Category: networking

Is Riverbed the next Data Domain?

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

With Data Domain off the market, we did a bit of blue-sky thinking about which company might find itself snapped up in a similar scenario. Our pick? Riverbed Technology. We’re not suggesting that the vendor is in play by any means, but hear us out on this one.

For starters, both Data Domain and Riverbed are fast-growing, single-product companies in markets that are dominated by mature technology vendors that have deep pockets and are hungry for growth. In the case of Data Domain it’s the storage market, while for Riverbed it’s the networking market. (To put some numbers around the differences, consider that Data Domain more than doubled its revenue in 2008, while its acquirer, EMC, saw storage revenue inch up just 10% last year.)

The obvious buyer of Riverbed would be Cisco. That’s so obvious, in fact, that we heard Cisco made at least two overtures to Riverbed before the company went public in September 2006. (However, one source characterized Cisco’s interest more as ‘industrial espionage’ than acquisition negotiations.) So we don’t see Riverbed going to Cisco. Instead, we like Hewlett-Packard as the acquirer of Riverbed.

The two companies have been friendly for years. HP originally had an OEM deal with Riverbed, and later resold the Riverbed product. HP has also integrated the Riverbed Optimization Software into its ProCurve infrastructure. To be clear, we’re not suggesting that there’s anything more than technology talks between the two sides right now. But if HP wanted to bolster ProCurve, picking up Riverbed would do that. Plus, such a deal could help HP stick it to Cisco, which took a swipe at HP earlier this year by jumping into the server market. Maybe HP is interested in countering with a big buy into one of the fastest-growing segments of the networking market.

Imaging an alternative exit for LogMeIn

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

With LogMeIn set to price its IPO later today, the next ‘buyer’ of the company will be public market investors. The on-demand vendor will sell 6.7 million shares in an offering that’s being led by JPMorgan Chase and Barclays Capital. LogMeIn set an initial range of $14-16 per share, implying a market capitalization of $300m-340m. It will likely price above that range, and we expect strong demand for LogMeIn shares once they start trading under the ticker ‘LOGM’ on the Nasdaq.

As the company gets set to realize that exit (after more than 17 months on file with the US Securities and Exchange Commission), we thought about where it might have looked had it opted for the other possible exit, a trade sale. We’re not suggesting that LogMeIn was dual-tracking by any means. In fact, although it kept its S-1 alive while so many other tech companies pulled their IPO paperwork, that move wasn’t driven by desperation. LogMeIn doesn’t actually need the proceeds. It is heading into the offering with no debt and $27m in cash on its books, having generated cash for the past nine quarters. Even on a GAAP basis, the firm has been profitable for the past three quarters.

Thus, LogMeIn doesn’t need the offering any more than it needs a trade sale. And to be clear, we hadn’t heard that the company was pursuing anything other than an IPO. Nonetheless, as we did some blue-sky thinking, we quickly came up with two deep-pocketed companies that would have been very smart to nab LogMeIn before it went public. Keep in mind, too, that the two primary rivals to LogMeIn are GoToMyPC and WebEx Communications, firms that have been snapped up by tech giants Citrix and Cisco, respectively.

So here’s our hypothetical short list of possible buyers for LogMeIn. Symantec already has several products that compete with LogMeIn (notably, PC Anywhere), but it is a key partner for LogMeIn. And Big Yellow has shown that it is ready to go shopping to bolster its software-as-a-service business. It paid $695m, or almost 5x trailing 12-month sales, for MessageLabs last October, its largest deal in more than a year and a half. Alternatively, Dell knows all about picking up companies just before they go public. It paid a double-digit multiple for its push into storage with the $1.4bn EqualLogic purchase in November 2007. However, Dell has also done a quartet of deals to build out its services offerings, some of which are offered by LogMeIn and others that are complementary. In addition, the customer profiles of the two vendors would synch pretty well, since LogMeIn gets roughly 80% of its revenue from the SMB market.

June gloom

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Whether or not the rebound got ahead of itself, the market has certainly tightened up this month. And no, we’re not talking about the equity market. (Although the sentiment is applicable there, as well, with the Nasdaq recently dipping to its lowest point in a month.) Instead, we’re talking about the M&A market. After a furious start to the second quarter, dealmaking has slipped back to the sluggish pace we saw in the first few months of 2009.

A quick glimpse at the numbers: In both April and May, we saw some 250 deals worth about $20bn in each month. So far this month, we’ve had about 205 deals worth a scant $8bn. With just three business days to go in June, we’re looking at spending being down about 60% from what it was in each of the first two months of the quarter.

We’ve also noticed the recent return of a trend that we saw more often in the opening months of 2009: the involuntary sale. In both large and small transactions, sellers have increasingly found themselves forced to take any offer that comes in. We noted that this week in the startup world, as LucidEra was turned over to a workout firm to sell its carcass. And on a larger scale, bankrupt Nortel Networks gave up on ever emerging as a viable company and began the painful process of liquidation sales. The first deal gives some sign of the resignation: Nortel sold its most valuable unit for what is likely to be less than 1x cash flow.

Second-quarter deal flow

Period Deal volume Deal value
April 2009 263 $21bn
May 2009 242 $19bn
June 2009 205 $8bn

Source: The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase

Going it alone can be expensive

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly, Henry Baltazar

Wall Street hasn’t been particularly supportive of tech companies that turn down unsolicited offers and opt to go it alone. Shares in a number of the targeted firms are currently changing hands at less than half the level that the would-be suitors were willing to pay for them. To wit: Microsoft was reportedly set to pay in the mid-$30s for each share of Yahoo, which is now trading in the mid-teens. And having spurned a $16-per-share unsolicited bid from Cadence Design Systems last summer, Mentor Graphics stock is now trading at about $7.

We mention that bit of cautionary history because there’s another showdown brewing. Broadcom, advised by Banc of America Securities, recently offered $9.25 for each share of Emulex, giving the unsolicited bid a total equity value of $764m. (As it often does, Goldman Sachs is advising the target.)

Broadcom’s bid values Emulex where it was trading last October. On an enterprise value basis, the proposed transaction values the maker of storage networking gear at just 1.2x its trailing 12-month (TTM) sales and 5.5x TTM EBITDA. Emulex investors want a richer valuation and have pushed the stock above $10 since the offer was unveiled. Broadcom has vowed to take the unsolicited bid directly to shareholders if the Emulex board rebuffs it. On its conference call Monday discussing fiscal third-quarter results, Emulex said only that it was ‘thoroughly’ reviewing Broadcom’s offer.

From Broadcom’s point of view, it’s understandable why it would want its fellow southern California-based company. If the deal goes through, Broadcom would get a foothold in a few interesting storage markets such as host bus adapters (for both standard servers and blade servers) and embedded storage processors for disk arrays. Broadcom sells Gigabit Ethernet and 10-Gigabit Ethernet products, but is not a player in the SAN market. With network convergence growing in popularity, Broadcom would also benefit from Emulex’s fiber channel technology and its new Fiber Channel over Ethernet adapters.

Cisco ‘papers’ purchase of Pure Digital

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

When we wrote recently that Cisco Systems was an unpredictable acquirer, we only covered half of it. Who would have thought (prior to rumors and subsequent official word last Thursday) that Cisco really wanted to buy its way into the consumer electronics market? Much less that the company wanted to enter that space so badly that it would pay what looks a lot more like a 2007 valuation than a 2009 valuation?

We’re referring, of course, to the networking giant’s acquisition last week of Flip camcorder maker Pure Digital Technologies for $590m. As for the valuation, we understand that Pure Digital wrapped up last year with sales of $150m, meaning Cisco paid about four times trailing 12-month sales for the company. Of course, Pure Digital was growing quickly, but we would still note that its valuation is about twice as rich as Cisco’s current valuation. (There were no bankers on either side of deal, we’ve been told.)

The concern about Cisco’s valuation is more than an academic issue for Pure Digital. After all, it took payment in Cisco shares, rather than cash. And that’s the other part of Cisco’s unpredictability. According to our records, the Pure Digital purchase was the first time Cisco has used its equity to acquire a company in more than four years. (The last time Cisco did a paper deal was its $450m pickup of wireless LAN switch vendor Airespace in January 2005.)

Since then, Cisco has inked some 42 transactions with a disclosed deal value of $13.4bn. And of course, the company still has its well-reported $29bn in cash on hand. That level won’t change due to Pure Digital. We can only speculate why Pure Digital’s backers chose to take Cisco stock rather than cash in this economic environment. But we would note that this isn’t the first time that one of Pure Digital’s backers has taken a slug of Cisco equity. Way back in 1987, Sequoia Capital’s founder Don Valentine put money into Cisco.

A (Big) Blue-colored Sun?

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Just two days after Cisco took the fight to its longtime allies in the server wars, IBM is now looking to buy some ammunition of its own. Big Blue is reportedly mulling a $6.5bn bid for Sun Microsystems, according to The Wall Street Journal. The deal would be the largest tech transaction (excluding telecom M&A) since Hewlett-Packard jabbed at IBM’s giant services division, paying $13.9bn for EDS last May. If it comes to pass, a pairing of IBM and Sun would also radically change the battle lines in the broader fight to build out datacenters, specifically around server, storage and software offerings.

Take the server market. If the deal goes through, a combined IBM-Sun would dominate the high-end, RISC-based, Unix-based symmetrical multiprocessor server market, leaving HP a distant third. However, one point that might pose a challenge for Big Blue is how long it would want to continue with Sun’s Sparc architecture, a direct clash with its own Power chips and System-p servers. Turning to storage, IBM is probably less excited about Sun’s assets in that market. Sun’s storage business has been languishing in the doldrums for years, despite Sun supporting it with its largest-ever acquisition, its mid-2005 purchase of StorageTek for $4.1bn in cash. Nonetheless, there are probably enough enterprise customers locked into Sun’s high-end, mainframe-centric tape business to interest Big Blue. And in software, IBM and Sun are both committed to open source, although we would add that they have slightly different models for monetizing their investments there.

Of course, there’s a chance that the reported talks may not result in a deal. However, we would note that Sun shares are behaving as if it will go through, soaring nearly 80% in early Wednesday afternoon trading to $8.80. That’s essentially where they were last September. That fact probably won’t be lost on Sun’s largest shareholder, Southeastern Asset Management. The activist investor, which has indicated that it talked with Sun to explore a possible sale of the company, among other steps to ‘maximize shareholder value,’ holds some 20% of Sun stock, according to its most-recent SEC filing.

Divesting at any costs

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

We recently noted how VCs are having to settle for scrap sales as they go through a bit of portfolio clean-out. But, hey, at least the value destroyed in each of the companies is only in the tens of millions of dollars. Companies that have been recently cleaning out their own portfolios in the form of divestitures have been eating hundreds of millions of dollars. Even billions of dollars.

Last week, two companies were in the news for what we would consider ‘divest at any cost’ transactions. First up, Motorola unwound its two-year-old purchase of Good Technology. After paying about $500m in November 2006 for Good, we would guess that Motorola almost certainly received less than $50m in selling the mobile messaging infrastructure vendor to privately held Visto. (At least there was something left to sell. The same can’t be said of Intellisync, which Nokia bought three years ago for $354.3m but recently said it will be shuttering.)

More dramatically, Nortel Networks looks likely to pocket just two pennies for every $1,000 that it handed over for Alteon WebSystems in mid-2000. (Keep in mind, however, that Nortel paid the $7.8bn total is stock, not cash.) The bankrupt telecom equipment vendor has put Alteon on the block, and the reported frontrunner is Israel-based Radware, which has put forward a bid of some $14m. (Since Nortel filed for Chapter 11, Alteon is being sold under an auction process run by the bankruptcy court, and other bidders could emerge.) As a final thought on both the Motorola and pending Nortel divestitures, we would note that both castoff divisions are landing in other companies, rather than a buyout shop.

NetQoS back in the market

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

When we caught up with NetQoS last June, the company had just inked its first purchase after a two-and-a-half-year hiatus, taking home trade-monitoring software startup Helium Systems. The Austin, Texas-based network performance management vendor is now ready to continue that shopping. Speaking at the Pacific Crest Securities Data Center Conference on Wednesday, Gordon Daugherty, the company’s head of corporate development, said NetQos is looking at a broad range of deals in a broad range of sizes.

Daugherty indicated that the company is eyeing companies in markets such as security and systems management, among others. Loosely, NetQoS is targeting a deal that could add about $10m in revenue to the $65m that it plans to record this year. However, Daugherty said the company is open to doing something larger than that placeholder. A larger purchase would require NetQoS to raise money for the first time in more than a half-decade. (The company has been profitable since 2005.) Daugherty added that the majority owner of NetQoS, New York City-based private equity firm Liberty Partners, has signed off on a fresh round to fund the right deal.

NetQoS acquisitions

Date Target Rationale
June 2008 Helium Systems Trade monitoring
December 2005 Pine Mountain Group Services
April 2005 RedPoint Network Systems Device management

Source: The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase

Cisco: not a common-sense shopper

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Through both direct and indirect cues, Cisco Systems’ John Chambers has created the impression that he’s about set to start wheeling a shopping cart up and down the Valley, grabbing technology companies with abandon. Folks who anticipate a dramatic return of Cisco to the M&A market have been busy putting together a shopping list for the company. (As has been well reported, the networking giant has plenty of pocket money; it current holds some $29bn of cash, and just raised another $4bn by selling bonds.) Most of the names on the list are ones that have been kicked around for some time.

For instance, fast-growing Riverbed Technology tops the list for some people. Indeed, Chambers approached the WAN traffic optimizer at least twice before the company went public in 2006, according to a source. We understand that talks ended with Riverbed feeling rather disenchanted with the giant. Other speculation centers on Cisco making a large virtualization play, either reaching for Citrix or VMware. The thinking on the latter is that Cisco would actually buy EMC, which sports an enterprise value of $21bn, to get its hands on the virtualization subsidiary. And last year we added another name to the mix, reporting that Cisco may have eyes for security vendor McAfee.

There’s a certain amount of logic to all of the potential acquisition candidates. At the least, speculation about them is defensible since they are all rooted in common sense. The only hook is that Cisco isn’t a ‘common-sense’ shopper. That’s not to say it isn’t an effective acquirer. Cisco very much is a smart shopper, and we’d put its recent record up there with any other tech company. What we mean is that Cisco’s deals are anything but predictable.

For instance, Cisco was selling exclusively to enterprises when it did an about-face nearly six years ago and shelled out $500m in stock for home networking equipment vendor Linksys. And it got further into the home when it followed that up with its largest post-Bubble purchase, the late-2005 acquisition of Scientific-Atlanta for $6.9bn. (Although word of the deal for the set-top box maker leaked out, few people would have initially put the two companies together.) Similarly, WebEx Communications wasn’t on any of the Cisco shortlists that we saw before the company pulled the trigger on its $3.2bn purchase of the Web conferencing vendor. But what do we know? Maybe some folks out there not only called one or two of those deals, but also hit the unlikely trifecta. If so, maybe you could email us to let us know – and while you’re at it, could you pass along some numbers for lottery picks?

Barracuda bites again

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

A ravenous eater, Barracuda Networks has now gobbled up four companies in the past 14 months. (And that doesn’t even count the privately held security company’s unsolicited bid in May for publicly traded Sourcefire, the Snort vendor.) Barracuda’s latest bite is backup and recovery company Yosemite Technologies. The company will be lumped in with the technology Barracuda picked up in November 2008 when it bought another backup vendor, BitLeap.

As we have chronicled, Yosemite evolved from a tape-based backup vendor to a disk-based one, and then added technology for continuous data protection for notebooks and laptops with the acquisition of early-stage FileKeeper. We understand that Yosemite, under the leadership of storage veteran George Symons, had been investing heavily in commercializing the technology. However, we suspect that fully realizing the value of the FileKeeper technology would have likely required another round of funding, which is tough to come by these days.

Instead, Yosemite opted for a sale to Barracuda. Terms weren’t disclosed, but a Barracuda insider once characterized the company’s approach to M&A to us this way: ‘We don’t mind picking through the boneyard.’ Barracuda has already built a powerful distribution channel to SMBs, so it just wants more products to push through that. With data protection covered, where might Barracuda look next? Our bet is that it is still interested in WAN traffic optimization (WTO). As we have noted, Barracuda CFO David Faugno knows the market well, having served as the top numbers guy at WTO vendor Actona Technologies before its sale to Cisco.

Barracuda’s deals

Date Target Rationale
September 2007 NetContinuum Web application security
November 2008 BitLeap Backup and recovery
November 2008 3SP SSL VPNs
January 2009 Yosemite Technologies Backup, data protection

Source: The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase