Category: technology stocks

Demandware to test demand in public market?

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

After a pair of billion-dollar deals over the past half-year removed two old-line e-commerce vendors from the Nasdaq, an on-demand startup is rumored to be looking to replenish the ranks on the public market. Several sources have indicated that Demandware has picked underwriters and is set to file its IPO paperwork shortly, with Goldman Sachs & Co and Deutsche Bank Securities running the books. The filing, if it comes, would continue a trend of offerings by relatively small subscription-based companies. Demandware is expected to do about $40m in revenue in 2011.

Founded in 2004 and based near Boston, the company provides an e-commerce platform for more than 150 customers, including Barneys New York and The Jones Group. Demandware’s investors include local VC firms General Catalyst Partners and North Bridge Venture Partners.

The IPO for Demandware would come at a time of consolidation in the e-commerce industry, with big buyers paying big prices. Late last year, Oracle acquired Art Technology Group for $1bn, paying the highest price that ATG shares had seen since 2001. (ATG, which was founded in 1991, counted more than 1,000 customers.) And then earlier this year, eBay handed over $2.4bn for GSI Commerce. That stands as the largest Internet transaction since February 2008.

Updata secures a bargain from CA

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

When CA Technologies ‘partnered’ with Indian outsourcing firm HCL Technologies to try to offload its security business in November 2007, we termed the move a ‘kind-of, sort-of’ divestiture that was unlikely to fit well with either party. Three and a half years later, the full divestiture is finally done: CA sold it to Updata Partners last week. Although terms weren’t disclosed, we understand that Updata is paying only about $10m for the business, a price that reflects just how much the division had suffered under the joint venture. The roughly $50m in sales at the unit is less than half the level it was at the time of the CA-HCL accord.

The fact that CA got any money for its security assets surprised some. We hear from several participants that at least one bidder put forward a ‘cashless’ offer, offering to take the unit off of CA’s hands for only the assumption of liabilities. (We gather that there was some interest in the business from a few of the larger, privately held security vendors, while from the financial world, both Platinum Equity and Symphony Technology Group were rumored to be bidders.) However, the deal was a very complicated one, not the least of which because there were some questions about the revenue sharing with HCL.

The split ownership, exacerbated by uneven commitments from the two sides, meant that the security business itself was rather starved, particularly for sales and marketing support. (It didn’t help that the division focused on consumers and small businesses, while its corporate parent, CA, targets enterprises. CA will continue to sell enterprise security offerings, which is primarily its identity and access management software.) Out from under the untenable ownership structure, the security unit will likely enjoy renewed focus and resources from its soon-to-be owners at Updata as the buyout firm tries, first, to stabilize the business and then ultimately get it growing again. The deal should close next month.

Autonomy picks up piece of rock from Iron Mountain

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly, Nick Patience

Announcing its first acquisition in almost a year, Autonomy Corp has picked up Iron Mountain’s digital assets in a surprisingly rich purchase of a castoff business. Autonomy will pay $380m in cash for the units, which include backup and recovery, e-discovery and digital-archiving software. The transaction effectively unwinds Iron Mountain’s acquisitions of Mimosa Systems and Stratify, deals the records giant had done as a hedge against the digitization of information. As my colleague Nick Patience writes in his report on the move in tonight’s Daily 451, the divestiture puts Iron Mountain almost entirely back in the business of storing cardboard boxes.

For Autonomy, we suspect that the main reason for the purchase is the division’s customer base of 6,000 as well as the six petabytes of data those customers have stored. (Autonomy already has e-discovery and archiving technology, so would be less interested in those Iron Mountain products.) Viewed in that light, the purchase price of $380m, or more than 2.5 times projected revenue in 2011, seems a bit steep. That’s particularly true when we consider that Iron Mountain was under the gun from big shareholders to dump the digital division. On the news, Iron Mountain shares inched a bit higher Monday afternoon, and have now added one-third in value since the beginning of the year.

Tripwire pulls the plug on its IPO

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Almost exactly a year after Tripwire formally filed its IPO paperwork, the security vendor has opted for the other exit, a trade sale. Thoma Bravo, a buyout shop with a number of other security and management companies in its portfolio, expects to close the acquisition of Portland, Oregon-based Tripwire this month. Terms weren’t disclosed but we understand that Thoma Bravo is paying about $225m. The decision by Tripwire to sell isn’t a surprise, any more than the fact that a buyout shop is its new owner.

If it had gone ahead with its IPO, we suspect that Tripwire would have had a rough go of it as a public company. Wall Street looks for growth, and while Tripwire has put up steady growth, it hasn’t been explosive growth or particularly valuable growth, at least in the eyes of portfolio managers. In 2010, Tripwire bumped up its overall top line 16% to $86m, primarily driven by increases in maintenance revenue and, to a lesser degree, consulting work. Collectively, those lines of business, which now represent more than half of Tripwire’s total revenue, rose 25% in 2010 – three times the rather anemic growth rate of 8% in license sales. (License sales actually flatlined in both the third and fourth quarters of 2010.)

The lagging license sales certainly wouldn’t have helped the company attract interest from strategic buyers. We noted earlier that nearly four years ago Tripwire came very close to selling to BMC. Since it filed its prospectus, we’ve heard that both Quest Software and CA Technologies looked at Tripwire. Still, in our view, Tripwire has a financial profile that should fit well inside a PE portfolio: some 6,000 customers; seven consecutive years of revenue and operating income growth; a rock-steady – and growing – maintenance stream of about $40m; and roughly $10m in cash flow per year.

Taking chips off the table

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

A half-decade after financial buyers did their best to sweep up the semiconductor industry, it’s now the fellow corporate acquirers’ turn to continue the dealmaking. On Wednesday, Applied Materials Inc announced that it would hand over $4.9bn for Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates. The deal between the chip equipment makers comes on the heels of two other multibillion-dollar transactions in the semiconductor sector earlier this year: Texas Instruments’ reach for analog chip maker National Semiconductor and Qualcomm’s bid to expand beyond cellular chips with its purchase of Atheros Communications.

All three of this year’s significant chip acquisitions rank among the 10 largest deals in the industry. However, all of the corporate transactions are still looking up at the buyouts done by private equity (PE) shops back when credit was cheap and easy. In fact, the total spending on the trio of landmark deals so far this year ($15bn) is less than the $17.6bn take-private of Freescale Semiconductor by a PE consortium in 2006.

Of course, bigger isn’t necessarily better. And we suspect that corporate buyers would hope to be at least a little more successful with their acquisitions than the buyout club has been with Freescale. Although Freescale is currently on file to once again be a public company, the buyout has been a tough one for its owners. Much of that difficulty stemmed from the fact that the PE shops put nearly $10bn of debt on the company. (It paid more than a half-billion dollars last year to service the debt.) Meanwhile, under its new ownership, Freescale is actually smaller than it was before the buyout.

‘Acquisition in Motion’?

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Instead of Research In Motion, maybe we should start calling the company ‘Acquisition In Motion.’ With Monday’s announcement of its purchase of ubitexx, the BlackBerry maker has now rung up nine acquisitions in just the past 13 months. That’s as many as the company had done, collectively, in the previous seven years. As we think about RIM’s accelerated M&A pace, we can’t help but wonder how much of that activity is essentially papering over weaknesses that were exposed by its two big smartphone rivals.

For instance, RIM needed some help on its core OS, so it went out about a year ago and spent $200m on QNX Software Systems. Then it realized that office productivity apps could stand to be displayed a bit more clearly on BlackBerry devices, so it reached for DataViz. And then there was the somewhat clunky user interface, which RIM hoped to polish with its purchase of The Astonishing Tribe in December for an estimated $125m. Those deals – along with the other half-dozen recent acquisitions – were seen as signs that RIM was getting the message that its phones just weren’t as appealing as the Apple iPhone or Google Android-powered devices.

The pickup of tiny German startup ubitexx pretty much makes that sentiment official. (That’s particularly true when we consider that the transaction came just two days after RIM reported that it will sell fewer phones than it predicted this quarter, and that the phones that do sell will be going cheaper than the company originally planned. The warning knocked RIM into a tailspin, and the stock has now shed one-third of its value over the past year.) Ubitexx allows RIM to bring mobile device management for Android and iOS smartphones and tablets to its BlackBerry Enterprise Server – a somewhat belated recognition that it isn’t just BlackBerry devices that are coming to the office these days

M&A flowers in April

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

The strong M&A spending continued in April, pushing the value of tech deals announced so far in 2011 to the highest level in four years. Through the first four months of the year, dealmakers have announced transactions valued at $111bn – more than the total, collectively, for the same period in the previous two years.

April came in at $26bn, the second-highest month for spending since the Credit Crisis and roughly twice the average monthly spending over the past nine months or so. The high spending in just-completed April comes after March’s $63bn of deal value, a monthly total that harkened back to the go-go days of tech M&A.

The main reason that 2011 is on track for a post-recession record level of spending is the return of the big deal. Obviously, the year-to-date totals are inflated by AT&T’s $39bn proposed cash-and-stock purchase of T-Mobile USA in March. But in addition to that transaction, which is the largest telco acquisition is a half-decade, there have been 21 other deals valued at more than $1bn so far this year. That handily tops the 10 10-digit deals in 2010, four in 2009 and 12 in 2008.

Why the confidence among the significant shoppers? We suspect that it has something to do with the fact that the Nasdaq, which is up 8% so far this year, has reclaimed the level it held in late 2007 before the Credit Crisis lopped it in half.

SuccessFactors pays a peak price for Plateau

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Plateau Systems certainly got a peak price from SuccessFactors. At $290m, the cash-and-stock acquisition is the largest purchase of a privately held human capital management (HCM) vendor. In fact, the pending purchase of Plateau is larger than a half-dozen acquisitions of public HCM companies we have recorded in recent years.

Similarly, the deal – which is roughly three times more than SuccessFactors had spent, collectively, on M&A – also stands out when compared to the two most-significant transactions in the learning management software (LMS) market where Plateau does its business.

Earlier this year, private equity-backed SumTotal Systems paid an estimated $150m for GeoLearning while a half-year ago, SuccessFactors’ direct rival Taleo handed over $125m for Learn.com. Just as those two deals have a lower aggregate price than Plateau’s price, publicly traded LMS vendor Saba Software actually garners a lower valuation on the market ($270m) than Plateau is set to receive in its sale.

Echoes of Oracle in Infor’s reach for Lawson

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Now that Lawson Software has agreed to a sale to Infor Global Solutions, it’s perhaps worth speculating about just how much Charles Philips learned about the art of M&A during his previous job. Philips, of course, currently serves as CEO of Infor after seven years at Oracle, which has a reputation as a (how to say it?) ‘disciplined buyer.’ The connotations of that description probably depend on which side of the table you sit on. At Oracle, the term is a compliment meaning ‘fiscally responsible’ while the view from the buyside might hold that they are ‘cheap.’

In any case, Philips’ proposed ‘take-under’ of Lawson, which got formalized on Tuesday, carries many of the hallmarks that some folks associate with deals done by his former shop: quick process, relatively low valuation and a confident ‘one-and-done’ offer. Recall that it was just six weeks ago that Infor, which is backed by Golden Gate Capital, lobbed an unsolicited offer of $11.25 per share for Lawson. And even though shares of the old-line ERP vendor traded $1 above the bid in recent weeks, Infor stuck to its original offer.

Provided the deal gets done, the acquisition marks a new era at Infor, with a new chief executive setting its course. Before Philips joined Infor last October, the consolidator had dramatically slowed its dealmaking, announcing just three deals over the previous four years. (And the recent purchases were much smaller ones at that.) Lawson stands as Infor’s largest-ever acquisition, one that will boost the company’s revenue by roughly one-third to some $3bn. Just the sort of move Oracle might have made when Philips was there.

Another marketing maker heading to market?

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Will Eloqua respond to Responsys? Does the rival on-demand marketing vendor perhaps have an IPO of its own planned? We couldn’t help but wonder that last Thursday as investors showed that they could hardly get enough of the Responsys offering, which priced above range and then tacked on another 28% in its first day of trading. The IPO created some $680m in market value for Responsys.

Responsys’ rather heady valuation (roughly 7x trailing sales and 5x projected sales) undoubtedly has to have generated more than a little interest from folks at Eloqua. And the company certainly has been taking steps in recent years that could indicate that it is eyeing the public market. For instance, three years ago it moved its headquarters from Canada to the Washington DC area while also hiring a raft of senior executives, most of whom have experience at public companies.

According to our understanding, Eloqua is a bit less than one-third the size of Responsys, which generated $94m in sales last year. Also, we gather that Eloqua lags a bit behind the 40% compound annual growth rate that Responsys has put up over the past half-decade. Still, the company offers a fairly compelling profile, with predictable subscription revenue flowing from its more than 800 customers. The strong debut from Responsys, plus the fact that shares of fellow on-demand marketer Constant Contact are trading around all-time highs, clearly suggest that Wall Street is in the market for marketing vendors.