Two strikes and counting for acquirers of Zimbra

Contact: Brenon Daly

Having already bounced around inside two tech giants before bouncing out of them altogether, Zimbra is now on its third owner in the past seven years. Telligent Systems, a relatively small VC-backed startup, has picked up the back-end email technology provider from VMware, which – in turn – had picked up the castoff business from Yahoo. Although terms weren’t released, we would guess Telligent spent a fraction of the $450m that the two previous buyers handed over for Zimbra.

With two tech giants having already whiffed on their ownership of Zimbra, however, we can’t help but wonder if Telligent’s purchase will be strike three for the once-promising company. The reason we ask is because in each of the deals, Zimbra was acquired in order to be something that it’s not.

For Yahoo, its mid-2007 purchase of Zimbra represented a way to counter Google Apps, which, at the time, was just starting to make its way into universities, small businesses and the service-provider market. Yahoo hosted hundreds of millions of unpaid consumer email accounts, but hadn’t been able to expand into businesses.

Yahoo’s efforts with Zimbra didn’t have any more success than the next owner, VMware. In early 2010, the infrastructure software giant made an ill-advised move into the application layer with Zimbra’s messaging and collaboration products. It has largely retreated from those efforts, divesting both Zimbra and SlideRocket as part of a larger corporate restructuring announced earlier this year.

And now it’s Telligent’s turn to see what it can do with Zimbra. From the outset, we would note that the stakes are much higher for Telligent than for either of the two previous acquirers. Both Yahoo and VMware, which do close to $5bn in annual sales, could absorb the financial impact of a questionable deal that didn’t work out. Privately held Telligent, which we estimate might generate $20m this year, doesn’t have that cushion. (Further, it may not have the brand equity to survive because Telligent is taking the unusual step of using the name of the acquired business for the surviving company.)

Telligent will have to stretch to blend its enterprise social networking products – hyped as real-time, collaborative and far more interactive than plain old email – with Zimbra. Simply put, the approaches come from different eras. Even a company as well-versed in software as Microsoft has recognized that and has adapted its M&A program accordingly. Although Microsoft dropped $1.2bn on social networking startup Yammer a year ago, the software giant only recently started integrating the Web 2.0 company with a select few stalwart programs such as SharePoint and Office, despite the connection between the applications.

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

RSA adds Aveksa, bolstering goverance and provisioning

Contact: Wendy Nather, Brenon Daly

The identity and access management (IAM) market has evolved far beyond hooking up Active Directory with cloud-based identity management and single sign-on to a whole realm of business context that needs to be addressed. To cover that, EMC’s RSA Security has acquired Aveksa, a ‘business-driven IAM’ vendor, adding to the security giant’s existing portfolio of authentication, analytics and governance offerings.

Much of RSA’s portfolio has come through a steady flow of M&A. The security division of EMC typically acquires one or two startups each year. We would note that deal flow is much slower than EMC’s other major division, VMware. Nonetheless, RSA has made significant moves in recent years, adding Silver Tail Systems (antifraud), NetWitness (event monitoring) and Archer Technologies (GRC), among others.

With Aveksa, RSA will get a solid source of identity governance, user provisioning and access management to go along with its authentication business. RSA says that another reason for the acquisition was the speed with which Aveksa could be rolled out in the enterprise. The published claim is that roughly 70% of customers were up and running in production within four months – a far cry from traditional IAM infrastructures, which can take years to customize and deploy. (See our full report.)

A return to the ‘new normal’ for tech M&A in Q2

Contact: Brenon Daly

After two straight quarters that each featured a single blockbuster transaction, tech M&A spending in the just-completed Q2 settled back into a more representative level for the post-recession era. Spending on acquisitions of tech, telecom and Internet companies around the globe from April to June totaled $46bn – essentially matching the value of deals in Q2 of last year as well as the quarterly average from 2010-2012. (Look for our full report on the Q2 M&A totals and trends later today on our website and in our next Daily 451.)

However, Q2 spending comes in about one-third lower than both the first quarter of this year and the final quarter of last year. The decline from mid-$60bn in both of those quarters to mid-$40bn in the just-completed quarter stems primarily from the fact that Q2 didn’t see a mega-transaction like the one that boosted totals in the other two quarters.

Both Q4 2012 and Q1 2013 featured single deals valued at more than $20bn, roughly the equivalent to the aggregate total of the four largest deals announced in Q2 2013. The $24bn proposed Dell buyout, announced in February, and Softbank’s $20bn reach for Sprint Nextel last October are the two largest transactions of the past half-decade.

Turning to deal volume, we would note that even as tech M&A spending returned to more representative post-recession levels in Q2, the number of transactions didn’t keep pace. In fact, overall quarterly deal flow plunged to its lowest level since the recession. From April to June, dealmakers announced just 751 transactions, a sharp 18% year-over-year decline. (Again, we’ll have a full report on Q2 M&A activity available later today on our website and in our next Daily 451.)

Recent quarterly deal flow

Period Deal volume Deal value
Q2 2013 751 $46bn
Q1 2013 785 $64bn
Q4 2012 851 $64bn
Q3 2012 912 $39bn
Q2 2012 916 $44bn
Q1 2012 918 $34bn
Q4 2011 904 $44bn
Q3 2011 969 $64bn
Q2 2011 980 $76bn
Q1 2011 919 $45bn

Source: The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

Adobe back in the market for marketing, drops $600m on Neolane

Contact: Brenon Daly

In its second-largest acquisition for its Marketing Cloud, Adobe Systems says it will hand over $600m in cash for marketing automation (MA) vendor Neolane. The purchase of Neolane, which is expected to close in Q3, trails only Adobe’s pickup of Omniture for $1.8bn in 2009 in terms of spending on deals to build out its Marketing Cloud. Collectively, these transactions have cost Adobe more than $3bn.

Although Adobe declined to discuss Neolane’s financials, the Paris-based startup has said it generated 2012 revenue of $58m, which would put it at roughly the same size as rivals Marketo and HubSpot. In terms of valuation, however, Neolane is a good bit off of Marketo’s market cap of some $870m.

We would chalk up the disparity in valuation to two main reasons. First, Neolane’s on-premises business is about as large as its subscription business, while Marketo is a pure SaaS company. Further, we understand that Neolane grew about 40% last year, which is a solid rate but just half the pace of the free-spending – and deeply unprofitable – Marketo. Through midyear, we would pencil out that Neolane generated roughly $70m in trailing 12-month revenue.

Adobe’s MA move comes after many other tech giants have already snapped up MA vendors, including salesforce.com paying a record $2.5bn for ExactTarget earlier this month. Other tech giants that have made significant MA acquisitions include IBM (Unica), Teradata (Aprimo), Oracle (Eloqua) and Intuit (Demandforce). Valuations for those transactions have ranged from 4.4x trailing sales to 11x trailing sales.

Select marketing automation transactions

Date announced Acquirer Target Deal value Price-to-sales valuation
June 27, 2013 Adobe Neolane $600m 8.6x*
June 4, 2013 salesforce.com ExactTarget $2.5bn 7.6x
December 20, 2012 Oracle Eloqua $956m 9.7x
April 27, 2012 Intuit Demandforce $424m 11.4x*
December 22, 2010 Teradata Aprimo $525m 6.3x
August 13, 2010 IBM Unica $523m 4.4x

Source: The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase *451 Research estimate

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

For Keynote’s new owners, it’s been buy-and-build buyouts

Contact: Brenon Daly, Dennis Callaghan

Sometimes it’s just easier to go shopping behind closed doors. We were reminded of that as Keynote Systems indicated that it plans to go private in a $395m sale to private equity (PE) firm Thoma Bravo. As we look at the PE shop’s portfolio companies, it’s striking how quickly the M&A pace has picked up once the companies can reach into the deep pockets of their new owner, and do so out of the glare of Wall Street.

Consider the M&A activity of Blue Coat Systems. The security company averaged about one acquisition every other year in the decade leading up to its December 2011 take-private by Thoma Bravo. So far in 2013, Blue Coat has already done two outright acquisitions, including paying what we hear is a double-digit multiple for Solera Networks. (451 M&A KnowledgeBase subscribers can see our estimates for terms of the Blue Coat-Solera pairing by clicking here.) Thoma Bravo also rolled Crossbeam Systems, which it already owned, into Blue Coat last December.

Similarly, Tripwire had done only one deal in the nearly decade and a half before it sold to Thoma Bravo in mid-2011. (And the security firm’s sole foray into M&A was a tiny asset purchase that only set it back $3m.) Earlier this year, it made a significant bet of more than $100m on nCircle, which bumped up total revenue by about one-quarter. And based on the early progress on that transaction, we understand that Tripwire may be looking to make another similarly sized acquisition in the coming quarters.

The Keynote leveraged buyout (LBO) isn’t expected to close until fall, and even after that the company’s new owners will probably want some time to more deeply understand and take some preliminary steps to get the test and measurement vendor growing again. Revenue has been flat so far this fiscal year as some customers have recently narrowed Keynote projects or put them off.

But once business is shored up, we could imagine Keynote returning to the M&A market, from which it has been absent since October 2011. My colleague Dennis Callaghan speculated in a report on the LBO that Keynote may also look to expand its capabilities in pre-deployment testing or even add content delivery network technology through acquisition.

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

Thoma Bravo hopes to unlock value from Keynote in LBO

Contact: Brenon Daly

After focusing its recent M&A activity on rounding out existing portfolio companies, buyout shop Thoma Bravo made another ‘platform play’ on Monday, offering $395m for Keynote Systems. Under terms, the private equity firm will pay $20 per share, or a total of $395m, for the 18-year-old testing and measurement vendor.

The deal, which is expected to close by September, comes at a time when Keynote is struggling to put up growth. Business across its two operating units – the core Internet measurement products as well as the newer mobile testing offerings – have both been flat so far this fiscal year. Further, the company has seen its operating and net income drop this year as some customers have recently narrowed Keynote projects or put them off.

The price Thoma Bravo is paying reflects the operating challenges at Keynote, which traded above the $20 bid for much of 2011. The dividend-paying company holds nearly $60m in cash and short-term investments. Backing out that amount from the $395m equity value for Keynote gives an enterprise value of $335m, or about 2.7 times the $125m in trailing sales the company has put up.

Keynote’s valuation of 2.7x sales is almost exactly the midpoint of Thoma Bravo’s two previous take-privates, the $195m buyout of Mediware Information Systems last September and the $1bn acquisition of Deltek in August. Since those LBOs, the buyout shop has been busy doing deals to bulk up its portfolio companies, including two follow-on acquisitions for Mediware as well as recent bolt-on deals for Blue Coat Systems, LANDesk Software and Tripwire.

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

For US tech IPOs, precious little new blood amid the larger bleed-out

Contact: Brenon Daly

Over the past month it’s been ‘one on/one off’ for publicly traded marketing automation vendors. In mid-May, we saw Marketo debut on the Nasdaq. (If rumors are to be believed, incidentally, Marketo only made it to market after stiffarming some would-be buyers.) On the other side, earlier this week we saw ExactTarget announce plans to depart the NYSE, selling for an industry-record $2.5bn a little more than a year after its own IPO.

Leaving aside the vast gap in value left by the two events – Marketo currently trades at less than one-third of ExactTarget’s terminal value – at least there’s some replacement in this sector. That isn’t true for most of the tech industry. In terms of the overall number of tech companies on US exchanges, there’s been precious little fresh blood to offset a continual bleed-out.

Looking broadly at the enterprise tech market so far this year, we’ve tallied a half-dozen IPOs, with half of those coming in the past month alone. In addition to Marketo, May also saw the listings of ChannelAdvisor and Tableau Software. That trio joined Marin Software, Model N and Rally Software Development as the Class of 2013 so far.

So that’s six new entrants to the ranks of US publicly traded tech companies, an average of about one IPO each month this year. (And keep in mind, this rate is post-JOBS Act, which supposedly made it easier for companies to come public.) Against those new arrivals, we have seen some 20 US public companies acquired so far this year, according to The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase.

That rate equals three tech companies erased from US exchanges for every one that joins. Many of these deals are taking major companies – which, in some cases, have traded for a decade or even longer – off Wall Street: Dell, BMC, Acme Packet, Websense and others. The debutantes just can’t keep pace with the departures.

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

A market-moving marketing move

Contact: Brenon Daly

In the largest-ever transaction in the rapidly emerging marketing automation industry, salesforce.com said on June 4 it will hand over $2.5bn in cash for ExactTarget. The deal represents a significant bet by the SaaS kingpin, which has talked about cross-channel marketing becoming a $1bn business in the coming years. Salesforce.com will nearly clean out its coffers to cover its purchase of ExactTarget, which is three times the size of salesforce.com’s second-largest deal.

Under terms, salesforce.com will hand over $33.75 for each share of ExactTarget. That represents the highest-ever price for the 13-year-old marketing automation vendor, which went public in March 2012 at $19. (J.P. Morgan Securities led ExactTarget’s IPO and advised the company on its sale. Bank of America Merrill Lynch worked the other side.) The deal is expected to close by mid-July.

At an enterprise value of $2.4bn, ExactTarget’s valuation of roughly 7.6 times trailing sales splits the difference between the two previous largest transactions in the marketing automation space. In December 2012, Oracle paid an uncharacteristically rich 9.7 times trailing sales for Eloqua, and Teradata paid 6.5 times trailing sales for Aprimo in December 2010, according to the 451 Research M&A KnowledgeBase. (For its part, rival Marketo, which salesforce.com and others were rumored to have looked at last fall, trades at nearly twice ExactTarget’s multiple.)

With the purchase of ExactTarget, the three largest deals salesforce.com has done have all been aimed at expanding the company’s marketing offering. It picked up Buddy Media in mid-2012 for $689m for its agency relationships after spending $326m on social media monitoring startup Radian6 in March 2011. But don’t look for any more deals in that space or any other from salesforce.com soon. During a call discussing the ExactTarget purchase, CEO Marc Benioff said salesforce.com will be on ‘vacation’ from M&A for the next 12-18 months.

In ICE-NYSE deal, a shark swallows a whale

by Brenon Daly

For all of the talk about the disruptive forces that have reshaped the tech landscape through M&A, the changes – at least at the high end of the market – have been largely incremental. Just take a look at deal flow so far this year. We’ve seen a bit of big-ticket telco consolidation as well as a pair of multibillion-dollar take-privates, the largest of which would see the current CEO play a leading role in not only the transaction itself but also the operation of the company after the close. It’s hardly dramatic stuff.

Certainly, we would argue that not one of those deals comes anywhere close to the upheaval embodied by the IntercontinentalExchange’s (ICE) planned acquisition of NYSE Euronext. The deal, which was backed by NYSE shareholders today, may well be the ultimate example of a startup gobbling up an established vendor.

For starters, the roles in the transaction are flipped from what we would expect in a typical tech deal. (Indeed, the NYSE has been a busy buyer in recent years, expanding into electronic trading platforms and consolidating old-line exchanges both in the US and abroad via M&A.) Consider the fact that ICE is barely more than a decade old while the fabled NYSE traces its roots back to 1792. And while ICE is the buyer, it is less than half the size of the NYSE, or the ‘Big Board’ as it is known on Wall Street.

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

A mixed May for M&A

Contact: Brenon Daly

Continuing the M&A trend we’ve seen so far this year, tech buyers in May either bought big or bought nothing. Spending on tech transactions across the globe this month ticked about 16% higher than the same month last year, although it was lower than both May 2011 and May 2010.

This month’s spending totals were boosted by three deals valued at more than $1bn, headlined by the planned $6.9bn take-private of BMC Software. (The buyout, which was spurred by an activist hedge fund, is the largest infrastructure software transaction in a half-decade.) With the BMC deal and the second-largest transaction of the month (Fidelity National Financial’s $2.9bn reach for mortgage software vendor Lender Processing Services), May accounted for two of the five largest tech deals announced so far in 2013.

However, overall M&A activity remained muted, with the number of transactions announced in May dropping about 15% compared with the same month of the two previous years. Once again in May, monthly deal volume failed to crack 300 transactions, the rough monthly average for tech deals in 2010 and 2011. That has left year-to-date deal volume levels down a significant 14% compared with the start of each of the two previous years.

2013 activity, month by month

Period Deal volume Deal value % change in spending vs. same month, 2012
May 2013 275 $18.4bn Up 16%
April 2013 251 $32.8 Up 129%
March 2013 219 $4.4bn Down 76%
February 2013 246 $47.6bn Up 296%
January 2013 303 $10.7bn Up 155%

Source: The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.