Category: infrastructure software

LANDesk lands the largest MDM deal so far

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly, Chris Hazelton

Two months ago, LANDesk Software switched from being a company that got bought to a company that does some buying of its own with the pickup of Managed Planet. (The old-line systems management vendor has had five owners in recent years.) LANDesk followed up that acquisition with another one earlier this week, reaching for mobile device management (MDM) vendor Wavelink. What’s more, the transaction is likely the largest one in the MDM sector so far.

Although terms weren’t disclosed, the deal triggered a Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) review, which would indicate that it is valued at more than the threshold level of $68m. (A source confirmed the HSR review of the transaction.) We understand that the price was actually closer to $90m, or about 4.5 times our estimated revenue for Wavelink of $20m. That would move LANDesk’s acquisition of Wavelink ahead of the sector’s previous big print, Symantec’s purchase of Odyssey Software. (Terms weren’t disclosed, but we estimate that Big Yellow paid $60m for its MDM partner Odyssey.)

As its own market segment, MDM emerged three years ago as iPhone and Android devices started popping up in offices and IT needed management tools since Research In Motion’s highly popular BlackBerry Enterprise Server did not support these devices at the time. Over the past 18 months, more than 80 vendors of varying sizes and sustainability have appeared to offer software and services to manage the ever-increasing number of smartphones and tablets.

That has tipped MDM toward commoditization, which is reflected in recent deal flow in the sector. For instance, big-name buyers such as Motorola Mobility, RIM and Numara have all done MDM deals valued at less than $10m, according to our estimates. However, there are a couple of medium-sized private MDM providers that are nearing breakeven and driving the evolution of this market to include application and data management.

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @MAKnowledgebase.

The IPO machine is back in ServiceNow

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

The Wall Street machine is primed to churn out its next new technology public company, as ServiceNow gets set to debut next week. Sure, the gears of the machine got jammed up a bit in the last offering (Facebook shares are still under water), but it should be humming again with the IPO of the on-demand helpdesk vendor.

Eight-year-old ServiceNow will almost assuredly create more than $2bn in market value overnight and, we suspect, restore the way an IPO is ‘supposed’ to work. (Well, let us qualify that last point: Wall Street speculators – which is how we characterize people who play IPOs, rather than invest in a company for the long term – simply expect new offerings to be priced to pop. And when the shares don’t, well, they dump and run, as Zuckerberg & Co. learned firsthand.)

But we don’t expect any ‘Facebook hangover’ for the ServiceNow IPO. The reason? The company is not only growing solidly (nearly doubling revenue), but is also generating relatively predictable growth, with long-term annual contracts (averaging 2.5 years) and renewal rates that run at almost 100%.

Unlike Facebook, ServiceNow also has the advantage that it is selling into a well-established market, although it is approaching it in a disruptive way. (Meanwhile, the existing IT systems management giants are suffering through tough times: Mercury Interactive has all but disappeared inside a reeling Hewlett-Packard, while BMC has attracted the unwelcome attention of a hedge fund for the company’s ‘underperformance.’)

And finally, there’s the matter of who’s running the two companies and their respective relationship with the would-be buyers of their stock. At Facebook, CEO Mark Zuckerberg couldn’t be bothered to meet with Wall Street investors during much of the roadshow. On the other hand, ServiceNow CEO Frank Slootman made investors a boatload of money on the last company he took public. He steered Data Domain through its IPO in 2007 and then sold the data de-duplication vendor two years later for roughly three times the value it came public at.

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @MAKnowledgebase.

TriNet expands with ExpenseCloud

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Throughout its history, TriNet Group has been a slow but steady consolidator. Perhaps the best-known play by the outsourced HR provider came three years ago, when it gobbled up publicly traded rival Gevity HR for $99m. In its most recent deal, however, the private equity-backed buyer has shifted gears a bit.

Rather than simply add more accounts through an acquisition, TriNet has added a nifty offering to its portfolio. The company recently picked up three-year-old startup ExpenseCloud, which helps automate the process around creating and reimbursing employee expenses. TriNet says the expense management offering will be available on its platform later this year.

Although, candidly, employee expense management sounds like a ho-hum market, the big player in this space – publicly traded Concur Technologies – has shown it can be a wildly valued one. The company’s shares currently change hands at their highest-ever level, putting its market valuation at a whopping $3.4bn. Concur recently projected that sales for its current fiscal year, which ends in September, would be in the neighborhood of $440m, meaning investors are valuing the company at 7.6 times this year’s projected sales.

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @MAKnowledgebase.

Some unlikely M&A agitation against BMC

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Having already agitated for the sale of at least five tech businesses over the past few years, Elliott Associates has set its sights on a significantly bigger target: BMC. The hedge fund said on Monday that it has acquired 5% of the systems management giant and will push for a sale of the company.

For its part, BMC retained Morgan Stanley to advise it on its defense against the unwanted approach and, more importantly, adopted a poison pill that makes any unsolicited deal highly unlikely to succeed. Nonetheless, the idea that BMC could get sold goosed the company’s shares, which added 9% in mid-Monday trading.

From our view, however, it’s highly unlikely that 32-year-old BMC, which has been public since August 1988, will get snapped up. The first – and most obvious – hurdle is the poison pill, or ‘shareholder rights plan’ in the company’s description. But even beyond that, there aren’t very many companies or (probably more relevantly) buyout shops that could write the $10bn or so check that it would take to clear BMC.

For a strategic buyer, we’ve always thought Cisco Systems would be the logical home for BMC. The two companies have partnered around the datacenter, with Cisco providing the gear and BMC serving up the management layer. However, the returns on that partnership haven’t been overwhelming, and Cisco has taken to acquiring small management vendors on its own over the past year and a half. (To bolster its management portfolio, Cisco has reached for startups such as LineSider Technologies, Pari Networks and newScale.) But Cisco, which reported weak financial results last week while also forecasting a ‘cautious’ IT spending environment, is hardly in a place to do its largest-ever acquisition.

That would leave private equity firms as the most likely acquirer of BMC. Those shops have been the buyers of the other companies that Elliott has put in play, including Epicor Software, Blue Coat Systems, Novell and others. However, the collective value of all those Elliott-inspired deals would likely be only half the size of a BMC purchase, which would be a whopper for any single firm. (That goes double because of the reserved credit markets right now.)

The last point underscores one of the other large problems with a BMC takeout: even though its shares have lost nearly 20% of their value over the past year, the company isn’t particularly cheap. It garners a $7.2bn market capitalization, so throwing a 35% premium on that takes the (hypothetical) acquisition price to about $10bn. That works out to about 4.6 times 2011 revenue (10x maintenance revenue) and more than 12x the $800m in cash flow from operations that BMC generated last year. Even with the $1.4bn cash ‘rebate’ from BMC’s treasury, any potential buyer is still looking at paying a double-digit cash-flow multiple for a single-digit grower.

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @MAKnowledgebase.

LANDesk’s measured return to M&A

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly, Dennis Callaghan

As a company that has had five different owners in recent years, LANDesk hasn’t necessarily always had the stability and support that’s needed to do deals of its own. But on Tuesday, the systems management vendor, which traces its roots back to the mid-1980s, stepped back into the M&A market with a measured, try-before-you-buy acquisition of existing partner Managed Planet. LANDesk already licensed Managed Planet’s analytics product as part of its larger offering, easing the technical due diligence in the transaction.

LANDesk’s purchase of analytics vendor Managed Planet represents a relatively low-risk – but potentially high-value – return to acquisitions, adding capabilities such as hardware discovery and analytics to LANDesk’s existing offering. Although small, the deal helps LANDesk know more about managing the business of technology, getting metrics on the value and usage of IT assets, guiding future purchases, upgrade decisions, cloud migrations and so on.

The transaction stands as the first one since Thoma Bravo carved LANDesk out of Emerson Electric in August 2010. With the acquisition, LANDesk – and its deep-pocketed private equity owner – appears to be telegraphing that it will continue shopping. We understand that LANDesk is currently looking at another potential purchase that might get done in the next few months.

Splunk soars in rip-roaring IPO

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

In a rip-roaring debut, Splunk soared onto the public market Thursday in an IPO that created more than $3bn of market value for the data analytics vendor. That’s a heady, double-digit valuation for a company that’s likely to generate only about $200m in sales this year. (Just as we predicted in last week’s special IPO report, the company has captured the attention of Wall Street. Subscribers can click here to read what else we see coming in the IPO pipeline in the next few months, and how the offerings are likely to fare.)

But Splunk’s rich pricing simply reflects the tremendous opportunity that the company has in front of it. If the name ‘Splunk’ conjures up images of exploring a cave, or ‘spelunking,’ we might suggest that a more accurate way to view the company is one ready to run – and run quickly – into a wide-open greenfield.

The company, which has already garnered 3,700 customers across a broad number of industries, makes the pitch that any company with large amounts of data is a potential customer. Splunk’s core offering is a search product that helps users make sense of the ever-increasing volumes of data, much of it machine-generated.

After it got going in 2003, Splunk had most of its use cases around IT operations and security. However, the company has expanded its product to also cover application performance management, online customer experience monitoring, marketing and beyond.

Originally, Splunk’s seven underwriters set a range of $8-10 for each share, but then ended up pricing at double that level at $17 each. In the aftermarket, the stock nearly doubled again, changing hands in the low $30s in mid-Thursday trading on the Nasdaq. (It trades under the ticker SPLK.)

A final interesting little market anecdote about the offering: With roughly 100 million shares outstanding, Splunk is starting its life as a public company at almost exactly the same amount ($3.3bn) that Hyperion Solutions finished its life as a public company. Splunk’s current CEO Godfrey Sullivan was previously CEO at Hyperion, which sold to Oracle five years ago.

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @MAKnowledgebase.

Dell picks up the pace

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

As a relative latecomer to the M&A market, Dell is making up for lost time. The company on Thursday announced its third acquisition of the week, reaching for Vancouver-based Make Technologies. Both Make and Clerity Solutions, which Dell picked up on Tuesday, produce migration software and will be slotted into the services division. Dell’s other purchase of the week was thin-client technology vendor Wyse Technology.

The recent frenetic M&A activity by the Austin, Texas-based company represents a dramatic reversal from its historic practice. For the first 30 years of its life, Dell rarely acquired anything. It only really started its M&A program in mid-2007 – a point by which many rivals already had consolidated broad patches of the tech landscape. While Dell sat out of the market, IBM, for instance, had already purchased more than 60 companies, buying its way into storage, document management, security and other areas. In the same period, Oracle gobbled up some 40 companies.

But it’s a different story so far this year. With five deals notched already in 2012, Dell has more transactions than IBM and Oracle combined. The contrast is even sharper with Dell’s nemesis Hewlett-Packard, which has yet to print a deal in 2012. In fact, just looking at the acquisitions that Dell has inked recently, many of them appear designed to bolster offerings where Dell goes up against its reeling rival, such as networking, security and storage.

Dell deals

Year Number of transactions
2012, YTD 5
2011 3
2010 7
2009 4
2008 1
2007 6
2006 2
2005 0

Source: The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @MAKnowledgebase.

Who will shop during Quest’s ‘go shop’?

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

After more than two decades as a public company, Quest Software said Friday that it was planning to go private in a $2bn management buyout (MBO) with participation from Insight Venture Partners. The deal isn’t unexpected, as the old-line software vendor has a financial profile that (arguably) is more at home in a private equity (PE) portfolio than on the Nasdaq: a company that grows at a modest 10% clip (led by its services business), does a handful of acquisitions every year, and is headed by a CEO who owns about one-third of the equity.

Under terms, the MBO group will offer $23 for each of the remaining shares not currently held by chief executive Vinny Smith. (As is standard in these transactions, Smith will roll over his equity into the newly owned entity once the deal closes.) Quest has about 90 million shares outstanding, so the equity value of the proposed transaction is roughly $2bn. On a net basis, the company carries about $200m in cash, giving Quest an enterprise value of roughly $1.8bn.

That means the MBO group is offering 2.1 times Quest’s 2011 revenue of $857m and 1.9x its forecasted revenue of about $940m in 2012. Or looked at from a financial buyers’ vantage point: Quest is being valued at 3.5x trailing services revenue. (The proposed buyout would be the largest purchase of a software company by a PE firm since the equity markets melted down and credit markets tightened up last August.)

Wall Street has already indicated that the offer, representing a 19% premium, isn’t rich enough. (The stock was trading through the bid on Friday afternoon, changing hands at nearly a dollar higher.) Last summer, even without the takeout premium, shares traded above the price the MBO group is offering. Perhaps anticipating that, the MBO has a 60-day ‘go-shop’ period where Quest and its advisers can actively canvass the market for a higher offer. If they secure a superior bid in that two-month window, Quest would be on the hook for a 2% breakup fee, compared with a 3% fee after that time.

Deep-pocketed acquirers could bid up capacity-planning valuations

Ben Kolada

Contact: Ben Kolada

In a recent report, my colleague Rachel Chalmers discusses opportunities for some of the largest IT firms to fill holes in infrastructure management capacity planning through M&A. However, if bidding increases for the remaining startups in this sector, valuations could rise above the current estimated $100m record set by VMware’s Integrien acquisition.

Capacity planning is similar to performance monitoring. However, monitoring can only tell you what happened in the past, or at best, what’s happening now. Capacity planning requires you to have some idea of what will happen in the future. We’ve seen some dealmaking in this sector already, with each of the primary precedent transactions being valued well above the market average. However, many of the remaining potential acquirers have very deep pockets and intense bidding by this group for the decreasing pool of available targets could elevate valuations. Chalmers’ report cites Oracle, HP, IBM and Microsoft as still missing some capacity-planning capabilities – these four firms have a combined $100bn in cash and cash equivalents in their war chests. Click here for the full report, which includes current market valuations and details some of the most likely acquisition candidates.

Dell uses M&A (again) to go it alone in storage

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Dell’s reach for AppAssure Software continues the tech giant’s trend of using M&A to reduce its reliance on outside vendors for its $2bn storage business. Most notably, the purchase of Compellent two years ago – following its unsuccessful effort to land 3PAR – reduced Dell’s long-standing partnership with storage powerhouse EMC. In a similar vein, Dell’s acquisition Friday morning of AppAssure is likely to trim its business with data-protection specialist CommVault. (Dell is CommVault’s largest OEM partner, accounting for roughly 20% of that company’s total revenue.)

Terms weren’t revealed but we would expect that Dell paid more than $100m for AppAssure. (Whatever the amount, the deal almost certainly represents a sterling return for Bain Capital, which is AppAssure’s sole backer, having put just $6m into the five-year-old startup.) According to our understanding, AppAssure generated about $20m in 2011, triple the level from the previous year.

For comparison, CommVault stock currently trades near its all-time high. CommVault’s steady run has put the company’s valuation at an eye-popping $2.3bn, or nearly 6 times the expected $400m in revenue for its current fiscal year, which wraps up next month. Word of Dell’s purchase of rival AppAssure put some pressure on CommVault’s high-flying shares. On an otherwise bull-market day on Wall Street, CommVault stock dipped 4% on trading that was more than twice as heavy as average by early Friday afternoon. We’ll have a full report on this deal in tonight’s Daily 451.