Category: IPO

An imbalance in the market for unicorns

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

The herd of unicorns gets bigger every day. But as the supply of these startups valued at more than $1bn continues to swell, we can’t help but note that on the other side of the equation, the demand isn’t really keeping pace, at least not outside a handful of elite investors. For the most part, the broader market hasn’t opened the exits for these unicorns to realize the value that’s being lavished on them.

So far this year, for instance, we haven’t seen any sales of VC-backed startups for more than about a half-billion dollars, according to 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase. Further, in a 451 Research survey last December, four out of 10 (42%) corporate M&A executives told us they expect the M&A valuations for privately held companies to actually decline in 2015 compared with their valuations last year. That was the most bearish forecast for exit values of startups from their would-be buyers since the recession year of 2009.

Meanwhile, the IPO market isn’t particularly rewarding these days, either. Box – a unicorn that had been a darling of the late-stage investment community through nearly a dozen rounds of funding – hasn’t created any additional value as a NYSE-listed company than it did as a private company. (And based on the fact that an astounding 40% of Box’s shares are sold short, Wall Street is very clearly betting that its flat-lined valuation is still too high.)

Despite the recent muted returns for VCs, unicorns continue to get fed. For instance, Slack, a collaboration tool that’s less than two years old, has reportedly doubled its valuation since previously notching a $1.2bn price in an October funding.

Obviously, we’re looking at an extremely short exit period of just the first quarter of 2015. And we’re conscious that in most cases, investors are placing bets today that they hope will pay off maybe a half-decade from now. But for right now, when we look at both ends of the market for highly valued startups, we can see how you buy a unicorn but we wonder how you go about selling it.

Projected change in private company M&A valuations

Period Increase Stay the same Decrease
December 2014 for 2015 29% 29% 42%
December 2013 for 2014 29% 55% 16%
December 2012 for 2013 28% 39% 33%
December 2011 for 2012 35% 26% 39%
December 2010 for 2011 71% 20% 9%
December 2009 for 2010 58% 36% 6%
December 2008 for 2009 4% 9% 87%
December 2007 for 2008 39% 28% 33%

Source: 451 Research Tech Corporate Development Outlook Survey

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

Box takes the tape off its IPO, again

Scott Denne

Contact: Alan Pelz-Sharpe

Box looks set to hit the IPO market six months after revealing an S1 filing that met with a storm of disapproval.

In the initial filing, the company revealed that it was spending more on sales and marketing than it was generating in revenue – about 2x more. Growth is the central element of Box’s DNA, like most tech companies exiting the startup phase. And Wall Street has been OK with that. But Box’s spending tested the limits, and the filing came amid a slump in SaaS stocks.

In the time since the initial S1, the enterprise file sync and share (EFSS) vendor has tamed its spending and demonstrated a path to profitability – though it’s still far from it. In the most recently reported quarter, its net loss was only 80% of its revenue, compared with a net loss that was 2.5x its sales a year earlier. Revenue nearly doubled across those periods.

Box has a promising compounding revenue renewal model, though it’s hard to articulate. That’s something its new filing goes to greater lengths to illustrate. Now that the company can show a path to profitability and is better at articulating its business model, the offering will likely do well, giving Box the capital and currency it needs to continue to grow.

The Street’s embrace of Box has implications beyond the company’s future. A successful offering would open the door for Dropbox to have an IPO of its own. Just as Box’s stumble on the way to an IPO damped the exit outlook for other EFSS startups (as we noted in an earlier report), its success would brighten the prospects for the entire sector.

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

What do the main buyers in the tech M&A market see for the year ahead?

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Last year was a big year for tech M&A, but what was the biggest deal of year? To find out, we asked the main buyers in the tech M&A market: corporate development executives. As part of a broader survey, we had them look at the handiwork of their peers and give us their pick for the most significant tech transaction of 2014.

So which deal got the Golden Tombstone? Facebook’s $19bn cash-and-stock acquisition of WhatsApp. The purchase last February by the 10-year-old social network represents the largest VC-backed exit in history. It drew twice as many votes as the second-place transaction, SAP’s $8.3bn reach for Concur Technologies, which is the largest-ever SaaS acquisition.

Additionally, we asked the corporate acquirers what they expected for the coming year. Their responses point to a continuation of the record run of tech M&A. More than half of corporate development executives (58%) indicated that they expect their company to pick up the pace of dealmaking in 2015. That stands as the highest forecast in a half-decade and compares with just one in five respondents (6%) projecting a slowdown in their M&A activity in the coming year.

Other highlights from the survey of corporate development executives include a bearish outlook for startup valuations, a record forecast for IPOs and the expectation of unprecedented amount of competition in deals from their private equity rivals in 2015. Subscribers: See the full report.

Top vote getter for ‘most significant tech transaction’

Year Deal
2014 Facebook’s acquisition of WhatsApp
2013 IBM’s acquisition of SoftLayer
2012 VMware’s acquisition of Nicira
2011 Google’s acquisition of Motorola Mobility
2010 Intel’s acquisition of McAfee
2009 Oracle’s acquisition of Sun Microsystems
2008 Hewlett-Packard’s acquisition of EDS
2007 Citrix’s acquisition of XenSource

Source: 451 Research Tech Corporate Development Outlook Survey

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

Big Oil has big trouble; Big Data has big opportunity

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

If data is the new oil, as some futurists would have it, then the accompanying transfer of value came through loud and clear in Friday trading. As oil prices slumped to their lowest levels since the recession, a pair of data-centric startups skyrocketed onto the market. The IPOs of New Relic and Hortonworks, collectively, created $2.5bn of market value.

Both offerings priced above the expected range and then surged another 40% on a day that saw US stock markets tick lower, in part, because of the pronounced slump in oil prices. The debut left both companies trading at platinum double-digit valuations. (New Relic, which will put up about $115m in sales in the current fiscal year, is being valued on Wall Street at about $1.5bn, while Hortonworks, which will do roughly $50m in sales this year, garnered a $1bn valuation.)

New Relic, which collects billions of data points around the performance of applications and the IT systems that run them, priced its shares at $23 each and saw them soar to about $33 in mid-Friday trading. ( See our full report on the New Relic offering.)

Similarly, Hortonworks – a ‘big data’ vendor that sells a Hadoop distribution – priced its shares at an above-range $16 and then saw its stock change hands at roughly $23. (See our full report on the Hortonworks offering.)

Just to put a point of contrast between old oil patch and new digital economy, consider this: the cost of buying one share each of New Relic and Hortonworks is roughly the same as the cost of buying a barrel of benchmark crude oil. Wall Street was very clear on which investment option looks more rewarding right now.

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

In the IPOs of New Relic and Hortonworks, it’s the grownup vs. the startup

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Although both New Relic and Hortonworks revealed their IPO paperwork on the same day, that’s pretty much all the similarities we could find between the two enterprise technology companies. The two candidates have wildly different delivery models, operating margins, customer counts and even maturity of business models. That’s not to say they both can’t find a home on Wall Street, but only one of them is likely to dwell in a ritzy neighborhood. (451 Research subscribers: look for our full reports on both the New Relic and Hortonworks offerings later today.)

Of the two offerings, New Relic looks to be the standout. The application performance management vendor is growing quickly, but maybe more importantly, it is starting to show some leverage in its business model. This stands in sharp contrast to some of the other unprofitable IPO candidates that talk distantly about the company hitting some magical ‘inflection point’ when the red ink turns black.

New Relic is already demonstrating greater efficiency in its model, which will undoubtedly appeal to Wall Street. Consider this: In the first six months of the company’s current fiscal year, its operating loss basically stayed the same even as revenue soared 84%. More specifically, New Relic actually lost less money in its most recent quarter, which wrapped in September, than it did in the same quarter a year earlier. It trimmed its quarterly loss even as the company added more than $10m, or 78%, to its top line.

In contrast, Hortonworks is still forming its business, without much – if any – regard to optimizing it. The three-year-old Hadoop distributor is a classic startup, with many of the concerns that come with early-stage businesses: customer concentration, heavy upfront spending and precariously thin margins. (Hortonworks’ professional services business, which actually runs at a negative gross margin, has been a serious drag on the company’s overall gross margin. Through the first three quarters of the year, Hortonworks has been running at just a 34% gross margin, less than half the 81% gross margin posted by New Relic.)

When we net out all the differences between New Relic and Hortonworks, we see a vast gulf between the two IPO candidates at the bottom line. Sure, both still run in the red, but New Relic is only a light red, while Hortonworks is hemorrhaging a blood red. To put some specific numbers on that metaphor: At its current rate, New Relic loses about 40 cents for every $1 it brings in as revenue. In contrast, Hortonworks loses a staggering $2.60 for every $1 it brings in as revenue.

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA

Webinar: Tech M&A outlook

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Last spring, respondents to the M&A Leaders’ Survey from 451 Research and Morrison & Foerster accurately predicted a dramatic surge in tech M&A activity. So what do they see coming now?

We’ll take a lively and thought-provoking look at the results from our latest survey in a special webinar on Wednesday, November 5 at 1:00pm EST. To register for the webinar, simply click here.

Among the key findings we’ll be discussing:

  • Nearly half of the respondents expect overall tech acquisition activity, which has been running at a record rate in 2014, to accelerate through the next half-year.
  • The percentage of survey respondents who say the tech M&A market is likely to be busier from now through next spring is three times higher than the 16% forecasting a decline in acquisition activity.
  • The outlook for private company M&A valuations has never been more bearish. A record 34% of respondents project that sale prices for startups will head lower from now through next April, compared with 26% who anticipate prices ticking higher.

Again, the webinar will be held on Wednesday at 1:00pm EST. Registration is complimentary and can be found here.

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

Survey: no slowdown in record tech M&A pace

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Even as tech M&A spending sprints along at a record clip in 2014, half of the respondents to the just-completed M&A Leaders’ Survey from 451 Research and Morrison & Foerster expect the pace to accelerate through the next six months. The 48% of survey respondents who say the tech M&A market is likely to be busier from now through next April is three times higher than the percentage forecasting a decline in activity. (451 Research subscribers: See our full report on the M&A Leaders’ Survey.)

Although the bullish forecast in our mid-October survey dropped from the high-water mark of 72% in our April 2014 survey, it essentially matches the level from surveys over the previous two years. For context, however, it’s also important to note that this outlook – with five out of six respondents indicating that dealmaking will either hold steady or pick up – is coming at a record time for tech M&A. Spending on tech transactions around the globe so far in 2014 is higher than the spending during the same period of 2012 and 2013 combined, according to The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase. (451 Research subscribers: See our full report on Q3 M&A and IPO activity.)

Survey respondents were less bullish in their outlook for private company M&A valuations. A record 34% of respondents predicted that sale prices for startups would head lower from now through next April, three times the percentage that said that in our survey just a half-year ago. We would attribute at least part of the deterioration to the fact that there were certainly bigger – and much higher-profile – sales of startups in the early part of 2014. Overall, according to the KnowledgeBase, the first half of 2014 has seen eight of the 10 largest deals announced so far this year, led by the largest-ever VC exit, WhatsApp’s sale to Facebook in February for $19bn.

M&A spending outlook for the next six months

Survey date Increase Stay the same Decrease
October 2014 48% 36% 16%
April 2014 72% 24% 4%
October 2013 50% 43% 7%
April 2013 54% 27% 19%
October 2012 49% 34% 17%
April 2012 59% 33% 8%

Source: M&A Leaders’ Survey from 451 Research / Morrison & Foerster

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

Zayo’s zesty debut

Scott Denne

Contact:  Scott Denne

Despite pricing below its target range, Zayo Group receives a warm reception on Wall Street. The fiber services and colocation vendor was trading up about $22 per share (roughly the midpoint of its proposed range) from its $19 IPO price, giving it an enterprise valuation of $8.09bn (7.2x TTM revenue).

Considering Zayo’s organic growth was just 6% in each of the past two years, that’s a healthy multiple, putting it well ahead of others in the colocation and network services sectors, though the diversity of the company’s business – which includes dark fiber, mobile backhaul networks and colocation – makes a direct peer tough to find. Ironically, the best available comparison for Zayo’s valuation is Zayo itself: in 2012, it took AboveNet private in a $2.2bn deal – the largest of the 32 acquisitions it has made since 2007 – at 4.5x trailing revenue.

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

After Alibaba, the IPO market begins long slide lower

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

The record-setting offering by Alibaba in mid-September stands as the clear peak for IPOs in 2014. The only question is how sharp the decline will be for the rest of the year.

So far, the slope hasn’t been that steep. CyberArk followed quickly on the heels of the offering by the Chinese e-commerce company, with the online identity management vendor nearly doubling on debut and holding up solidly in the aftermarket. That was followed a week later by online home furnishings retailer Wayfair pricing above its expected range and soaring onto the NYSE at a valuation of more than $3bn. And then last week, marketing automation provider HubSpot surged onto the public market, trading at about 10x trailing sales. (Subscribers: See our report on the HubSpot IPO).

After this batch of IPOs, however, the drop-off accelerates. Currently in the pipeline are companies that are looking like they will be tough sells on Wall Street, including the deeply unprofitable GoDaddy, the profligate Box and the old-line consolidator Good Technology. (We would note that both Box and Good Technology seem to have acknowledged that they may not be pulling in any money from Wall Street any time soon, and have retreated to raising from late-stage investors again.)

Looking at the calendar, it’s unlikely that many other companies are aiming to hustle and get in their IPO paperwork and go public before the end of the year. That’s particularly true as the equity markets hit a rough patch. Both the Nasdaq and the S&P 500 dropped about 4% just last week, the sharpest weekly decline in more than two years. Volatility also ticked up substantially. Put that all together, and it’s looking like a long slide to close 2014 for new offerings.

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

IPO = Interminable Private Offerings

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

For one pair of money-burning companies, IPO no longer stands for Initial Public Offering – instead, it’s Interminable Private Offerings. Unable to graduate to Wall Street, both Box and Good Technology have retreated, returning hat in hand to the ranks of late-stage investors for their next round of life-sustaining capital.

Good Technology, a mobile management software consolidator that has never come close to turning a profit, drew in another $80m on Wednesday. That comes almost three months after collaboration software vendor Box – a startup that spends more on sales and marketing than it takes in as revenue – pulled in $150m. (Tellingly, Box’s latest round was reportedly done at a flat valuation.)

Taken together, Good Technology and Box have now raised more than $800m in funding from private sources. In comparison, Good Technology had hoped to raise $100m from public investors, while Box plans a $150m offering, scaled back from an original $250m.

The new fundings are a clear setback to both Good Technology and Box, which have been on file to go public since May and March, respectively. Further, it may well give pause to other companies that were looking to Wall Street to subsidize their free-spending ways. After all, an S-1 is an expensive, time-consuming and very revealing bit of paperwork.

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.