Category: semiconductors

Slimmed-down LSI catches eyes on Wall Street

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Wall Street’s vote on NetApp’s purchase of the Engenio division from LSI is pretty clear: the seller got the better end of the deal. On an otherwise tough day on the market Thursday, LSI shares were one of the rare spots of green on trading screens as investors backed the company’s move to focus more on its chips business. The stock closed up 3%, with volume was more than twice as heavy as average. On the other side, NetApp slumped 6% on trading that was four times heavier than a typical day.

The reaction comes after LSI, advised by Goldman Sachs, announced plans after the closing bell Wednesday to sell its Engenio external storage systems business to NetApp for $480m in cash. (Over the past decade, LSI had several plans to spin off that unit in an IPO, but never managed to get it done.) The deal, which is expected to close within 60 days, continues a run of divestitures that LSI has undergone, including shedding divisions serving mobility and consumer products.

We would note that Engenio is garnering a valuation of just 0.7 times sales, a smidge below the more typical 1x sales seen in many divestitures. (For instance, when LSI shed its mobility products unit in mid-2007, that business garnered 1.2x trailing sales.) Still, the discount doesn’t seem to have mattered to Wall Street.

PE firms back at the table

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

The buyout barons might not be as powerful as they were before the Credit Crisis, but that doesn’t mean the financial buyers can’t elbow aside their rivals from the corporate world. Earlier this week, Golden Gate Capital topped an existing agreement that Conexant Systems had with fellow chipmaker Standard Microsystems. While it wasn’t unusual for private equity (PE) firms to take auctions when credit was flowing cheap and easy, it’s been relatively rare in the past two years.

Terms call for Golden Gate to hand over $2.40 for each share of Conexant, giving the deal an equity value of roughly $180m. (Additionally, the company carries $86m of net debt.) The buyout firm’s all-cash offer topped a cash-and-stock bid of $2.25 per share from Standard Microsystems. The new agreement has a ‘no shop’ clause and is not conditional on financing. It also carries a $7.7m breakup fee, exactly the same amount that Standard Microsystems is pocketing for its trouble.

A 7% bump in acquisition price may not seem like much, but it could be an early signal that PE firms are getting much more aggressive in deals. That’s actually what corporate development executives told us they expected in 2011 from their PE rivals. In our annual survey, nearly four out of 10 (38%) corporate buyers said they expected more competition from buyout shops, compared to just 13% who said the opposite.

A public signoff from McAfee

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

After nearly two decades in some form or another as a public company, McAfee all but certainly reported its quarterly results to Wall Street for the final time on Tuesday morning. The company’s sale to Intel is expected to close in the coming weeks, a deal that will bring the largest stand-alone security vendor under the ownership of the largest semiconductor maker. For 2010, McAfee reported sales of $2.1bn and cash from operations of $595m. It didn’t hold a conference call because of the imminent close of its sale to Intel. (We suspect that the company won’t miss that quarterly ritual.)

The unexpected acquisition, which received our Golden Tombstone award as the most significant transaction of last year, was supposed to have already closed. When the $7.7bn deal was announced in mid-August, the companies indicated that they expected it to close before the end of 2010. It got overwhelming clearance from McAfee’s shareholders in early November, with 1,500 ‘yes’ votes for every one ‘no’ vote. US regulators signed off on the transaction in December.

But it took another month for European regulatory authorities to give their blessing – and they did so only conditionally. Among other things, Intel had to assure the European Commission that it won’t prevent other security providers from working on its chips and that the vendors will be able to use ‘functionalities’ of Intel’s products in the same way that McAfee is able to. While Intel may not be thrilled about making concessions to the EC, at least the six-month-old deal isn’t getting bogged down there. Remember that it took Oracle some nine months to close its purchase of Sun Microsystems, largely because of European regulatory concerns.

SMSC picks up the final portion of once-mighty Conexant

Contact: John Abbott

The agreement this week by New York City-based analog and mixed-signal chip vendor SMSC (aka Standard Microsystems) to acquire Conexant Systems for $284m in cash and stock marks the end of a drawn-out breakup process for the target company. Conexant was formed in January 1999 as a spinoff of the legendary Rockwell Semiconductor Systems, best known for its pioneering desktop calculator chips in the 1960s and modem chips in the 1990s. Rapidly hitting hard times, Conexant was subsequently carved up through a series of smaller spinoffs.

The foundry business was the first to go, as Jazz Semiconductor in March 2002 (Jazz later merged with National Semiconductor spinoff Tower Semiconductor in 2008 to form TowerJazz). The divestment of radio frequency and mobile chips to Skyworks Solutions was completed in June 2002, followed by the sale of the communications chips business to Mindspeed Technologies in June 2003 – both are still active. Most of the rest went to NXP Semiconductors (broadband media processors for $110m in April 2008), Coppergate Communications (home networking, value undisclosed, May 2008) and Ikanos Communications (broadband access products for $54m in April 2009). SMSC now takes on the final vestiges, consisting of silicon platforms for imaging, audio, fax, embedded modem and video-surveillance applications. The market’s negative reaction to the deal reflects a lack of excitement in these remaindered industry sectors.

However, the fit isn’t without some logic. SMSC’s primary business comes from mixed-signal connectivity chips aimed at personal computers, automotive and portable devices, including USB and Ethernet system on chips. The Conexant IP will broaden SMSC’s activities in the computing, consumer, industrial and automotive sectors; strengthen its relationships with some key joint customers; and boost its analog/mixed-signal R&D team to more than 900 engineers. SMSC has agreed to pay $98m in cash and will issue 2.9 million to 3.6 million shares when the deal closes some time during the first half of calendar 2011. It also takes on $86m in debt. Both boards have approved the transaction.

Founded in 1971, SMSC only became a significant industry force after buying Western Digital’s Ethernet and Token Ring LAN chip business in 1991, paying $33m. The company has been showing healthy organic growth of late, while also seeking opportunities to acquire: Conexant is its fifth deal since July 2009, and by far the largest in its history, adding 600 staff (230 of them in Asia) to its current headcount of just over 900. Combined trailing 12-month revenue would have reached $632m. However, synergies resulting in cost savings of up to $10m are forecast by the fourth quarter of 2012, so cuts appear inevitable.

Right-click here to download pictures. To help protect your privacy, Outlook prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. Right-click here to download pictures. To help protect your privacy, Outlook prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.

SMSC picks up the final portion of once-mighty Conexant

-by John Abbott

The agreement this week by New York City-based analog and mixed-signal chip vendor SMSC (aka Standard Microsystems) to acquire Conexant Systems for $284m in cash and stock marks the end of a drawn-out breakup process for the target company. Conexant was formed in January 1999 as a spinoff of the legendary Rockwell Semiconductor Systems, best known for its pioneering desktop calculator chips in the 1960s and modem chips in the 1990s. Rapidly hitting hard times, Conexant was subsequently carved up through a series of smaller spinoffs.

The foundry business was the first to go, as Jazz Semiconductor in March 2002 (Jazz later merged with National Semiconductor spinoff Tower Semiconductor in 2008 to form TowerJazz). The divestment of radio frequency and mobile chips to Skyworks Solutions was completed in June 2002, followed by the sale of the communications chips business to Mindspeed Technologies in June 2003 – both are still active. Most of the rest went to NXP Semiconductors (broadband media processors for $110m in April 2008), Coppergate Communications (home networking, value undisclosed, May 2008) and Ikanos Communications (broadband access products for $54m in April 2009). SMSC now takes on the final vestiges, consisting of silicon platforms for imaging, audio, fax, embedded modem and video-surveillance applications. The market’s negative reaction to the deal reflects a lack of excitement in these remaindered industry sectors.

However, the fit isn’t without some logic. SMSC’s primary business comes from mixed-signal connectivity chips aimed at personal computers, automotive and portable devices, including USB and Ethernet system on chips. The Conexant IP will broaden SMSC’s activities in the computing, consumer, industrial and automotive sectors; strengthen its relationships with some key joint customers; and boost its analog/mixed-signal R&D team to more than 900 engineers. SMSC has agreed to pay $98m in cash and will issue 2.9 million to 3.6 million shares when the deal closes some time during the first half of calendar 2011. It also takes on $86m in debt. Both boards have approved the transaction.

Founded in 1971, SMSC only became a significant industry force after buying Western Digital’s Ethernet and Token Ring LAN chip business in 1991, paying $33m. The company has been showing healthy organic growth of late, while also seeking opportunities to acquire: Conexant is its fifth deal since July 2009, and by far the largest in its history, adding 600 staff (230 of them in Asia) to its current headcount of just over 900. Combined trailing 12-month revenue would have reached $632m. However, synergies resulting in cost savings of up to $10m are forecast by the fourth quarter of 2012, so cuts appear inevitable.

Qatalyst strikes again, but bigger

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

When Jason DiLullo joined Qatalyst Partners last April, the boutique firm announced that he would play a major role in expanding the firm into semiconductor deals. Indeed he did. Qatalyst is getting sole credit for advising Atheros Communications on its sale to Qualcomm, the largest chip acquisition in four years. (On the other side, Goldman Sachs and Barclays Capital advised Qualcomm.) With an equity value of $3.6bn, it is Qatalyst’s largest deal – by about $1bn, no less – since it opened its doors in March 2008.

The chip deal brings the total value of the 10 transactions that Qatalyst has worked on to more than $17bn. Of course, the firm is primarily known for its role in helping to consolidate the storage sector, working on the sales of Isilon Systems and 3PAR last year, as well as Data Domain in mid-2009. (All three of those companies were erased from the market at their highest-ever valuation.) Collectively, the equity value of those three storage deals is about $7bn – ‘only’ twice the amount of Qatalyst’s sole chip deal.

3Leaf ends up at Huawei – but will it be staying there?

Brenon Daly

Contact: John Abbott

Six months ago, I/O virtualization startup 3Leaf Systems disappeared from our radar screens. A little digging around more recently revealed that key staff members had scattered. VP of marketing Shahin Kahn was now at ORION Marketing Group, a consulting firm, with other ex-Sun Microsystems colleagues. CEO B.V. Jagadeesh had turned up as CEO of Virtela Technology Services, a managed network, security and technology services company. In his company biography he revealed that 3Leaf had been sold in a ‘private transaction.’ The trail of clues led on to Bob Quinn, founder and CTO of 3Leaf, who could be traced (via his LinkedIn profile) to Chinese telecom equipment maker Huawei Technologies, where he was now acting as a consultant. We surmised, and later received confirmation, that Huawei was the new owner of 3Leaf’s technology.

Two weeks ago, Huawei submitted an application to CFIUS – the US government’s Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States – including its first public statement that it had acquired 3Leaf in May. No details emerged other than that only the intellectual property and 15 of the 50 employees had been obtained in a transaction worth around $2m. According to CFIUS, Huawei should have requested permission from the committee. Huawei said it regarded the deal as a patent sale and hiring exercise and so believed it didn’t need to clear it with CFIUS. In 2008, the company abandoned its bid for 3Com due to US security terms. Hewlett-Packard stepped in to acquire 3Com a year later. More recently, Huawei has faced opposition to a proposed equipment-supply partnership in the US with Sprint Nextel over security concerns.

Aside from all this, the deal is a sorry – and somewhat worrying – end for 3Leaf, which raised roughly $67m from VCs Alloy Ventures, Enterprise Partners Venture Capital and Storm Ventures, as well as money from strategic investors Intel and LSI. 3Leaf was working on what should be a hot sector, I/O virtualization, but perhaps it entered the market too early. Its first product, the V-8000, first shipped in May 2007, but used a somewhat proprietary approach due to the lack of standards at the time. The company effectively started all over again in 2009 with plans to build new technology for virtualizing CPU and memory resources across x86 server clusters. It was looking for deals from OEMs, although there were also plans to sell prepackaged versions based on SuperMicro servers. However, 3Leaf needed more money to fund the ongoing research, and those efforts appear to have been unsuccessful.

3Leaf looked promising when it was founded, but early technology decisions led it down a blind alley. There may be some value in its patents and certainly more in the experience of its engineers, but it seems unlikely that, if CFIUS forces Huawei to sell the assets it’s bought, there will be many takers. If one is found, it’s likely to be a major server vendor with networking pretensions such as HP or IBM, or an I/O and networking adapter specialist such as Emulex or QLogic. Meanwhile, other startups in closely related areas – including ScaleMP, NextIO, Numascale, RNA Networks, VirtenSys and Xsigo Systems – soldier on.

PE: which door is marked ‘exit’?

Brenon Daly

by Brenon Daly, Jason Schafer

After chalking up some 17 purchases under the ownership of a private equity (PE) consortium, ViaWest has been bought by another PE firm. Oak Hill Capital Partners will pick up the 11-year-old managed hosting provider, which currently operates 16 datacenters and counts 1,000 customers. Although financial details of the transaction were not disclosed, we estimate the purchase price at around $420m. That works out to about 4.2 times trailing revenue and about 10 times cash flow for ViaWest, according to our understanding. (My colleagues at Tier1 Research estimate that roughly 70% of ViaWest’s revenue comes from its colocation business, with the remaining 30% coming from managed services.)

The deal, which should be completed this quarter, caught our eye because it is yet another recent sponsor-to-sponsor transaction that we estimate is valued in the hundreds of millions of dollars. Almost exactly two months ago, Francisco Partners flipped RedPrairie to New Mountain Capital for what we understand was roughly the same price as ViaWest. The sale of the supply chain management vendor came even though it had filed a few months before that to go public.

While there’s certainly nothing wrong with buyout shops swapping assets, it’s hardly the sign of a healthy exit environment for PE firms. Of course, there is one gigantic counterpoint to that: NXP Semiconductors, owned by Bain Capital and KKR, filed last week to sell $1.15bn worth of shares on the NYSE. The buyout tandem picked up the chip maker in 2006, when it was spun off of Royal Philips Electronics. We’re certain that a lot of fellow financial buyers, which also took home chip companies during the LBO boom in 2006-07, will be following NXP’s offering very closely.

Oracle: two deals, but more than a year apart

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Exactly a year ago today, Oracle announced its unexpected $7.4bn acquisition of Sun Microsystems. If it doesn’t seem like it was that long ago, that’s because it really wasn’t. Final approval for the deal dragged on for nine full months, largely because of scrutiny by the European Commission of Oracle owning Sun’s open source database, MySQL. Eventually, Brussels agreed with our initial assessment that MySQL and Oracle rarely competed (MySQL was focused mostly on the low end of the market and on Web applications), so they cleared the transaction.

The purchase of Sun is a singular deal for Oracle. (It brings the company into the hardware game for the first time, for instance.) And it stands out even more when compared with Oracle’s pickup on Friday of Phase Forward, which is the only public company that Oracle has snagged since Sun.

For starters, the price of Phase Forward is about one-tenth the price of Sun. But more significantly, Sun was a broad, horizontal acquisition, while Phase Forward is a vertical market play. The target serves life sciences companies offering a subscription-based way to keep track of clinical trials. (It has more than 335 customers.) And perhaps most notably, parts of Sun’s technology (Sparc and Solaris, among others) will be integrated into many offerings from Oracle, which is following the strategy of other systems vendors. On the other hand, Phase Forward will be slotted into the narrowly defined Oracle Health Sciences unit.

More on Intersil-Techwell

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

We looked at Intersil’s purchase of Techwell on Thursday, primarily from the perspective of the senseless lawsuits that are swirling around the transaction. But fittingly for the largest acquisition of a US-based chip company since mid-2007, there’s a lot more that’s noteworthy about the deal. (Note: The equity value of the transaction is actually $450m, while the $370m figure in the announcement is the enterprise value.)

For starters, Intersil’s pickup of Techwell, which is expected to close in two months or so, is the sixth deal the chip company has inked in the past year and a half. (In another report, we noted some similarities in a pair of purchases that Intersil did back in 2008.) At $450m, the buy is the largest that Intersil has announced in a half-decade. The acquisition gets Intersil into two new markets: video security surveillance systems, where Techwell gets about 70% of its sales, and automotive displays, which accounts for the remaining 30%.

Also, the planned sale of Techwell represents the second exit at an above-market multiple in just three weeks for Technology Crossover Ventures (TCV). A late-stage investment firm, TCV owned chunks of both Techwell and RiskMetrics Group, which sold to MSCI Barra for $1.55bn at the beginning of March. TCV holds nearly 4.3 million shares of Techwell, according to the latest 13F filing with the SEC, meaning the firm stands to enjoy a $79m payday when the deal closes.

A management ‘buy-under’ at Silicon Storage Technology?

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

In the third-quarter earnings report for Silicon Storage Technology at the end of October, chief executive Bing Yeh went out of his way to tout the vastly improving outlook for the flash memory vendor. Yeh noted that end-market demand had recovered and pricing had firmed up in what had been a pretty tough market. Third-quarter sales picked up sequentially and the company actually posted black numbers after three straight quarters of losses. The rebound was expected to continue in the fourth quarter, with a profit forecast for the period, as well.

And yet, the price that Yeh and his buyout partners at Prophet Equity bid for SST last week is actually lower than the vendor’s share price on the day Yeh made his comments about the rosy outlook for the company he heads. In fact, over the past two months, shares of SST have only traded below the proposed sale price of $2.10 in 11 of the 46 trading days. Looked at another way, the proposed management buyout (MBO) of SST represents a ‘take-under’ (rather than a takeover) when compared to the closing price in three out of four sessions since early September.

By their very nature, MBOs are fraught with conflict. In cases like SST, where executives plan to roll over their stakes in the company, the executives are effectively both buyers and sellers of the firm. (According to SST’s proxy, Yeh holds roughly 11% of all shares, making him the single-largest owner of the vendor.) The conflict emerges when we look at the basic economic self-interest on both sides of the transaction: The owners of SST (including Yeh) want to get as high a price as possible in the sale of their business, while the buyers (including Yeh) want to pay as low a price as possible to purchase the business.

Beyond the mismatch of motivation in MBOs, there’s also the thorny issue that executives almost certainly have insights on their business that aren’t available to other owners. We would guess that Yeh, who helped found SST 20 years ago and also serves as the chairman of the company’s board, probably knows more about the firm’s business and its prospects than anyone else on the planet.

At least one other insider at SST, however, didn’t share the support of the below-market MBO. Board member Bryant Riley, the founder of the Southern California investment firm B. Riley & Co., voted against the proposed buyout and then resigned from the board. (It’s worth noting that Riley got his seat in May 2008 only after agreeing to stop pestering the company about ‘strategic alternatives.’) Most SST investors – at least those who don’t stand to have a stake in the privately held company – have also voted against the deal. Shares have traded above the offer price since the bid was revealed November 12.