Category: technology stocks

Tech deal flow dries up in November

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Despite the lowest monthly total for tech acquisitions in three years, M&A spending in November just about kept pace with the historically high levels of 2016. Overall, acquirers spent about $38bn on tech deals around the world in the just-completed month, slightly below the average of $42bn during the previous 10 months. November spending pushed the value of transactions announced so far in 2016 to more than $450bn, the second-highest annual total since the internet bubble burst in 2000, according to 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase.

Transactions that helped push the November spending level higher included:

  • Samsung placed an ambitious $8bn bet on the emerging connected car market, acquiring HARMAN. In the past decade and a half, the Korean giant hadn’t spent more than $350m on a single tech purchase.
  • Announcing its third multibillion-dollar deal in as many years, Broadcom paid $5.5bn for Brocade. As part of the deal, Broadcom is expected to divest a major portion of Brocade’s business, which could help it recoup several billion dollars.
  • Symantec followed up a $4.7bn acquisition last spring to bolster its enterprise security business with the $2.3bn purchase of LifeLock in an attempt to revive its flagging consumer security division.

But the real story of tech M&A last month is the dramatic decline in overall deal volume, where November – like the result of last month’s US presidential election – saw a dramatic split. Basically, the first half of the month roughly matched the rate of acquisition announcements from 2016, but then activity plummeted: Dealmakers announced 156 transactions from November 1-15, but just 94 acquisitions (or 38% of the monthly total) from November 16-30, according to the M&A KnowledgeBase. Of the 20 largest deals last month, fully three-quarters of them (15 transactions) came in the first two weeks.

Undeniably, deal flow was somewhat slowed by the US Thanksgiving holiday in the next-to-last week of November. But even with that holiday, there were almost an equal number of business days in the first and second halves of the month. And, keep in mind, the first half of last month also featured its own interruption to business in the form of a national election. Ahead of the presidential election, nearly one-third of respondents (31%) to the M&A Leaders Survey from 451 Research and Morrison & Foerster indicated that the US presidential election had slowed their dealmaking activity. That impact appears to already be registering in actual deal flow as transaction volume in November dropped by 25% compared with the average number of monthly prints in 2016.

2016 tech M&A activity, monthly

Period Deal volume Deal value
November 2016 250 $37.7bn
October 2016 319 $82bn
September 2016 297 $29.9bn
August 2016 300 $30.9bn
July 2016 329 $93.7bn
June 2016 375 $66.7bn
May 2016 324 $23bn
April 2016 344 $19.6bn
March 2016 337 $23.9bn
February 2016 322 $28.3bn
January 2016 380 $20.9bn

Source: 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase

Big Yellow and big buyouts push infosec M&A spending to record

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

What happens at the top end of a market usually goes some distance toward setting the overall tone in that particular market. At least that’s one way to view M&A in the information security sector, which has surged to a record level of spending led by transactions involving the two largest vendors. Up until recently, both Symantec and McAfee had been largely out of the market as the companies worked through earlier strategy bets that didn’t pay off.

So far this year, infosec shoppers have spent $14.3bn on deals, according to 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase. That tops the previous record of $13.5bn in 2010. However, a look inside the deal flow indicates that the previous record was much more concentrated: the single-largest transaction in 2010 (Intel’s $7.7bn purchase of McAfee) accounted for more than half of that year’s overall deal value, while the single-largest transaction in 2016 (Symantec’s $4.7bn pickup of Blue Coat Systems) accounts for just one-third of this year’s spending.

Intel’s partial unwind of its experiment with McAfee is contributing to this year’s record. But more dramatically, it’s the reversal at Symantec that has boosted overall spending in the infosec space. After shying away from significant acquisitions in recent years, Big Yellow has now inked its two largest security deals in just the past the past five months. For perspective, the combined $7bn Symantec has shelled out since last summer for Blue Coat and LifeLock is more than it has spent, collectively, on its 25 other infosec purchases since 2002, according to the M&A KnowledgeBase.

In addition to large corporate buyers, big financial acquirers have also been contributing to this year’s record spending. Both TPG Capital’s carve-out of McAfee and PE-backed AVAST’s consolidation of AVG were valued in the billions of dollars. For comparison, the previous record year of 2010 didn’t feature any billion-dollar PE transactions.

infosec-updated-ma-totals

Where is the tech M&A market heading?

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

With an astonishing $450bn of deal value announced so far this year, 2016 has already hit the second-highest annual spending level for tech M&A since the internet bubble burst in 2000. And while this year probably won’t eclipse last year’s record, we would note that 2016 activity is coming against a backdrop of political and economic change that’s almost unprecedented in developed countries. Acquirers are continuing to buy, despite the uncertainty introduced by events such as Brexit or even the recent election cycle in the US.

But will the current M&A boom continue? Is 2017 going to see just a continuation of the strong deal flow? Or will the uncertainty give buyers pause as they head into next year?

To get a sense of where the tech M&A market is heading, join 451 Research and Morrison & Foerster next Tuesday at 1pm EST for a webinar on what senior M&A executives and advisers are forecasting for the market in 2017 and beyond. (To register, click here.) Topics we’ll cover in the complimentary hour-long webinar include:

  • Recent activity and trends in the tech M&A market.
  • What bankers, corporate execs and others expect to see in tech M&A next year – and beyond.
  • What impact the divisive US presidential election will have on dealmaking.
  • How significant are the expected regulatory changes in the wake of the just-completed election cycle?
  • On the all-important question of valuation, what do tech buyers forecast they will have to pay for startups in the coming months?

We hope you can join 451 Research and Morrison & Foerster next Tuesday as we make sense of what’s driving tech M&A activity right now and how that will play out next year and beyond. To register, click here.

mofo-ma-forecast-oct-2016

It’s win or go home for Oracle and its bid for NetSuite

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Just like this year’s World Series, there’s a dramatic win-or-go-home contest playing out in the tech M&A market. The showdown pits the ever-acquisitive Oracle against one of Wall Street’s biggest investors. The stakes? The fate of the largest SaaS acquisition ever proposed.

At midnight tonight, Oracle’s massive $9.5bn bid for NetSuite will effectively expire. In the original offer three months ago, Oracle said it will pay $109 for each of the nearly 87 million (fully diluted) shares of NetSuite, valuing the subscription-based ERP vendor at $9.5bn. That wasn’t enough for NetSuite’s second-largest shareholder, T. Rowe Price. Instead, the institutional investor suggested that Oracle pay $133 for each NetSuite share, adding $2bn to the (hypothetical) price tag.

Oracle has declined to top its own bid. Nor will it adjust the other major variable in negotiations: time. (Oracle has already extended the deal’s deadline once, and says it won’t do it again.) In an unusually public display of brinkmanship in M&A, Oracle has said it will walk away from its $9.5bn bid if enough shareholders don’t sign off on its ‘best and final offer.’ As things stand, shareholder support is far below the required level, largely because of T. Rowe’s opposition.

Does T. Rowe have a case that Oracle is shortchanging NetSuite shareholders with a discount bid? Or is the investment firm greedily hoping to fatten its return on NetSuite by baiting Oracle to spend more money? If we look at the proposed valuation for NetSuite, it’s hardly a low-ball offer. On the basis of enterprise value, Oracle’s current bid values NetSuite at 11.1x trailing sales. That’s solidly ahead of the average M&A multiple of 10.3x trailing sales for other large-scale horizontal SaaS providers, according to 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase. (For the record, T. Rowe’s proposed valuation of $11.6bn for NetSuite roughly equates to 13.7x trailing sales – a full turn higher than any other major SaaS transaction.)

With the two sides appearing unwilling to budge, NetSuite will likely return to its status as a stand-alone software firm. If that is indeed the case, NetSuite will probably have to get used to that status. The roughly 40% stake of NetSuite held by Oracle chairman Larry Ellison serves as a powerful deterrent to any other would-be bidder, which was one of the points T. Rowe raised in its rejection of the deal. Assuming 18-year-old NetSuite stands once again on its own, the first order of business will be to pick up growth again. (Although there’s still the small matter of a $300m termination fee in the transaction.) In its Q3, NetSuite reported that revenue increased just 26%, down from 30% in the first half of the year and 33% for the full-year 2015.

Select multibillion-dollar SaaS deals

Date announced Acquirer Target Deal value Price/trailing sales multiple
July 28, 2016 Oracle NetSuite $9.3bn 11.1x
September 18, 2014 SAP Concur $8.3bn 12.4x
May 22, 2012 SAP Ariba $4.5bn 8.6x
December 3, 2011 SAP SuccessFactors $3.6bn 11.7x
June 1, 2016 Salesforce Demandware $2.8bn 11x
June 4, 2013 Salesforce ExactTarget $2.5bn 7.6x

Source: 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase

Life in the public eye

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Just as we’ve hit the home stretch for the current US election cycle, we’ve also entered crunch time for the otherwise sluggish tech IPO market. Any company that still plans to debut in 2017 will need to sprint to beat the holidays, which tend to stall offerings ahead of the turn of the calendar. Whether any startups actually make it to Wall Street depends at least in part on the events in Washington DC. (We have already noted that a recent survey from 451 Research’s ChangeWave service showed the Clinton vs. Trump circus has slowed consumers’ discretionary spending plans.)

In that way, political elections and tech offerings are somewhat intertwined. Further, there are some distinct similarities between the two events. Both involve candidates going out and seeing how popular they are with the public. Both also involve time-consuming and expensive journeys that wind toward a goal of serving the public at some level. And finally, both can bring long, rewarding stays in the public eye – alternatively, they can result in embarrassingly revealing and disconcertingly short stays. It all depends on how they serve their constituencies, whether voters or investors.

Not wishing to drag out the metaphor any longer – and certainly not wishing to spend any more attention on this dismal and depressing election cycle – we’ll shift our focus solely to the tech IPO market. We’ve already seen a half-dozen enterprise tech vendors make it public this year, and while one or two startups may add to that total, most are likely to look to join the ‘Class of 2017.’ Heading into next year, the outlook for tech IPOs appears strong. Slightly more than half of the respondents to the most recent M&A Leaders’ Survey from 451 Research and Morrison & Foerster predicted an increase in the number of tech offerings from now through next spring. That was the survey’s most bullish forecast for IPOs in two years.

mofo-ipo-outlook-oct-2016

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

For tech M&A, it’s an ‘October surprise’

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Once again, there was a gigantic ‘October surprise’ in the tech M&A market. In the just-finished month, Qualcomm put together a blockbuster $39.2bn play for NXP Semiconductors, accounting for nearly half of all spending on last month’s tech deals. A year ago, Dell’s mammoth $63.1bn purchase of EMC dominated October 2015 spending. Together, those October prints are the two largest non-telecom tech acquisitions of the past decade and a half, according to 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase.

On its own, the Qualcomm-NXP pairing slightly exceeded an entire month’s worth of tech spending in 2016. When added to the other 304 transactions announced in October, the total for spending on tech deals across the globe hit $82bn. Also boosting last month’s total was CenturyLink’s $24bn reach for Level 3 Communications. (Including the assumption of debt, the enterprise value of that transaction swells to $34bn.) Altogether, October spending ranks as the second-highest monthly total of 2016, according to the M&A KnowledgeBase.

Outside of those two big prints, which accounted for slightly more than three-quarters of all announced deal value last month, dealmaking was a bit slower than usual at the top end of the market. In our M&A KnowledgeBase, we tallied just six transactions valued at more than $1bn last month, down from a monthly average of eight ‘three-comma deals’ through the first three quarters of the year. Overall deal flow was also a little slower than usual, with the number of announced transactions in October down almost 15% compared with the monthly average in the first half of 2016 and down almost 20% compared with the same month of the two previous years.

With two months of 2016 still remaining, this year has already topped full-year spending for every year except the post-internet bubble record level of 2015. While this year likely won’t challenge last year in terms of deal volume or the value of those transactions, it is outpacing 2015 in another key M&A consideration: valuations. Looking at the largest multiples paid in deals valued at $10bn or more over the past two years, four of the five transactions have printed in 2016, according to the M&A KnowledgeBase.

2016 tech M&A activity, monthly

Period Deal volume Deal value
October 2016 305 $81.8bn
September 2016 290 $29.8bn
August 2016 299 $30.9bn
July 2016 329 $93.7bn
June 2016 375 $66.7bn
May 2016 324 $23bn
April 2016 344 $19.6bn
March 2016 337 $23.9bn
February 2016 322 $28.3bn
January 2016 380 $20.9bn

Source: 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

Big tech deals come at big prices

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

This year is proving to be a very rich vintage for tech M&A. At the top end of the market, acquirers are paying higher multiples than they’ve paid in any year since the end of the recession. Consider the rather mature semiconductor industry, where, historically, acquisition activity has been characterized by low-multiple consolidation. That hasn’t been the case so far in 2016, where chip deals have accounted for three of the four largest transactions. Rather than dragging down the broad-market valuation, they are actually boosting it substantially.

The chip industry’s platinum valuation was once again on display in Qualcomm’s $39.2bn purchase of NXP, the latest – and largest – blockbuster transaction in the semiconductor industry. In addition to Qualcomm-NXP, there have been two other semiconductor deals valued at more than $10bn. The average multiple in those big-ticket transactions stands at an astounding 11.9x trailing sales. That’s more than twice the average multiple of 5.4x trailing sales for the three chip deals valued at more than $10bn last year, according to 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase.

And while chip companies have been spending freely, other big buyers are also paying up. Microsoft’s $26.2bn play for LinkedIn values the online professional network at more than 8x trailing sales. Oracle, which itself trades at a little more than 4x trailing sales, has offered to buy NetSuite in a transaction that values the SaaS vendor at more than 10x trailing sales. (Although it’s not certain that the deal will actually go through due to disgruntled shareholders.)

More than any other recent year, the driver for those large-scale transactions in 2016 has been growth, whether it’s innovating existing products through M&A (Microsoft-LinkedIn), obtaining a presence in the nascent but expanding market of mobility and the Internet of Things (semiconductor deals), or acquiring a faster-growing delivery model for software (Oracle-NetSuite). Overall, the 50-largest tech acquisitions so far this year have gone off at 4.7x trailing sales, according to the M&A KnowledgeBase. That’s the highest level since the recent recession and a full turn higher than the 3.6x trailing sales recorded in 2015.

2012-to-2016-kb-avg-valuation-multiple

A summer surge puts Q3 tech M&A back on record pace

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

For at least one quarter, it was as if we never turned the calendar on the record-breaking pace of tech M&A we saw in 2016. Dealmakers around the globe spent $153bn on 910 tech, media and telecom (TMT) transactions announced from July to September. That ranks the just-completed Q3 as the third-highest quarterly total since the end of the recession, according to 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase. In fact, the rather unexpectedly strong M&A spending in Q3 exactly matched the average quarterly tally from 2015, when deal value hit its highest annual level since the internet bubble burst.

This summer’s surge brings the total spent by TMT acquirers around the globe so far in 2016 to $336bn, putting 2016 already ahead of the full-year totals for six of the past eight years. Looking ahead, if we assume the pace of spending from January-September continues in Q4, full-year 2016 deal value would hit some $440bn – the second-highest annual total since 2002, according to the M&A KnowledgeBase.

Spending in the summer quarter was dominated by a parade of blockbuster transactions. Overall, last quarter saw four of the five largest deals of the year announced. Significant Q3 transactions include:

  • Continuing its big-ticket expansion into technology growth markets, SoftBank paid $32.4bn for ARM Holdings. The deal stands as the second-largest semiconductor transaction in history, trailing only Avago’s $37bn purchase of Broadcom last year.
  • Intel ended its experiment of baking security directly into its silicon by divesting a majority stake of its McAfee division. The move values McAfee at just $4.2bn, meaning the business has lost about 40% of its value under Intel’s six-year ownership. For comparison, during that same period, Symantec’s market value has almost doubled.
  • Hewlett Packard Enterprise unwound a series of earlier software acquisitions that were supposed to drive its next leg of growth, taking a pretty big discount in the process. The portfolio, which was accumulated over a decade by its predecessor company, cost HPE more than $20bn to acquire, but was spun off to Micro Focus in a transaction valued at $8.8bn.
  • Oracle paid $9.3bn, or 11x trailing sales, for NetSuite, making the largest purchase of a subscription software vendor ever. NetSuite’s valuation was roughly twice the level that Oracle has paid for the license-based software providers it has bought over the years.
  • In the biggest sale of a VC-backed company in two and a half years, Walmart paid $3.3bn for e-commerce startup Jet.com.

Our full report on the blockbuster Q3 tech M&A activity will be available to 451 Research subscribers later today.

Recent quarterly deal flow

Period Deal volume Deal value
Q3 2016 910 $153bn
Q2 2016 1,043 $110bn
Q1 2016 1,039 $73bn
Q4 2015 1,063 $185bn
Q3 2015 1,162 $85bn
Q2 2015 1,074 $208bn
Q1 2015 1,040 $121bn
Q4 2014 1,028 $65bn
Q3 2014 1,049 $102bn
Q2 2014 1,005 $141bn
Q1 2014 854 $82bn

Source: 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase

A public/private split in Apptio’s IPO

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Apptio soared onto Wall Street in its debut, pricing its offering above the expected range and then jumping almost 50% in early Nasdaq trading. The IT spend management vendor raised $96m in its IPO, and nosed up toward the elevated status of a unicorn. However, in a clear sign of the frothiness of the late-stage funding market a few years ago, Apptio shares are currently trading only slightly above the price the institutional backers paid in the company’s last private-market round in May 2013.

That’s not to take anything away from Apptio, which created some $850m of market value in its offering. (Our math: Apptio has roughly 37 million shares outstanding, on an undiluted basis, and they were changing hands at about $23 each in midday trading under the ticker APTI.) That works out to a solid 5.4 times 2016 revenue, which we project at about $157m. (Last year and so far in the first half of 2016, Apptio has increased sales in the low-20% range. That growth rate, while still respectable, is about half the rate it had been growing. We suspect that deceleration, combined with uninterrupted red ink at the company, help explain why Wall Street didn’t receive Apptio more bullishly.)

In midday trading, Apptio’s share price was only slightly above the $22.69 per share that it sold shares to so-called ‘crossover investors’ Janus Capital Group and T. Rowe Price, among other investors, in its series E financing, according to the vendor’s prospectus. A relatively recent phenomenon, crossover investing has seen a number of deep-pocketed mutual funds shift some of their investment dollars to private companies in an effort to build an early position in a business they hope will come public and trade up from there.

However, given the glacial pace of tech IPOs in recent years as well as the overall deflation of the hype around unicorns, that strategy hasn’t proved particularly lucrative. In fact, many of the price adjustments that mutual funds have made on the private company holding have been markdowns.

But the institutional investors would counter that the short-term valuation of their portfolio matters less than the ultimate return. For the most part, we’ve seen conservative pricing of tech IPOs in 2016. (Twilio, for instance, has more than doubled since its IPO three months ago.) Apptio probably doesn’t have the growth rate to be as explosive in the aftermarket as Twilio, but it can still build value. That’s what investors – regardless of when they bought in – are banking on.

Recent enterprise tech IPOs*

Company Date of offering
Pure Storage October 7, 2015
Mimecast November 20, 2015
Atlassian December 10, 2015
SecureWorks April 22, 2016
Twilio June 23, 2016
Talend July 29, 2016
Apptio September 23, 2016

*Includes Nasdaq and NYSE listings only

A tarnished Golden Tombstone

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

In each of the past nine years, 451 Research has surveyed more than 100 corporate development executives to find out which deal announced during that year stood out to them as the most significant transaction. The peer-selected prize, which we call the Golden Tombstone, has gone to companies across the tech landscape. Still, many of those blockbuster transactions haven’t generated the expected returns. The Golden Tombstone, it turns out, can tarnish over time.

We saw that yet again this week, as Intel unwound its full ownership of McAfee, which was voted the most significant transaction of 2010. With that divestiture, the number of Golden Tombstone-winning transactions that have been undone climbed to three, representing an alarming one-third of the annual prize winners. (The others: Hewlett-Packard Enterprises sold off its services business in May, reversing its 2008 acquisition of EDS; and Google unwound its 2011 purchase of Motorola Mobility three years later.) For the record, the ‘exit’ prices for all of those businesses was far less than the ‘entrance’ prices.

Not to jinx the transaction or anything, but we would nonetheless note that last year’s landslide winner was Dell’s acquisition of EMC. That transaction, which was announced last October and officially closed earlier this week, was an obvious vote for the Golden Tombstone. After all, it is the largest pure tech transaction in history. And yet, even though Dell and EMC are only (officially) beginning their corporate life together, there’s already some ominous history lining up against the deal.

Top vote-getter for ‘most significant tech transaction’

Year Deal
2015 Dell’s acquisition of EMC
2014 Facebook’s acquisition of WhatsApp
2013 IBM’s acquisition of SoftLayer
2012 VMware’s acquisition of Nicira
2011 Google’s acquisition of Motorola Mobility
2010 Intel’s acquisition of McAfee
2009 Oracle’s acquisition of Sun Microsystems
2008 Hewlett-Packard’s acquisition of EDS
2007 Citrix’s acquisition of XenSource

Source: 451 Research Tech Corporate Development Outlook Survey

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.