Category: technology stocks

A new face for Google’s enterprise cloud

Brenon Daly

During last week’s GPC NEXT 2016 conference, it became pretty clear that Google is hoping that Diane Greene can do for the enterprise cloud what Andy Rubin did for mobility. In both cases, the search giant has set about acquiring a well-known ‘face’ to give it a credible and visible presence in a market that it cannot organically move into but – at the same time – can’t afford to miss. (See our full report on the conference, where the company bolstered its Google Cloud Platform with multi-cloud management, a machine-learning engine and more scalable containers, among other announcements.)

A decade ago, Google’s acquisition of Android Inc not only brought the company a fledgling OS for mobile phones, but also included the high-profile figure of Rubin. From those early days, Rubin served as a kind of ‘rock-star engineer’ as Android soared to become the world’s most-used mobile OS. (Rubin stepped out of his role in Google’s mobile business in 2013 and left the company altogether the following year.) More recently, Google made what could be characterized as one of the tech industry’s largest-ever ‘acq-hires’ when it paid $380m in cash and stock four months ago to snag bebop, a startup headed by VMware cofounder (and Google board member) Diane Greene.

Just as Rubin served as a senior VP at Google as part of his company being acquired, Greene is serving as a senior VP at Google as part of her company being acquired. However, where the parallel breaks down between the two executives is around timing. Google bought Rubin’s company in August 2005 – a full two years before Apple introduced its iPhone. In contrast, Google purchased Greene’s company just last November – nearly a decade after Amazon launched its Amazon Web Services and had grown it to a $10bn run-rate business. (Click here to to read more about the remarkable growth of AWS.)

That’s not to say that Google, led in its efforts by a proven executive such as Greene, can’t make inroads into the enterprise cloud arena, thereby closing the gap with AWS and second-place Microsoft Azure. After all, the company wasn’t anywhere among the earliest search engines, but it overtook every single one of them as it netted billions of dollars on its way to becoming the world’s most-popular search engine.

But there are challenges in Google’s ‘people and products’ strategy, as demonstrated by Rubin’s own experience at the company after he left the Android division. A true gadget guy, Rubin moved over to head the search giant’s grandly ambitious robotics unit when it launched in 2013. It was built on a series of acquisitions, most notably the December 2013 pickup of Boston Dynamics. However, Rubin couldn’t replicate in Replicant (the name for Google’s robotics business) the success he had with Android, and left the company in 2014. Google is now reportedly in the process of selling off and repurposing the Replicant assets.

Cloud computing as a service MarkMon

Source: 451 Research’s Market Monitor

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

After a decade of dominance, what’s next for AWS?

Brenon Daly3 Comments

Contact: Brenon Daly

Even as it begins its second decade of life today, there’s an undeniable sense that Amazon Web Services (AWS) is only getting started. From a standing start in March 2006 with a single storage product, AWS has created a profitable tech behemoth that is gobbling up huge chunks of the IT landscape. (For a deeper look at how AWS has gone about upending the multibillion-dollar markets where it operates, see a recent report from my colleague Owen Rogers on how AWS handles the pricing and delivery of its vast array of services.)

On its own, AWS is easily worth more than $100bn, a remarkable bit of value creation that’s been done almost entirely organically. Amazon has almost exclusively used R&D – rather than M&A – to build AWS. For the most part, the AWS cloud offering has been developed through reallocation of existing assets and engineering instead of acquiring those things.

In terms of corporate strategy, that sets Amazon and its AWS business apart from most other tech companies, which tend to default to buying rather than building. Each year, tech vendors collectively spend hundreds of billions of dollars expanding their product portfolios and addressable market, only to struggle to put up any growth. (To take one extreme, consider IBM, which has seen annual revenue drop from roughly $100bn in 2013 to less than $80bn this year. In that same period, Big Blue has spent more than $8.6bn on 39 acquisitions, according to 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase.)

The organic value creation at AWS stands out even more when compared with even the biggest and best tech deals. Consider the case of VMware. EMC’s purchase of the virtualization startup in late 2003 for $635m is rightfully cited as one of the most successful tech acquisitions in history. VMware’s market valuation of $21.2bn is currently dictated by terms of Dell’s pending pickup of VMware’s parent, EMC. (Before the transaction was announced, VMware had a market cap of about $34bn.)

Even on an unaffected basis, AWS is at least three times more valuable than VMware. And the case could certainly be made that the gap between the two companies will only widen in the future. After all, AWS is now larger than VMware and growing nearly eight times faster than VMware, which has slowed to a single-digit percentage rate. (AWS increased revenue a stunning 72% to $7.9bn in 2015.) Further, AWS has a large and growing market opening in front of it. 451 Research’s Market Monitor forecasts that the market for cloud computing ‘as a service’ – which includes PaaS, IaaS and infrastructure software as a service (ITSM, backup, archiving) – will hit $21.9bn this year and more than double to $44.2bn by 2020.

Source: 451 Research’s Market Monitor

With two months in the books, 2016 tech M&A is still slogging along

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

For the second straight month, tech M&A in February looked more like the post-recession years leading up to 2015’s record activity than last year’s bonanza. Spending on tech, media and telecom (TMT) acquisitions around the globe in the just completed month hit $28.7bn, according to 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase. While that represents a significant bump from the paltry $20.5bn of aggregate spending in January, February’s total falls more than one-third lower than the average monthly level in 2015. Further, the number of transactions in this leap-year February slipped to the lowest monthly number since late 2014.

Looking inside the pricing of last month’s deal flow, transactions tended to be polarized. On the top end, big buyers Cisco and Microsoft both paid double-digit valuations in their purchases of Jasper Technologies and Xamarin, respectively. Also, in terms of deal size, IBM’s $2.6bn reach for Truven Health Analytics is notable as Big Blue’s largest acquisition since late 2007.

However, as might be expected as the equity markets ground lower across the globe in February, many more tech acquisitions went off at significantly reduced valuations. For instance, onetime IPO hopeful Yodle fetched just $342m, or 1.6x trailing sales, in its sale to Web.com. LoJack got erased from the Nasdaq at just 1x trailing sales. And LeapFrog Enterprises, an educational toy maker whose shares once traded at north of $40 each, is set to be consolidated for just $72m, or $1 per share.

In addition to pressuring valuations, the turmoil in the equity markets has also scared off any companies from going public. Two months into 2016, we still haven’t seen a tech IPO. Even Nutanix – which filed its initial S-1 in late December – hasn’t updated its paperwork in the 10 weeks since then. The drought so far this year comes as corporate development executives in a 451 Research survey gave their lowest forecast for the number of tech IPOs since the credit crisis.

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

What is Charles Darwin doing at this year’s RSA Conference?

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

In addition to the Pollyanna marketers and go-getter executives that make up most of the attendees at the RSA Conference, there will also be a slightly more unsettling figure looming around the security industry’s marquee event: Charles Darwin. No, the long-dead scientist won’t be actually docking his ship, HMS Beagle, on the San Francisco waterfront to attend next week’s confab. But Darwin’s seminal theory about ‘natural selection’ is going to be one of the more visible – if unacknowledged – themes at this year’s RSA Conference. Bluntly put, some of the 500 companies and sponsors that help put on this year’s event won’t be around when RSA opens the doors on future conferences. (451 Research subscribers, see our full preview of this year’s RSA Conference.)

This isn’t to say that the RSA show floor is somehow going to turn into a killing ground. Rather than viewing it cinematographically, we view it clinically. The RSA Conference is nothing more than a petri dish of organisms that, until now, have had ideal conditions to evolve and reproduce. In the months leading up to this year’s gathering, however, those life-sustaining conditions have deteriorated to the point where some of the organisms will not survive. The weak will be ‘selected out’ – a process that in some ways is overdue in the crowded information security market.

We’re already seeing some of that pressure come through in infosec M&A. Consider the contrast between the two largest acquisitions by FireEye, which has served as a convenient bellwether for the next-generation infosec vendors. Two years ago, it spent almost $1bn, more than 10x trailing sales, for incident response firm Mandiant. Last month, it handed over just $200m upfront for iSIGHT Partners, valuing the threat intelligence specialist at half the multiple it paid for Mandiant. Further, according to our understanding, iSIGHT garnered only a slight uptick in valuation in its sale compared with its valuation in a funding round announced a year earlier. The return can still be boosted, provided iSIGHT hits the targets of a $75m earnout. But even including the additional kicker, it’s still a relatively modest exit for a company that as recently as last year had positioned itself in the IPO pipeline.

That bearishness might not come through on the RSA Conference show floor or even in the afterhours cocktail parties next week. But long after the booths are packed up and the drinks have stopped flowing, infosec startups will have to get back to business. And what they are likely to find is that business for the rest of the year is going to get a whole lot tougher as buyers and backers hold much more tightly onto their life-sustaining purchases and investments, respectively. To help adapt to that new environment, startups might be well served to tuck a copy of Darwin’s On the Origin of Species into their RSA Conference swag bag and look for some pointers on how to make it through the upcoming selection cycle in the infosec industry. See our full report.

CW infosec spend 2016

Tech M&A Outlook webinar

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

With the world economy shuddering and global equity market sliding, 2016 is starting out in rough shape. That’s also crimping deal flow so far this year, with January spending on tech acquisitions just half the average monthly level from last year. To get a sense of what’s happening now in the M&A market and what we expect for the rest of the year, join us on Wednesday, February 3 at 1:00pm EST (10am PST) for our annual Tech M&A Outlook webinar. You can register here.

The hour-long webinar will start with a look back at the record-breaking year of 2015 to highlight some of the trends that helped push tech M&A spending to its highest level since the Internet bubble burst. What had buyers spending freely last year – including 83 transactions valued at more than $1bn – and what has happened to that confidence so far this year? That lack of confidence has also kept any startups from coming public so far in 2016, the first time that has happened since the credit crisis. What does the rest of the year look like for tech IPOs, and which companies might look to debut despite the inhospitable market?

Join the Tech M&A Outlook webinar for views from some of 451 Research’s 100+ analysts and what they expect to be driving deals in key sectors, including the Internet of Things, mobility and security. Register here.

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

For tech M&A, 2016 is more so-so than go-go

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

At the start of 2016, this year looks a lot more so-so than go-go for tech M&A. Spending on global tech, media and telecom acquisitions in the just-completed month of January exactly matched the middling monthly average registered from 2010-14, just before spending soared in 2015 to its highest level in a decade and a half. Compared with last year’s record, the value of January deals reached just half the average monthly spending in 2015. (See our full report on last year’s astounding M&A activity.)

Across the globe, acquirers spent just $20.7bn on 365 transactions in January, according to 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase. (It’s worth noting that while the value of January acquisitions dropped by half vs. the average month in 2015, deal volume in January exactly matched last year’s monthly average.) One reason for the weak start for M&A in 2016 is the drubbing the equity markets have taken so far this year. The Nasdaq plummeted 8% in January, the worst monthly performance for the index in a half-decade.

Amid the index’s decline last month, a number of tech vendors got roughed up as they reported lackluster fourth-quarter results and projected a slowing 2016. (Think about Intel’s datacenter business in Q4 growing at just half the rate it grew in Q1-Q3, or Apple reporting flat iPhone sales for the first time in that product’s history.) The uncertainty basically knocked out any of the more speculative, high-multiple transactions from the top end of the M&A market. For instance, the average valuation of the four largest deals in January was less than 2x trailing sales.

To help make sense of what’s happening now in the tech M&A market, as well as the outlook for the rest of 2016, be sure to attend our webinar on Wednesday, February 3 at 10am PST. The hour-long Tech M&A Outlook webinar features forecasts for both acquisition activity and valuations, in addition to providing specific outlooks for a handful of key tech sectors – including Internet of Things, mobility and information security – that we expect to be particularly active in the coming year. You can register here.

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

For now, VC is still flowing — but what happens when it doesn’t?

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

For the most part, the venture capital industry seems like it hasn’t changed the calendar and still thinks it’s the ‘up and to the right’ year of 2015. Firms are still writing checks for amounts that, until a few years ago, only came from public market – rather than private market – investors. (Datadog raising almost $100m earlier this week, for instance.) And, even though there have been only a smattering of successful $1bn VC-backed exits in recent years, firms are still bidding up funding rounds for startups, and continuing to create ‘unicorns.’ (Anaplan crossed that threshold in a round announced earlier this week.)

That is unlikely to continue in 2016, at least according to a majority of tech investment bankers, many of whom have worked on private and public fundraising. In our survey last month, more than half of the tech investment bankers forecast that venture funding will get tighter in 2016 than it was last year. That stands as the most bearish outlook since the recession, coming in twice the level of bankers that said VC dollars will be less available in our previous survey.

If indeed venture firms start keeping their money in their own bank accounts – rather than investing it in entrepreneurs – that could well put startups under pressure, resulting in slower growth rates and lower valuations for those that survive tighter times as well as dramatic flameouts for those that don’t. Not to be too ominous, but recall how business contracted in 2008-2009 when debt – which, like equity, is oxygen for many companies – was no longer widely and easily available.

Of course, quite a few VCs recognized how the broad economic recession during the credit crisis could weigh on the tech industry. (Sequoia Capital posted its famous ‘RIP: Good Times’ slides in October 2008 as a cautionary forecast for its portfolio companies.) Similarly, a few VCs have recently sounded off that valuations have gotten ahead of themselves and that startups need to watch their spending more closely.

But for the most part, that message of fiscal responsibility has only started to get through to executives and their backers. Most money-burning startups continue to run their businesses as if there’s an inexhaustible supply of money. Triple headcount in a year? Sure, if a company can find enough warm bodies. Spend three times more on sales and marketing than the revenue that effort brings in? No reason not to as long as companies are valued on growth. But at some point this year, startups will almost certainly have to make different decisions than they’ve made up to now.

Projected change in availability of VC funding for startups

Year More available The same Less available
December 2015 for 2016 7% 36% 57%
December 2014 for 2015 36% 40% 24%

Source: 451 Research Tech Investment Banker Survey

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

Even after record year, tech bankers say pipeline isn’t a problem for 2016

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

After working through a year that saw tech M&A spending soar to its highest level in a decade and a half, tech investment bankers say their pipelines are still relatively full for 2016. More than seven out of 10 respondents (72%) indicated that the total value of as-yet unclosed transactions is higher now than it was this time last year, according to the annual 451 Research Tech Banking Outlook Survey. This year’s bullish forecast is five times higher than the 14% that said their pipelines are drier than they were a year ago.

Although bankers’ assessment of their pipeline for this year ticked a bit lower from our previous survey, it is still the third-strongest response we’ve tallied since the recent recession. It is even more noteworthy when we consider that half of the bankers (51%) said in a separate question that we are at or near the end of the current M&A cycle. That was 10 times higher than the 5% who said the cycle is either just beginning or close to the beginning.

On the more important question about valuations (as opposed to activity), bankers are unprecedentedly bearish for this year. Nearly two-thirds of respondents to our survey (64%) indicated that they see deal pricing coming down in 2016, compared with just 14% that anticipate valuations ticking higher. That’s almost a direct reversal of typical valuation outlook over the past half-decade given by M&A advisers.

451 Research subscribers can click here to view the rest of the results of our annual survey of senior tech investment bankers and their forecast on how busy they expect to be – including buyouts and IPOs – and what tech sectors will see the most activity in 2016.

Change in dollar value of tech mandates

Year Increase Stay the same Decrease
December 2015 for 2016 72% 14% 14%
December 2014 for 2015 77% 17% 6%
December 2013 for 2014 65% 19% 16%
December 2012 for 2013 58% 21% 21%
December 2011 for 2012 67% 21% 12%
December 2010 for 2011 83% 10% 7%
December 2009 for 2010 68% 12% 20%
December 2008 for 2009 26% 22% 52%

Source: 451 Research Tech Banking Outlook Survey

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

Tech’s corporate acquirers pull back on M&A plans

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

After a record run for tech M&A spending in 2015, an unprecedented number of the main buyers in the market expect to cut back on their shopping in the coming year, according to our annual survey of corporate development executives. Respondents gave their most bearish forecast for acquisition plans in the nine years of the 451 Research Tech Corporate Development Outlook Survey. Fewer than one-third (31%) of respondents said their firms would be increasing activity in the coming year, a full 20 percentage points lower than the average level over the previous eight surveys.

For the first time in survey history, virtually the same number of corporate development executives forecast that their firms would be scaling back their M&A programs (28%) as said they would be increasing acquisition activity (31%) in the coming year. In previous surveys, the percentage of respondents projecting an increase has vastly outweighed those anticipating a decrease, ranging from roughly two to 10 times as many as respondents.

If the bearish sentiment does come through in the activity, 2016 would snap three consecutive years of higher M&A spending, culminating in a record of nearly $600bn worth of announced tech, media and telecom (TMT) acquisitions in 2015, according to 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase.

451 Research subscribers can see our full report on the outlook from corporate development executives regarding M&A valuations, private equity activity and just how many – or rather, how few – startups will go public in 2016.

Projected change in M&A activity

Year Increase Stay the same Decrease
December 2015 for 2016 31% 41% 28%
December 2014 for 2015 58% 36% 6%
December 2013 for 2014 45% 42% 13%
December 2012 for 2013 38% 42% 20%
December 2011 for 2012 56% 30% 14%
December 2010 for 2011 52% 41% 7%
December 2009 for 2010 68% 27% 5%
December 2008 for 2009 44% 33% 23%

Source: 451 Research Tech Corporate Development Outlook Survey

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

One company’s trash is another company’s treasure

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Corporate divestitures aren’t necessarily the castoffs they used to be. Increasingly, divisions that have outlived their usefulness inside large companies are getting shipped directly to other companies, bypassing the once-obligatory stop in a private equity (PE) portfolio. This trend of ‘strategic to strategic’ divestitures has been driven by dramatic changes in tech companies and their strategies – on both sides of the transactions.

On the ‘supply’ side, there have never been more divestitures by listed US tech companies than in 2015, according to 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase. (See our full report on this year’s record level of activity.) Some tech companies – particularly those of a certain age – have sold off assets as part of a larger corporate reorganization. (For instance, Hewlett-Packard, which cleaved itself into two $50bn-revenue businesses in November, has shed five divisions this year – as many divestitures as it had done, collectively, over the previous half-decade, according to the KnowledgeBase.) In some cases, the push to divest has been sharpened by the ever-increasing agitation by activist hedge funds.

Meanwhile, on the ‘demand’ side, the fact that companies are dealing directly with other vendors on divestitures isn’t all that surprising when we consider how frequently they have been negotiating with each other on outright sales. (Consolidation, which corporate development executives told us in a survey last December would be the second-most-popular type of deal in 2015, is roughly akin to a scaled-out version of a divestiture.) Consolidation has reached an unprecedented level this year, with huge chunks of the IT landscape coming together.

Put that together, and publicly traded tech companies are increasingly finding themselves sitting across the negotiating table from other publicly traded companies. Carbonite, j2, CACI International, Raytheon, Trend Micro, Amdocs, Tangoe and others have all picked up businesses from fellow publicly traded companies in recent months, according to the KnowledgeBase.

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.