SS&C pays a premium for Advent

Contact: Scott Denne

SS&C Technologies scoops up Advent Software in one of the highest multiples we’ve seen among software vendors serving the investment and finance community. At $2.5bn, SS&C values the target at 6.8x trailing revenue.

The valuation is predicated on cross-selling Advent’s portfolio management software and services alongside SS&C’s broader offering of fund administration and related software, then using the accelerated revenue to pay down the combined company’s new debt. SS&C is funding the deal with $3bn in new debt and refinancing. Few businesses switch out their portfolio management systems and given that those products generate about 70% of Advent’s revenue, cross-selling could be a tricky proposition.

The combined company, however, will be well-positioned to win sales among new firms and new lines of business at existing ones. For example, SS&C has a hedge fund administration business (one it obtained in 2012 with the $895m purchase of GlobeOp) and Advent also has portfolio management for that same audience. As stock markets rise, so too will new hedge funds.

While the transaction is the highest multiple in this sector in nearly a decade, according to The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase, it’s not without precedent. Carlyle Group paid 8.2x TTM revenue when it took SS&C private in 2005 for $982m. And SS&C itself is trading today at 6.8x, benefiting from a 10% bump in its share price on news of the deal.

Following the close, SS&C will have a 5.3x debt-to-EBITDA ratio. The acquirer has leveraged up before to get a transaction done. Following its own take-private, it was at 6.8x and after its pickups of GlobeOp and Thomson Reuters’ PORTIA business in 2012 it was up to 4.2x, which today stands at 1.4x. Judging by the increase in share prices, Wall Street is confident it can de-lever again.

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

SolarWinds’ Librato buy

Contact: Scott Denne

SolarWinds has scooped up Librato for $40m in a deal that’s a low-water mark among its recent acquisitions. The previously prolific dealmaker slowed the pace of acquisitions in 2014, making just one purchase – the $67m acquisition of Pingdom – after two $100m-plus purchases in 2013 and more than a half-dozen smaller deals over the previous two years.

Even though it’s smaller, the purchase of the cloud application monitoring business is equally aggressive as recent deals. SolarWinds expects Librato to add $2-3m in revenue to the top line this year, meaning that the network and systems management company is likely paying in the neighborhood of 20x TTM. According to the 451 M&A KnowledgeBase, its three previous deals were all done at trailing revenue multiples between 5-13x.

After anticipating slowing growth heading into 2014, SolarWinds finished the year with $429m, up 28% from 2013 and ahead of where management was guiding early in the year. Although SolarWinds is better positioned to entertain M&A, it’s likely to stick to the same strategy it began around 2013 – hunting for deals that expose it to new markets, rather than tuck-ins aimed at adding features and upselling a target’s existing customers on other parts of the SolarWinds portfolio. Librato is in-line with the current strategy since it expands SolarWinds into systems monitoring for cloud-hosted applications.

Amazon’s chip deal highlights new exit ramp for silicon startups

Contact: John Abbott Daniel Bizo

Amazon’s somewhat surprising acquisition of stealthy chip startup Annapurna Labs for a reported $350-375m isn’t perhaps as unexpected as it appears at first sight. One of the exit strategies of such startups nowadays is to be sold off to a larger company building or operating its own systems hardware that has reached the stage where it needs its own custom silicon. That means the startup abandons the aspirations it had to be a more broadly applicable company. The acquired personnel typically become an internal chip design team for their new parent.

The most obvious example is Apple’s $278m acquisition of P.A. Semi in April 2008 . Apple obtained a 150-strong team of engineers, including the lead designer of the DEC Alpha and StrongARM processors, that boosted the development of its A series chips used in the iPhone and iPad. Apple followed up that move by buying Intrinsity in April 2010 for a reported $121m and flash memory chip designer Anobit in December 2011 for a reported $500m. Three years later, Apple snared yet another silicon startup, Passif Semiconductor, for its wireless networking chips.

Another systems maker that has its eye on chipmakers is Oracle. “You could see us buy a chip company,” said Oracle chief Larry Ellison back in 2010 . It hasn’t yet, but Ellison continues to hint. At the recent launch of Oracle’s X5 Engineered Systems range, Ellison told the audience that the company was in the process of moving more software functionality into silicon: “We are doing a lot of it,” he said. The easiest way of doing this while keeping full control would be to buy a team with expertise in hardware acceleration.

Closer, perhaps, to what Amazon is doing is the example of Google, which bought early-stage chip startup Agnilux in April 2010. Agnilux had been formed by some of the P.A. Semi team that subsequently left Apple. Even before that (in June 2007), Google had acquired PeakStream, a company that had developed a layer to make the programming of multicore processors easier. And since the Agnilux buy, Google has hired several prominent chip designers, including HP’s Partha Ranganathan, who was involved in the development of Moonshot. Google has also been quite public about its interest in IBM’s OpenPower initiative and the possibilities of using OpenPower as the basis for bespoke chip development (although it’s fair to say that things have gone quiet recently in this area).

Facebook has also been investigating the possibilities of its own chip design. The company already designs its own servers and was the driving force behind the formation of the Open Compute Project, a means of opening out the specifications of system designs so that customers can modify servers to more closely fit their own workload requirements.

Which brings us back to Amazon, which began advertising for chip designers with ARM expertise last year, and hired former Calxeda chip designer Mark Davis as the manager of a new hardware engineering and silicon optimization team based in Austin, Texas. (As an aside, defunct chip startup Calxeda, which ran out of money at the end of 2013 while trying to develop an ARM server chip, may itself reemerge – its intellectual property assets were picked up at the start of 2015 by Silver Lining Systems, a division of Taiwan-based systems provider AtGames Cloud Holdings, which is working in conjunction with ARM and the server group of Taiwan-based ODM Foxconn Technology).

Little is currently known about Annapurna Labs, an Israel-based company founded in 2011, except that some of its systems-on-a-chip parts are already being deployed in some entry-level storage systems using standard ARM processing cores, integrated networking and IO controllers. Amazon Web Services will likely employ Annapurna’s silicon-tailoring expertise to gain an edge in storage cost performance over rival cloud providers by using unique chips in its storage systems and, over time, networking gears. We expect to see more chip M&A activity from both traditional systems vendors and giant scale-out datacenter operators.

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

Harman’s automotive biz drives two new deals

Contact: Scott Denne

Buoyed by a strong automotive business, Harman International Industries makes a pair of acquisitions that both augment and diversify its position in the car market. The two purchases – Symphony Teleca and Red Bend Software – are among the highest prices Harman has paid for tech businesses.

At $780m, Symphony Teleca is Harman’s largest tech buy on record. Prior to that, last year’s pickup of AMX (another attempt to diversify beyond the automotive segment) for $365m was the record holder and, at the time, that was only the second time we had tracked Harman breaking the $100m barrier in a tech deal. With today’s additional announcement that it’s also paying $170m for Red Bend, it’s now broken that barrier four times.

Harman has long been a supplier of audio equipment, GPS, climate control and other hardware to car manufacturers. That part of its business accelerated to 24% year-over-year growth in its most recent fiscal year. While the burgeoning connected car market is driving more opportunity for growth, the automotive industry is a bumpy road. For example, a weak automotive economy pushed Harman’s automotive sales down 5% from a year earlier.

Its reach for Symphony Teleca brings Harman an outsourced software development vendor that’s already doing some business within the automotive segment at a time when software is gaining significance as vehicles add more connected devices. Today, about 50% of Symphony’s revenue comes from mobile or automotive software projects, the remainder from areas including home and enterprise, as well as sectors well outside Harman’s current scope, such as healthcare. That exposure will help Harman diversify beyond the automotive vertical (more than 50% of its revenue today) and into a platform for other parts of the connected device ecosystem.

Likewise, Red Bend both amplifies Harman’s auto opportunities and extends the business beyond those. The target builds firmware for managing connected devices and sending over-the-air software updates. Currently, its revenue (less than $50m annually) is concentrated on mobile devices. On its own, Red Bend has not infiltrated the automotive market, something that Harman obviously plans to change.

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

Dropbox continues collaborative streak

Contact: Scott Denne Alan Pelz-Sharpe

Dropbox prints another collaboration deal, this time picking up CloudOn, a service for creating, editing and sharing Word, PDF and other documents over the Internet. The purchase comes just two months after a Faustian pact with Microsoft to completely integrate Office with Dropbox.

Today’s transaction appears to be larger than most Dropbox tuck-ins. The target raised $26m in venture funding and had about 50 employees. The deal (and the Microsoft partnership) highlight Dropbox’s efforts to build out collaboration and workflow tools to appeal to business customers, particularly SMBs. And with it, Dropbox continues a streak it began last year of nabbing collaboration tools and teams to add to its core sync and share offering.

A year or two ago, CloudOn would have been seen as a legitimate competitor to Dropbox. No longer. Now it’s time for consolidation as Dropbox and soon-to-be-public Box reach for the startups with the coolest features and functions.

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

Social media primed for advertising M&A

Contact: Scott Denne

Advertising already generates billions of dollars for Facebook and Twitter, but the market for tools that enable advertisers to target social audiences is still nascent. As the importance of advertising on social media grows and the platforms become more diverse, businesses from different corners of the marketing and ad-tech ecosystem will likely add offerings to address this need.

There have already been a few tuck-ins by advertising and social media marketing companies such as Sprinklr, MediaMath and Buddy Media (before becoming part of salesforce.com). Now, changes to Facebook’s News Feed algorithm that limit the reach of organic marketing mixed with a host of diverse social platforms beginning to sell advertising could spur dealmaking and generate attention for social advertising software vendors that can execute and optimize social advertising budgets.

Businesses built around social media marketing or those that focus on paid advertising in other, non-social channels have, so far, been the acquirers of social advertising firms. We believe the categories of acquirers should and will expand to include enterprise software providers, small business software vendors and, of course, continued activity from ad-tech firms.

Subscribers to 451 Research’s Market Insight Service can access a detailed report on this sector.

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

Zayo pays premium for Latisys to continue datacenter push

Contact: Mark Fontecchio Kelly Morgan

Zayo Group takes its sharpest turn yet toward datacenter and networking services with the $675m acquisition of Latisys. The deal, Zayo’s largest in three years, continues a push into more profitable lines of business, a theme that’s dominated nearly all of its last 17 purchases dating back to 2012.

Zayo has traditionally been known as a broadband services provider, and about half of its revenue still comes from that segment. But that percentage has dropped considerably in the past year, as Zayo has used M&A to increase its presence in physical infrastructure services such as colo and raw fiber, which generate 47% of its revenue but 53% of its profit.

Latisys, with datacenters in the US and London, is fetching a high premium from Zayo. Two of Zayo’s colo deals last year – Neo Telecoms and Colo Facilities Atlanta – fetched about 10x and 3x EBITDA, respectively. This one is for about 15x EBITDA, a premium due to Latisys’ ability to both fill gaps in Zayo’s US portfolio and get it a foothold in Europe.

Look for a more detailed report on Zayo’s pickup of Latisys in tomorrow’s 451 Market Insight.

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

DCIM companies get in datacenters but can’t find exits

Contact: Rhonda Ascierto

More datacenter operators are using datacenter infrastructure management (DCIM) software to connect silos of data about power, cooling, space and connectivity. Though early, widespread adoption of DCIM seems inevitable, and this has attracted a rash of suppliers – we track about 70 or so. But a growing, largely untapped market has not meant success for all suppliers. Large DCIM deals are hard won, with long sales cycles. That’s made it tough for small suppliers to get a foothold and, therefore, has limited the exit potential in the space.

While some smaller players are growing, more are becoming marginalized. There were four DCIM acquisitions in 2014, according to The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase, including suppliers of mature software being used by some large facilities. We believe none of the companies’ sale prices matched or exceeded the capital they raised. They include N’compass, which was bought for $5m (less than 1x TTM revenue, we believe) by OTCBB company AlphaPoint last month, and Power Analytics, a decades-old DCIM supplier that was picked up by a local patent licensing firm in July.

Nearly half (45%) of all DCIM revenue is driven by just five vendors, and the top three are giants Emerson Network Power, Schneider Electric and Panduit. We expect revenue to continue to flow to large and diversified players. They spend heavily on development, and they promise longevity, which is important: ideally, DCIM is for the life of the datacenter.

There are, however, a few small suppliers with unique intellectual property and solid revenue that could generate a return. But M&A activity in past years points to a lack of options for the dozens of other smaller providers struggling to stand out. A couple of the more successful smaller players are likely to merge. By pooling their resources, they could improve their prospects, brand and efficiency – perhaps attracting an extra funding boost at the same time. A rollup like this could also help the less-successful small vendors, although we’re not aware of any plans to date.

Subscribers to 451 Research’s Market Insight Service can click here for a detailed report on exits in the DCIM sector.

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

Citrix stays tactical

Contact: Scott Denne

Citrix’s first acquisition of 2015 sets it up for another year of tactical M&A. Though up from 2013, we tracked just $65m in dealmaking by Citrix in 2014. Sanbolic, a 15-year-old company that brings software-defined storage into Citrix’s VDI stack, appears to be another tuck-in.

In 2012, Citrix announced $833m in acquisitions. That was its highest annual total on record, though it was hardly an outlier. Over the previous decade Citrix had been willing to invest in larger deals. Prior to that record-breaking year it had only dipped below $100m annually on three occasions – 2009, 2008 and 2004.

Citrix was growing revenue at a double-digit pace in 2012. Now that its core desktop business is maturing, growth has come down to mid-single digits in the most recent quarter, with license revenue declining at the same rate. Last year, management was open about the fact that M&A would likely be limited to tuck-ins, rather than strategic deals such as Zenprise and Bytemobile that got Citrix into ancillary markets. If Sanbolic is any indication, the company doesn’t plan to change that just yet.

Citrix M&A by year

Year Deals Deal Value
2014 4 $65m
2013 2 $11m
2012 6 $833m
2011 7 $354m
2010 4 $127m
2009 0 $0
2008 3 $27m

Source: The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

Box takes the tape off its IPO, again

Contact: Alan Pelz-Sharpe

Box looks set to hit the IPO market six months after revealing an S1 filing that met with a storm of disapproval.

In the initial filing, the company revealed that it was spending more on sales and marketing than it was generating in revenue – about 2x more. Growth is the central element of Box’s DNA, like most tech companies exiting the startup phase. And Wall Street has been OK with that. But Box’s spending tested the limits, and the filing came amid a slump in SaaS stocks.

In the time since the initial S1, the enterprise file sync and share (EFSS) vendor has tamed its spending and demonstrated a path to profitability – though it’s still far from it. In the most recently reported quarter, its net loss was only 80% of its revenue, compared with a net loss that was 2.5x its sales a year earlier. Revenue nearly doubled across those periods.

Box has a promising compounding revenue renewal model, though it’s hard to articulate. That’s something its new filing goes to greater lengths to illustrate. Now that the company can show a path to profitability and is better at articulating its business model, the offering will likely do well, giving Box the capital and currency it needs to continue to grow.

The Street’s embrace of Box has implications beyond the company’s future. A successful offering would open the door for Dropbox to have an IPO of its own. Just as Box’s stumble on the way to an IPO damped the exit outlook for other EFSS startups (as we noted in an earlier report), its success would brighten the prospects for the entire sector.

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.