content management software inside Dell, which has sold off most of its software assets. Dell is (once again) focusing on hardware, with product revenue accounting for roughly three-quarters of the combined company revenue of $74bn.

Documentum serves as the main piece of EMC’s Enterprise Content Division (ECD), a $600m unit that is a bit lost inside a $24bn company. (We would note that ECD accounts for just 2.5% of overall revenue at EMC – exactly the same portion of revenue generated at Dell by its software business, which was divested in June.) ECD would represent less than 1% of the combined company revenue, likely relegating it even further to an ‘afterthought’ sale.

That won’t help ECD, which is already slowly shrinking inside EMC. Unusually for a software company, product sales account for only about one-quarter of the division’s revenue, with the remaining three-quarters coming from maintenance and support. Still, ECD is able to put up very respectable gross margins in the mid-60% range. That financial profile, which represents a mature and somewhat sticky offering, fits well with private equity requirements. So we could see Documentum going to a buyout shop, which is where Veritas landed, as well as Dell’s own software division.

However, if Dell does manage to sell Documentum, it would likely garner only about $1bn for the business. (For the record, EMC paid $1.8bn, mostly in equity, for Documentum in 2003.) That would value ECD at roughly 1.7 times sales, which is exactly the valuation Dell got when it unwound its own software business three months ago.

Even as summer heated up, tech dealmaking cooled down in August

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly Kenji Yonemoto

After surging at the start of summer, tech M&A activity in August settled back to a more representative level. Acquirers around the globe announced 281 tech, media and telecom transactions valued at $30.5bn in the just-completed month, according to 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase. The spending basically matches the August levels of the two previous years. However, it is just one-third the amount dealmakers spent in July and half of June’s spending.

The main reason why spending last month didn’t drop further than it did – August still ranked as the third-highest monthly total in 2016 – is primarily due to an unprecedented wave of private equity (PE) activity. Last month, buyout shops accounted for roughly half of all tech M&A spending, which is about three times their typical level. Overall, PE shops were buyers in five of the 10 largest transactions, including both of August’s biggest prints, according to the M&A KnowledgeBase.

While M&A spending held up last month, the same can’t be said for deal volume. The number of prints announced in August sank below 300 for the first time in two and a half years, according to the M&A KnowledgeBase. Deal volume dropped to just 281 transactions, down 18% from the monthly average in 2016. (Relatedly or not, stock trading volume last month also slid to some of the lowest levels in recent memory.)

With eight months of 2016 now complete, tech M&A spending has already cracked $300bn, putting it ahead of five of the seven full-year totals since the recent recession ended. Assuming the rest of the year continues at the same rate it has shown since January, 2016 would see some $450bn worth of deal flow. However, we suspect that the pace of spending in the remaining four months of the year could slow if several looming macro factors (an increasingly rancorous US election cycle, a long-considered interest rate hike, the continued deceleration of most of the world’s large economies) introduce more uncertainty into the picture.Jan-Aug MA totals

In its IPO, will Apptio suffer the curse of the crossover?

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

In what’s shaping up to be a bit of a test case for late-stage financings, a rather richly valued Apptio plans to go public. The company, which sells software that helps clients manage their IT spending, has revealed paperwork for an IPO with a placeholder amount of $75m. However, as Apptio makes its way to Wall Street, one of its existing backers on Wall Street has already trimmed the value of the company.

Institutional investor T. Rowe Price led Apptio’s $50m series D round in March 2012. At the end of 2015, the mutual fund had reduced the value of its investment by 24% compared with the previous year, according to the prospectus of the fund that holds Apptio equity. T. Rowe also marked down by a similar amount its holding of Apptio shares from a financing a year later. Fellow mutual fund Janus led the $45 series E in May 2013, Apptio’s last private round. According to Apptio’s prospectus, the company sold shares to Janus and other investors in that round at $22.69 per share.

Of course, valuations rise and fall every day on Wall Street. And startups that have drawn big money from mutual funds only to see their shares get marked down after the purchase often say the downgrades are mere ‘accounting’ moves made by people who don’t really understand Silicon Valley finance. However, in the case of Apptio, some of the discount may be warranted because it is currently growing only half as fast as it was when it raised its big slugs of capital from the so-called crossover investors.

In the first two quarters of 2016, Apptio has increased revenue a solid-but-not-spectacular 22%. That’s the same pace as its full-year 2015, but just half the rate of 2014. At the same time as Apptio’s growth has slowed, losses have mounted. It lost $41m in 2015, up from $33m in 2014. Although losses have eased so far this year, Apptio still very much runs in the red.

Part of the reason for the deep losses is that Apptio’s software is a rather heavy implementation, which can take several months to set up. For its software to be useful, clients need to have an IT budget that runs in the hundreds of millions of dollars, and some customization of the software is typically required. (Roughly 20% of the vendor’s revenue comes from professional services.)

Although Apptio has collected an enviable roster of clients, it counts just 325 total customers. As a point of reference, that’s roughly the same number of customers that Workday had when it went public in 2012. Further, the two companies were roughly the same size, recording about $130m in revenue in the fiscal year leading up to their mid-summer filings. However, at the time of their IPOs, they were on very different trajectories: Workday was doubling revenue, compared with 22% growth for Apptio. Obviously, for growth-focused Wall Street, that is almost certain to result in very different valuations for the companies. Workday hit the market at an astonishing 40x trailing sales, while Apptio would probably count itself fortunate to garner a double-digit valuation.

Enterprise tech IPOs* over the past 12 months

Company Date of offering
Pure Storage October 7, 2015
Mimecast November 20, 2015
Atlassian December 10, 2015
SecureWorks April 22, 2016
Twilio June 23, 2016
Talend July 29, 2016

*Includes Nasdaq and NYSE listings only

Rackspace pivots to private

Brenon Daly

Bruised by a fight in the clouds, Rackspace has opted to go private in $4.3bn leveraged buyout (LBO) with Apollo Global Management. The company, which has been public for eight years, is in the midst of a transition from its original plan to sell basic cloud infrastructure, where it couldn’t compete with Amazon Web Services, to taking a more services-led approach. Terms of the take-private reflect the fact that although Rackspace has made great strides in overhauling its business, much work remains.

Leon Black’s buyout shop will pay $32 for each share of Rackspace, which is exactly the price the stock was trading at a year ago. Further, it is less than half the level that shares changed hands at back in early 2013. Of course, at that time, Rackspace was growing at a high-teens clip, which is twice the 8% pace the company has grown so far this year.

In terms of valuation, Rackspace is going private at just half the prevailing market multiple for large LBOs so far in 2016. According to 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase, the previous nine take-privates on US exchanges valued at more than $500m have gone off at 4.4x sales. (See our full report on the record number – as well as valuations – of take-privates in 2016.) In comparison, Rackspace is valued at just slightly more than 2x trailing sales: $4.3bn on $2bn of revenue, with roughly the same amount of cash as debt.

More relevant to Rackspace as it moves into a private equity (PE) portfolio is that even as the company (perhaps belatedly) transitions to a new model – one that includes offering services on top of AWS, Azure and other cloud infrastructure providers that Rackspace once competed against – is that it generates a ton of cash. Sure, growth may be slowing, but Rackspace has still thrown off some $674m of EBITDA over the past year.

The company’s 33% EBITDA margin is even more remarkable when we consider that Rackspace, which has more than 6,000 employees, is relatively well-regarded by its customers for its ‘fanatical’ support of its offerings. While we could imagine that focus on customer service as competitive differentiator might set up some tension under PE ownership (people are expensive and tend not to scale very well), Rackspace has the advantage of having built that into a profitable business. In short, Rackspace is just the sort of business that should fit comfortably in a PE portfolio.

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

The buyout barons get busy on Wall Street

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Cash-rich buyout firms are still shopping on Wall Street, undeterred by recent record levels hit in US equity markets. The dramatically increased buying power of private equity (PE) shops has resulted in an unprecedented number of significant tech vendors erased from US exchanges so far this year. Already in just eight months of 2016, PE firms have announced nine take-privates valued at more than $500m, up from an average of about five transactions per year in the past half-decade, according to 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase.

Part of the reason why PE shops are buying big companies is that they have amassed billions of dollars of capital, so they don’t have to sweat when writing the equity check. Further, credit is once again flowing relatively freely to help support these large deals. With money in hand, buyout firms are ready to do business. To get a sense of that, consider Vista Equity Partners’ $1.8bn acquisition of Marketo in May. According to the proxy filed with the SEC in connection with the transaction, Vista announced the purchase just one month after first informally floating the idea of buying the marketing automation specialist.

Of course, it also helps that buyout shops are willing to pay up to do their deals. In the case of Marketo, for instance, Vista is paying 7.9x trailing sales for company, which was growing at about 30%. Vista paid a comparable multiple in its similarly sized reach for Cvent in April. Meanwhile, the buyout pair of Silver Lake Partners and Thoma Bravo paid a full turn more last October for SolarWinds, a roughly $500m business that sold for $4.5bn. The valuation of the network management software provider looks equally as rich when we consider that it sold for 28x EBITDA, by our calculation.

On average, in the nine large take-privates so far in 2016, PE firms have paid an average of 4.4x trailing sales, according to the M&A KnowledgeBase. That, too, is the richest valuation we have recorded for PE shops, slightly ahead of the average of 4.1x trailing sales in 2015 but about twice the prevailing multiple in the previous three years. For more context: The recent take-privates are valued about half again as richly as the LBOs done during the previous buyout boom of 2006-07, when the average tech vendor went private for slightly less than 3x trailing sales, according to the M&A KnowledgeBase.

KB recent take-privates

The comeback kids of the tech IPO market

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

If there’s going to be a recovery in the tech IPO market, information security (infosec) looks like it will lead the way. According to 451 Research’s recently launched M&A KnowledgeBase Premium, one-quarter of the 72 startups that we think are of a size and mind to go public in the near future come from the infosec industry. The ‘shadow IPO’ pipeline is one of the key features of the new premium version of 451 Research’s industry-leading M&A KnowledgeBase.

The premium version of our M&A KnowledgeBase features a full financial profile of the candidates, as well as 451 Research’s qualitative assessment of each company’s technology and its competitive positioning in the market. For instance, the profile of Veracode includes our proprietary estimates of the application security startup’s bookings for both 2015 and 2016, plus our analysis of its expansion into the new growth market of mobile apps. Altogether, KnowledgeBase Premium has a shortlist of 18 infosec vendors that could be eyeing an upcoming IPO, including Carbon Black, LogRhythm and ForeScout.

Although the IPO market has been mired in a slump recently, with just three enterprise-focused offerings so far this year, many private companies have matured to the point where their business models are comparable to their publicly traded brethren. Further, many are putting up growth rates that leave Nasdaq and NYSE firms in the dust. That’s particularly true in the infosec space, where a recent survey of 881 IT budget-holders by 451 Research’s Voice of the Enterprise found that 46% of respondents had more to spend on security in the coming quarter, compared with the start of the year. That was 10 times the percentage who indicated that their infosec budgets were shrinking.

Of course, merely having a business that’s ready to go public doesn’t necessarily mean that the company needs to file an S1. Most of the infosec companies have plenty of cash in their treasuries, with the 18 pre-IPO vendors having raised about $2bn in venture backing. (KnowledgeBase Premium not only tracks fundings, but in some cases it also notes the valuation of the funding.) Additionally, many of the publicly traded infosec names – including both of the sector’s most recent debutants, Rapid7 and SecureWorks – haven’t necessarily found bullish investors on Wall Street.

But as the Twilio offering and its subsequent aftermarket trading has shown, a company with a strong growth story can almost always find buyers, regardless of what’s happening in the overall market. With that in mind, we’ll watch for more of the 72 names on our M&A KnowledgeBase Premium IPO shortlist – particularly those in the bustling infosec arena – to move from the pipeline to Wall Street in the coming quarters.

IPO pipeline by sector

Source: 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase Premium