Tag: IPO

Market imbalance

Brenon Daly

The markets are shrinking. And we’re not just referring to the trillions of dollars of value that have been lost from the New York Stock Exchange and the Nasdaq over the past year. Instead, we’re talking about the actual number of companies on the markets.

Listings rise and fall over the years, as companies go public or get acquired. At least, they do in normal years. But in a year like 2008, with black swans flying across the sky, the number of listings just falls (rather like the prices of the stocks that remain on the exchanges). Already this year, we’ve seen some 62 US publicly traded companies get acquired. On the other side of the ledger, we’ve had fewer than 10 technology IPOs since January. (And don’t look for Metastorm, which filed to go public in mid-May, to debut on the Nasdaq anytime soon. The company pulled its planned offering on Thursday.)

In terms of M&A dollars, as you might guess given the state of the markets, the companies that trade on them have been sharply marked down, as well. While the number of deals has dropped 27%, the value of those deals has plummeted twice that amount (56%). In addition, spending on public company deals has declined even more than the overall tech M&A market, which has sunk about 40% in terms of dollars spent so far this year.

Acquisitions of US public companies

Period Deal volume Deal value
January 1-November 14, 2007 85 $250bn
January 1-November 14, 2008 62 $109bn

Source: The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase

Ad networks: What recession?

3 Comments

-by Thomas Rasmussen

Akamai just got serious about online ads. It acquired ad network acerno from i-Behavior last week for $95m in cash. (See my colleague Jim Davis’ report for more on this acquisition.) This marks not just a somewhat drastic change in focus for Akamai, but is also an encouraging sign for the remaining online advertising networks. Despite the current economic meltdown, and more specifically the declining revenue and abysmal forecasts from ad giants Yahoo and Google, everybody seems to want a slice of the multibillion-dollar online advertising market.

Including the Akamai transaction, a total of 23 online advertising deals have been inked this year. That is up more than 25% from 17 deals for all of 2007, and just four in 2006. This increase in M&A activity stands in stark contrast to the overall Internet M&A picture, where the number of deals has declined more than 10%.

Moreover, despite highly publicized warnings from VCs about the decline in available venture capital and possible exits, funding has been flowing freely and rapidly to online advertising startups. Some of the many to receive funding recently include mobile ad firm AdMob, which raised $15.7m last week for a total of $35m raised to date; Turn Inc., which raised $15m recently for a total of $37m; ContextWeb, which raised $26m in July for a total of more than $50m raised; social networking ad network Lotame, which raised $13m in August in a series B round for a total of $23m raised; and Adconion Media Group, which closed a staggering $80m in a series C round in February, bringing its total funding to more than $100m.

With IPO markets closed, these startups should all be considered M&A targets. Adconion in particular stands out because of its international reach and large base of 250 million users, 50 million of whom are in the US. It would be a nice fit for one of the large media conglomerates competing for online advertising dominance. And they have shown that they are not afraid of opening the vault to do so. VC and banker sources say funding is likely to continue for the near term since there is still a lot of buyer interest. It is unlikely to suffer the same fate as the social networking funding fad, because some online advertising companies actually make money. As this segment continues to consolidate over the next year, we suspect deal flow will likely eclipse that of the past 12 months. Mobile and video advertising ventures are likely to lead the next generation of online advertising-focused startups.

Select recent online advertising deals

Announced Acquirer Target Deal value Deal closed
October 15, 2008 Technorati AdEngage Not disclosed October 15, 2008
June 18, 2008 Microsoft Navic Networks $250m (reported) Not disclosed
April 29, 2008 Cox Enterprises Adify $300m May 2008
March 11, 2008 Qualcomm Xiam Technologies $32m March 11, 2008
February 5, 2008 AOL Perfiliate Technologies $125m February 5, 2008
November 7, 2007 AOL Quigo Technologies $346m December 20, 2007
September 4, 2007 Yahoo BlueLithium $300m October 15, 2007
May 18, 2007 Microsoft aQuantive $6.37bn August 13, 2007
May 15, 2007 AOL Third Screen Media $105m May 15, 2007
April 13, 2007 Google DoubleClick $3.1bn March 11, 2008
April 30, 2007 Yahoo Right Media $680m July 12, 2007

Source: The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase

Fixed on the market

Brenon Daly

Although the IPO market is closed right now, some VCs are nonetheless steering – and steeling – their portfolio companies for a public market payday. Of course, that often means passing up a trade sale, which holds out the appealing prospect of cash on close. But Menlo Ventures’ John Jarve pointed out in his talk at IBF’s early-stage investment conference that those sales can be shortsighted. Consider the case of portfolio company Cavium Networks.

Jarve says Cavium, which makes security processors for F5 and Cisco, among others, has attracted a number of suitors. One would-be buyer floated a $350m offer for the company. Instead, Cavium went public in May 2007. At its peak, it sported a market capitalization of nearly $1.5bn. Even in the midst of the current Wall Street meltdown, Cavium is still valued at $500m.

The Cavium tale sparked a round of (perhaps apocryphal) Silicon Valley chestnuts about companies that also passed on trade sales to remain independent: Cisco allegedly rejecting an $80m offer from 3Com and Google nixing a reported $1bn bid from Yahoo. One we can add to that list is Riverbed. Several sources have indicated that Cisco made a number of serious approaches to the WAN traffic accelerator, but was rebuffed. Riverbed, which at one point was valued at about $3.5bn, currently trades at a $740m market capitalization.

Take the next exit

Brenon Daly1 Comment

In addition to clobbering existing stocks, the recent financial crisis has thinned the ranks of companies that we had expected to offer up stock in the coming months. In the past week alone, two companies that we had short-listed as IPO candidates (back when there was an IPO market) both got swallowed in trade sales.

On Wednesday, MessageLabs took a $695m offer from Symantec to help establish Big Yellow’s on-demand security offering. We understand MessageLabs had put together its underwriting ticket, and was planning to hit the market once the IPO window opened again. The IPO track was a distinct change from the path rumored for MessageLabs for more than two years. Several sources have indicated that MessageLabs had been shopped widely, with Trend Micro considered the most serious suitor at times.

And last week, we had to take LeftHand Networks out of the ‘shadow IPO pipeline’ when Hewlett-Packard came calling with a $360m offer. For more than a year we have noted that, pending the return of the market for new offerings, LeftHand appeared set to join the IPO parade of storage vendors (a half-dozen storage companies have gone public in the past two years). Instead, LeftHand sold, in a deal banked by Merrill Lynch. Incidentally, Merrill Lynch also banked the sale of another company that had its eye on the public market: Postini, a direct rival to MessageLabs, went to Google for $625m in July 2007.

Banking deals

With the current credit crisis rocking the big banks, online consumer banking portal Bankrate has sidestepped most of the damage and even plans to do a bit of shopping. In the last month alone, it acquired banking blog Bankaholic and consumer credit resource portal Creditcardguide.com for $12.4m and $34m, respectively. That brought its total shopping tab over the past year to $150m on six acquisitions. (We would note that most of the companies that Bankrate picked up were existing partners.) The company recently told us that it will continue its acquisition spree, and it has the means to do so. Bankrate will have an estimated $35m in cash after its latest acquisitions, and has generated some $25m in cash flow over the past year. So who might the portal bank next?

Bankrate is decidedly a so-called ‘Web 1.0′ company. It lacks the customization and social networking features that many of its newer Web 2.0 competitors tout. This lack of new technology, along with a softening online advertising market, could land the portal in trouble. Bankrate could help shore itself up against those technology shortcomings by focusing its acquisition efforts on personal finance startups like Rudder and Mint.com. However, we don’t think it will do that. Instead, we expect Bankrate to focus strictly on the space that it knows, expanding partly by targeting its legacy competitors.

Given this, we think a likely target might be Creditcards.com, which is both a rival and a partner. Creditcards.com, majority owned by Austin Ventures since 2006, tapped Credit Suisse and Citigroup to bring it public in December, but the economic environment forced it to delay its offering in May. The company is profitable, with $60m in sales, but is laden with debt. Besides having very similar businesses, the two companies are hardly strangers. In fact, current Creditcards.com CEO Elisabeth DeMarse was the CEO of Bankrate prior to becoming Austin Ventures’ CEO-in-residence.

Given Creditcards.com’s likely valuation of several hundred million dollars, however, it is unlikely that Bankrate could afford the acquisition. (Bankrate currently sports a market capitalization of about $700m.) Instead, we suspect that Bankrate will continue to ink tuck-in acquisitions. We wouldn’t be surprised if smaller competitors like Credit.com or Credit-Land.com caught its eye.

Recent Bankrate acquisitions

Date Target Deal Value
September 23, 2008 Bankaholic $12.4m
September 11, 2008 LinkSpectrum (dba CreditCardGuide.com) $34m
February 5, 2008 InsureMe $65m
February 5, 2008 Lower Fees (dba Fee Disclosure) $2.9m
December 10, 2007 Nationwide Card Services $27.4m
December 10, 2007 Savingforcollege.com $2.3m

Source: The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase

Meru: Nasdaq or bust

Brenon Daly

At the rate networking companies are consolidating, there may be no one left to buy Meru Networks. Earlier this week, Hewlett-Packard satisfied its appetite for WLAN equipment by acquiring Colubris Networks. That deal comes just two months after rival Trapeze Networks got snapped up by Belden, a cable and wiring company.

But the deal that probably scotched any potential trade sale for Meru was Brocade’s $3bn gamble on Foundry. The reason: Foundry has an OEM arrangement with Meru and was viewed as the most-likely acquirer of the WLAN equipment startup. We’re guessing Brocade probably figures it has its hands full with integrating Foundry’s existing business without adding additional pieces. Also, we view the planned Brocade-Foundry pairing as focused primarily on the datacenter, which wouldn’t have much use for WLAN equipment.

The only suitor we can put forward for Meru at this point is Juniper Networks. While Meru’s enterprise focus would fit well with Juniper, we understand the two companies kicked around a deal in 2005, at a reported $150m, but talks didn’t go far. Besides, a Meru source indicated recently that the company is plugging away on an IPO for next year. (We’ve heard that from the company for more than two years , but maybe 2009 will be the year.)

For Meru to go public at a decent valuation, however, it needs both a healthy IPO market and a healthy comparable, Aruba Networks. That company is currently trading at half the level it was at the start of the year, following a blown quarter in February. Aruba will have a chance to make amends in two weeks, as it will report results from its fiscal year on August 28.

Recent WLAN deals

Date Acquirer Target Price
Aug. 2008 HP Colubris Not disclosed
June 2008 Belden Trapeze Networks $133m
July 2008 Motorola AirDefense $85m*
*Estimated      

Source: The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase

Changing channels

Brenon Daly6 Comments

In the hyper-competitive storage market, it seems that one vendor’s pain is another vendor’s gain. We’ve heard from three market sources recently that Dell’s largest-ever acquisition — its $1.4bn purchase of EqualLogic — has hit some difficulties around defections and uncertainties from the SAN vendor’s existing channel partners. Resellers who pushed EqualLogic’s offering in the past are worried about being crushed by Dell’s powerful direct-sales machine, as has happened to some of Dell’s ‘partners’ in the past.

Based on the recent numbers posted by rival SAN vendor Compellent Technologies, there may be something to those concerns. Compellent, which recently signed up its 1,000th customer, said second-quarter sales surged 74% to $21m — which is about what they were for the first two quarters of 2007 combined. (The performance, along with the forecast for profitability for the rest of the year, helped spark a 20% rally in the company’s shares over the past month.) At a recent investment banking technology conference, Compellent CEO Phil Soran told us he’s looking to poach EqualLogic’s channel partners. We’ve heard similar plans coming from rival storage player Lefthand Networks.

How well Dell is able to balance the sales channels for EqualLogic will go a long way toward determining how much of a boost the acquisition will give to its emerging push into storage. Already, the return on EqualLogic is made more challenging by the fact that Dell bought it literally at the top of the market. The day that Dell announced the acquisition, the Nasdaq hit a level it hadn’t seen since early 2001. (The index is currently off 14% since then, after having dropped as much as 23% from its early-November highs.) To make its high-priced acquisition of EqualLogic pay off, Dell is going to have to work hard to keep its new SAN rivals from siphoning off channel sales.

Sophos bags an elephant

Brenon Daly

In a twist on a private-public transaction, Sophos laid out on Monday a bold $340m plan to pick up Utimaco, an encryption vendor that trades on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange. Rather than rolling into the public company, Sophos plans to take Utimaco off the market. It plans to fund the acquisition by drawing on three sources. (My colleague, Nick Selby, has the details on the financing as well as the strategy.)

The financing is crucial because this deal is a whopper. If it goes through, it’ll be the largest IT security deal in seven months. More significantly, however, Sophos’ planned acquisition of Utimaco stands as the biggest purchase by a privately held security company. In fact, it’s nearly twice the size as the number two deal, Barracuda’s unsolicited run at Sourcefire. (And it’s not certain that deal will close at all. Sourcefire, which is slated to report second-quarter earnings on Thursday, has shot down the deal so far.)

Although Utimaco will be erased from the market, we view the disappearance as temporary. Once the two companies get through the integration, we expect Sophos to try to go public once again. (Recall that last fall, it announced plans to list on the London Stock Exchange but shelved them as the markets deteriorated.) Among the underwriters for the planned IPO was Deutsche Bank, which advised Sophos on the purchase of Utimaco. Indeed, it was the same DB banker on this deal that also co-advised on a very similar transaction last fall, McAfee’s $350m purchase of Dutch encryption vendor SafeBoot. (DB and UBS Investment Bank advised SafeBoot, while Morgan Stanley advised McAfee.)

Star-crossed companies?

Brenon Daly

Having already made a pair of profitable on-demand investments, venture firm StarVest Partners has decided to take a larger bite in its most recent software-as-a-service (SaaS) deal. The New York City-based firm recently led the majority acquisition of Iron Solutions, which provides online information about used farm and industrial machinery. (Want to buy a John Deere tractor? There are nearly 2,900 of them for sale on the Iron Solutions site.) StarVest put up $8.5m of the $15m for 90% of Iron Solutions, with the remaining money coming from Dublin Capital Partners, Spring Mountain Capital and GVIC Communications.

The deal caught our eye because StarVest was also an early investor in NetSuite, owning 5% of the company according to the S-1 filed ahead of NetSuite’s IPO in 2007. (StarVest’s other SaaS exit came when Dell paid $155m in cash for portfolio company MessageOne, an on-demand email archiving company run by Michael Dell’s brother.)

StarVest’s interest in NetSuite dates back to May 2000, when it led a Series C investment in the SaaS applications suite vendor together with Oracle head honcho Larry Ellison. (Ellison, of course, is the co-founder and majority owner of NetSuite.) Iron Solutions and NetSuite teamed up in October 2007 to provide industry-specific applications for agricultural equipment dealerships, and the on-demand player often uses that example to illustrate how its software can be tailored to a specific industry.

Does StarVest’s simplification of the capital structure at Iron Solutions make a sale more likely, perhaps making the firm a broker in a deal between a pair of portfolio companies? (We would note that Oak Investment Partners recently played matchmaker in an inter-portfolio marriage of two SaaS companies.)

Speculation about a possible purchase of Iron Solutions by NetSuite may be a bit of a stretch. However, it’s worth noting that NetSuite’s only acquisition so far has been a vertical deal: the $31m purchase of OpenAir, which helped boost NetSuite’s services industry expertise.

Perhaps NetSuite could broaden the focus of Iron Solutions’ online marketplace, appraisal and valuation services to a much wider market. The applications vendor has already begun to offer applications tailored for light manufacturing and has voiced a desire to add in heavy manufacturing in the future. If it’s serious about those moves, NetSuite may well find that Iron Solutions’ equipment marketplace and other know-how come in handy. The two sides, and their backers, certainly know each other well enough.

Selected StarVest exits

Company Event
MessageOne Sale to Dell for $155m
NetSuite IPO in December 2007

Bear market mauls debutants

Brenon Daly

The talking heads at the Nasdaq and the New York Stock Exchange generally define a bear market as a 20% decline from the index’s highs. And, as anyone who picked up a weekend newspaper knows, the markets have officially slumped into bear territory since peaking last fall.

Of course, an index is made up of individual stocks, with some getting more roughed up than others. Oracle has basically traded flat since the Nasdaq meltdown began last October; Microsoft has matched the index’s decline; and VMware has been hammered, plunging nearly three times the Nasdaq decline over the same period. (Another way to look at the meltdown in shares of VMware: At its peak, VMware stock was worth roughly the same amount as a barrel of oil at current prices. Now, you’d have to pony up nearly three shares of VMware to trade for that same barrel of oil.)

With investors not willing to take a chance on shares of existing companies, what chance do the shares of largely unknown and entirely untested IPO candidates have? The short answer is ‘zilch.’ Actually, it’s somewhat of an academic question as there hasn’t been a VC-backed IPO since ArcSight floated on the Nasdaq four months ago. (As we’ve written in the past, we wouldn’t be surprised to see ArcSight get gobbled up, with Hewlett-Packard a logical buyer, in our view.)

With the IPO window closed, corporate acquirers have even more leverage in negotiations. (In other words, don’t expect transactions going off at a double-digit price-to-sales multiple, like IPO candidate EqualLogic got from Dell last November.) We’ve already seen Initiate Systems scrap its proposed offering and go hat-in-hand to a gaggle of investors. Meanwhile, a handful of other S-1s from other companies are gathering dust at the SEC. And we hardly expect any movement during the third quarter. Given the parched IPO market and corporate acquirers in the doldrums, it’s going to be a long, hot summer for a few of these IPO candidates.