Category: cloud computing

VeriSign saves best for last

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

When we look back at VeriSign’s two-year period of jettisoning unwanted businesses, we can only marvel at how it saved the best for last. The divestiture of its identity and authentication division to Symantec for $1.28bn caps a massive process of unwinding the previously misguided acquisitions of former CEO Stratton Sclavos. The longtime chief executive had used the money that gushed from VeriSign’s core registry business to buy his way into markets that were pretty far afield, such as mobile messaging and telecom billing.

Indeed, the scale of VeriSign’s divestitures is unprecedented among technology vendors, with the company dumping seven businesses in 2009 alone. (It’s interesting to note that while Morgan Stanley handled at least three of the divestitures last year, JP Morgan Securities banked VeriSign on the big sale of its security unit.) The company had seemingly wrapped up the grueling process last fall, telegraphing to Wall Street that it liked its two remaining businesses: registry and security. For that reason, the sale of the security division came as a bit of a surprise, the rumors of the divestiture earlier this week notwithstanding.

The sale also came at a substantial premium to virtually all of the other divestitures that VeriSign has closed. While the other divisions were lucky if they went for 1 times sales, the security business is going to Big Yellow for 3.5x sales. (More representative of the divestiture process is the 1x sales that VeriSign received when it sold its managed security services business to SecureWorks a year ago.) On a cash-flow basis, we understand that Symantec is paying about 10x EBITDA, which is roughly twice the valuation of most corporate castoffs.

As we see it, there are two basic reasons for the security division to fetch such a premium. For starters, it hummed along at a mid-20% operating margin. (Granted, that’s lower than VeriSign’s core registry business, but it’s still a level that most companies would envy.) But more importantly, we understand that Symantec actively sought out the VeriSign business, and indicated that it was a serious suitor right from the outset. Certainly, the pairing makes sense. As my colleague Paul Roberts points out, Symantec significantly bolstered its offering around cloud identity, broadening the reach of its policies around data protection, threat monitoring and compliance with enhanced authentication.

Where might Symantec shop?

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

After its double-header encryption deals last week, Symantec appears set to return to M&A. Like a number of tech giants, Big Yellow largely shunned dealmaking last year. But the drop-off was particularly notable at Symantec: It spent more than $1bn on acquisitions in both 2007 and 2008, but less than $100m in 2009. We would hasten to add that in the fiscal year that just ended on April 2, Symantec generated $1.7bn in cash flow from operations. That brought its cash stash to more than $3bn.

As to where the company might be shopping, my colleague Paul Roberts in our Enterprise Security Program outlines five areas that make sense for Symantec to buy its way into – as well as who might be of interest in those markets. In a new report, Roberts looks for M&A activity from Symantec in the following areas: threat detection and reputation monitoring, SIEM and vulnerability management, enterprise rights management, database security and endpoint control. All of those areas are a long way from Symantec’s original market of antivirus software.

A final thought on Big Yellow and its possible shopping is that the company actually enjoys a fair amount of goodwill on Wall Street right now. Symantec’s fiscal fourth quarter, which it reported Wednesday, was surprisingly strong for many investors, particularly after rival McAfee had a less-than-stellar first quarter. In fact, on many trading screens Symantec was the only green stock Thursday on an otherwise blood-red day. Symantec shares closed up less than 2%, but that was on a day that saw the Dow Jones Industrial Average plummet almost 1,000 points, or 9%, in afternoon trading.

Equinix: Datacenter dominance

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly, Jeff Paschke, Aleetalynn Schenesky-Stronge

Wrapping up one of the largest recent deals in the datacenter market, Equinix said Monday that it has closed its $683m purchase of rival Switch and Data. (No fewer than five banks claimed a print on the transaction.) Terms call for Equinix to hand over $134m in cash and $549m in equity. Since the deal was announced in late October, shares of Equinix have added some 4% while the Nasdaq has gained 15%.

The consolidation play by Equinix creates the largest multi-tenant datacenter provider in an otherwise extremely fragmented market. Our colleagues at Tier1 Research estimate that there are more than 350 datacenter providers in North America alone. After the combination, Equinix will control 11% of the North American colocation market, up from 8.5% on its own, according to T1R. The acquisition of Switch and Data adds 16 new metropolitan areas in North America where Equinix will now offer service, including Atlanta, Toronto, Denver, Miami and Seattle.

On its own, Equinix recorded revenue of $882m last year and analysts projected that the company would hit $1bn this year. Switch and Data bumps up the vendor’s top line by about 20%. Equinix will provide further financial details of the combination during an investor presentation on Thursday.

salesforce.com puts together pieces on Jigsaw

Brenon Daly

by Brenon Daly

Just three months after salesforce.com raised $575m in a convertible note offering, the CRM vendor is dipping into its treasury for the largest deal in its history. The $142m purchase price for Jigsaw Data is more money than salesforce.com spent, collectively, on its previous seven acquisitions. (Add to that, there’s a potential $14m earnout that Jigsaw could pocket.) Yet, even after it pays for this pickup, salesforce.com will still have more than $1bn in cash on hand. The transaction is expected to close this quarter.

We understand that Jigsaw finished up last year with about $18m in revenue, and salesforce.com indicated that it was expecting $17-22m in non-GAAP revenue from Jigsaw for the three quarters that the company will be on the books this fiscal year. According to our calculations, salesforce.com is valuing Jigsaw at roughly the same level that the target is currently valued by public investors, at least on one basis metric. Salesforce.com is paying about 7.9 times trailing sales for Jigsaw while its own market cap is about 8.3 times trailing sales. (Of course, shares of the on-demand CRM vendor are currently changing hands at their highest-ever level, having more than doubled over the past year.)

For Jigsaw, the sale to its longtime partner also represents a solid return for its backers, who wrote the checks that funded the company’s growth to 1.2 million members and more than 21 million contact records. Jigsaw’s three investors (El Dorado Ventures, Norwest Venture Partners and Austin Ventures) put in a total of $18m over the past six years. Strictly in terms of money in/money out, that means Jigsaw is returning almost eight times its investment. Not many startups have been able to deliver those kinds of returns recently because they’ve typically been overfunded and exit multiples have increasingly been under pressure.

Is third time a charm for IntraLinks?

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Maybe the third time will be the charm for IntraLinks. The company, which is perhaps best known for its ‘virtual deal rooms,’ filed to go public late last week, the third time it has put in an S-1. It plans to raise $150m in the offering, which is being led by Morgan Stanley, Deutsche Bank Securities and Credit Suisse. IntraLinks had also been on file back in the Bubble Era, filing its IPO paperwork in mid-1999 only to pull it a year later, and again for a few months in late 2005.

To get a sense of just how much the company – and, by extension, Wall Street – has changed since the frothy time of the late 1990s, we went back and pulled IntraLinks’ original prospectus to compare it to the most-recent paperwork. It hardly seems like the same company.

In 1999, IntraLinks lost five times more money than it even brought in as revenue (a $21.3m net loss on just $4.1 in revenue for the year). The company even managed the highly impressive trick of running its business at a negative gross margin. The kicker on that upside-down business model is that it was actually pretty common back in the late 1990s. Plenty of companies running at even larger losses than IntraLinks made it public during that era.

Like a lot of us, IntraLinks seems positively grown up now compared to the time when companies were throwing equity around like it was funny money and stock prices only went up. It finished 2009 with $141m in revenue, meaning that it now generates more sales every two weeks than it did during the entire year that it first filed to go public. And while the vendor still hasn’t managed to hit profitability, it has narrowed its operating loss to just $3.4m last year. For the record, IntraLinks’ gross margin hit a respectable 65% in 2009, a sharp reversal from the Bubble Era, when it actually sank deeper into the red with every sale that it made.

A Coremetrics sale to salesforce.com?

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Could this be a case of history repeating itself? A Web analytics vendor pulls out at the last minute of a technology conference at a boutique bank, and then announces that it has agreed to a richly priced sale of the company. That’s the way it played out last fall with Omniture at ThinkEquity’s conference. And at least part of that has happened with Coremetrics this week at Pacific Crest Securities’ Emerging Technology Summit. (Coremetrics was slated to present at the event Thursday morning, but canceled its appearance, officially because the presenter was ill.)

Of course, there’s been a lot of M&A buzz around Coremetrics in recent weeks, with at least two sources indicating that the company had retained Goldman Sachs to represent it. As to who might be a buyer for the Web analytics shop, we come back to one name: salesforce.com. We understand that the CRM giant was acutely interested in Omniture and, according to some sources, was the cover bidder in that process. (Omniture, of course, ultimately sold to Adobe in a somewhat puzzling pairing.)

Coremetrics’ analytics would fit neatly with salesforce.com’s sales and marketing offering. Both are also SaaS companies. And, as we noted last month, the profitable company, which has about $1bn in cash available, has announced plans to raise another $500m in a convertible offering. Altogether, that’s plenty of cash to cover a potential purchase of Coremetrics, which would probably go for several hundred million dollars. And if the Coremetrics sale parallels the Omniture sale in that the analytics company goes to a somewhat unexpected buyer, we might put forward Autonomy Corp as a possibility, as my colleague Nick Patience did in a recent report. The acquisitive British vendor also recently announced plans to raise a slug of money.

A Mimosa-colored Iron Mountain

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Adding a major piece to its information management portfolio, Iron Mountain said Monday that it will hand over $112m in cash for Mimosa Systems. (We noted two weeks ago that the market was buzzing on this possible pairing.) The purchase is the largest by Iron Mountain since its October 2007 acquisition of Stratify, a deal that serves as the basis for the company’s Iron Mountain Digital. (Stratify’s founder now heads up Iron Mountain’s digital business. Incidentally, Mimosa chief executive T.M. Ravi will join Iron Mountain Digital as head of marketing.)

The purchase of Mimosa adds on-premises content archiving to Iron Mountain Digital, and brings it more directly into competition with some of the largest suppliers of information management technology, including two companies that bought their way into the market. In mid-2007, Autonomy Corp paid a whopping $375m for Zantaz, and two years ago Dell shelled out $155m for MessageOne. We understand that Dell valued its archiving startup at slightly more than 6x trailing sales, while Autonomy paid about 3.3x trailing sales for Zantaz. According to two sources, Iron Mountain is paying roughly the same multiple that Autonomy paid, valuing Mimosa at about 3.2x its estimated trailing sales of about $32m.

Will Iron Mountain soon be sipping a Mimosa?

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly, Kathleen Reidy, Simon Robinson

For what was once a fairly staid Old Economy business, Iron Mountain has done a better job than most companies in acclimating itself to the digital age. The records management vendor has accomplished that with eight acquisitions over the past half-decade, picking up technology for online backup and e-discovery, among other offerings. The $158m purchase of e-discovery provider Stratify stands, in many ways, as Iron Mountain’s marquee acquisition for its digital business. It has maintained the Stratify name and, last November, turned its whole digital subsidiary over to Ramana Venkata, the founder and former CEO of Stratify.

After that purchase in October 2007, Iron Mountain stayed out of the market for more than two years, despite many adjacent sectors that it could buy its way into. (And, from what we remember of the past two recession-wracked years, prices for startups weren’t particularly steep.) The M&A drought ended last month with the pickup of a San Francisco-based services company, Legal Imaging Technologies, that provides electronic document conversion. Terms weren’t disclosed.

But now we wonder if that small buy might be followed by a large deal. Several sources have indicated that Iron Mountain may be looking to snare a digital-archiving startup. It had relied on its partnership with MessageOne, but since that company’s acquisition by Dell, Iron Mountain has moved on, partnering with Mimecast last April. The partnership – combined with the fact that both businesses deliver their offerings through a subscription model – makes an acquisition of Mimecast by Iron Mountain a logical fit.

However, the market has been buzzing recently with another possible pairing for Iron Mountain – Mimosa Systems. Although Mimosa has talked in the past about going public this year, we have always thought that an acquisition of the company was more likely. (It has raised $50m in backing and, according to one source, was tracking to about $40m in bookings last year.) While Mimosa’s technology is highly regarded, the fact that it’s on-premises rather than on-demand would pose some integration challenges. However, it does have an emerging cloud story that would likely be of interest to Iron Mountain.

No recession for mobile advertising M&A

-Contact Thomas Rasmussen

Following Google’s purchase of AdMob in November, we predicted a resurgence in mobile advertising M&A. That’s just what has happened and, we believe, the consolidation is far from having run its course. Apple, which we understand was also vying for AdMob, acquired Quattro Wireless for an estimated $275m at the beginning of the year. At approximately $15m in estimated net revenue, the deal was about as pricey as Google’s shopping trip for its own mobile advertising startup. And just last week, Norwegian company Opera Software stepped into the market as well, acquiring AdMarvel for $8m plus a $15m earnout. We understand that San Mateo, California-based AdMarvel, which is running at an estimated $3m in annual net sales, had been looking to raise money when potential investor Opera suggested an outright acquisition instead.

These transactions underscore the fact that mobile advertising will play a decisive role in shaping the mobile communications business in the coming years. For instance, vendors can now use advertising to offset the costs of providing services (most notably, turn-by-turn directions) that were formerly covered by subscription fees. Just last week, Nokia matched Google’s move from last year by offering free turn-by-turn directions on all of its smartphones. Navigation is only the beginning for ad-based services as mobile devices get more powerful and smarter through localization and personal preferences.

While traditional startups such as Amobee will continue to see interest from players wanting a presence in the space, we believe the next company that could enjoy a high-value exit like AdMob or Quattro will come from the ranks that offer unique location-based mobile advertising such as 1020 Placecast. The San Francisco-based firm, which has raised an estimated $9m in two rounds, is a strategic partner of Nokia’s NavTeq. As such, we would not be surprised to see Nokia follow the lead of its neighbor Opera by reaching across the Atlantic to secure 1020 Placecast for itself.

salesforce.com: All dressed up and nowhere to go

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly, China Martens

We noted late last week that it has emerged recently that salesforce.com did indeed make an (unannounced) acquisition to help bolster its upcoming enterprise collaboration product, Chatter. The purchase of GroupSwim, which had just 30 customers, was undoubtedly a tiny one. That’s been the case in the five previous buys by salesforce.com, as well.

But now, the market is buzzing that salesforce.com may be looking to take on a larger deal. Why else would a profitable company that already has $1bn on its hands raise another $500m in an upcoming convertible offering? If that sort of reasoning worked for Occam, then it’ll work for us. All that remains, then, is to figure out where salesforce.com is going to spend that money.

It turns out that coming up with a shopping list for salesforce.com is actually a bit more complicated than it is for many other companies. For starters, the firm positions itself as a platform vendor, which means that it is designed to be open and inclusive. That is exactly counter to M&A. So while it might make sense for salesforce.com to move into marketing automation (MA), for instance, by picking up Unica or Constant Contact Inc, a play like that would immediately alienate all other MA providers on AppExchange. (Currently, there are 29 different MA applications listed on AppExchange, among more than 170 applications in the broader ‘marketing’ category.)

Salesforce.com has worked around that by looking more to partner than purchase, as it did to co-create FinancialForce.com, a partnership with Unit 4 Agresso. Clearly, salesforce.com could afford to buy Unit 4 Agresso outright. (The Dutch company has a market capitalization of about $650m.) We suspect that partnerships might be the approach that salesforce.com uses to cover human capital management (HCM). A number of rumors have tied the CRM giant to either of the big HCM players, Taleo or SuccessFactors. (As an aside, we might be willing to pay money to listen to any M&A negotiations between salesforce.com’s laidback, New Age-y chief executive Marc Benioff and the blunt-talking, hard-driving CEO at SuccessFactors, Lars Dalgaard. We can only imagine the look on Dalgaard’s face if Benioff invited him to sit zazen, which wouldn’t be out of character for the salesforce.com honcho.)

So having scratched most names, what’s one company that we could imagine salesforce.com reaching for? InContact. The acquisition would boost salesforce.com’s Service Cloud, taking the firm even deeper into the call center. The (hypothetical) deal would fit nicely with InStranet, which salesforce.com acquired in mid-2008 for $31.5m, and would hardly break the bank. InContact has a market capitalization of merely $90m. And as a final bonus, salesforce.com would finally be able to shed its limited ticker ‘CRM’ in favor of the bigger, more encompassing ticker of ‘SAAS,’ which is what inContact currently trades under.