Cadence ends hostilities

Cadence Design Systems unexpectedly yanked its two-month-old unsolicited bid for rival Mentor Graphics Friday, scrapping a deal that would have given the chip design industry some much-needed consolidation. In pulling the $1.6bn all-cash offer, Cadence blasted Mentor for refusing to open its books. According to Cadence, that prevented it from lining up lenders to cover the $1.1bn it was planning to borrow for the deal. Mentor disputed that. It added regulatory review would have likely dragged out the process. Whatever the case, Mentor investors didn’t stick around. Mentor stock plummeted 26% to close at $10.33, compared to Cadence’s offer of $16 per share. For its part, Cadence stock rose 7%. Still both stocks are below the level they were when the dance began.

Meru: Nasdaq or bust

At the rate networking companies are consolidating, there may be no one left to buy Meru Networks. Earlier this week, Hewlett-Packard satisfied its appetite for WLAN equipment by acquiring Colubris Networks. That deal comes just two months after rival Trapeze Networks got snapped up by Belden, a cable and wiring company.

But the deal that probably scotched any potential trade sale for Meru was Brocade’s $3bn gamble on Foundry. The reason: Foundry has an OEM arrangement with Meru and was viewed as the most-likely acquirer of the WLAN equipment startup. We’re guessing Brocade probably figures it has its hands full with integrating Foundry’s existing business without adding additional pieces. Also, we view the planned Brocade-Foundry pairing as focused primarily on the datacenter, which wouldn’t have much use for WLAN equipment.

The only suitor we can put forward for Meru at this point is Juniper Networks. While Meru’s enterprise focus would fit well with Juniper, we understand the two companies kicked around a deal in 2005, at a reported $150m, but talks didn’t go far. Besides, a Meru source indicated recently that the company is plugging away on an IPO for next year. (We’ve heard that from the company for more than two years , but maybe 2009 will be the year.)

For Meru to go public at a decent valuation, however, it needs both a healthy IPO market and a healthy comparable, Aruba Networks. That company is currently trading at half the level it was at the start of the year, following a blown quarter in February. Aruba will have a chance to make amends in two weeks, as it will report results from its fiscal year on August 28.

Recent WLAN deals

Date Acquirer Target Price
Aug. 2008 HP Colubris Not disclosed
June 2008 Belden Trapeze Networks $133m
July 2008 Motorola AirDefense $85m*
*Estimated      

Source: The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase

Changing channels

In the hyper-competitive storage market, it seems that one vendor’s pain is another vendor’s gain. We’ve heard from three market sources recently that Dell’s largest-ever acquisition — its $1.4bn purchase of EqualLogic — has hit some difficulties around defections and uncertainties from the SAN vendor’s existing channel partners. Resellers who pushed EqualLogic’s offering in the past are worried about being crushed by Dell’s powerful direct-sales machine, as has happened to some of Dell’s ‘partners’ in the past.

Based on the recent numbers posted by rival SAN vendor Compellent Technologies, there may be something to those concerns. Compellent, which recently signed up its 1,000th customer, said second-quarter sales surged 74% to $21m — which is about what they were for the first two quarters of 2007 combined. (The performance, along with the forecast for profitability for the rest of the year, helped spark a 20% rally in the company’s shares over the past month.) At a recent investment banking technology conference, Compellent CEO Phil Soran told us he’s looking to poach EqualLogic’s channel partners. We’ve heard similar plans coming from rival storage player Lefthand Networks.

How well Dell is able to balance the sales channels for EqualLogic will go a long way toward determining how much of a boost the acquisition will give to its emerging push into storage. Already, the return on EqualLogic is made more challenging by the fact that Dell bought it literally at the top of the market. The day that Dell announced the acquisition, the Nasdaq hit a level it hadn’t seen since early 2001. (The index is currently off 14% since then, after having dropped as much as 23% from its early-November highs.) To make its high-priced acquisition of EqualLogic pay off, Dell is going to have to work hard to keep its new SAN rivals from siphoning off channel sales.

What’s brewing at Cisco?

Although Cisco chief executive John Chambers has thrown cold water on speculation about a large acquisition, the market continues to buzz about possible deals by the networking giant. Observers who think Cisco is big-game hunting point to a number of unusual moves from the company, which – with a bit of reading between the lines – appear to suggest something big is brewing.

For starters, they point to the fact that Cisco has largely stepped out of dealflow, inking just two deals so far in 2008. (We recently noted Cisco’s conspicuous absence, just a day before it announced its $120m purchase of network device configuration vendor Pure Networks.) In comparison, this time last year Cisco had inked nine acquisitions. Additionally, Cisco has drastically scaled back its share repurchase program, perhaps suggesting the company is stockpiling cash for a big deal.

Of course, most of the rumors have concerned a possible pairing of Cisco and EMC, largely so Cisco could get its hands on VMware. (EMC sports a market capitalization of $30bn.) This comes on the heels of earlier rumors that Cisco might be looking at Citrix, largely so it could get its hands on XenSource.

We have a new name to toss into the Cisco M&A rumor mill: McAfee, which has a $6bn market cap. Speculation has recently surfaced that the networking company is eyeing the largest IT security pure play, a combination that would allow Cisco – for the first time – to have control over endpoints. It would pick up a solid portfolio of security products from McAfee, notably encryption and port and device control offerings, as well as potentially salvaging Cisco’s disastrous NAC effort. (And as an added bonus with the deal, Cisco could stick it to Symantec. Cisco has little love for Symantec.)

Whether a deal materializes, or even is being considered, we would expect Cisco to emphasize security much more in the future. It recently handed the division over to Scott Weiss, who came with the January 2007 acquisition of IronPort Systems. A VC who has invested in Weiss’ companies over the years (Weiss also ran Hotmail) said he wouldn’t be surprised if Cisco turned over the entire business to Weiss when Chambers decides to step down.

Ailing AOL no closer to a sale

Although CEO Jeff Bewkes and his Time Warner (TWC) cohorts put a positive spin on the company’s second-quarter results Wednesday, we’d sum up the call as bafflingly uneventful. The company highlighted gains in its TV and movie operations, while remaining virtually silent on its plans for AOL’s legacy Internet access business. If anything, the news concerning the ailing AOL division worsened, with Time Warner indicating that the AOL split is not set to occur before early 2009. The lack of urgency on the part of Bewkes amid declining AOL subscriber count and revenue is extremely disheartening.

Subscriber count at the legacy AOL division fell to 8.1 million subscribers from 10.9 million a year ago. This continues the trend of a year-over-year decline of an average 20-25% since 2003. For the first time in AOL’s history, revenue from advertising tops revenue from its subscription business ($530m and $491m, respectively). Operating income for the AOL division is $230m, one-third of which we estimate comes from subscriptions. This is in contrast to Earthlink (ELNK), which has seen its operating income steadily increase quarter-over-quarter for the past year. EarthLink’s operating income from its most recent quarter was $64m, despite having only 3.3 million subscribers. Clearly, AOL is failing to properly make money from its subscribers. We suggest the company turn the business over to someone who can do that as soon as possible.

Fortunately, there appears to be a suitor for the AOL legacy business. EarthLink CEO Rolla Huff has said he’s ready to discuss a deal. Time Warner should take him up on that immediately. If AOL’s subscriber base continues to decline (and there is no reason to believe it won’t), by the time Bewkes is ready to negotiate a sale, it will be in the six million range. Our advice to Bewkes: Put together a deal book on AOL and get out of the subscription business while you can.

AOL ISP divestitures

Announced Target Acquirer Deal value Price per subscriber
Oct. 2007 Albanian ISP business Telekom Slovenije $5.6m $2,489
Oct. 2006 UK ISP business Carphone Warehouse $712m $339
Sep. 2006 French ISP business Neuf $365m $730
Sep. 2006 German ISP business Telecom Italia $878m $366
Dec. 2005 Argentinean ISP business Datco $1m $67
Feb. 2004 Australian ISP business Primus $18m $200

Source: The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase

Big Blue shops across the pond

Despite a lingering cold front in transatlantic M&A, IBM recently announced plan to shell out $340m for ILOG. We noted in a mid-year report that spending by North American acquirers of EU-based targets has declined by roughly two-thirds from mid-2007 to mid-2008 compared to mid-2006 to mid-2007. The reason: the slumping dollar and grinding bear market that has cut the value of acquisition currencies for U.S. companies. (Both the greenback and the Nasdaq have lost about 15% of their value over the past year.)

Big Blue’s purchase of the Paris-based vendor of business rules engine technology isn’t likely to signal a rebound in ‘eastbound’ M&A, at least not a significant one. My colleague Adam Phipps notes the IBM-ILOG deal isn’t even among the Top 10 transactions, when ranked by deal size. The proposed combination comes in twelfth place in terms of purchases made by North American companies of EU-based companies over the past year.

Post-acquisition decapitation

The write-offs from wrong-headed acquisitions just keep coming. And we don’t mean just financial write-offs. Instead, we’re referring to the practice of a company’s board ‘writing off’ the executives who crafted a deal. This week’s high-profile example came when Alcatel-Lucent finally tossed overboard the two architects of ‘la grande fusion.’ Since that deal was announced in April 2006, the combination has incinerated some $20bn over shareholder value, leaving the telco equipment vendor with a market capitalization of just $13.6bn. (That’s less than the sales the company posted in 2007.) That two-year performance finally got Serge Tchuruk, the company’s chairman who represents the Alcatel side of the combination, and Patricia Russo, the Lucent legacy, shown the door.

This house-cleaning at Acaltel-Lucent comes just two weeks after AMD kicked Hector Ruiz upstairs. In virtually the same breath that AMD announced Ruiz would be relieved of his CEO post but continue as chairman, the company said it will divest much of the business it picked up with its $5.4bn purchase of graphics chip maker ATI Technologies. Announcing the deal two years ago, Ruiz said his combination offered ‘limitless’ possibilities for innovation. Instead, the future of AMD looks rather limited, in large part because of the $2.5bn it borrowed to cover its disastrous purchase of ATI. AMD’s total debt stands at $5bn, compared with just $1.6bn in cash.

Meanwhile, a chief executive who we’ve always thought must be on the hot-seat for a misguided acquisition appears to have gotten a bit of a reprieve this week. Symantec CEO John Thompson said Wednesday that fiscal first-quarter sales of its backup products outpaced overall revenue growth. That reverses the recent weakness in the company’s storage offering, which Symantec acquired with its $13.5bn purchase of Veritas in December 2004. Wall Street applauded the company’s report, with shares up about 10% since Wednesday. Still, Thompson has yet to recognize much value from the three-and-half-year-old purchase of Veritas. Symantec shares, which changed hands at $21.74 midday on Friday, are still about $6 below where they were when the company picked up Veritas. Perhaps that goes some distance to explaining the loose rumors this week that something big – possibly the much-discussed divestiture of the storage business or even an outright sale of the company – was brewing at Symantec.

Leading the acquisition

Deal Stock performance since deal Status of acquiring company CEO since deal
Symantec-Veritas, Dec. 2004 Down 35% John Thompson, CEO since April 1999, continues to serve
Alcatel-Lucent, April 2006 Down 61% CEO Russo and chairman Tchuruk ousted this week
AMD-ATI, July 2006 Down 77% Long-time CEO Hector Ruiz replaced in mid-July
Secure Computing-CipherTrust, July 2006 Down 51% Chairman and CEO John McNulty replaced in April

Source: Company reports, The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase

Sizing up Secure Computing

In many ways, Secure Computing’s divestiture of its authentication business to Aladdin Knowledge Systems raises more questions than it answers. Secure’s rationale for the sale is pretty simple: pay down some debt and get out of a sideline business that’s dominated by RSA and has a solid number two in Vasco Data Security. (For the record, Vasco is about four times the size of Secure’s SafeWord business and runs at a highly respected 25% operating margin.)

So it’s pretty clear why Secure was a willing seller (in fact, we hear that Secure had been a willing seller of the business for more than a year). Less clear is why Aladdin was a willing buyer of the property – at a relatively rich price of 2x sales, no less. Aladdin investors chose not to stick around for the company’s explanation of why it was willing to shell out two-thirds of its cash holdings for a product line in a cutthroat market. They fled the stock, trimming 14% off the price and sending Vasco to its lowest level since January 2004.

Of course, Secure has had an even rougher run of it on the market recently, as the company has come up short of Wall Street estimates for the past two quarters. Shares of Secure currently change hands lower than they have at any point during the past half-decade. Since the beginning of the year, the stock has shed 60%, a decline that recently cost longtime CEO James McNulty his job.

The long, uninterrupted slide in Secure’s valuation raises an even larger question about the divestiture: Was the sale of SafeWord just a prelude to an outright sale of the company itself? The numbers certainly don’t work against a deal. In fact, Secure is currently valued at basically 1x sales – just half the level it got for the divested property. (Usually, it’s the reverse, with corporate cast-offs getting sold at less than half the overall company’s valuation.)

Any planned acquisition, however, would probably have to go through Warburg Pincus, which holds the equivalent of about 7% of Secure’s common stock, going back to a financing deal it struck to help Secure buy CipherTrust in July 2006 for $264m. Warburg invested $70m at a time when Secure stock was trading at about 3x higher than it is now. With Warburg that far underwater on its holding, we can only imagine the pointed questions the private equity firm will ask Secure.

Will Earthlink acquire AOL’s ISP business?

In April we speculated that AOL (TWC) might be close to shedding its legacy ISP access business. We pegged the most likely acquirer as Earthlink (ELNK). In an earnings conference call this week, Earthlink CEO Rolla Huff echoed that sentiment, stating that he was bullish about combining its business with the AOL division.

Of course, interest from one party does not a deal make. But, given AOL’s burning desire to shed this dinosaur and completely rid itself of its ancient and tumultuous past, it is safe to assume that if the two parties can agree on terms, a deal might just materialize. The real question is how struggling Earthlink can come up with the estimated $1.5bn-$2.5bn it would take to acquire the AOL unit and its roughly nine million subscribers. Since Earthlink is one of few companies able and willing to make that acquisition, AOL does not exactly hold a lot of bargaining power. We think Earthlink might just get this at a bargain basement valuation closer to $1.5bn, just two times AOL’s cash flow from its ISP division.

Netezza’s bogeyman

When Microsoft gets into a new market, the impact on the existing vendors tends to be in line with the software giant’s gargantuan size. After all, fears among startups over getting ‘Netscape-d’ have often been realized. That’s particularly true in the days before the convicted monopolist started putting on a softer face on its business. Gone are the days when Microsoft would threaten ‘to cut off the air supply’ of other companies, as it famously did to the Internet browser pioneer. Maybe it’s middle-aged softness at the 33-year-old company, but Microsoft’s bite often seems a little toothless these days. (Does anyone really think Microsoft – with or without spending $45bn on Yahoo – will be able to narrow the gap to Google in search advertising?)

Still, there was a moment last week when it appeared the Redmond, Wash.-based behemoth once again looked like it had the power to scare the bejesus out of a company (and its investors) by buying its way into a market. Last Thursday, as it was holding its annual meeting with Wall Street, Microsoft said it was purchasing Datallegro, a data-warehousing startup that we estimate was running at about $35m in sales. A market source indicated that rumors of the deal started percolating late Wednesday, a day before official word of the acquisition. Almost immediately, shares of data-warehousing vendor Netezza came under pressure. After hitting an intra-day high of $13.36 on Wednesday, Netezza stock slumped as much as 8% and closed basically at the low of the day. It opened even lower Thursday and sunk the entire day, finishing the session at $11.48. From its peak to its trough in those two sessions, Netezza lost 14%, with trading on Thursday about 50% busier than average.

However, as easy as it may be to point to Microsoft’s competitive move as the reason for Netezza’s decline, the two events are linked only by coincidence rather than causality. According to two market sources, Netezza actually distributed shares back to its VCs, meaning the stock’s slump can be attributed to the supply side, rather than demand side. (There have been no SEC filings about the move, and calls to the company to verify the information weren’t immediately returned.) Maybe Microsoft isn’t the big, bad company we all thought it was?