M&A – Page 109 – Inorganic Growth

What to do with webOS?

November 21, 2011 Brenon Daly

Investors can only hope that Hewlett-Packard doesn’t announce any ‘bold, transformative steps’ this afternoon like it did the last time it discussed its quarterly financial results. Recall that it was just mid-August when the tech giant unveiled a dramatic overhaul of its business: looking to jettison its $40bn PC division while simultaneously closing the largest acquisition in the software industry in seven years. And, to make matters worse, HP announced those moves in the same breath as it said it would fall short of its earnings projections for the third straight quarter.

Given that the makeover had the dubious distinction of being both overdue and ill-conceived, it’s probably not surprising that it was doomed. (As, it turned out, was the chief architect of those plans, Leo Apotheker.) The company had shed as much as $20bn in market value at one point because of the strategic stumbles, although it is ‘only’ down about half that amount now.

Part of the recent recovery has come from the fact that HP has stabilized, at least in some regards. There was no lingering, interminable Yahoo-style search for a replacement when Apotheker got dumped; instead, the company moved Meg Whitman into the corner office in quick order. Also, rather than see through the sale of its PC business – a divestiture that would have only brought pennies on the dollar, if it could have been done at all – HP reversed course and said it plans to remain in the PC business.

Of course, there’s still uncertainty hanging over one key aspect of its Personal Systems Group: webOS. As we see it, HP has four basic options for the business, which supplies operating systems to tablets and smartphones. It could keep webOS and put real investments behind it, even though, in the short term, those efforts might not produce much return. HP could shop webOS to a device maker, which might benefit from an integrated hardware and software product or, at the least, cut the manufacturer’s reliance on Google’s Android. Alternatively, rather than try to sell webOS as an ongoing entity, HP could slim it down to simply a portfolio of patents and put that on the block. And finally, if it can’t sell webOS in any fashion, it could just follow in the footsteps of Nokia and its Symbian OS, and punt the software into the open source community in hopes of gaining developer support with a wider range of webOS devices.

And the next IT security IPO is…

November 17, 2011 Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

From what we hear, investors won’t have to wait anywhere close to another two years for an IPO by an information security vendor. In fact, a pair of companies is set to put in their paperwork, with at least one prospectus possibly filed yet this year. Those offerings would follow last week’s strong debut of Imperva, which was the first IPO in the information security sector since Fortinet hit the market in November 2009.

Since then, however, a half-dozen other security providers that we might have expected to go public – both those formally on file, as well as ones in the ‘shadow’ pipeline – have been snapped up in trade sales or have scrapped IPO plans. So which companies are likely to make it through the ongoing wave of consolidation and actually hit the public market?

Several sources have indicated that both AVG Technologies and AVAST Software have picked their underwriting teams and should be filing prospectuses in the coming weeks. In addition to similar timing on their IPOs, the two companies actually have a fair number of traits in common: both trace their roots back more than 20 years to Prague, and both are primarily known for their ‘freemium’ antivirus offering. Additionally, both AVG and AVAST boast that their products have been downloaded more than 100 million times.

Assuming AVG and AVAST do indeed file and come public, they will likely benefit from two key trends on Wall Street. First, there is a clear demand among investors for security companies. Consider the fact that they are valuing Imperva at a rather rich level of nearly seven times 2011 sales, with Fortinet commanding an even higher valuation.

Second, there has been a notable shift toward the ‘consumerization’ of IPOs. Tech vendors that have debuted so far this year such as LinkedIn, Pandora Media, HomeAway, Zillow and, of course, Groupon have not only dominated headlines, they have also raised significantly more money in their offerings than pure enterprise offerings. Most notably, Groupon raised $700m in its hotly debated IPO. But LinkedIn also raised $400m and Pandora raised $240m, which is more than twice the amount Imperva garnered in its offering, for instance. We’ll have a full look at the rumored offerings by AVG and AVAST, along with a broader look at the information security market, in a special report in tonight’s Daily 451.

Symantec gets the better end of a ‘win-win’ deal

November 16, 2011 Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

When a marriage dissolves, it’s typically a messy process with bitter recriminations and resentments over how to divide the results of lives pooled together. Not so with Symantec’s step out of its three-and-a-half-year-old joint venture (JV) with Huawei. Selling its 49% stake in the storage and security appliance JV to its Chinese partner for $530m brings both companies a number of advantages. And while we might be tempted to label it one of those mythical win-win transactions, a closer look at the deal shows that Big Yellow gets more of the ‘win’ than Huawei, at least in our view.

From a purely financial standpoint, Symantec exits the JV having more than tripled the valuation of the entity. As CFO James Beer noted on a call discussing the sale, Symantec is realizing an annualized internal rate of return (IRR) of 31%. (We might add that performance came in the face of the worst global economic slowdown since the Great Depression, and is roughly three times the return of the Nasdaq over the same period. The IRR is undoubtedly higher than the numbers put up by many of the late-stage investors and buyout shops over that time.)

Additionally, the terms don’t limit Symantec from expanding its business in China, either in terms of distribution or even in new agreements with other hardware providers. Meanwhile, Huawei will be paying Symantec OEM royalties from its contributions to products for the next seven years. (No amount was given for those payments.) That’s not a bad deal at all for Symantec, which was advised by Citigroup Global Markets while Morgan Stanley banked Huawei.

Cloud deals arising from the fog

November 10, 2011 Ben Kolada

Contact: Ben Kolada

Going into the last day of the 9th Cloud Computing Expo, held in Santa Clara, California, we get the feeling that conference attendees will see an M&A shakeout within the next few years. To a degree, this dealmaking has already begun, with a small handful of exhibitors already having been scooped up, including a couple of firms that were acquired just last month. Meanwhile, the remaining vendors, most of whom are young startups, are scrapping to define and prove themselves for what they hope will someday be their own fruitful exits.

The cloud computing market is real and growing. My 451 Market Monitor colleagues, who have the tedious task of sizing the cloud market, estimate global cloud revenue (excluding SaaS) at $9.8 billion for 2011, with nearly 40% revenue growth expected in 2012. Many players in this sector have already taken note of its potential and acquirers’ interest, resulting in an increase in both deal sizes and deal volume for cloud vendors. According to The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase, so far this year a record 465 transactions claimed some aspect of cloud. That’s nearly double what we saw in the same period last year. (To be honest, many of these acquired companies are about as cloudy as snake oil, but there are real cloud deals being done. Platform Computing and Gluster, which both announced their sales last month, sold for an estimated combined deal value just shy of $450m.)

However, in terms of revenue, most of the cloud startups we spoke with haven’t yet really proven themselves commercially. But as these firms transition their focus from product development to marketing and sales, their growth will attract more and more suitors. And double-digit revenue isn’t exactly a requirement for a successful exit, as both the recent CloudSwitch and Cloud.com takeouts proved. Though we understand that none of these companies are looking to sell just yet, we wouldn’t be surprised if cloud-enablement providers such as OnApp, Abiquo and Nimbula are picked off one by one within the next few years. And we were reminded yet again that open source networking and routing vendor Vyatta could someday see a real offer from Dell, though the IT giant would likely face a competing bid from Cisco.

Best Buy buys outside the box

November 7, 2011November 8, 2011 Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Best Buy continues to buy outside the box. The consumer electronics giant, which has more than 1,000 big-box stores, announced a pair of deals Monday that add to its emerging businesses that have been responsible for most of the company’s recent growth. In the larger of its purchases, Best Buy will pay $1.3bn to pick up full ownership of its US and Canadian mobile phone business, which had been run as a joint venture with British retailer Carphone Warehouse Group. Additionally, Best Buy will pay $167m for mindSHIFT Technologies, a managed service provider that has about 5,400 small business customers.

The transactions continue a revamp of Best Buy, which started out life as an audio equipment store in 1966. More recently, it has made several acquisitions to expand beyond its historic business. For instance, it bought Geek Squad in 2002 to provide helpdesk support for customers. Service revenue, which has been bolstered by Geek Squad, currently accounts for 7% of the roughly $50bn in sales Best Buy will record this year, and it’s one of the few business lines that has actually increased same-store sales so far this year.

While the Geek Squad pickup has paid off for Best Buy, others have been disappointments. The retailer paid almost $700m for mall-based CD retailer Musicland in 2001, just as the business got ambushed by online music. More recently, it spent $97m in a puzzling purchase of Speakeasy, an Internet service provider. And then there’s the $121m acquisition in September 2008 of Napster. While some of those M&A missteps may have hurt Best Buy, they’ve been nothing like the stumble by its main rival, Circuit City. The company, which pioneered the electronic superstore model, got liquidated in 2009.

Yahoo: hunted, but still in the hunt

November 2, 2011 Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Amid all the speculation that Yahoo would sell itself (or not), the search engine operator swung to the other side of the table on Tuesday, announcing the $270m all-cash purchase of interclick. The planned acquisition, which is expected to close early next year, is the first time Yahoo has reached for a fellow public company in more than eight years. Yahoo has picked up more than 45 privately held companies and one Bulletin Board-listed company since it acquired Overture Services in 2003 for $1.6bn, its largest-ever acquisition. (Another interesting side note on the interclick deal: Boutique advisory firm GCA Savvian has now advised the past two companies that Yahoo has acquired.)

And in its purchase of interclick, Yahoo is getting a relative bargain, at least on one key measure. (Interclick only generates a few million dollars of cash flow each year, so calculating an EBITDA multiple doesn’t make much sense.) At a $270m equity value, interclick is valued at roughly two times projected 2011 revenue. Even with the takeout premium, that’s less than half of Yahoo’s corresponding valuation. The search engine operator currently garners an equity value of about $19bn, or 4.2 times projected sales of $4.5bn this year.

A frightfully slow October

November 1, 2011 Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Spending on tech M&A in the just-completed month of October slumped to the third-lowest monthly tally of the year, amid concerns about the growth prospects across the globe as well as specific questions about the stability of Europe. The total value of deals in the past month hit just $10.7bn, trailing only the totals for September ($8.5bn) and February ($10.3bn). Spending for the month of October hasn’t been this low since 2004.

The main reason for the rather anemic spending level in the past month is the absence of significant transactions. October’s priciest deal (Oracle’s $1.5bn all-cash purchase of RightNow Technologies) doesn’t even land in the top 25 largest acquisitions announced so far this year. We would add that the small amount of M&A spending came despite a stunning 11% gain on the Nasdaq index in October. Of course, that equity market surge has to be considered in context: The index has only returned to the level where it started the year, and is still below the level where it started August.

Sterling Partners aids Mosaid

October 31, 2011

Contact: Thejeswi Venkatesh

Earlier this month, Wi-LAN indicated it would ‘pack up and move on’ if Mosaid Technologies’ shareholders did not accept its sweetened $42 per share unsolicited offer. But in a rather unusual turn of events, it is Mosaid that has moved on. On Friday, the chip technology company announced an agreement with buyout shop Sterling Partners to go private at $46 a share in cash. (Sterling’s bid values Mosaid at about 10 times trailing EBITDA and represents the highest price for the stock in more than a decade.)

Ontario-based Mosaid has many characteristics that make it a good LBO candidate. For instance, it generated $32m in operating cash flow last year. Even more importantly, that cash flow has been fairly predictable thanks to fixed payment agreements with the likes of Hynix Semiconductor, IBM and Samsung. (During the recession-hammered years of 2008 and 2009, Mosaid still generated about the same level of cash from operations.)

And finally, the company has a robust patent portfolio of 2,800 patents. As we have seen in a number of deals recently, IP is increasingly playing a role in M&A, whether it’s the acquisition of Nortel Networks’ patents by a group of companies led by Apple, or the subsequent $12.5bn purchase of Motorola Mobility by Google, the second-largest tech transaction of 2011. Mosaid’s large – and growing – portfolio of patents could well add a bit more to Sterling’s return, when the private equity firm looks to exit this deal.

‘Googorola’ close to closing

October 28, 2011 Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

In what could be its last financial report before it is formally acquired by Google, Motorola Mobility said after the closing bell Thursday that mobile device revenue in the third quarter rose 20% over the same period last year to $2.4bn. That was nearly twice the overall rate of growth at the company in the quarter, although it was a slower rate than the mobile device division had grown in earlier quarters this year.

The main drag on the unprofitable division was anemic sales of its Xoom tablet, with the company indicating that it shipped just 100,000 units in the quarter. That’s just half the number it shipped in Q1 and one-quarter the number it shipped in Q2. But Motorola Mobility did manage to ship more smartphones in the just-completed quarter (4.8 million) than it did in either of the two previous quarters.

And once Google does assume ownership of the company, it may well see a slight bump in demand for those devices, at least according to a finding by our ChangeWave Research division. In late September, ChangeWave asked more than 4,100 consumers what impact Google’s acquisition of Motorola Mobility would have on their plans to buy a smartphone from the combined company. The vast majority said Google’s ownership wouldn’t have any impact. However, of the respondents that indicated a preference, four times the number said they were ‘more likely’ (13%) than said they were ‘less likely’ (3%) to buy a smartphone from the combined company in the future.

The planned $12.5bn sale of Motorola Mobility stands as the second-largest tech acquisition announced so far this year. (The purchase doubled Google’s aggregate M&A spending.) Shareholders in the Libertyville, Illinois-based company are slated to vote on the proposed deal November 17, although it will still need to be cleared by regulators. Assuming that all goes to plan, Google should close its acquisition of Motorola Mobility by the end of the year or early next year.