Category: technology stocks

IncrediMail reaches deep for deal

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Almost exactly a year after taking the top spot at IncrediMail, CEO Josef Mandelbaum has announced his first acquisition at the digital media company. And it’s a big one: IncrediMail, which had just $33m in cash in March, will spend $25m upfront and another possible $15m earnout to add startup Smilebox. IncrediMail will cover at least the first tranche of the payment from its own treasury when the deal closes later this year, but it may look to tap the credit market for the earnout.

The transaction represents a significant bet by the Israeli firm, which has a market cap of just $70m. According to IncrediMail’s forecast, Smilebox should add more than $15m to revenue next year to the vendor, which, organically, has only generated about $30m in sales in each of the past two years. (We should note, however, that those sales are highly profitable for IncrediMail. Its operating margin runs at roughly 40%.)

The fact that Mandelbaum is doing deals for IncrediMail shouldn’t come as much of a surprise. Before taking the top spot at the small public company, he ran the interactive division of American Greetings, where it built out the digital business of the card provider through a series of acquisitions. Among the deals Mandelbaum put together included the pickups of BlueMountain.com, PhotoWorks, Egreetings.com and Webshots. In fact, during his tenure at American Greetings, we understand that Mandelbaum may have even been interested in buying his current firm, IncrediMail.

In Network Solutions’ sale, General Atlantic gets a bit of both exits

Ben Kolada

Contact: Ben Kolada

Web.com is acquiring Web hosting and domain name registration vendor Network Solutions in a deal valued at $756m, including the assumption of debt. And we expect that Network Solutions’ owner couldn’t be more relieved. With flat revenue and customer attrition in recent years, Network Solutions’ private equity owner, General Atlantic (GA), wasn’t likely to find much interest for the portfolio company on Wall Street.

However, GA structured the transaction in such a way that – at least for now – it is enjoying a good day on the stock market. Terms of the deal call for just over a quarter of Network Solutions’ price to be covered by Web.com shares. (That will leave GA and other Network Solutions’ shareholders owning 37% of the combined company.) Web.com initially valued that chunk of equity at about $150m. On Thursday afternoon, the value of the 18 million Web.com shares heading to GA and other owners had soared closer to $200m. The reason? Wall Street liked the acquisition as well as Web.com’s second-quarter financial results. (We’ll have a full report on this transaction in tonight’s Daily 451 and 451 TechDealmaker sendouts.)

Saying ‘Goodnight’ to a stand-alone SAS?

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

After years of politely – but unequivocally – rebuffing all M&A approaches, is SAS Institute chief executive James Goodnight suddenly listening to pitches? Rumor has it that Goodnight, who has fashioned the business analytics vendor in the manner of a corporate patriarch of the 19th century, may finally be ready to sell. Any deal for SAS, of course, would have to go through Goodnight, as he owns two-thirds of the company outright.

If SAS is indeed in play – which, granted, is a big, multibillion-dollar assumption – it would represent a dramatic shift in not only the corporate history of the 35-year-old company, but also, more broadly, the landscape for business intelligence (BI) software. Goodnight has steered his firm on a path of independence through the years of consolidation in the BI industry. Most notably, he sat out the spree of deals in 2007 that saw his three largest publicly traded BI rivals get snapped up for a total of some $15bn.

All the while, Goodnight has been shaping a culture at SAS that is a bit of a throwback to the cradle-to-grave employee benefits that other tech vendors, which have to appease outside investors, could never offer. (Among the perks: a pianist who plays in the employee cafeteria, Olympic-sized swimming pools and even onsite Montessori childcare.) SAS employs more than 12,000 people.

SAS’s unique corporate traits have made it not only one of the most valuable privately held software companies, but also one of the most difficult to know what to do with it. (We have referred to SAS as the ‘white elephant’ of the software industry.) A decade ago, SAS worked with Goldman Sachs to explore a possible IPO, but that came to nothing. Goldman is thought to be running the current M&A process for SAS, too.

So that leaves a sale of SAS as Goodnight’s only exit. Companies rumored to be interested in SAS include Hewlett-Packard, IBM, Oracle, SAP and EMC, which is thought to be the lead horse at this point. But there’s still the not-insignificant matter of price. While still loose, the numbers we have heard for SAS, which recorded sales of $2.4bn in 2010, value the company at $12-13bn. Even a price only slightly above that range would make a purchase of SAS the largest-ever software deal, eclipsing Symantec’s $13.5bn stock swap for Veritas Software in late 2004.

Windstream misses the message

Ben Kolada

Contact: Ben Kolada

As the telecom industry continues its buying spree, some firms are missing the bigger picture – hosting and datacenter services are the new growth channels for telcos. While CenturyLink and Verizon have each announced acquisitions in the growing datacenter services industry, Windstream Communications appears to be satisfied with consolidating telecom assets. The telco’s purchase of complementary competitive carrier PAETEC is its seventh telco rollup since its formation in 2006. And while PAETEC does provide a wealth of network assets, it contributes little in the way of revenue growth. For the price it’s paying for PAETEC, Windstream could have gobbled up a number of hosting properties at a fraction of the cost.

To be fair, Windstream’s PAETEC pickup does provide more than 50,000 high-revenue enterprise accounts and an expanded fiber footprint. But the target’s organic revenue has been flat in recent years, and growth this year is likely to come primarily as a result of the Cavalier Telephone buy it completed in late 2010. (We would also note that Cavalier’s revenue was in precipitous decline, due primarily to churn in its consumer division. Cavalier’s revenue dropped from $421m for full-year 2009 to an estimated $390m in trailing revenue at the time of its sale.)

Beyond fiber and enterprise accounts, Windstream is also interested in PAETEC’s datacenter services assets. And rightfully so, considering Windstream’s hosting assets could certainly use a boost. The company’s last pure M&A foray into the hosting sector was in November 2010, when it shelled out $310m for Hosted Solutions. That target only generated $51m in trailing sales, or about 1% of Windstream’s total revenue. But for the $2.2bn the telco is paying for PAETEC (including the assumption of debt), it could have easily expanded its hosting footprint in the US and abroad by acquiring both InterNap Network Services and Interxion. Applying a flat 20% equity premium to the pair would put their combined deal value at about $1.6bn on an enterprise value basis, or about three-quarters of PAETEC’s price.

Uncertainty chills M&A in July

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

One month into the third quarter, and it looks like tech M&A activity is returning to a ‘normalized’ post-recession level. In August, we tallied global spending on tech and telco deals of just $12bn – putting Q3 on track for about $36bn of aggregate deal value. If the pace holds for the July-September period, the level would essentially match spending in Q3 2009, when the global economy was still mired in the Great Recession.

Overall, since the housing market speculation and related financial industry meltdown knocked the economy into a tailspin, tech M&A activity has ranged, loosely, from $30-50bn per quarter. As mentioned, Q3 2009 was at the low end of that while Q3 2010 was at the high end, with $46bn of announced deal value. (We noted a cold snap in the market in June, which knocked spending to just $10bn – less than half the level it had been in April and May.)

The relative weakness in M&A in the just-completed month of July came as larger economic concerns weighed on the overall market. A number of tech companies (including STEC, Juniper Networks, Riverbed Technology and Fortinet, among others) reported weaker-than-expected results last month, in some cases due to sluggish international sales. Meanwhile, closer to home, the US government teetered on the brink of default at the end of July, although a last-minute agreement to raise the debt ceiling may have headed that off. Nonetheless, the uncertainty around the outlook for the second half of 2011 appears to be blunting the appetite for acquisitions.

2011 activity, month by month

Period Deal volume Deal value
July 313 $12.2bn
June 297 $9.6bn
May 316 $26.5bn
April 287 $26.5bn
March 300 $63.7bn
February 285 $10.3bn
January 323 $11.7bn

Source: The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase

InterNap’s time as a takeover target could be running out

Ben Kolada

Contact: Ben Kolada

If its past is any prediction of its future, hosting services provider InterNap Network Services could soon lose its position as the industry’s next takeover target. The Atlanta-based firm, which is set to release its second-quarter results, has seen flat sales for the past three years. This is in stark contrast to the hosting industry at large, which has historically grown in the double digits. Meanwhile, other firms are emerging as more desirable targets, pushing InterNap to the back of the buyout line.

Our colleagues at Tier1 Research have written that InterNap was a favored takeover target. However, the firm appears to have since lost its luster. Investors are becoming increasingly frustrated with its poor performance, particularly after first-quarter total revenue declined 6% year over year. And shareholders once again fear the worst – in the past month, shares of InterNap have lost more than one-tenth of their value.

As InterNap is lying stagnant, other firms are posting enviable growth rates, making them much more attractive acquisition candidates. We understand that privately held SoftLayer is gearing toward the public markets, though it could certainly be scooped up before filing its paperwork. SoftLayer surpassed InterNap’s revenue last year, and is projecting bottom-line growth of about 20% this year, to just shy of $350m. InterXion has been cited as a potential target, as well. The company is also enjoying double-digit growth rates, and would provide a large platform for any telco looking to expand its European hosting footprint.

We would note, however, that both InterXion and SoftLayer are considerably pricier properties. While InterNap currently sports a market cap of about $330m, InterXion is valued at nearly $1bn. And we estimate that SoftLayer, on its own, cost GI Partners some $450m. However, when including the other legs of the SoftLayer platform – Everyones Internet and The Planet – the full price to the buyout shop could exceed $600m. But InterXion’s and SoftLayer’s price tags won’t necessarily stand in the way of their sales. We would never have guessed that CenturyLink would have been able to afford Savvis, especially so soon after closing its $22bn Qwest purchase.

ACI looks to crash S1’s wedding

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Just a month after announcing its largest-ever acquisition, S1 Corp has found itself unexpectedly (and perhaps unwelcomely) on the other end of a potential transaction. The payments software maker agreed in late June to acquire Fundtech in a stock swap valued at $326m. On Tuesday, ACI Worldwide sought to play the spoiler in that planned marriage, pitching an unsolicited offer to S1 that it says holds ‘significant upside’ compared to the proposed Fundtech deal.

ACI is offering $9.50 in cash and stock for each share of S1, for total consideration of $540m. The bear hug represents a premium of 33% over S1’s previous closing price and the highest price for the stock since late 2004. ACI says it has the financing lined up and could close the deal by the end of the year. Although S1 hasn’t responded to ACI’s proposal, its stock traded in line with the offer, changing hands on Tuesday afternoon at about $9.35.

In some ways, the current interest in S1 is about a half-decade overdue. We speculated in September 2006 that the company was likely on its way out. At that time, S1 was busy unwinding some misguided deals that it had inked years earlier as part of a larger ‘strategic review.’ (The divestitures came at a time when activist hedge fund Ramius Capital was the company’s largest shareholder.) Had it made its move then, ACI could have picked up the company on the cheap: S1 was trading at half the level of ACI’s current bid.

Dual track, but singular outcomes

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

For the third time in just two months, a tech company that had planned to go public has instead ended up inside a company that’s already public. The latest dual-track sale came Wednesday when Force10 Networks opted to accept a bid from Dell rather than see through its IPO plan. The networking gear vendor had filed its prospectus in March 2010.

The deal follows one month after would-be debutant Apache Design Solutions sold to ANSYS and two months after SiGe Semiconductor went to Skyworks Solutions. Those three transactions probably only generated about $1.2bn in liquidity, including Force10’s reported price of roughly $700m. (As a side note, we might point out that Deutsche Bank Securities was a book runner on all three proposed IPOs.)

As this trio of enterprise-focused startups finds itself snapped out of the IPO pipeline, consumer-oriented companies continue to receive a warm welcome on Wall Street. Consider this: Zillow, which went public earlier this week, now trades at about 20 times trailing revenue. In contrast, Force10, SiGe and Apache Design garnered much more modest valuations ranging roughly from 2-6x trailing revenue in their sales.

Riverbed buys Zeus, but shares go to Hades

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Announcing the largest deal in its history, Riverbed Technology said it will hand over $110m in cash for Zeus Technology in an effort to broaden its application performance portfolio. Zeus, which sells software for load balancing and traffic management, generated about $12m in revenue over the last year and is expected to contribute some $20m in sales for the coming year. That means Riverbed is paying nearly 10 times trailing sales for Zeus, and that’s not including a potential $30m earnout for the UK-based startup. (Fellow UK-based firm Arma Partners advised Zeus on the sale.)

In addition to being a rather richly valued purchase, the acquisition of Zeus also effectively doubles the amount that Riverbed has spent, collectively, on M&A in its history. The deal will likely bring Riverbed more deeply into competition with the main application delivery control vendors, including F5 and Citrix.

From our perspective, we might note that it’s a good thing Zeus is taking its payment in cash. Why? Riverbed stock lost nearly a quarter of its value on Wednesday. (The WAN traffic optimization provider reported a bit of softness in sales in Europe for the second quarter.) The decline erased all of Riverbed’s gains for 2011, but the stock is still twice the level it was at this time last year.

Unify buys a new identity

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

It’s fairly rare for an acquiring company to take on the name of the target it has purchased, and it’s even more uncommon for the buyer to then dive headlong into the business it just picked up. And yet, that’s exactly what’s happening at Unify Corp, an old-line vendor now known as Daegis. (See our full report on the transition.) The name trade comes almost exactly a year after Unify spent some $38m in cash and stock to acquire its new namesake, Daegis. That was more, collectively, than Unify had spent on all of its other deals.

Before it added Daegis, Unify had been known for its software application development and migration tools. The 30-year-old company realized that there probably wasn’t much value to be created by being a fairly staid performer in a fairly staid market, so it went shopping. In 2009, Unify bought a small archiving and records compliance provider, AXS-One. It followed that up a year later with the much more significant purchase of Daegis, which got the company squarely in the e-discovery market. That business is now providing virtually all of the growth for Unify/Daegis.

While the new focus on the e-discovery space is a reasonable – and potentially profitable – move for Unify/Daegis, the transition does bring a fair amount of risk. The vendor already had to bump back the release of the product that was supposed to combine Unify’s archiving technology with Daegis’ e-discovery capabilities. Further, it recently scrapped any financial guidance as it sorts through its changes in business model. So far, Wall Street hasn’t really voted on the renamed and refocused company. Shares in Daegis, which also have the new symbol DAEG, are largely unchanged over the past month.