Category: M&A

Exclusive: A deal for Datto?

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

A unicorn is rumored to be on the block, with several market sources indicating that disaster-recovery startup Datto is looking for a buyer. We understand that Morgan Stanley is running the process. While Datto secured a $1bn valuation in a growth round of funding two years ago, we are hearing that current pricing would add a solid – but not exorbitantly rich – premium to that level.

According to our understanding, early discussions with buyers have bids coming in at about $1.3bn for Datto. Our math has that rumored price valuing the 10-year-old startup at 6.5x this year’s sales of roughly $200m. (Estimates in 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase Premium, which features in-depth profiles and proprietary insight about specific privately held startups, indicate that Datto generated $160m in sales last year, up from $130m in 2015. Click here to see Datto’s full profile in our M&A KnowledgeBase Premium.) The company sells its backup and recovery products to SMBs, with virtually all sales going through the channel.

With its scale and business model, Datto appears almost certain to end up in the portfolio of a private equity (PE) firm, assuming the company does trade. There is precedent. Datto’s smaller rival Axcient was consolidated by eFolder earlier this summer in a transaction that was at least partially backed by financial sponsor K1 Investment Management.

More broadly, PE shops, which have never had more money to spend on tech in history, have been increasingly looking to the IT infrastructure market to make big bets. Already this year, buyout shops have announced three deals valued at more than $1bn, according to 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase. Unlike those targets, which were all owned by fellow PE firms, Datto founder Austin McChord still holds a majority stake in his company.

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

When the chips are down 

Scott Denne

Contact: Scott Denne

After two years of record consolidation among semiconductor companies, M&A has deteriorated as fewer sizeable targets remain. The two most recent significant sales in the chip industry show that suitable buyers are just as lacking as the sellers in both deals ink uncertain transactions. In the largest chip transaction of the year, Toshiba has agreed to a $17.9bn sale of its flash memory business to an unwieldy syndicate – meanwhile, Imagination Technologies sold itself off in two separate deals (worth $800m) aimed at avoiding objections from US regulators.

Toshiba finds itself forced into the sale of its flash business to raise capital following the bankruptcy of its nuclear subsidiary – certainly not ideal conditions for a sale. Yet the winning bidder for the second-largest maker of flash memory, a syndicate led by Bain Capital, raised legal objections from Western Digital, a flash storage vendor that has a joint venture (JV) with Toshiba.

There are questions about how well the group could manage the asset, even if the buyer manages to get the transaction over the finish line – an uncertain prospect given the spat with Western Digital. The investor group (Bain, Apple, Dell, Toshiba, Seagate, SK Hynix and three others) called and abruptly cancelled a press conference on the deal. A squabble over media strategy doesn’t bode well for setting a coherent course for a business with $7bn a year in revenue.

Earlier this week, UK-based Imagination Technologies announced that it will sell most of its business to Canyon Bridge Capital Partners, a China-funded private equity firm whose proposed takeover of Lattice was recently shot down by the Trump administration. Imagination is selling its US-based MIPS business to Tallwood Venture Capital in hopes of avoiding such a fate.

If the Toshiba deal stands up to multiple legal challenges from Western Digital – the company claims Toshiba has limited rights to transfer ownership of a JV between the two companies – it will nearly double the size of semiconductor M&A this year to $44.2bn, a pace that’s less than half of last year’s, according to 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase.

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

A pause in Big Software’s ‘SaaS grab’

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

After years of trying to leap directly to the cloud through blockbuster acquisitions, major software vendors have been taking a more step-by-step approach lately. That’s shown up clearly in the M&A bills for two of the biggest shops from the previous era trying to make the transition to Software 2.0: Oracle and SAP.

Since the start of the current decade, the duo has done 11 SaaS purchases valued at more than $1bn, according to 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase. However, not one of those deals has come in the past 14 months, as the two companies have largely focused on the implications of their earlier ‘SaaS grab.’

During their previous shopping spree for subscription-based software providers, Oracle and SAP collectively bought their way into virtually every significant market for enterprise applications: ERP, expense management, marketing automation, HR management, CRM, supply chain management and elsewhere. All of the transactions appeared designed to simply get the middle-aged companies bulk in cloud revenue, with Oracle and SAP paying up for the privilege. In almost half of their SaaS acquisitions, Oracle and SAP paid double-digit multiples, handing out valuations for subscription-based firms that were twice as rich as their own.

In addition to the comparatively high upfront cost of the SaaS targets, old-line software companies face particular challenges on integrating SaaS vendors as part of a larger, multiyear shift to subscription delivery models. Like a transplanted organ in the human body, the changes caused by an acquired company inside the host company tend to show up throughout the organization, with software engineers re-platforming some of the previously stand-alone technology and sales reps having their compensation plans completely overhauled.

The disruption inherent in bringing together two fundamentally incompatible software business models shows up even though the acquired SaaS providers typically measure their sales in the hundreds of millions of dollars, while SAP and Oracle both measure their sales in the tens of billions of dollars.

For instance, SAP is currently posting declining margins, an unusual position for a mature software vendor that would typically look to run more – not less – financially efficient. But, as the 45-year-old software giant has clearly communicated, the temporary margin compression is a short-term cost the company has to absorb as it transitions from a provider of on-premises software to the cloud.

Of course, the transition by software suppliers such as Oracle and SAP – painful and expensive though it may be – simply reflects the increasing appetite for SaaS among software buyers. In a series of surveys of several hundred IT decision-makers, 451 Research’s Voice of the Enterprise found that 15% of application workloads are running as SaaS right now. More importantly, the respondents forecast that level will top 21% of workloads by 2019, with all of the growth coming at the expense of legacy non-cloud environments. That’s a shift that will likely swing tens of billions of dollars of software spending in the coming years, and could very well have a similar impact on the market capitalization of the software vendors themselves.

SAP breaks buying slump 

Scott Denne

Contact: Scott Denne

SAP becomes a buyer again, inking its first substantive transaction in three years with the acquisition of customer identity manager Gigya. The company sat out a flurry of M&A activity among its peers last year. Now the extensive role that identity plays in digital marketing has brought it back to the market.

Last year, Salesforce and Oracle gorged on acquisitions as the latter made the largest ever SaaS deal with the $9.5bn purchase of NetSuite and the former did the most sizeable transaction in its history with the $2.8bn reach for Demandware. In contrast, SAP printed seven deals last year, although none larger than $25m, according to 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase. And, per its annual report, the company spent just $112m of its cash on those transactions. Media reports put the price of Gigya above $300m. The target has more than 300 employees and had raised in excess of $100m in venture capital.

Gigya develops software that enables enterprises to collect data that customers declare in online registration forms and social signups and to link that with CRM and other sales, marketing and commerce applications. SAP Hybris, its e-commerce and marketing software business, has expanded its personalized marketing and customer experience capabilities, a project that’s difficult to execute without a single source of customer identity information, such as that built by Gigya, a longtime Hybris partner.

The rationale for this deal resembles the reasons behind Salesforce’s 2016 purchase of Krux. Yet whereas Salesforce was looking to obtain a hub of data for customer acquisition, Gigya’s tools are designed to help marketers manage customer data to expand customer relationships and has capabilities beyond marketing and into security and privacy.

Goldman Sachs advised Gigya on its sale.

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

Google’s smartphone redial 

Scott Denne

Contact:Scott Denne

For a first marriage, it’s common to overlook a spouse’s flaws, harbor unrealistic fantasies about life together and spend unjustifiable sums on the wedding. A second marriage tends to be a more measured affair, with a conservative price tag and thoughtful evaluation of how the pairing fits into one’s broader life goals. The same applies to Google’s second purchase of a mobile phone company, as the search giant is paying $1.1bn for certain assets of HTC almost three years after unwinding its tie-up with Motorola Mobility.

While today’s deal marks a big commitment, it’s well short of the $12.5bn it spent for Motorola six years ago. Its reach for HTC differs from that earlier one – most of which it unwound in a 2014 divestiture to Lenovo – in more ways than price. With Motorola, Google envisioned itself becoming a marquee manufacturer of smartphones. This time, Google is making a more tactical move in the mobile market.

Google is obtaining the HTC team (and a license to related patents) that it used to build its Pixel phone, a collaboration that’s showing early signs of paying off. According to 451 Research’s VoCUL surveys, less than 1% of consumers with a smartphone own one made by Google, although the number planning to buy a Google phone sits near 3%. Even with those gains, Google’s phone business remains a long distance from matching Apple or Samsung.

But catching up to those companies, at least in hardware sales, isn’t likely the goal. Those same 451 surveys show that Google’s mobile OS, Android, has a larger market share than Apple’s iOS and more consumers prefer Android for future purchases. In that sense, the HTC pickup isn’t so much a break from its Motorola deal, but a continuation of the gains made from it.

Leading up to its acquisition by Google, Motorola’s sales were in a tailspin that continued after the transaction. Yet Google was able to build a broad ecosystem for Android during that time. That’s what it has in mind in nabbing the HTC team. Google is focusing its own hardware efforts on building high-end devices not mainly to sell devices but to showcase what’s possible with Android, making it easier for other hardware providers to develop functionality they’ll need in the competition against Apple, ensuring that Google’s software (and its cash-cow search engine) retains a place in the mobile market.

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

Retailers go shopping online 

Scott Denne

Contact: Scott Denne

It’s been a tough year for retail. More than a dozen retailers – the latest being Toys R Us – have filed for bankruptcy, while others – JC Penney and Macy’s, for example – have grappled with lower-than-expected sales and store closings. As they face the acute threat from online sellers, Amazon in particular, they have adjusted their acquisition strategies to be more ambitious in scale, yet narrower in scope.

According to 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase, spending on tech M&A by retailers spiked this year and last, with each cresting above $4bn in spending, whereas each of the four years prior to that, total spending fell safely below $1bn. (Two deals – Walmart’s $3.3bn purchase of Jet.com and PetSmart’s $3.4bn reach for Chewy – account for most of that boost, yet even excluding those transactions, spending by retailers in 2016 and 2017 sits slightly higher than normal.)

Aside from the increase in spending, retailers have executed a shift in M&A strategy. Where they had once been inclined to pick up companies outside their core competency, buying websites, logistics or gaming companies, they’re now more likely to snag their online counterparts, as Signet Jewelers recently did – amid declining in-store sales – with its $328m acquisition of R2Net. As their customers have done more of their shopping online, retailers have done the same. This year and last, retailers printed more deals for e-commerce vendors than all other categories combined, a contrast to their earlier buying habits.

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

Trump’s death blow to a deal

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Respondents to the previous edition of the M&A Leaders’ Survey from 451 Research and Morrison & Foerster have once again delivered the wisdom of the crowds. When asked last spring about the outlook for US-China tech deal flow, respondents overwhelmingly predicted that President Trump’s policies would crimp M&A activity between the world’s two largest economies. Specifically, two-thirds (65%) of the 157 respondents from across the tech M&A landscape forecast a decline in purchases of US tech companies by Chinese buyers. That was more than four times the level (14%) that anticipated an increase.

In line with that April forecast, Trump has blocked the proposed $1.3bn acquisition of Lattice Semiconductor by a Beijing-based fund, citing national security concerns. Regulatory approval of the planned purchase by Canyon Bridge Capital Partners, which was announced last November, had been viewed as virtually impossible after The Committee on Foreign Investment in the US indicated that it would not sign off on the transaction. Trump delivered the death blow to the deal on Wednesday.

Trump’s move represents a rare bit of White House intercession in an acquisition. But it isn’t necessarily out of character for Trump, who has singled out China for some of his sharpest criticism as he has pursued a self-described ‘America First’ policy. Again, respondents to the M&A Leaders’ Survey last spring accurately predicted that Trump’s singularly unfriendly views toward China would disproportionately impact US-Sino deal flow. In the survey, fully one out of five respondents (20%) forecast that Chinese buyers of US tech companies, such as Lattice Semi, would ‘substantially’ cut their activity due to the Trump administration, compared with just 3% who said they expected overall cross-border M&A to drop off ‘substantially’ in the current regime.

451 Research and Morrison & Foerster are currently in market with the latest edition of the M&A Leaders’ Survey, and would appreciate your views on where the tech M&A market is and where it’s heading. In addition to broad market questions, we also revisit questions around Trump’s impact on cross-border M&A as well the specific outlook for China-based buyers. We would appreciate your time and thoughts. To participate, simply click here.

A private equity play in the public market

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

In a roundabout way, private equity’s influence on the technology landscape has also spilled over to Wall Street. So far this year, one of the highest-returning tech stocks is Upland Software, a software vendor that has borrowed a page directly out of the buyout playbook. Shares of Upland – a rollup that has done a half-dozen acquisitions since the start of last year – have soared an astounding 150% already in 2017.

Investors haven’t always been bullish on Upland. Following the Austin, Texas-based company’s small-cap IPO in late 2014, shares broke issue and spent all of 2015 and 2016 in the single digits. For the past four months, however, shares have changed hands above $20 each.

Upland’s rise on Wall Street this year essentially parallels the recent rise of financial acquirers in the broader tech market – 2017 marks the first year in history that PE firms will announce more tech transactions than US public companies. As recently as 2014, companies listed on the Nasdaq and NYSE announced twice as many tech deals as their rival PE shops. (For more on the stunning reversal between the two buying groups, which has swung billions of dollars on spending between them, see part 1 and part 2 of our special report on PE and tech M&A.)

Although Upland is clearly a strategic acquirer in both its origins and its strategy, it is probably more accurately viewed as a publicly traded PE-style consolidator. The company has its roots in ESW Capital, a longtime software buyer known for its platforms such as Versata, GFI and, most recently, Jive Software. Upland was formed in 2012 and, according to 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase, has inked 15 acquisitions to support its three main businesses: project management, workflow automation and digital engagement.

Selling into those relatively well-established IT markets means that Upland, which is on pace to put up about $100m in revenue in 2017, bumps into some of the largest software providers, notably Microsoft and Oracle. To help it compete with those giants, Upland has gone after small companies, with purchase sizes ranging from $6-26m.

However, the company has given itself much more currency to go out shopping. Early this summer – with its stock riding high – it raised $43m in a secondary sale, along with setting up a $200m credit facility. Given Upland’s focus on quickly integrating its targets, it’s unlikely that it would look to consolidate a sprawling software vendor. But it certainly has the financial means to maintain or even accelerate its rollup of small pieces of the very fragmented enterprise software market.

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

Container craze could spark monitoring M&A 

Scott Denne

Contact: Nancy Gohring

Even though it’s early still for the use of containers and microservices, we’ve seen a handful of startups enter the market with technology designed specifically for the monitoring needs of those environments. Established vendors also are developing techniques for this segment, yet adoption of these technologies is moving fast enough that broader application monitoring companies may decide to buy a specialist to speed time to market.

In our 2016 Voice of the Enterprise (VotE): Cloud Transformation, Budgets and Outlook survey, 26.7% of respondents said they were either in broad or initial implementations of containers in production environments. A further 11.3% said they were using containers in test and development environments, 21.4% said they were employing containers in trials, and 40.7% said they were evaluating containers.

Emerging vendors such as Sysdig, Outlyer and Instana are developing new approaches that aim to solve the particular challenges of monitoring applications built using containers and microservices, especially the challenges that emerge in dynamic environments. Most of these startups are quite small, with relatively few customers, indicating that they still have work to do to prove their worth. However, we believe both legacy and newer-breed providers looking to quickly add capabilities around this fast-growing use case could benefit from a pairing with one of the new entrants, allowing them to start serving users now.

Legacy vendors specifically, which have been eclipsed in recent years by more modern players, may have the most to gain from such an acquisition. Subscribers to 451 Research’s Market Insight Service can access a detailed report that analyzes the potential acquisitions of application monitoring companies built for container environments.

Webinar: PE activity and outlook

Brenon Daly

Forget Oracle, IBM, or any of the other big-name, publicly traded acquirers that – until now – have always set the tone in the tech M&A market. If a tech deal printed in 2017, the buyer is more likely to be a private equity firm than any of the well-known serial acquirers on the US stock market. This is the first time in the history of the multibillion-dollar tech M&A market that financial acquirers have been busier than these strategic acquirers.

To understand how the ever-growing influence of buyout shops is reshaping both M&A and the tech industry, join 451 Research for an hour-long webinar on Thursday, September 7, 2017, starting at 1:00pm ET. Registration is available here: https://www.brighttalk.com/webcast/10363/274289.