Category: mobile

Tangoe finds a European dance partner

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Looking to increase its international business, Tangoe recently reached across the Atlantic for UK-based ttMobiles. The geographic expansion effort is a key initiative for Tangoe, which opened its European headquarters in Amsterdam less than a year ago. The company currently gets virtually all of its revenue from US-based customers, although a representative for Tangoe noted Wednesday that slightly more than one-quarter of the $16.8bn that flowed over its platform in the fourth quarter came internationally.

The purchase of ttMobiles is the third acquisition Tangoe has made since its IPO last summer. (And that’s on top of the five deals it inked as a private company.) Like most of its other acquisitions, the latest purchase by the communications lifecycle management vendor is a small one: Tangoe will hand over just $9m for ttMobiles. At the end of 2011, Tangoe was basically running at breakeven and had $43m in its treasury, mostly thanks to the IPO.

Tangoe expects ttMobiles to contribute $4.5m in revenue this year, meaning it is valued at basically 2 times projected sales. (For its part, Tangoe trades at more than 4x projected sales.) We understand that the company will continue to pursue deals that offer geographic expansion, as well as look to consolidate rivals to bulk up the number of customers it serves

Cable & Wireless Worldwide may lose independence

Ben Kolada

Contact: Ben Kolada, Thejeswi Venkatesh

Just two years after parent company Cable & Wireless Group split itself into two businesses, the consumer division Cable & Wireless and the business services unit Cable & Wireless Worldwide (CWW), CWW may once again find itself as part of a larger organization. Vodafone confirmed Monday that it is in talks regarding the possible acquisition of CWW. The deal, which is rumored to be valued at roughly $1bn, should be welcome news to CWW’s investors, who have seen the company’s stock plummet by two-thirds in the past year.

Independent CWW, which provides fixed lines that link to wireless transmitters and switches, among other voice and data services, has fared poorly since the split, as revenue flatlined and the company issued several profit warnings. However, exploding Internet usage on mobile phones has caused renewed interest in CWW. Vodafone, which is light on its fixed-line capacity in the UK, would likely use the acquisition to enable more bandwidth availability for its mobile users. Vodafone will be able to take advantage of CWW’s vast infrastructure to backhaul its own cellular services, rather than rely on third-party operators. CWW’s investors are hopeful that the deal will come to fruition, with shares of the telco closing the trading day 30% higher. Vodafone has until March 12 to make a decision on the acquisition.

Selling to Facebook

Ben Kolada

Contact: Ben Kolada

Rather than buy into Facebook after it debuts on the open market, many companies may consider selling to the social networking giant after its IPO. Facebook is already rich with cash, and is about to become much richer. Meanwhile, its M&A strategy has so far focused on acquiring smaller startups for their IP and engineering talent, but the company has said it may do bigger deals in the future.

According to The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase, Facebook has so far bought 25 companies, mostly for their specialized employees such as software engineers and product designers, but also for complementary technology. The company has been fairly cash conscious in its transactions, preferring to motivate acquired personnel with stock options rather than upfront cash payouts – in fact, Facebook spent just $24m in cash, net of cash acquired, on the deals it closed in 2011.

While innovative startups with skilled personnel, particularly those in the collaboration and social networking sectors, should still consider selling to Facebook a viable exit, midmarket and larger technology firms should also consider Facebook a potential suitor. In both public reports and in its IPO prospectus, the company has said it could put its treasury to work on larger deals. And it will certainly have the fire power – adding proceeds from its $5bn public offering to its treasury would bring its total spending power to nearly $9bn (including cash and marketable securities).

Facebook could apply some of its rationale for buying smaller vendors to larger acquisitions. For complementary technology, it could target a larger mobile advertising network (it picked up development-stage rel8tion in January 2011). The lack of a mobile ad platform is a gaping hole in Facebook’s portfolio, especially considering it had 425 million mobile monthly active users at the end of 2011. A company similar to AdMob (which sold to Google) or Quattro Wireless (acquired by Apple) such as Millennial Media or Jumptap would go some way toward filling that gap. For regional expansion and consolidation, Facebook could make a move for any of a number of international competitors, including Cyworld in Korea, Mixi in Japan, Vkontakte in Russia or Renren in China. As the trend toward consumerization in the enterprise continues in the form of social networking and collaboration (salesforce.com’s Chatter or Oracle’s Social Network come to mind), Facebook could look at an enterprise offering as well. The leading candidate in this sector would be Jive Software, one of the most prized properties in the social enterprise space with a market valuation of about $1bn.

IBM plays small ball in big market

Ben Kolada

Contact: Ben Kolada, Vishal Jain, Chris Hazelton

After a streak of batting in the majors, Big Blue recently took a swing in the minor leagues. The company’s recently announced pickup of Worklight is one of the smallest deals it has announced in more than two years. (In fact, Worklight’s $70m price tag is a fraction of the estimated $475m that IBM has spent on average for its acquisitions since the beginning of 2010.) Nonetheless, it’s a handsome price for a small company, and is indicative of the premium that acquirers are willing to pay for technologies that cover the entire scope of mobile app lifecycle development and management.

According to our understanding, Big Blue’s offer gives Worklight a boisterous valuation of 20-30x trailing sales. Why the sky-high valuation? Basically, as the PC era diminishes, IBM felt pressure to prop up its existing enterprise offerings for mobile clients. Faced with the extent of fragmentation, both on the client and back-end services side, IBM saw Worklight as key to the missing pieces in its puzzle. Worklight completes Big Blue’s coverage of HTML5 frameworks, brings single-code-based development, and provides encrypted local device storage as well as cross-platform publishing and packing capabilities.

Beyond its implications for IBM, the transaction is another example of a longer-term trend we’re seeing in mobile app lifecycle management. In our 2012 M&A Outlook – Mobility, we noted that enterprises need a platform that can manage their entire app development life cycle right from development and through to deployment and maintenance. Larger enterprises that have typically used mobile enterprise application platforms will eye app development firms or agencies in their quest to take control of mobile app development. These acquisitions would be similar to ones closed by Antenna Software, Deloitte, Financial Times, VeriFone and Wal-Mart in 2011.

Intel: the latest tech giant to buy patents

Contact: Thejeswi Venkatesh

Intel has announced the acquisition of 190 patents, 170 patent applications and video codec software from RealNetworks for $120m. The transaction comes just eight months after Intel bought SiPort, a Santa Clara, California-based company that made audio-processing semiconductors. We see these moves as an indication that Intel wants to integrate more media and graphics capabilities into its chips, which these purchases should help with.

Barely three days ago, Intel inked a deal with QLogic to buy its InfiniBand business for $125m. That already makes Intel’s M&A spending for 2012 more than 60% of its full-year 2011 spending. What’s more, Intel was reportedly one of the bidders for InterDigital Communications, whose patent sale was called off earlier this week due to a gap in valuation expectations (InterDigital was reportedly looking for $3bn).

Patent sales have become one of the overarching themes of recent M&A activity, and one that we expect to continue throughout the year (see our 2012 M&A Outlook – Introduction for a full report). The reason for this is partly for offense (to expand a vendor’s existing product portfolio, like this Intel transaction) and partly for defense (as a hedge against a lawsuit, as is the case in Google’s reach for Motorola Mobility). The importance of these deals also registers on the other side of the transaction, the seller of the IP. Consider the contrast: Wall Street sent shares of RealNetworks soaring (up about 34%) on word that it had struck its deal with Intel, while it punished shares of InterDigital for not getting a sale done. InterDigital is currently trading at just half the level it was last summer.

Intel’s M&A activity

Fiscal year Deal volume Deal value
2011 11 $377m
2010 7 $9120m
2009 3 $884m
2008 3 $8m
2007 1 $110m

Source: The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase

And the Golden Tombstone goes to …

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

It’s time to once again hand out our annual award for Tech Deal of the Year, as voted by corporate development executives in our recent survey. For the second straight year, the voting came down to a tight race between two transactions. For 2011, Google’s planned purchase of Motorola Mobility just edged SAP’s reach for SuccessFactors. (Last year, Intel’s rather unexpected acquisition of McAfee slightly topped Hewlett-Packard’s takeout of 3PAR following a drawn-out bidding war.)

Both of the deals in the running for the 2011 prize certainly would have been worthy recipients of the Golden Tombstone. Google’s all-cash $12.5bn purchase of Motorola Mobility is more than the search engine has spent on its more than 100 other acquisitions and, beyond that, stands as the largest tech transaction (excluding telecommunications) since mid-2008. (Specifically, it is the largest deal since HP’s $13.9bn pickup of services giant EDS, which was voted the most significant transaction of 2008.) Meanwhile, SAP is paying an eye-popping 11 times trailing sales for SuccessFactors. With a price tag of $3.5bn, the deal is the largest-ever SaaS acquisition, more than twice the size of the second-place transaction.

AT&T’s loss is Verizon’s gain

Ben Kolada

Contact: Ben Kolada

In the land of multibillion-dollar telco mergers, sometimes the piecemeal approach is more effective than a one-and-done deal. AT&T attempted to leap over the competition with its proposed $39bn acquisition of T-Mobile USA; however, the world’s largest telecom company fell flat on its face. In failing to secure the T-Mobile takeover, AT&T is on the hook for a hefty $3bn cash breakup fee and must share spectrum in 128 cellular markets with its still-independent competitor. The spectrum loss is of particular irony, considering the primary driver for the T-Mobile purchase in the first place was the target’s spectrum assets.

Rather than pursue another long-shot acquisition, AT&T should focus on smaller spectrum purchases. That’s precisely what its competition has done. While AT&T spent months attempting to persuade politicians and federal regulators to approve the T-Mobile deal, which would have combined the second- and fourth-largest wireless carriers in the US, Verizon was dutifully seeking out smaller spectrum buys. Just this month, the company announced a pair of spectrum transactions worth a combined total of nearly $4 billion – the same price as the pretax charge AT&T will take in the fourth quarter (that charge includes the $1bn book value for the spectrum agreement with T-Mobile). Meanwhile, AT&T still hasn’t received FCC approval for its $1.9bn acquisition of certain Qualcomm spectrum licenses, which was announced back in December 2010.

A December rebound in tech M&A

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

After three months of basically standing on the sidelines, tech dealmakers have stepped back into the market in a big way in December. During just the first week of the final month of 2011, the value of announced transactions across the globe hit $8.6bn, led by SAP’s announcement of the largest-ever SaaS deal with its $3.6bn purchase of SuccessFactors and Verizon’s mammoth $3.6bn reach for some excess wireless spectrum with its pickup of SpectrumCo.

To put that $8.6bn of deal value in December into context, consider this: it already equals the full-month total for September and is fully twice the amount of spending in November. But then, last month was particularly grim for M&A. In fact, spending in November sank to its lowest monthly level in more than two and a half years, which was the depths of the Great Recession. Further, the number of transactions in November (only 240) stands as the lowest of any month so far in 2011 and is roughly 20% below the typical monthly volume.

BMC rumored to be going mobile

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Rumors are swirling that BMC will announce the acquisition of AirWatch, a purchase that would extend the systems management provider’s reach into the fast-growing mobile device market. The deal, which may print next week, would mark the first major move to consolidate the highly fragmented mobile device management (MDM) space, a market where we count more than 50 vendors of all sizes. AirWatch is one of the largest MDM players, and will get valued that way, according to sources. The rumored price tag is about $250m, or roughly 10 times revenue.

If the deal comes together, it would represent BMC’s only significant acquisition in mobility. The company nibbled in the market last summer, reaching for startup Aeroprise in July. (That was primarily a technology transaction, basically adding mobile capabilities to BMC’s flagship Remedy IT Service Management Suite.) Assuming this deal closes, we would expect other tech giants – both IT management companies as well as security vendors – to look at acquiring MDM capabilities as well.

Securing a tweet

Brenon Daly

Contact: Wendy Nather

Whisper Systems has announced that it has been acquired by Twitter (appropriately enough, the news was tweeted). Terms of the acquisition were not disclosed, but given Whisper’s emphasis on Google Android security, we expect that the deal was as much about the brains behind the technology as it was about the tools themselves. Whisper’s products include WhisperCore, a set of functions for data and network encryption as well as permissions management; WhisperMonitor, an Android-based firewall for mobile devices; Flashback, a cloud-based secure backup service for Android data; TextSecure, a facility for encrypting SMS messages on the fly; and RedPhone, an encryption function for voice that saw heavy use by activists during Egypt’s political uprising.

Twitter has inked 15 transactions, but this is the first one that focuses on security, and it’s in an area that appears to add real gravitas to the communications technology: it’s not just for ensuring that your Uncle Fred can’t accidentally get to your status updates. Mobile devices and protection against regimes make a solid combo, and they bolster Twitter’s use as a real-time reporting system. It’s not clear how many of the current products will remain viable under Twitter’s control, but the reasoning behind the choice of Whisper, as opposed to any number of other mobile device security startups, seems pretty clear.

But we find this deal even more interesting due to the fact that one of Whisper’s founders, security researcher Moxie Marlinspike, has also been making the conference rounds discussing a well-known problem: that of Internet-wide trust in domain name system (DNS) and SSL infrastructure. Certificate authorities that underpin transactions over the Internet have been increasingly attacked directly (with COMODO and DigiNotar being prime examples; the latter went bankrupt as a result of its breach), and DNS-based attacks are on the rise. Marlinspike not only points out the inherent design problems in the trust-based system, but also has proposed the most plausible solution: overhauling the structure into a new system he has dubbed Convergence. When you have access to an Internet security architect of Marlinspike’s caliber, you don’t let it go to waste. We’ll be watching for new developments on a possibly more fundamental level than just secure text messaging for Tweets.