Tag: SUMT

Take-privates are taking more money

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Even though the volume of take-privates has plummeted this year, the deals that are getting announced appear to be far more competitive than they’ve ever been. At least that’s true after the LBO is announced. So far this year, we’ve seen terms get raised in four take-privates, due to either named or unnamed bidders.

The latest: On Tuesday, an unidentified private equity (PE) firm offered $8 for each share of MSC Software, topping the existing agreement for $7.63 per share that buyout shop Symphony Technology Group had with the maker of design software. The new bid added about $18m to the price of MSC. That follows post-announcement raises in the LBOs of I-many and Entrust, which increased the final purchase prices by $19m and $9m, respectively. And then there was the bidding war over SumTotal Systems between Vista Equity Partners and Accel-KKR that saw the final price come in 50% higher than the initial offer.

But in the case of MSC, we probably shouldn’t be surprised that the initial offer got bumped a bit higher. After all, it was only a scant 13% premium over the previous closing price. Shares of the company actually traded at the price proposed by Symphony just a month before the PE shop unveiled its bid. Although to be fair, much of the run had been triggered by speculation that hedge fund Elliott Associates, the vendor’s largest shareholder, was pushing for a sale of MSC. (Under the plan put forward by Symphony, Elliott would have rolled over its equity.) For the record, the proxy filed in connection with Symphony’s bid indicates that Elliott actually first broached the idea of a sale to MSC in February 2008, a time when shares were changing hands above $12 each.

Auction action

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

With one bidding war over a Nasdaq-traded company wrapped up last week, two new skirmishes broke out on Monday. Both Borland and MathStar received conditional offers of higher prices than had previously been floated for the companies. The bid-and-raise process at both these otherwise-neglected companies indicates the M&A market has recovered notably from its low point earlier this year.

In the larger of the two transactions, Borland said in a proxy filed in support of its existing agreement to sell to Micro Focus that it has received a nonbinding ‘expression of interest’ from an unnamed buyout shop. The offer – which is conditional on the firm completing due diligence on the application lifecycle management software vendor – has the firm paying $1.20 for each share of Borland. That tops Micro Focus’ offer in early May of $1 for each share of Borland.

Micro Focus’ bid, which has been blessed by the boards of both companies, came after it first showed interest in picking up Borland in July 2007, according to the proxy. Meanwhile, the proxy indicated that the unnamed financial acquirer only contacted Borland on May 21 of this year. The buyout firm added that due diligence would take about two weeks, and that its offer was not conditional on financing. Borland said in the proxy that it has opened its books to the unnamed suitor.

Meanwhile, after being in play for more than a half a year, MathStar attracted the interest of Tiberius Capital, a Chicago-based fund that offered to buy half of the company at $1.15 per share. That tops an existing offer of $1.04 for each MathStar share from another company. We would note both of these deals come after a seven-week bidding war over SumTotal Systems, which saw the final price soar 50% above the opening bid.

A bid and a raise for SumTotal

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

The sum total of all interested parties in SumTotal Systems may well be greater than the two that have already disclosed themselves. At least that’s the thinking among investors – or rather, speculators – in the learning management software vendor. Recall that earlier this month, Vista Equity Partners tossed the struggling company an unsolicited offer of $3.25 for each share. (Vista is being advised by Union Square Advisors.) As we noted, the bid included a ‘go-shop’ provision.

SumTotal never got back to Vista on its offer, but it did throw its arms around a slightly richer one from Accel-KKR on Friday. The white knight bid $3.80 for each SumTotal share, valuing the company at about $124m, or $20m more than Vista’s offer. However, we would note that SumTotal shares have traded slightly above Accel-KKR’s offer price since the bid was unveiled. (On Monday afternoon, SumTotal stock was changing hands at $3.85.) Like Vista’s initial offer, Accel-KKR’s included a go-shop provision. On that front, it seems like the shopping may not be done for SumTotal.

PE firm calculates SumTotal

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

A half-decade ago, a pair of struggling public companies joined together in an effort to capitalize on the fragmented e-learning market. Click2Learn.com and Docent, which had beat up on each other for years, merged into a single company under the name SumTotal Systems. (Shareholders of Click2Learn held 52% of the combined entity, with Docent shareholders owning the rest.) The merger did little to help SumTotal’s performance on the Nasdaq. Since the pairing, which closed in mid-March 2004, the stock had dropped from above $8 to a low of $1.33 last month.

Earlier this week, Vista Equity Partners floated a bid of $3.25 for each of the 31.8 million shares of SumTotal outstanding. The buyout firm owns about four million SumTotal shares, or about 12.6% of the total. Vista started to accumulate its position in September, when the stock was just under $5, according to US Securities and Exchange Commission filings. Vista is the company’s largest shareholder. In addition, the second-largest holder, Discovery Group, has indicated that it wants SumTotal to sell the business. For its part, SumTotal (advised by RBC Capital Markets) has said only that it is reviewing the offer.

Vista’s unsolicited offer for SumTotal has more than a few echoes of Vector Capital’s recent grab of Aladdin Knowledge Systems. Both unsolicited bids came from San Francisco-based PE shops that had amassed a large stake in each company. Both valued the targeted company at less than 1x trailing sales, on enterprise value. (And somewhat unusually, both offers included ‘go-shop’ provisions.) There is one crucial difference, however, between the two targets: SumTotal isn’t profitable, and in fact has never turned a profit. Altogether, it has rung up an eye-popping $353m in accumulated deficit.