Category: M&A

Oracle M&A: real and rumored

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Since 2005, Oracle has notched an average of about an acquisition per month each year. Generally speaking, the deals can be sorted into three main buckets: broad horizontal technology purchases, small technology tuck-ins and equally small purchases of companies selling applications for specific industries. Fittingly for a busy buyer, Oracle has one of each of those types of transactions either done or ready to get done. At least, those are the rumors.

First, let’s start with an acquisition that Oracle has announced. On Monday, the vendor said it will pay an undisclosed amount for Relsys, a 22-year-old company that makes safety and risk management software for the pharmaceutical industry. Oracle’s purchase of the Irvine, California-based company comes after it made similar buys for software vendors that serve specific industries, including telecommunications, insurance, retail, utilities and others.

Turning to the speculative transactions, we heard a month ago from several sources that Oracle was interested in picking up Virtual Iron Software. As an example of a technology acquisition, Virtual Iron would add Xen management capabilities to Oracle, which already has a Xen-based hypervisor. And on a larger scale, the market has been buzzing with talk this week about whether Oracle might be mulling a bid for Red Hat. (The open source giant, which reports earnings after today’s close, has seen its shares double since late November.)

While Oracle has reached for open source vendors in the past (Sleepycat Software and Innobase) and still lacks an OS offering in its portfolio, we have doubts that it would make a play for Red Hat. The main reason: Larry Ellison has maintained that his company does not need to have a Linux distribution of its own since it provides support for Red Hat via its Unbreakable Linux program, which was launched in late 2006.

Select platform acquisitions by Oracle

Date Target Price Market
January 2008 BEA Systems $8.5bn Middleware
May 2007 Agile Software $495m Product lifecycle management
March 2007 Hyperion Solutions $3.3bn Business intelligence
November 2006 Stellent $440m Content management
September 2005 Siebel Systems $5.85bn CRM
December 2004 PeopleSoft $10.46bn ERP

Source: The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase

Cisco ‘papers’ purchase of Pure Digital

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

When we wrote recently that Cisco Systems was an unpredictable acquirer, we only covered half of it. Who would have thought (prior to rumors and subsequent official word last Thursday) that Cisco really wanted to buy its way into the consumer electronics market? Much less that the company wanted to enter that space so badly that it would pay what looks a lot more like a 2007 valuation than a 2009 valuation?

We’re referring, of course, to the networking giant’s acquisition last week of Flip camcorder maker Pure Digital Technologies for $590m. As for the valuation, we understand that Pure Digital wrapped up last year with sales of $150m, meaning Cisco paid about four times trailing 12-month sales for the company. Of course, Pure Digital was growing quickly, but we would still note that its valuation is about twice as rich as Cisco’s current valuation. (There were no bankers on either side of deal, we’ve been told.)

The concern about Cisco’s valuation is more than an academic issue for Pure Digital. After all, it took payment in Cisco shares, rather than cash. And that’s the other part of Cisco’s unpredictability. According to our records, the Pure Digital purchase was the first time Cisco has used its equity to acquire a company in more than four years. (The last time Cisco did a paper deal was its $450m pickup of wireless LAN switch vendor Airespace in January 2005.)

Since then, Cisco has inked some 42 transactions with a disclosed deal value of $13.4bn. And of course, the company still has its well-reported $29bn in cash on hand. That level won’t change due to Pure Digital. We can only speculate why Pure Digital’s backers chose to take Cisco stock rather than cash in this economic environment. But we would note that this isn’t the first time that one of Pure Digital’s backers has taken a slug of Cisco equity. Way back in 1987, Sequoia Capital’s founder Don Valentine put money into Cisco.

IPO window opens a crack

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

It’s been exactly a year since SolarWinds put in its paperwork to go public. In that time, capitalism has been beaten and bloodied. To underscore that, consider that the late-great Lehman Brothers was one of the original underwriters of the proposed offering. Obviously, that bank has been erased – both on prospectus and elsewhere. Morgan Stanley now serves as the other major bulge-bracket underwriter on SolarWinds’ ticket.

As we noted earlier this month, the tech IPO market has had nothing to offer since the debut of Rackspace in the middle of last year. Last week, Omneon Video Networks pulled its planned IPO, two years after initially filing the paperwork. That withdraw came less than two weeks after GlassHouse Technologies also scrapped its planned debut.

But a funny thing happened after we declared the IPO market dead: We began to see some signs of life. Chinese online game developer Changeyou.com is set to hit the Nasdaq next week. We would guess that planned debut has much to do with the rebound in the Nasdaq, where Changeyou.com intends to trade. Since finishing a month-long slide on March 9, the Nasdaq has gained some 17%. The index has risen from below 1,300 (close to where it bottomed out in October 2002, after the tech wreck) to above 1,500 during Monday’s Treasury-inspired rally.

We wonder if SolarWinds, which has already amended its original prospectus six times, won’t also look to take advantage of this slim opening of the IPO window to go public. Of course, we’ve always thought that SolarWinds could go public in just about any market, given the fact that it mints money. Last year, the company continued to run at an EBITDA margin of more than 50%, even as revenue hit $93m, up from just $38m in 2006 and $59m in 2007.

Not ad(d)ing up

-Email Thomas Rasmussen

Contrary to our pronouncement last year, the online advertising industry is in a tough spot at the moment. Venture funding for these companies has been shut off as the slumping demand for Web-based advertising has hit the sector harder than it anticipated. (At least it’s not as bad as the regular advertising market. As one VC quipped recently, “While the online ad market has caught a cold, the offline ad market has caught pneumonia.”) Still, the decline in the space has created numerous opportunities for buyers looking to pick up scraps.

One such company having a field day in the current environment is Adknowledge. Just this week, the company picked up the advertising business of struggling MIVA for the bargain price of $11.6m. The division has estimated trailing 12-month revenue of about $75m, down sharply from $100m a year ago. The acquisition came after Adknowledge tucked in two small social networking ad networks for less than $2m, much less than the more than $4m the two raised in venture capital. Furthermore, Adknowledge, which has raised an estimated $45m, tells us that it is still shopping.

Of course, it’s not all gloom and doom for the online ad market. One area where there’s actual growth – and at least the promise of rising valuations – is in online video advertising. VCs have put hundreds of millions of dollars into this sector. Their bet: More Web surfers will increasingly look to online videos for information and entertainment. Granted, it’s still a small space. (Consider the fact that YouTube probably contributed only a few hundred million dollars of revenue to Google’s total revenue of $21.8bn in 2008.) Still, the promise is there. Also encouraging VCs in this market is that the online ad giants (Google, Microsoft, AOL and so on) may well need to go shopping to get video ad technology. We recently published a more-thorough report on that, matching potential buyers and sellers.

Oracle’s stimulus package

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

One way to read Oracle’s novel announcement on Wednesday that it will start paying a dividend is that after years of handing out money to shareholders of other companies in the form of acquisitions, it will dole out some to its own investors. Word that the software giant will pay a dividend for the first time comes after a quarter in which Oracle acquired just one company, mValent. It was the lowest quarterly total for the company in recent memory, and compares with the shopping spree in the same quarter last year that saw it take home BEA Systems for $8.5bn, among other deals.

Although terms for Oracle’s most-recent acquisition weren’t released, we understand that it paid less than $10m for mValent, a change and configuration management startup. Viewed in light of the announced dividend of a nickel per share, even assuming that Oracle paid $10m for mValent, the purchase price works out to just 4% of the cash that the company is set to return to shareholders next month. (With five billion shares outstanding, Oracle’s dividend bill will be $250m per quarter, or $1bn for the full year.)

Even though time and money can only be spent once (as the saying goes), merely committing to paying a dividend doesn’t necessarily take a company out of the M&A market. Look at Microsoft, which has been a dividend-paying company since the beginning of 2003. It has inked four of its five largest deals even as it handed back billions of dollars to its own shareholders. And that corporate largess has hardly imperiled the Redmond, Washington-based behemoth. It finished last year with more than $20bn in cash and short-term investments on its balance sheet.

Oracle’s M&A, by quarter

Period Deal volume Disclosed and estimated deal value
Fiscal Q3 (December-February) 2009 1 Estimated less than $10m
Fiscal Q2 (September-November) 2008 5 $455m
Fiscal Q1 (June-August) 2008 2 Not disclosed
Fiscal Q4 (March-May) 2008 2 $100m
Fiscal Q3 (December-February) 2008 4 $8.5bn
Note: Oracle’s fiscal year ends in May

Source: The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase

A (Big) Blue-colored Sun?

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Just two days after Cisco took the fight to its longtime allies in the server wars, IBM is now looking to buy some ammunition of its own. Big Blue is reportedly mulling a $6.5bn bid for Sun Microsystems, according to The Wall Street Journal. The deal would be the largest tech transaction (excluding telecom M&A) since Hewlett-Packard jabbed at IBM’s giant services division, paying $13.9bn for EDS last May. If it comes to pass, a pairing of IBM and Sun would also radically change the battle lines in the broader fight to build out datacenters, specifically around server, storage and software offerings.

Take the server market. If the deal goes through, a combined IBM-Sun would dominate the high-end, RISC-based, Unix-based symmetrical multiprocessor server market, leaving HP a distant third. However, one point that might pose a challenge for Big Blue is how long it would want to continue with Sun’s Sparc architecture, a direct clash with its own Power chips and System-p servers. Turning to storage, IBM is probably less excited about Sun’s assets in that market. Sun’s storage business has been languishing in the doldrums for years, despite Sun supporting it with its largest-ever acquisition, its mid-2005 purchase of StorageTek for $4.1bn in cash. Nonetheless, there are probably enough enterprise customers locked into Sun’s high-end, mainframe-centric tape business to interest Big Blue. And in software, IBM and Sun are both committed to open source, although we would add that they have slightly different models for monetizing their investments there.

Of course, there’s a chance that the reported talks may not result in a deal. However, we would note that Sun shares are behaving as if it will go through, soaring nearly 80% in early Wednesday afternoon trading to $8.80. That’s essentially where they were last September. That fact probably won’t be lost on Sun’s largest shareholder, Southeastern Asset Management. The activist investor, which has indicated that it talked with Sun to explore a possible sale of the company, among other steps to ‘maximize shareholder value,’ holds some 20% of Sun stock, according to its most-recent SEC filing.

Shopping with St. Patrick

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Starting in the mid-1990s, Ireland joined the New Economy. The island shifted its economy from a centuries-old farming and manufacturing base into a services-oriented and technology-savvy industry. The historic economic isolation of the island gave way to brisk trade with its fellow European Union countries and beyond. Ireland prospered, with some dubbing the country ‘the Celtic tiger’ – a nod to the nickname for the fast-growing countries in Asia during that same period.

Recently, though, Ireland’s boom time has been slowed by the global recession. However, we would point out that the economic decline in the Emerald Isle has been nowhere near as sharp as in another European island nation that dramatically reinvented itself, Iceland. Of course, it helps to think of Iceland not as a country but as a hedge fund, as financial journalist Michael Lewis wrote recently.

What’s interesting to note on this St. Patrick’s Day is how Ireland’s flourishing tech sector has turned into a shopping center for other companies. Since St. Patrick’s Day last year, there has been more than twice the number of Irish tech companies sold than the number of acquisitions made by Irish tech companies. The gulf in spending by Irish companies compared to spending for Irish companies is even more pronounced. Just something to chew over today, in between bites of corned beef and cabbage.

Emerald Isle M&A

Period Acquisitions by Irish companies, $ total Acquisitions of Irish companies, $ total
March 17, 2008-March 17, 2009 11, $225m 25, $720m

Source: The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase

Spring cleaning

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

For many tech companies, it’s time for a bit of spring cleaning. Specifically, there’s been a fair amount of sweeping out of corner offices. Last week saw Time Warner turn over the reins of its struggling AOL unit to a former Google sales executive. (Yes, we share the puzzlement around Tim Armstrong’s move.) Today, Internap Network Services got a fresh face at the top as wheeler-dealer Eric Cooney had his first day as chief executive at the beaten-down networking company. And in just two weeks, John Thompson ends a decade-long run as CEO of Symantec, turning over the security and storage giant to current COO Enrique Salem.

Amid all these moves, we wonder if the sweeping changes in companies’ executive suites will be accompanied by some sweeping out of companies’ portfolios. In the case of AOL, we’re pretty sure that the new appointment will hasten a sale of the unit. (My colleague Thomas Rasmussen noted last summer the concerning ‘lack of urgency’ at Time Warner over AOL, even as subscribers continued to plummet.) When Symantec announced last November that Salem would take the top spot, we speculated that NetBackup, Symantec’s backup and recovery unit, could find its way onto the auction block.

But what about today’s appointment at Internap? We wonder if the new leadership might not take a fresh approach to its underperforming content delivery network (CDN) unit. Internap’s big move into CDN came in October 2006, when it paid $217m in stock for VitalStream Holdings. Internap has acknowledged that it overpaid for the company, writing down a chunk of the purchase price.

And, as my colleague Jim Davis noted in a Tier1 report last week, the performance of Internap’s CDN business has lagged that of its rivals. In fact, Internap’s CDN unit has posted revenue declines for three straight quarters. We would hasten to add that the company’s just-appointed CEO has a solid M&A record behind him. In his previous post as head of Tandberg Television, Cooney oversaw a number of acquisitions before selling the company to Ericsson in early 2007. Could he be planning some dealmaking around Internap’s CDN business?

M&A at Accellos

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Another supply chain management (SCM) rollup is getting rolling. Colorado Springs, Colorado-based Accellos has already closed four acquisitions and has a letter of intent in place for its fifth. Backed by a handful of private equity (PE) firms, Accellos began shopping back in October 2006 with the double-barreled purchase of Headwater Technology Solutions and Radio Beacon. The pair of deals gave Accellos $15m of combined revenue out of the gate. The company added one company in both 2007 and 2008.

As it was closing the purchase of Prophesy Transportation Solutions last September, Accellos also pulled in a $28.5m second round of financing. (That brought its total funding to $54m, although it still has $20m of that in the bank.) Accellos, which projects that it will wrap this year with some $45m in sales, says it’s only about halfway through its shopping spree. (It’s looking for companies with revenue of $4-8m.) The company indicated at this week’s Montgomery Technology Conference that it will probably need to close a total of 9-10 deals in coming years to hit its goal of more than $100m in annual sales.

If Accellos’ strategy sounds familiar, it’s because at least two other PE-backed companies have also set about rolling up the SCM market. Battery Ventures picked up HighJump Software for $85m last May, and then tacked on BelTek Systems Design last November and Insight Distribution Software a month ago. And since Francisco Partners acquired RedPrairie in May 2005, the company has inked seven acquisitions.

Are earn-outs cop-outs?

-Contact Thomas Rasmussen and Yulitza Peraza

Despite being derided by some as cop-outs, earn-outs are nonetheless popping up more frequently in deal terms. It used to be that the staggered payments were a way to keep the talent at the acquired company from bailing as soon as the ink was dry on the deal. Now, retention isn’t so much the concern, it’s more valuation. Earn-outs are being used to bridge the increasingly wide gulf between buyer and seller expectations.

So far this year, 18% of deals with an announced value of less than $500m had an earn-out provision, up slightly from 15% for the same period in 2008. However, the additional payments are making up a larger part of potential deal values. The average earn-out amounted to half of the deal value in transactions announced so far this year, compared to just one-third during the same period last year. We would attribute that to the leverage buyers have in the current M&A environment as well as their need to preserve cash.

And, anecdotally, we have been hearing that buyers are using their position to set unrealistic terms (thus avoiding payouts down the road, and preserving more of their cash). Consider the case of Mazu Networks, which sold to Riverbed Technology last month for $25m in cash and a potential $22m earn-out. Combined, the upfront and earn-out payments would have nearly made whole the investors in the Cambridge, Massachusetts-based security company. But a closer look at the terms reveals just how unlikely it is that Mazu and its backers will see much – if any – of that earn-out. The reason? To be paid in full, Mazu will have to more than double its bookings by the end of March next year at a time when the economy is shrinking and even tech stalwarts are struggling to post any revenue growth.