Category: VC

Survey: Back to normal for tech M&A

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

After two straight forecasts of substantial deterioration in the tech M&A market, the outlook for activity has picked back up, according to the latest edition of the semiannual M&A Leaders’ Survey from 451 Research and Morrison & Foerster. Nearly half of the respondents (47%) indicated they would be increasing their activity in 2017 compared to 2016. On the other hand, 20% of respondents said they would be slowing down on acquisitions next year, with the remaining one-third (33%) forecasting no change in their rate.

Broadly, the latest top-level results of the M&A Leaders’ Survey represent a more ‘normalized’ forecast for activity, following the most bearish outlook we’ve ever recorded. In our previous survey last April, the number of respondents forecasting an uptick in acquisition activity only slightly exceeded the number indicating they would be cutting back on their shopping. For comparison, in the just-completed survey, more than twice as many respondents said they would be accelerating acquisition activity than said they would be slowing down.

The shift in sentiment comes as tech M&A spending accelerated dramatically through the summer, with the value of transactions announced in Q3 hitting the third-highest quarterly level since the end of the recent recession, according to 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase.

Now in its tenth edition, the M&A Leaders’ Survey from 451 Research and Morrison & Foerster drew responses from 150 senior M&A professional on a variety of topics, including forecasts for types and structure of transactions, as well as the impact of recent events on their deal-making plans. Some of the highlights:

  • Private equity buyers are expected to play an increasingly significant role in the market. Nearly half of survey respondents (45%) forecast buyout shops would spend more in 2017 than they have in 2016, compared to just one-quarter (28%) who forecast lower spending.
  • Respondents indicated the White House clash between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton is slowing deal flow far more than any disruption caused by the UK effectively severing economic and political ties with the European Union, following June’s Brexit vote.
  • Concerns about potential liability due to cybersecurity (think Verizon-Yahoo) are making buyers take a much closer look at the companies they plan to acquire.
  • Buoyed by a handful of strong recent tech offerings, the IPO market is expected to accelerate even more next year, according to a majority of survey respondents.

Respondents to the M&A Leaders’ Survey will get aggregate results, as well as selected comments and insight, emailed to them tomorrow. 451 Research subscribers should look for a full report on the survey later this week.

mofo-ma-forecast-oct-2016

A summer surge puts Q3 tech M&A back on record pace

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

For at least one quarter, it was as if we never turned the calendar on the record-breaking pace of tech M&A we saw in 2016. Dealmakers around the globe spent $153bn on 910 tech, media and telecom (TMT) transactions announced from July to September. That ranks the just-completed Q3 as the third-highest quarterly total since the end of the recession, according to 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase. In fact, the rather unexpectedly strong M&A spending in Q3 exactly matched the average quarterly tally from 2015, when deal value hit its highest annual level since the internet bubble burst.

This summer’s surge brings the total spent by TMT acquirers around the globe so far in 2016 to $336bn, putting 2016 already ahead of the full-year totals for six of the past eight years. Looking ahead, if we assume the pace of spending from January-September continues in Q4, full-year 2016 deal value would hit some $440bn – the second-highest annual total since 2002, according to the M&A KnowledgeBase.

Spending in the summer quarter was dominated by a parade of blockbuster transactions. Overall, last quarter saw four of the five largest deals of the year announced. Significant Q3 transactions include:

  • Continuing its big-ticket expansion into technology growth markets, SoftBank paid $32.4bn for ARM Holdings. The deal stands as the second-largest semiconductor transaction in history, trailing only Avago’s $37bn purchase of Broadcom last year.
  • Intel ended its experiment of baking security directly into its silicon by divesting a majority stake of its McAfee division. The move values McAfee at just $4.2bn, meaning the business has lost about 40% of its value under Intel’s six-year ownership. For comparison, during that same period, Symantec’s market value has almost doubled.
  • Hewlett Packard Enterprise unwound a series of earlier software acquisitions that were supposed to drive its next leg of growth, taking a pretty big discount in the process. The portfolio, which was accumulated over a decade by its predecessor company, cost HPE more than $20bn to acquire, but was spun off to Micro Focus in a transaction valued at $8.8bn.
  • Oracle paid $9.3bn, or 11x trailing sales, for NetSuite, making the largest purchase of a subscription software vendor ever. NetSuite’s valuation was roughly twice the level that Oracle has paid for the license-based software providers it has bought over the years.
  • In the biggest sale of a VC-backed company in two and a half years, Walmart paid $3.3bn for e-commerce startup Jet.com.

Our full report on the blockbuster Q3 tech M&A activity will be available to 451 Research subscribers later today.

Recent quarterly deal flow

Period Deal volume Deal value
Q3 2016 910 $153bn
Q2 2016 1,043 $110bn
Q1 2016 1,039 $73bn
Q4 2015 1,063 $185bn
Q3 2015 1,162 $85bn
Q2 2015 1,074 $208bn
Q1 2015 1,040 $121bn
Q4 2014 1,028 $65bn
Q3 2014 1,049 $102bn
Q2 2014 1,005 $141bn
Q1 2014 854 $82bn

Source: 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase

A public/private split in Apptio’s IPO

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Apptio soared onto Wall Street in its debut, pricing its offering above the expected range and then jumping almost 50% in early Nasdaq trading. The IT spend management vendor raised $96m in its IPO, and nosed up toward the elevated status of a unicorn. However, in a clear sign of the frothiness of the late-stage funding market a few years ago, Apptio shares are currently trading only slightly above the price the institutional backers paid in the company’s last private-market round in May 2013.

That’s not to take anything away from Apptio, which created some $850m of market value in its offering. (Our math: Apptio has roughly 37 million shares outstanding, on an undiluted basis, and they were changing hands at about $23 each in midday trading under the ticker APTI.) That works out to a solid 5.4 times 2016 revenue, which we project at about $157m. (Last year and so far in the first half of 2016, Apptio has increased sales in the low-20% range. That growth rate, while still respectable, is about half the rate it had been growing. We suspect that deceleration, combined with uninterrupted red ink at the company, help explain why Wall Street didn’t receive Apptio more bullishly.)

In midday trading, Apptio’s share price was only slightly above the $22.69 per share that it sold shares to so-called ‘crossover investors’ Janus Capital Group and T. Rowe Price, among other investors, in its series E financing, according to the vendor’s prospectus. A relatively recent phenomenon, crossover investing has seen a number of deep-pocketed mutual funds shift some of their investment dollars to private companies in an effort to build an early position in a business they hope will come public and trade up from there.

However, given the glacial pace of tech IPOs in recent years as well as the overall deflation of the hype around unicorns, that strategy hasn’t proved particularly lucrative. In fact, many of the price adjustments that mutual funds have made on the private company holding have been markdowns.

But the institutional investors would counter that the short-term valuation of their portfolio matters less than the ultimate return. For the most part, we’ve seen conservative pricing of tech IPOs in 2016. (Twilio, for instance, has more than doubled since its IPO three months ago.) Apptio probably doesn’t have the growth rate to be as explosive in the aftermarket as Twilio, but it can still build value. That’s what investors – regardless of when they bought in – are banking on.

Recent enterprise tech IPOs*

Company Date of offering
Pure Storage October 7, 2015
Mimecast November 20, 2015
Atlassian December 10, 2015
SecureWorks April 22, 2016
Twilio June 23, 2016
Talend July 29, 2016
Apptio September 23, 2016

*Includes Nasdaq and NYSE listings only

Even as summer heated up, tech dealmaking cooled down in August

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly Kenji Yonemoto

After surging at the start of summer, tech M&A activity in August settled back to a more representative level. Acquirers around the globe announced 281 tech, media and telecom transactions valued at $30.5bn in the just-completed month, according to 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase. The spending basically matches the August levels of the two previous years. However, it is just one-third the amount dealmakers spent in July and half of June’s spending.

The main reason why spending last month didn’t drop further than it did – August still ranked as the third-highest monthly total in 2016 – is primarily due to an unprecedented wave of private equity (PE) activity. Last month, buyout shops accounted for roughly half of all tech M&A spending, which is about three times their typical level. Overall, PE shops were buyers in five of the 10 largest transactions, including both of August’s biggest prints, according to the M&A KnowledgeBase.

While M&A spending held up last month, the same can’t be said for deal volume. The number of prints announced in August sank below 300 for the first time in two and a half years, according to the M&A KnowledgeBase. Deal volume dropped to just 281 transactions, down 18% from the monthly average in 2016. (Relatedly or not, stock trading volume last month also slid to some of the lowest levels in recent memory.)

With eight months of 2016 now complete, tech M&A spending has already cracked $300bn, putting it ahead of five of the seven full-year totals since the recent recession ended. Assuming the rest of the year continues at the same rate it has shown since January, 2016 would see some $450bn worth of deal flow. However, we suspect that the pace of spending in the remaining four months of the year could slow if several looming macro factors (an increasingly rancorous US election cycle, a long-considered interest rate hike, the continued deceleration of most of the world’s large economies) introduce more uncertainty into the picture.Jan-Aug MA totals

In its IPO, will Apptio suffer the curse of the crossover?

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

In what’s shaping up to be a bit of a test case for late-stage financings, a rather richly valued Apptio plans to go public. The company, which sells software that helps clients manage their IT spending, has revealed paperwork for an IPO with a placeholder amount of $75m. However, as Apptio makes its way to Wall Street, one of its existing backers on Wall Street has already trimmed the value of the company.

Institutional investor T. Rowe Price led Apptio’s $50m series D round in March 2012. At the end of 2015, the mutual fund had reduced the value of its investment by 24% compared with the previous year, according to the prospectus of the fund that holds Apptio equity. T. Rowe also marked down by a similar amount its holding of Apptio shares from a financing a year later. Fellow mutual fund Janus led the $45 series E in May 2013, Apptio’s last private round. According to Apptio’s prospectus, the company sold shares to Janus and other investors in that round at $22.69 per share.

Of course, valuations rise and fall every day on Wall Street. And startups that have drawn big money from mutual funds only to see their shares get marked down after the purchase often say the downgrades are mere ‘accounting’ moves made by people who don’t really understand Silicon Valley finance. However, in the case of Apptio, some of the discount may be warranted because it is currently growing only half as fast as it was when it raised its big slugs of capital from the so-called crossover investors.

In the first two quarters of 2016, Apptio has increased revenue a solid-but-not-spectacular 22%. That’s the same pace as its full-year 2015, but just half the rate of 2014. At the same time as Apptio’s growth has slowed, losses have mounted. It lost $41m in 2015, up from $33m in 2014. Although losses have eased so far this year, Apptio still very much runs in the red.

Part of the reason for the deep losses is that Apptio’s software is a rather heavy implementation, which can take several months to set up. For its software to be useful, clients need to have an IT budget that runs in the hundreds of millions of dollars, and some customization of the software is typically required. (Roughly 20% of the vendor’s revenue comes from professional services.)

Although Apptio has collected an enviable roster of clients, it counts just 325 total customers. As a point of reference, that’s roughly the same number of customers that Workday had when it went public in 2012. Further, the two companies were roughly the same size, recording about $130m in revenue in the fiscal year leading up to their mid-summer filings. However, at the time of their IPOs, they were on very different trajectories: Workday was doubling revenue, compared with 22% growth for Apptio. Obviously, for growth-focused Wall Street, that is almost certain to result in very different valuations for the companies. Workday hit the market at an astonishing 40x trailing sales, while Apptio would probably count itself fortunate to garner a double-digit valuation.

Enterprise tech IPOs* over the past 12 months

Company Date of offering
Pure Storage October 7, 2015
Mimecast November 20, 2015
Atlassian December 10, 2015
SecureWorks April 22, 2016
Twilio June 23, 2016
Talend July 29, 2016

*Includes Nasdaq and NYSE listings only

The comeback kids of the tech IPO market

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

If there’s going to be a recovery in the tech IPO market, information security (infosec) looks like it will lead the way. According to 451 Research’s recently launched M&A KnowledgeBase Premium, one-quarter of the 72 startups that we think are of a size and mind to go public in the near future come from the infosec industry. The ‘shadow IPO’ pipeline is one of the key features of the new premium version of 451 Research’s industry-leading M&A KnowledgeBase.

The premium version of our M&A KnowledgeBase features a full financial profile of the candidates, as well as 451 Research’s qualitative assessment of each company’s technology and its competitive positioning in the market. For instance, the profile of Veracode includes our proprietary estimates of the application security startup’s bookings for both 2015 and 2016, plus our analysis of its expansion into the new growth market of mobile apps. Altogether, KnowledgeBase Premium has a shortlist of 18 infosec vendors that could be eyeing an upcoming IPO, including Carbon Black, LogRhythm and ForeScout.

Although the IPO market has been mired in a slump recently, with just three enterprise-focused offerings so far this year, many private companies have matured to the point where their business models are comparable to their publicly traded brethren. Further, many are putting up growth rates that leave Nasdaq and NYSE firms in the dust. That’s particularly true in the infosec space, where a recent survey of 881 IT budget-holders by 451 Research’s Voice of the Enterprise found that 46% of respondents had more to spend on security in the coming quarter, compared with the start of the year. That was 10 times the percentage who indicated that their infosec budgets were shrinking.

Of course, merely having a business that’s ready to go public doesn’t necessarily mean that the company needs to file an S1. Most of the infosec companies have plenty of cash in their treasuries, with the 18 pre-IPO vendors having raised about $2bn in venture backing. (KnowledgeBase Premium not only tracks fundings, but in some cases it also notes the valuation of the funding.) Additionally, many of the publicly traded infosec names – including both of the sector’s most recent debutants, Rapid7 and SecureWorks – haven’t necessarily found bullish investors on Wall Street.

But as the Twilio offering and its subsequent aftermarket trading has shown, a company with a strong growth story can almost always find buyers, regardless of what’s happening in the overall market. With that in mind, we’ll watch for more of the 72 names on our M&A KnowledgeBase Premium IPO shortlist – particularly those in the bustling infosec arena – to move from the pipeline to Wall Street in the coming quarters.

IPO pipeline by sector

Source: 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase Premium

Salesforce: Try before you buy

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

When it comes to M&A, Salesforce likes to go with what it already knows. More than virtually any other tech firm, the SaaS giant tends to acquire startups that it has already invested in. Overall, according to 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase, Salesforce’s venture arm has handed almost one of every five deals to the company. Just this week, it snapped up collaboration vendor Quip – the eighth startup backed by Salesforce Ventures that Salesforce has purchased.

For perspective, that’s twice as many companies as SAP Ventures (or Sapphire Ventures, as it has been known for almost two years) has backed that have gone to SAP. (We would note that the parallel between SAP/Sapphire Ventures and Salesforce Ventures doesn’t exactly hold up because the venture group formally separated from the German behemoth in January 2011.) Still, to underscore SAP/Sapphire Ventures’ nondenominational approach to investments, we would note that archrival Oracle has acquired as many SAP/Sapphire Ventures portfolio companies as the group’s former parent, SAP, according to the M&A KnowledgeBase.

Salesforce’s continued combing through its 150-company venture portfolio comes at a time of uncertainty and a bit of anxiety about the broader corporate venture industry. It isn’t so much directed at the well-established, long-term corporate investors such as Salesforce Ventures, Intel Capital, Qualcomm Ventures or Google’s investment units. Instead, it’s the arrivistes, or businesses that have hurriedly set up investment wings of their own over the past two or three years as overall VC investment surged to its highest level since 2000. (They seem to have been infected with the very common Silicon Valley malady: Fear of Missing Out.) It’s hard not to see a bit a froth in the corporate VC market when Slurpee seller 7-Eleven launches its own investment division, 7-Ventures.

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

Dollar Shave Club: a rare unicorn indeed

Brenon Daly

by Brenon Daly

With a reported unicorn-sized exit, Dollar Shave Club has been able to pull off what few other high-profile e-commerce startups have done recently: actually deliver a return to its investors. The e-tailer, which raised more than $150m since its founding four years ago, sold to consumer products giant Unilever for $1bn, according to numerous press reports. Assuming that 10-digit price tag is correct, Dollar Shave Club investors stand to pocket a tidy return.

The same can’t be said for the backers of two other websites that frequently found themselves in the headlines for ‘disrupting’ the staid retail industry, but came up short when they sold earlier this year to the very brick-and-mortar companies they set about disrupting. Both Gilt Groupe (acquired by Hudsons Bay Company in January) and One Kings Lane (acquired by Bed Bath & Beyond in June) sold for less than the money they raised from VCs. Investors lavished about a quarter-billion dollars on both Gilt Group and One Kings Lane, or some $100m more than Dollar Shave Club took in.

The distressed sales of Gilt Group and One Kings Lane initially confirmed that some of the air appeared to be leaking out of the valuation bubble for many of Silicon Valley’s highest-valued startups. That shouldn’t come as a surprise. After all, a majority of the respondents to the M&A Leaders’ Survey from 451 Research and Morrison & Foerster forecast last October that the unicorns that would exit in the coming year would do so at a lower valuation than they had commanded in their latest VC fundings.

MoFo Unicorn outlook

Still early days for IoT security

Brenon Daly

Contact: Christian Renaud Brenon Daly

The Internet of Things (IoT) market is transitioning from early (over) hype to production deployments, causing problems with operational security. This has raised the visibility of an increasing number of IoT startups, ranging from legacy operational technology (OT) security vendors that have been ‘IoT washed’ to IT security providers and pure plays. In a just-published report, we profile 11 startups looking to take advantage of the growing interest in IoT security. (Collectively, these companies have received about $115m from venture investors, and we would note that they represent a small subset of all IoT security technology startups.)

In terms of exits, 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase tallies just nine security-related transactions that we believe were driven entirely, or in large part, by IoT. Spending on just those rather narrowly defined IoT security deals totaled $966m, with one pairing (Belden-Tripwire) accounting for the vast majority of the total.

The fact that security isn’t spurring more IoT acquisitions isn’t all that surprising, when viewed against how M&A has played out in other emerging tech markets. Vendors tend to focus on the opportunities – rather than the threats – that come with the new, new thing. Consider the SaaS space, which essentially changes the delivery of software. Literally, thousands of SaaS applications have been acquired in recent years, whether through consolidation or expansion into adjacent areas.

However, only a handful of transactions have gone toward securing the app, despite the fact that 451 Research surveys have shown that concerns about security are the primary obstacle for SaaS adoption, just as they are for IoT deployments. (For instance, just two of the 43 acquisitions that SaaS kingpin Salesforce has done since its founding have involved security, and both have been tiny deals.) As IoT deployments broaden and become more complex, we expect security to account for more than its current 3% of deal flow. Again, to see which startups might be figuring into upcoming deal flow, see our full report on IoT security M&A.

IoT MA as % of overall

For tech M&A, it’s more of the same in May

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Tech M&A spending appears to be settling into a new normal. In the just-completed month of May, total spending on tech, media and telecom transactions across the globe came in at $21.2bn, according to 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase. That marks the fifth straight month that spending has totaled about $20bn, a level of consistency rarely seen in the generally lumpy tech M&A market. For comparison, in the January-May period in each of the past three years, the highest monthly spending has been at least twice the lowest monthly spending.

May also marked another month of consistency in terms of deal value being concentrated at the top end of the market. Last month, the three largest transactions accounted for half of the total spending, according to the M&A Knowledgebase. That has been true for every month so far in 2016 except February. May’s big-ticket deals included CSC’s purchase of Hewlett Packard Enterprise’s services arm, which stands as the largest divestiture of 2016; Bell Canada’s consolidation of Manitoba Telecom Services; and Vista Equity Partners’ buyout of Marketo, the second-largest take-private of 2016.

Assuming the relatively uniform monthly spending holds for the remaining seven months of 2016, the full-year value of tech deals would come in at about $275bn. That would be less than half of the amount spent in 2015, which represented a 15-year high in M&A, and basically match the level of 2013.

Deal flow in 2016

Month Deal volume Deal value
May 305 $21.2bn
April 335 $19.6bn
March 334 $23.3bn
February 319 $29.2bn
January 378 $20.9bn

Source: 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase