Tag: LBO

Who’s not shopping for Epicor

Brenon Daly1 Comment

In virtually any other credit market, we’d be tempted to hold out old-line ERP vendor Epicor Software as an exemplary buyout candidate. The company will do about $530m in revenue this year, with $200m of that coming in the easily bankable form of software maintenance fees. (And the company is hardly expensive, with an enterprise value that’s just 3.7x this year’s maintenance revenue.) Moreover, it’ll throw off some $65m in cash flow in 2008 to help cover a hypothetical leveraged buyout.

But as we said, these are not normal days for debt. So in our report last week on an activist hedge fund pushing the company to pursue ‘strategic alternatives,’ we focused on the strategic buyers that might be interested in – and could afford – Epicor. They are, in order of likelihood: Microsoft, Oracle and SAP. Truth be told, though, none of those acquirers seems likely. And while we’re scratching potential suitors for Epicor, we can go ahead and erase M2 Technology Partners.

The buyout firm, which launched in mid-June with backing from Accel-KKR, is headed by Mark Duffell and Michael Piraino, who served as Epicor’s COO and CFO, respectively, until earlier this year. We understand that M2 is exploring other opportunities in the business applications market, and may well have its inaugural investment signed, sealed and delivered by the end of the year. It won’t be Duffell and Piraino’s old shop Epicor, but just think how much time they’d save on due diligence if it were.

Significant ERP deals

Date Acquirer Target Price
December 2000 Microsoft Great Plains Software $1.1bn
May 2002 Microsoft Navision $1.3bn
June 2003 PeopleSoft JD Edwards $1.75bn
December 2004 Oracle PeopleSoft $10.46bn
June 2005 Lawson Intentia International $449m
November 2005 Golden Gate Capital Geac Computer $1bn
January 2008 Unit 4 Agresso Group Coda $314m

Source: The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase

Standstill around the lamp

Brenon Daly

After a few months of pointed exchanges, Aladdin Knowledge Systems and its would-be buyer, Vector Capital, have agreed to a standstill in an attempt to negotiation a deal. Vector, the encryption vendor’s largest shareholder, had been pushing for a shareholder vote on Oct. 23 on its plan to replace three of Aladdin’s five board members. The buyout firm has set aside that demand, as well as agreeing not to unload any of its 14% holding. For its part, Aladdin agreed to sign a confidentiality agreement with Vector, and will not to seek another buyer for part or all of its business. Last month, Vector offered $13 for each share of Aladdin; the stock currently trades above that. The standstill gives the two sides at least a month to work out a deal, as Vector can’t call for another shareholder meeting until Oct. 30 at the earliest.

Battle set for Aladdin’s lamp

Brenon Daly1 Comment

In contrast to the LBO of data encryption vendor SafeNet a year-and-a-half ago, Vector Capital’s latest effort to take an IT security company private has been a more contentious process. After a series of public and private exchanges with Aladdin Knowledge Systems, Vector, through a subsidiary, called for a special meeting of shareholders to vote on the buyout firm’s plan to replace three of the company’s five board members. On Thursday, Aladdin agreed to the vote, setting October 23 as the date for the proxy showdown.

Vector is currently Aladdin’s largest shareholder, with a 14% stake (Aladdin insiders hold about 20%). The buyout firm began picking up shares earlier this summer at about $9 per share. It quickly piled up a 9% stake, and has since bumped it up to 14%. Along the way, we understand it made numerous private offers to buy the company and then disclosed in late August a public offer to buy the rest of the company at $13 per share. While Vector’s offer represented a 40-50% premium from when the firm started buying, Aladdin shares have ticked above the offer, changing hands at $13.80 in mid-Friday trading.

The unsolicited bid from Vector didn’t go over well with Aladdin. The company has dismissed it as ‘opportunistic’ but hasn’t said much more than that. Behind the scenes, Aladdin has carped that the only party that stands to gain from Vector’s bid is Vector, either by picking up Aladdin on the cheap or disrupting Aladdin’s business enough that it would benefit rival SafeNet, a Vector portfolio company. Investors, who have seen Aladdin shares shed as much as two-thirds of their value since last October, may not be so dismissive of the floor price set by Vector. (They are also mindful of what might happen to their holdings if Vector – stymied in its efforts to ink a deal – gets rid of its 14% stake of Aladdin. Look out below.)

In the month remaining before the vote, we suspect the jabbing and jockeying between Aladdin and Vector will increase. Israel-based Aladdin recently retained the PR firm Joele Frank, Wilkinson Brimmer Katcher, which is basically the go-to shop for companies caught in a bear hug, to get its side of the story out. But the company, along with all of its flaks, faces an experienced bidder. Not only has Vector pushed through unsolicited bids in the past, one of the partners working on the firm’s efforts, David Fishman, has worked on the other side of the table. Before joining Vector, Fishman was a banker at Goldman Sachs, where he worked on a number of defensive deals, including PeopleSoft’s attempted stiff-arm of Oracle. We’re pretty confident that no one involved in this transaction wants to repeat the nastiness of Oracle’s hostile run at PeopleSoft.

Star-crossed companies?

Brenon Daly

Having already made a pair of profitable on-demand investments, venture firm StarVest Partners has decided to take a larger bite in its most recent software-as-a-service (SaaS) deal. The New York City-based firm recently led the majority acquisition of Iron Solutions, which provides online information about used farm and industrial machinery. (Want to buy a John Deere tractor? There are nearly 2,900 of them for sale on the Iron Solutions site.) StarVest put up $8.5m of the $15m for 90% of Iron Solutions, with the remaining money coming from Dublin Capital Partners, Spring Mountain Capital and GVIC Communications.

The deal caught our eye because StarVest was also an early investor in NetSuite, owning 5% of the company according to the S-1 filed ahead of NetSuite’s IPO in 2007. (StarVest’s other SaaS exit came when Dell paid $155m in cash for portfolio company MessageOne, an on-demand email archiving company run by Michael Dell’s brother.)

StarVest’s interest in NetSuite dates back to May 2000, when it led a Series C investment in the SaaS applications suite vendor together with Oracle head honcho Larry Ellison. (Ellison, of course, is the co-founder and majority owner of NetSuite.) Iron Solutions and NetSuite teamed up in October 2007 to provide industry-specific applications for agricultural equipment dealerships, and the on-demand player often uses that example to illustrate how its software can be tailored to a specific industry.

Does StarVest’s simplification of the capital structure at Iron Solutions make a sale more likely, perhaps making the firm a broker in a deal between a pair of portfolio companies? (We would note that Oak Investment Partners recently played matchmaker in an inter-portfolio marriage of two SaaS companies.)

Speculation about a possible purchase of Iron Solutions by NetSuite may be a bit of a stretch. However, it’s worth noting that NetSuite’s only acquisition so far has been a vertical deal: the $31m purchase of OpenAir, which helped boost NetSuite’s services industry expertise.

Perhaps NetSuite could broaden the focus of Iron Solutions’ online marketplace, appraisal and valuation services to a much wider market. The applications vendor has already begun to offer applications tailored for light manufacturing and has voiced a desire to add in heavy manufacturing in the future. If it’s serious about those moves, NetSuite may well find that Iron Solutions’ equipment marketplace and other know-how come in handy. The two sides, and their backers, certainly know each other well enough.

Selected StarVest exits

Company Event
MessageOne Sale to Dell for $155m
NetSuite IPO in December 2007

M&A goes MIA in Q2

Brenon Daly1 Comment

With the second quarter wrapped up, we’ve been busy tallying the deal flow from the period. As you might guess, M&A levels for the past three months mirror the dour economic climate. The quick numbers: Overall tech M&A fell 40% in the second quarter, year-over-year, dragged down by private equity players that have been knocked out of the market by the credit market turmoil. The total shopping bill of $148bn is a sharp decline from the $241bn in the same period last year, putting it only slightly above the $122bn recorded in the second quarter of 2006.

A number of trends shaped M&A in the quarter, including the continued use of bear hugs to pressure reluctant sellers, the frozen IPO market and the rise of consolidation deals. Of course, the single largest crimp on deal-making in the second quarter was the utter disappearance of tech buyouts. The value of tech LBOs in the second quarter fell more than 90% compared to the same period last year, when credit was flowing freely. In the just-completed quarter, we recorded some $7bn worth of tech buyouts, down from $85bn in the year-ago period. Looked at another way, LBOs accounted for just 5% of all tech M&A spending in the second quarter, after representing a full one-third of total spending in the same period last year.

Deal flow breakdown

Quarter PE deal value Corp. deal value Total deal value
Q2 2006 $13bn $109bn $122bn
Q2 2007 $85bn $156bn $241bn
Q2 2008 $7bn $141bn $148bn

Source: The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase

Buyout blues

Brenon Daly

Three years ago, the buyout barons shook up the technology M&A market with the $11.3bn LBO of services giant SunGard. At the time it was the largest tech buyout, equaling basically half the money spent on all LBOs in the previous year. Even as financial acquirers became more active – increasingly their spending sevenfold from 2004-07 – the SunGard buyout stood as the third-largest tech LBO.

SunGard’s brozen-medal placing seemed unlikely to hold at this time last year. There seemed to be a new multibillion-dollar LBO every week, with the targets getting bigger in every transaction. (Remember the half-serious speculation that Microsoft could be taken private?) All that changed in late summer, when debt became more expensive, sending the LBO market into a funk from which it hasn’t recovered. So far this year, LBO firms have announced 49 deals worth $10.3bn, down from 59 deals worth $97bn in the same period last year, according to The 451 Group’s M&A KnowledgeBase.

The change in climate isn’t lost on the financial deal-makers. Underscoring the difficulties in the current credit market, SilverLake’s Alan Austin said at the recent IBF VC Investing Conference in San Francisco that his firm couldn’t pull off a deal like SunGard right now. The buyout firm put in $3bn of equity and borrowed the remaining $8bn. ‘We could never do something like that today – never mind the terms (of the debt)’, Austin said at the conference.

PE deal flow

Period Deal volume Deal value
Jan. – June 2008 51 $11bn
Jan. – June 2007 59 $97bn
Jan. – June 2006  35  $17bn
Jan. – June 2005 25 $24bn

Source: The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase

How do you say ‘Tumbleweed’ in French?

Brenon Daly

About a year and a half ago, we heard Tumbleweed Communications was being shopped hard by private equity firms. The intervening credit crises – which bumped up the price of debt and trimmed the returns on LBOs – quite likely tabled any buyout. The email security vendor has struggled since then. It came up short of Wall Street estimates in every quarter in 2007. Shares that changed hands above $3 each in early 2007 dropped in a straight line to just above $1 this March.

Rather than a PE shop, however, it turns out Tumbleweed’s buyer will be the Sopra Group, a French IT consulting firm. Sopra will make the acquisition through its Axway subsidiary, paying $2.70 in cash for each share. With about 51 million shares outstanding, Tumbleweed gets a an equity value of about $138m, only slightly more than twice the sales it is expected to record this year. Sopra also got a discount from its currency: the Euro has climbed about 18% in value since we reported on Tumbleweed in February 2007. See full report.

Barracuda bares its teeth

Brenon Daly

Never known as a shy or retiring competitor, Barracuda Networks has lobbed an unsolicited bid to acquire Sourcefire for $7.50 per share in cash. (Full report.) That works out to a slight 13% premium on Sourcefire’s closing price ahead of the bid, and essentially where the shares began 2008.

We look at Barracuda’s bid as setting a ‘floor price’ for Sourcefire. It is certainly an opportunistic offer, as Sourcefire has been burned on Wall Street. (The company didn’t help itself when it came up short of investors’ expectations in its first quarter as a public company a year ago.) To get this deal closed, however, we suspect Barracuda will have to raise its bid. Investors have already pushed Sourcefire shares above the offer price.

To push this deal along, Barracuda can draw on the experience of one of its two outside backers, Francisco Partners. The buyout shop took IT security appliance vendor WatchGuard Technologies private in July 2006 after a protracted and bitter campaign.

Big Yellow’s purple elephant

Brenon Daly

Asked not too long ago to explain the slump in Symantec’s stock since acquiring Veritas three years ago, CEO John Thompson memorably called the combined company ‘a purple elephant.’ The allegorical description was a bit of a departure for the straight-laced, straight-talking ex-Big Blue executive, who went on to add that since Wall Street had never seen such a large security-storage company, it didn’t know how to value it. (Generally speaking, however, investors have known how to value it: lower. Since announcing the $13.5bn acquisition in December 2004, Symantec shares have shed about 22% of their value, compared to a 15% gain in the Nasdaq over that same time.)

The purple elephant has turned into a bit of a sacred cow, with Thompson defending the combination at every turn and forcefully knocking down any suggestion that Symantec should shed some of the Veritas assets. (Of course, Symantec already ditched Precise – an application performance management product that it inherited from Veritas – back in January.) Talk of possible divestitures surfaced last week following a research note from Cowen and Co analyst Walter Pritchard, who speculated that NetBackup and Data Center Foundation, a storage and server management product, may find their way onto the auction block. Not so, countered Thompson on Symantec’s first-quarter earnings call last Wednesday. The company has ‘no plans to divest anything – none.’ A senior corporate development guy at a company named as one of the possible buyers of the Foundation business told us recently that he hasn’t even been informally approached to gauge the company’s possible interest in Foundation, much less seen a book on the possible asset sale.

Of course, M&A is cyclical, to some degree tracking the overall economy. And we know this about dealmaking in a recession: When times get tight, ties get thin. We’ve already seen that most dramatically in the private equity world, whether it’s former buyout buddies taking each other to court or banks looking to get out of their lending agreements they’ve already signed. That same thinking (‘maybe we shouldn’t have done…’) is now hitting the C-suite. Consider the ongoing sell-a-thon at Time Warner, with the company planning to split off its cable services business, and, we speculate, finally putting AOL’s core US access business on the block. Or, there’s eBay entertaining the idea of jettisoning Skype Technologies, after writing down basically half of the $2.6bn purchase price. Or, if current reports are to be believed, Sprint Nextel may unwind the $39bn acquisition that has soured into a money-burning debacle. Although Thompson says Symantec isn’t a seller, this is clearly the climate in which companies are being pushed to reexamine their acquisitions. That could very well mean taking the knife to the purple elephant again.

Reversing deal flow

Company Assets Comment
Symantec NetBackup, Data Center Foundation, according to rumors Symantec says it’s not looking to sell.
Time Warner Cable services business, and (we speculate) AOL’s US access unit AOL has already shed ISP businesses overseas.
eBay Skype Technologies New CEO says next few quarters will determine if company keeps its overpriced acquisition.
Sprint Nextel Nextel WSJ reports this week that Sprint may unwind Nextel deal, and look to sell itself.
VeriSign Numerous units picked up in 20-company shopping spree VeriSign has already divested three businesses this year.