Category: services

Mapping vendor Garmin searches for direction

In a time of increasing competition and decreasing margins, the once-soaring navigation companies seem to have lost their bearings. Former Wall Street darlings Garmin and TomTom both reported lackluster quarters last month. Although overall revenue at both companies is still solid, other lines on the P&L sheet have deteriorated – notably margins. Both companies are now trading near 52-week lows, down roughly 70% from their highs for the year. (Undoubtedly, Garmin will face some investor ire when the company holds its shareholder meeting on June 6.)

With fierce consolidation and price declines, the issue facing Garmin and others is how to differentiate themselves from the new entrants that range from conglomerates Nokia and Research in Motion to small startups such as Dash Navigation. (Looming over all of this is the phenomenal success of Apple’s iPhone.) We foresee 2008 being a year of further consolidation as Garmin continues to shop in an attempt to retain its competitive edge.

Garmin’s gross margins are down to less than 50% from 70% just a few years ago and are expected to decline to below 40% this year, according to CFO Kevin Rauckman. The new competitive environment has forced a steep decline in average selling price: the company’s personal navigation device sold for $500 just a few years ago, but now the gizmo goes for half that amount. Garmin has stated that it intends to stave off the price erosion by setting up its products as a premium brand, much like what Apple did with the iPod. In order to achieve this, Garmin has been looking to make acquisitions in the content segment and will launch its first mobile phone, the Nuvifone, which looks, sounds and works eerily similar to a GPS-enabled iPhone.

So which companies might be ripe for the taking? Aside from the expected distribution acquisitions such as Garmin’s rumored purchase of Raymarine, mapping, traffic and content provider startups such as Dash, Inrix and Networks in Motion offer the kind of technology that Garmin needs. Moreover, if Garmin is serious about branching into the complex mobile phone market, a case could easily be made for an acquisition of longtime partner Palm Inc. The struggling pioneer was reportedly in play last year, but instead opted to have Elevation Partners take a 25% stake in the firm. Palm’s valuation has since been cut in half; we believe the company could surely be had for cheap as investors are eager to recoup their losses. Debt-free Garmin is cash-rich with about $600m, plus another $550m in marketable securities. So financing acquisitions is not a big issue for the company. The real question is whether Garmin can navigate a margin-boosting plan into place before it plummets off a cliff.

Signs of a consolidating industry

Announced Acquirer Target Deal value
Oct. 1, 2007 Nokia Navteq $8.1bn
July 23, 2007 TomTom Tele Atlas $2.8bn

Source: The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase

Saving on services at HP

Brenon Daly

Like so much at Hewlett-Packard these days, CEO Mark Hurd seems to be succeeding where his predecessor, Carly Fiorina, failed. In this case, Hurd is set to buy outsourcing giant EDS in a $13.9bn deal. While Wall Street roughed up HP a bit, there wasn’t anywhere near the outcry that hit Fiorina when she tried to pull off her multibillion-dollar services deal in late 2000. Following the hammering from investors, Fiorina relented and backed away from her plan to pick up the consulting business at PricewaterhouseCoopers after just two months. (Of course, IBM ended up getting a bargain two years later on the PwC unit, paying $3.5bn for it in 2002. That was just one-fifth the amount HP was set to hand over.)

The goal of the moves by Fiorina and Hurd is the same: build up the services arm of the hardware-oriented company. (With 2007 revenue of $22bn, EDS would more than double the size of HP’s services business.) Hurd has already used that strategy in the company’s software portfolio, shelling out $4.5bn for Mercury Interactive to effectively double the size of that division. Of course, we suspect the support Hurd is enjoying for his planned acquisition has more to do with fiscal reasons than strategic ones. Paying less than 1x sales for EDS is a very ‘un-Fiorina’-like valuation. 

Rival moves in services

Acquirer Target Announced Deal value Target TTM sales
IBM PwC (consulting arm) July 30, 2002 $3.5bn (adjusted to $3.9bn) $4.9bn
HP EDS May 13, 2008 $13.9bn $22bn

Evercore’s short cycle

Brenon Daly

Investment banking, as everyone knows, is a cyclical business. In the case of Evercore Partners, the downswing lasted about a day. On Monday morning, CEO Roger Altman was on a call with disenchanted investors trying to explain why the company booked just half the amount of revenue in the first three months of this year that it did in the same period last year. (Setting aside the utter ridiculousness of projecting quarterly revenue on an advisory business, Evercore’s first-quarter revenue of $45m came in about one-third below the amount Wall Street had projected.) On the report, Evercore shares sank to their lowest level since the boutique bank came public almost two years ago.

By Monday afternoon, however, it was looking like Evercore was set to pocket tens of millions of dollars for the bank’s role in co-advising EDS on its $13.9bn sale to Hewlett-Packard. Depending on how Evercore and Citigroup divvy up the advisory fee, Evercore could end up taking home more money from its EDS mandate than it booked in the first three months of the year. (HP’s purchase is expected to close in the second half of 2008, so the success fees will flow after that.) We guess that’s what Altman, who worked firsthand on the EDS sale, meant when he said the bank’s backlog was ‘fine.’ Evercore shares, however, haven’t recovered and, in fact, are changing hands below where they were on Monday.  

Banking HP-EDS

Company Advisers
HP JPMorgan, Lehman Brothers
EDS Citigroup, Evercore Partners