Category: investment banking

After a two-year surge, a two-month slump in tech M&A

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly 

The tech M&A market is still struggling to get going in 2017. For the second straight month, spending on tech acquisitions around the globe totaled just half the average monthly level from last year. According to 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase, tech acquirers announced just $19bn worth of transactions in the just-completed month of February, almost exactly matching the low spending level of January. Put together, the opening months of this year represent the weakest back-to-back monthly spending totals since 2013.

Similarly, the number of announced deals in February slumped to its lowest monthly level in more than three years. The 238 transactions tallied for February in the M&A KnowledgeBase represents a 30% slide from January deal volume and a 25% year-over-year decline from the average activity levels in February 2016 and February 2015.

The decline is due primarily to several of the well-known corporate acquirers either slowing their M&A machines or unplugging them altogether so far this year. For instance, neither SAP nor Intel have put up a 2017 print. Meanwhile, IBM has announced just one small transaction this year, down from a head-spinning pace of seven acquisitions in the first two months of 2016.

On the other hand, private equity (PE) firms have continued their record-setting pace. Buyout shops, which represent the sole ‘growth market’ in tech M&A right now, announced 23 deals in February – almost as many as they did in February 2015 and February 2016 combined. Three separate PE firms (Blackstone Group, H.I.G. Capital and The Riverside Company) announced at least two transactions last month.

The lackluster start to 2017 comes after tech M&A hit its two strongest years of the past decade and a half. (Tech acquirers dropped more than $1.1 trillion on deals over the 2015-16 spree, according to the M&A KnowledgeBase.) That recent record activity appears to have siphoned off some of the acquisitions in 2017. Senior tech investment bankers surveyed by 451 Research last December gave their weakest forecast for M&A spending in 2017 for any year since the recent recession.

A mule that’s actually a unicorn

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly 

Unlike a fair number of late-stage startups, MuleSoft is no donkey trying to pass itself off as a unicorn. The fast-growing data-integration specialist has tripled revenue over the past three years, and appears to be on track to put up about $250m in sales this year. More importantly, MuleSoft is not hemorrhaging money. That should play well on Wall Street, which has telegraphed that it will no longer reward the growth-at-any-cost strategy at startups that want to come public (ahem, Snap Inc).

Assuming MuleSoft does indeed make it to the NYSE, where it will trade under the ticker MULE, it would mark the first enterprise technology IPO since last October. Of course, Snap is currently on the road, telling potential investors that its business model, which consists of hardware and disappearing messages, is the next Facebook rather than the next Twitter. But we’ll leave aside the offering from that consumer technology vendor, which just might be able to convince investors that losing a half-billion dollars last year, which is about $100m more than it booked as revenue, is a sustainable or even desirable business model.

Instead of Snap’s planned IPO, MuleSoft’s offering lines up more closely with fellow infrastructure software provider AppDynamics. (At least up to the point where Cisco comes in with a too-good-to-be-ignored $3.7bn offer.) A glance at the prospectus from each vendor shows both growing at a rapid clip (AppDynamics posted a slightly higher rate, even off a bigger base) and posting GAAP numbers that were at least headed out of the red (MuleSoft lost less than AppDynamics, on both an absolute and relative basis). Also, both firms had annual customer retention rates, measured by dollars spent, of roughly 120%. Wall Street eats up that sort of metric.

MuleSoft raised roughly $250m in total funding, most recently announcing a $128m round in mid-2015. With investors clamoring for growth tech companies right now, MuleSoft could certainly start life as a public entity with a double-digit multiple. Maybe not the nearly 18x trailing sales that AppDynamics commanded in its sale to Cisco. (After all, that was terminal value, not trading value.) But MuleSoft could almost undoubtedly convince Wall Street that it’s worth a premium to Talend, a rival data-integration vendor that came public last summer and currently trades at about 7x trailing sales. MuleSoft is larger than Talend and – more importantly to Wall Street – it is growing twice as fast. That profile will likely boost MuleSoft’s initial valuation on Wall Street to north of $2bn, or 10x its trailing sales of $190m.

2016 enterprise tech IPOs*
Company Date of offering
SecureWorks April 22, 2016
Twilio June 23, 2016
Talend July 29, 2016
Apptio September 23, 2016
Nutanix September 30, 2016
Coupa October 7, 2016
Everbridge October 11, 2016
BlackLine Systems October 27, 2016
Quantenna Communications October 27, 2016
Source: 451 Research *Includes Nasdaq and NYSE listings only

How secure is your deal, legally?

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly 

For all of the attention paid to the financial and strategic aspects of M&A, it certainly pays to remember that, at their core, acquisitions are fundamentally legal processes. The terms and conditions of any acquisition effectively codify all of the other points that come up over the weeks or even months of negotiating a deal. Pricing, timing, governance, executive responsibilities – all of those key M&A considerations, along with dozens of other smaller-but-still-thorny concerns, are ultimately spelled out in a legally binding agreement.

Most of the final provisions of any deal surface during the earlier due-diligence period, which, depending on your particular view of law, can be a process to either help optimize the outcome of the combination or simply lessen the chances that you’ll get screwed in the transaction. Given the direct influence that due diligence has in shaping the ultimate acquisition agreement, it’s worth noting what the two sides are paying attention to when they strike a deal.

One key area of M&A-related examinations that’s getting an increasingly sharper focus is information security. A survey last October of 150 senior members of the tech M&A community, including a number of lawyers, revealed that not a single respondent reduced the amount of due diligence they did on a target company’s cybersecurity practices last year. Further, in the most recent edition of the M&A Leaders’ Survey from 451 Research and law firm Morrison & Foerster, fully eight out of 10 (82%) respondents said the level of scrutiny actually increased over the course of 2016, with the remaining 18% saying it held steady.

Obviously, as has come out in Verizon’s ongoing attempt to purchase Yahoo’s operating business, cybersecurity considerations can have a dramatic impact on a deal. The acquisition will now drag on a few months longer and the price will be lowered by $350m, or 7%, because of the massive data breaches that Yahoo revealed after the late-July announcement. As Verizon moves ahead with its plan to acquire the faded purple website, the transaction is nonetheless a reminder that cybersecurity concerns in M&A need to figure into boardroom discussions, not just courtroom disputations.

451 Research M&A Outlook webinar

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

After a slow start in January, what does the rest of the year hold for tech M&A? Will 2017 rebound like 2016, which had a similarly slow opening month only to surge later in the year to finish with the second-highest annual spending total since the internet bubble burst? Or will this year settle back down to more typical post-recession levels, which would mean a decline of about 50% in spending from 2016’s total?

Join 451 Research tomorrow for an hour-long webinar as we look at the recent activity and forecasts from both corporate and financial acquirers, the valuations they are paying (and expect to pay) as well as what broad forces are likely to shape deals in the coming year. Additionally, we’ll look at specific themes that are likely to play out in key sectors of the IT market, including software, security and mobility. The webinar starts at 10:00am PST on Tuesday, February 7, and you can register here.

Lots of tech deals, but few dollars, to start 2017

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

After slumping sharply in the two months following the unexpected results of the US election, the number of tech acquisitions picked back up in January. M&A spending, however, didn’t follow suit. In the just-completed month, tech buyers around the globe announced 330 deals, with the aggregate value of those transactions totaling just $18bn, according to 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase. January spending represents the lowest monthly level in two years, and just half the average monthly amount in 2016.

At the top end of the market, the M&A KnowledgeBase tallied just five deals valued at more than $1bn. That’s down from last year’s average of eight big-ticket transactions each month. Further, with one notable exception, the ‘three-comma deals’ so far this year have all gone off at below-market multiples. For instance, Keysight Technologies is paying just 3.2 times trailing sales for application testing vendor Ixia, which had been posting declining revenue. Clearlake Capital Group is paying an even lower multiple for LANDESK, owned by fellow buyout firm Thoma Bravo, according to our understanding.

A discount didn’t apply to last month’s largest transaction, Cisco’s reach for AppDynamics. The networking giant, which has been busily buying software vendors, paid an astounding 17.4x trailing sales for the application performance monitoring provider. (The $3.7bn deal marks the largest sale of a VC-backed company in three years.) Part of that rich valuation can be attributed to the fact that Cisco had to outbid the public market for AppDynamics, which was just a day away from setting the price of its planned IPO when Cisco announced the acquisition. Still, AppDynamics’ valuation is the highest multiple ever paid for a software firm with more than $50m in revenue, according to the M&A KnowledgeBase.

January’s deal volume, on the other hand, reversed two months of sharp declines to close 2016. The number of tech transactions in both November and December dropped to three-year lows, according to the M&A KnowledgeBase. Buyers last month included ServiceNow, Amazon Web Services and Oracle. Meanwhile, companies that double-dipped in the M&A market to start 2017 included Microsoft, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and the recently public Everbridge.

Recent tech M&A activity, monthly

Period Deal volume Deal value
January 2017 330 $18bn
December 2016 268 $39.5bn
November 2016 284 $39.6bn
October 2016 334 $83.2bn
September 2016 312 $30.1bn
August 2016 306 $31.5bn
July 2016 345 $94.1bn
June 2016 384 $67bn
May 2016 329 $23.8bn
April 2016 349 $20.7bn
March 2016 343 $23.9bn
February 2016 323 $28.3bn
January 2016 384 $21bn

Source: 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

The tech IPO window: open but unused

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

With AppDynamics stepping into Cisco’s ever-expanding software portfolio rather than continuing its march toward Wall Street, tech startups have once again been shut out of the public markets in the opening month of a year. Last January also didn’t see a single enterprise tech IPO, starting a drought that lasted until late April. Q1 2016 was the first quarter since the recent recession not to have a tech company come to market – and the current quarter is in danger of repeating that, despite some of the most-welcoming conditions on Wall Street.

Unlike this year, last year’s Q1 shutout was sparked by a double-digit percentage slide in US equity indexes in the opening six weeks of 2016. The Dow Jones Industrial Average, which is currently above the symbolically significant 20,000 level, bottomed out below 15,600 last February. (From trough to top, that represents almost a 30% gain in the Dow, adding more than a trillion dollars of market value.) Last winter’s bear market was even worse for highly valued tech names, which is what most of the tech IPO candidates aspire to be.

With investors selling their existing tech holdings, it was hard to find buyers for any new tech listings. In the imbalanced market at the start of last year, the financially prudent decision for startups tracking to an IPO was simply to wait until summer, when tech came back in favor among investors. By our count, seven of the nine enterprise-focused tech vendors that went public in 2016 debuted in the second half of the year. The debuts were actually even more concentrated than that, as two-thirds of tech IPOs last year came in just the six-week period leading up to the US elections in early November. Not a single tech provider has gone public in the three months since the election.

Part of the scarcity is due to seasonality. (Companies tend to prefer to finish Q4, which is almost inevitably their biggest quarter, and then go to market with full-year financials and a valuation that’s based on the coming year’s projected sales.) And yet, while IPO-minded startups have been focused on closing business and getting their financial paperwork in order, companies already public have been enjoying an extended, and somewhat unexpected, ‘Trump rally’ on Wall Street.

Indexes have posted a roughly 10% surge since the election, as investors bet that having a businessman as US president – who’s working with a Republican-controlled Congress – will be able to stimulate more economic growth. Perhaps more important to the relatively fragile IPO market, the instability and uncertainty from broader political and economic events has receded sharply. (For instance, the CBOE’s Volatility Index is currently just half the level it was during the run-up to the election.) The shift in sentiment is even more dramatic in our own surveys of individual investors.

In the two monthly surveys by 451 Research’s Voice of the Connected User Landscape (VoCUL) since Trump was elected, more than four out of 10 investors have said they are ‘more confident’ about the direction of the stock market now than they were 90 days earlier. That’s roughly twice the percentage that said they were ‘less confident’. Those are the most-encouraging assessments of Wall Street in a 451 Research survey since the end of the recession. And yet in the most bullish of recent bull markets, not a single tech startup has made it public in 2017.

The IPO window may be as open right now as it’s been in years, but investors would never know it. With two months remaining in the first quarter – and current stock market indexes more than 20% higher than they were in Q1 2016 – the net result for new enterprise tech offerings from last Q1 and the current quarter could well be the same: an IPO shutout.

Now available: 451 Research’s 2017 M&A Outlook

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Each year, 451 Research looks ahead to the coming year in M&A, highlighting the trends that will shape deal flow and the markets that are expected to see much of the activity. The report, which serves as an ‘M&A playbook’ for 2017, is now available to 451 Research subscribers.

Topics covered in the latest edition of the M&A Outlook include:

  • Besides the ‘usual suspects,’ which other tech acquirers stepped up their shopping in 2016 and are likely to accelerate that pace this year? If companies including Dell, Twitter and Dropbox aren’t buying any longer, where is the demand going to come from?
  • Specifically, which tech markets are expected to see the biggest flow of M&A dollars in the coming year? Enterprise security and mobility lead the forecast, but what about emerging cross-sector themes such as the Internet of Things and big data?
  • What’s shifted in the exit environment for VC-backed companies to open the way for some of the startups to realize ‘unicorn’ prices in the real world? And will 2017 (finally) see a rebound in the tech IPO market?
  • With president-elect Donald Trump set to officially take over as CEO of the US next week, why are corporate acquirers expecting a ‘Trump rally’ in the tech M&A market? What about buyers coming from China, who spent more acquiring US tech firms in 2016 than the previous five years combined?

The 5,500-word report – which includes nearly 20 graphics, many of them drawing on 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase – thoroughly and insightfully covers last year’s activity as well as this year’s forecast. Get your copy of the M&A Outlook now.

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

Machine learning and the M&A machine

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Coming off a 60% increase in the number of machine-learning-related transactions last year, the trend of adding ‘smarts’ to technology looks likely to drive even more deals in 2017. Senior investment bankers picked machine learning as the top M&A theme for the coming year in last month’s 451 Research Tech Banking Outlook Survey, with more than eight out of 10 respondents (82%) predicting an uptick in activity. That outlook for machine learning outpaced the view in all individual technology markets as well as the other four cross-market themes of the Internet of Things, big data, cloud computing and converged IT.

One of the reasons why machine learning (and the related – but broader – theme of artificial intelligence) is expected to figure into so many transactions is that the technology is broadly applicable. Basically, any company that is looking to make its products more efficient – which, in turn, makes the users of those products more efficient – could be viewed as a potential acquirer of machine-learning technology. (To be clear, our view of machine learning is that the technology is a subset of artificial intelligence, focused on using algorithms that learn and improve without being explicitly programmed to do so. For a more in-depth look at the AI/ML market, see our recent sector overview led by my colleague Nick Patience.)

Certainly, machine learning appears to be an almost foundational technology when we consider the broad pool of buyers. Just in the past year, acquirers as diverse as Ford Motor, Salesforce, Intel and GE Digital have all announced machine-learning-related transactions, according to the M&A KnowledgeBase. Those deals have been part of a surge of M&A that saw buyers announce as many machine-learning-themed purchases in 2016 as they did from 2002-14, according to the M&A KnowledgeBase.

The where and how of tech M&A in 2017

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

After a surprisingly strong year for tech M&A spending in 2016, it’s natural to look ahead to this year and wonder how – and where – dealmaking will play out. To get a sense of that, we asked the primary players in the market for their specific forecasts on acquisition activity, valuations and even IPOs. 451 Research subscribers can see the full report on our tenth-annual 451 Research Tech Corporate Development Outlook Survey, as well as our twelfth-annual 451 Research Tech Banking Outlook Survey.

In addition to both survey groups offering their broad forecasts for tech M&A, we also asked specific questions about topics that will undoubtedly shape the market in the coming year. A quick highlight from each of the surveys:

  • A plurality of corporate acquirers are anticipating a ‘Trump rally’ in the tech M&A market in 2017. Half of the respondents (49%) expect the political and economic changes from the president-elect’s policies to ‘stimulate’ M&A activity – three times the percentage (16%) that said the policies will ‘inhibit’ dealmaking in the coming year.
  • Tech bankers expect even more M&A spending on enterprise security in the coming year. They also picked that as the top sector for 2016, and they were on to something: Spending on enterprise security soared to a record $16.7bn, more than the two previous years combined, according to 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase.

Again, to see our full report on the M&A outlook from many of the most-active corporate acquirers, click here; and to see our full report on the views and predictions from senior tech investment bankers, click here.

A half-trillion-dollar year for tech M&A

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Even after a record tech M&A run in 2015, dealmakers still had ambitious shopping plans for 2016. Across the globe, tech acquirers announced $500bn worth of transactions in the just-completed year, ranking 2016 as the second-highest annual total for spending since the internet bubble burst in 2000, according to 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase. The unexpectedly strong spending last year came as the number of deals valued at $1bn or more soared to a new record, thanks in no small part to unconventional buyers ready to write big checks.

Although overall M&A spending dropped just 15% year over year in 2016, the year started much slower. In the opening months, the value of announced transactions was running at only half of 2015’s average monthly level. Only a summer surge pulled last year above a middling performance. In the back half of 2016, companies shrugged off the political shakeups in the European Union and the US and inked big deals. Nearly two-thirds (63%) of last year’s total announced M&A spending came in the final six months of the year, according to the M&A KnowledgeBase.

Even with the decline in the aggregate value of tech transactions in 2016, spending has still increased for three of the past four years. That surge, which has seen the annual amount of money spent on acquisitions more than double over the period, has expanded the pool of tech buyers beyond the ‘usual suspects’ of big-name corporate acquirers. For example, private equity firms announced more transactions in 2016 than any year in history, with spending soaring to its highest level since before the recent recession, when ‘club deals’ were all the rage. Also, Asian-based tech companies accounted for 16 of the 98 transactions valued at $1bn or more, an unprecedented share of the top end of the M&A market for the traditionally conservative shoppers.

As to where that leaves tech M&A for 2017, we’ll have some predictions about that from the main participants in the market later this week. In mid-December, 451 Research surveyed – separately – both corporate development executives and senior investment bankers to get a sense of their plans and pipeline for the coming year. One high-level finding: for the first year in the decade of surveying both groups, the forecasts didn’t exactly line up with one another. Uncharacteristically, bankers sounded a bearish tone for 2017, while corporate executives plan to ramp up their shopping. Look for full reports on the outlook and reasoning from both groups later this week.