A different outcome of the EMC-Netezza rumors

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Although EMC paid top dollar for Greenplum, the startup may not have been EMC’s top choice for its move into data warehousing. At least two sources have indicated that the storage giant talked with fellow Boston-area company Netezza earlier this year. Talks were apparently short-lived, as the two sides never got close on price.

When discussions were going on, Netezza stock was trading at about $10. Our sources report that EMC was kicking around a bid that had a roughly 40% premium – in other words, essentially where shares change hands right now. Netezza, which came public three years ago, has been trading at its highest level since October 2007 lately.

Yet even with the run in Netezza shares (up 45% so far this year), the company isn’t egregiously expensive. It currently sports a market capitalization of $870m, but has about $110m in cash and equivalents, lowering its net cost to $760m. That’s about 3.2 times projected sales this fiscal year and just 2.7x next fiscal year’s estimated sales.

As it is, EMC paid a substantially higher multiple for Greenplum. (Our estimate, based on two sources familiar with the transaction, is that EMC handed over about $400m, or roughly 13x estimated trailing sales, for Greenplum.) Of course, there are different motivations – and, naturally, multiples – attached to either move. Netezza was a much more mature company, with more than twice the number of customers of Greenplum. On the other side, Greenplum had developed some pretty slick technology, particularly for cloud environments, that should fit easily into EMC’s broad sales channel.

Desktop virtualization could lead to real security deals

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly, Steve Coplan

Despite virtualization sweeping datacenters and now serving as a cornerstone of cloud computing, virtualization security has largely been an afterthought. Few startups focused on this market are generating much revenue, and M&A activity has been muted, both in terms of deal flow and valuations.

For instance, VMware – the kingpin of virtualization, which sits on nearly $3bn in cash and has spent hundreds of millions of dollars on acquisitions in other markets – has made only tiny moves around security. It reached for Blue Lane Technologies in October 2008 for what we believe to be less than $10m. (Blue Lane was one of about 20 initial partners in VMware’s VMsafe, which was introduced in early 2008.) That purchase came almost a year after VMware added hypervisor security vendor Determina for an estimated $15m.

Things may be about to change. My colleague Steve Coplan has written in a new report that the rise of desktop virtualization is likely to make security much more of a central concern. But as he notes, it’s not immediately clear which companies will actually be providing the security – the virtualization vendors, security firms or perhaps even management software providers? He looks at the rationale for all three groups as acquirers, and even lays out a few scenarios in the report.

In the dark on Big Blue’s buys

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

At the risk of stepping into a Kantian dialectic on ‘materiality,’ we can’t help but comment on the fact that when IBM does a deal – even a semi-large deal – mum’s the word. So far this year, Big Blue has picked up two companies that were large enough to consider going public at some point, with each acquisition costing the company around $400m in cash (according to our estimates). Yet in both the purchase of Initiate Systems and BigFix, IBM declined to disclose the price.

Viewed from the Big Blue side, it’s understandable that a startup like Initiate or BigFix, both of which were generating less than $100m in sales, is hardly a significant addition to a tech giant that’s going to post about $100bn in sales this year. Further, even though $400m sounds like a lot of money to most of us, we have to remember that IBM generates that much in cash roughly every two weeks. So, the thinking goes, Big Blue is well within its rights to not disclose ‘immaterial’ transactions. (That’s a view shared by Apple, for instance, which we have taken to task in the past for being run more like a private fiefdom than a public company.)

However, as is often the case in arguments based on relativism, there’s a distinct lack of accountability in it. After all, IBM is spending other people’s money. Shareholders own the company and, at least theoretically, the executives and management at the company – including all those who had a hand in the deals – work for shareholders.

Not to get overly sanctimonious about it, but in deals like Initiate and BigFix, IBM’s true owners are in the dark about how their employees are spending their money. And we’re not talking about dipping into the petty cash jar, but emptying hundreds of millions of dollars from the corporate treasury. That seems to us to be a fairly significant event.

The Big Blue erasure

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

In addition to the current snarling bear market and the onerous regulatory requirements, we’ve noticed yet another hurdle IPO candidates have to clear to get to the public market: IBM. With last week’s purchase of BigFix, the tech giant has gobbled up two private companies this year that were both tracking for an IPO. In February, Big Blue snagged Initiate Systems, a master data management vendor that had filed to go public in late 2007 but pulled its prospectus in mid-2008.

As we understand it, BigFix wasn’t nearly as close to an offering as Initiate. But the security management startup certainly had the financial profile to become a public company. (In fact, we’ve listed the Emeryville, California-based vendor as a possible IPO candidate in our outlook for the security market in each of the past two years.) BigFix was tracking to $65m in revenue for 2010, up from $52m in 2009, according to sources. (Bookings were closer to $85m last year.) The company also generated some $14m in free cash flow in 2009, a surprisingly large amount for a 13-year-old startup that had only raised $36m in venture backing.

In both of the deals, IBM paid a fairly rich multiple. Although terms weren’t disclosed, we understand that Big Blue handed over $425m, or 5.3 times trailing revenue, for Initiate. And we hear from multiple sources that IBM paid $400m, or nearly 8x trailing revenue, for BigFix. The multiple in both deals is substantially higher than the median price-to-sales multiple (1.8x) that we recently calculated for all tech transactions in the second quarter.

As a final thought, we highly (highly, highly) doubt that if either Initiate or BigFix came public right now, it would garner anywhere near a $400m valuation. (We recently put out a special report on the dreary IPO market.) More likely, skittish investors would discount the debut valuation to around $250m, give or take. Add in lockup periods and other considerations in an IPO that draw out the path to liquidity, and it’s no wonder both Initiate and BigFix took a rich, all-cash offer from IBM.

Big is back in Q2 M&A

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Spending on tech M&A in the second quarter surged to the highest quarterly rate since the Credit Crisis erupted, driven by a return of some of the largest technology buyers. Overall, deal makers announced 773 transactions, with a total value of $62bn. The Q2 total, which represented a doubling of spending from the first three months of the year, topped the previous record in the ‘new normal’ environment by slightly more than 10%.

Fittingly for a new record, big tech names have figured prominently in M&A since April. For instance, SAP announced the largest transaction in the software industry in more than two years when it reached for Sybase in May, spending $6.1bn. Also in May, IBM put together its largest deal in two and a half years, paying $1.4bn for Sterling Commerce. Even telcos got into the act, with a pair of transactions valued at more than $10bn each in the second quarter.

Overall, four of the five largest acquisitions of the year were announced in the second quarter. That helped push the number of deals valued at $1bn or more announced in the second quarter to twice as many as the first quarter (14 transactions vs. 7). It’s also worth noting that with 21 10-digit transactions already announced in 2010, the full-year number of big-ticket purchases is almost certain to exceed the 33 deals valued at $1bn or more in both 2008 and 2009.

Recent quarterly deal flow

Period Deal volume Deal value
Q2 2010 773 $62bn
Q1 2010 847 $30bn
Q4 2009 818 $55bn
Q3 2009 758 $38bn
Q2 2009 777 $49bn
Q1 2009 622 $10bn
Q4 2008 724 $38bn
Q3 2008 733 $32bn

Source: The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase

Tech M&A in Q2: A clear record, but cloudy outlook

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

At the beginning of June, we noted that spending on tech deals in the second quarter was tracking to hit its highest quarterly level since the Credit Crisis erupted two years ago. And with the second quarter set to end later today, the period will indeed set a record, thanks largely to the return of big buyers. On a preliminary basis, we tallied $62bn worth of transactions in the April-June period. That’s basically 10% higher than the previous record, and fully twice the spending that we saw in the first three months of the year.

The new spending record – at least it’s a record in the world of the ‘new normal’ – comes despite some ominous growls from a bear market. The Nasdaq shed 10% of its value in the second quarter, finishing both May and June solidly in the red. For the past six weeks, the index has basically been lower than where it started the year.

Despite a long-standing correlation between the equity markets and M&A, spending on deals has picked up as the Nasdaq has dipped. However, where the correlation has stayed true is in the number of transactions. Activity has slowed virtually each month of the year, hitting its lowest level for 2010 in June. In fact, the monthly totals for each of the three months of the second quarter were lower than the lowest monthly total in the first quarter.

2010 activity, monthly

Month Nasdaq return Deal volume Deal value
January (5%) 296 $5bn
February 4% 278 $8.3bn
March 8% 273 $17bn
April 2% 252 $21.1bn
May (8%) 269 $19.7bn
June (5%) 249 $21.2bn

Source: The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase

A very happy birthday to LogMeIn

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Exactly a year ago, LogMeIn hit the public market with an offering that has done what IPOs are generally expected to do. The debut priced at the top of its range ($14-16), raised a goodly amount of money ($107m, from 6.7 million shares at $16 each) and has held up solidly in the aftermarket. In its year as a public company, LogMeIn stock is up some 80% from its offer price, and more than 40% from its first-day close – twice the return of the Nasdaq over the same period. It currently sports an outsized market valuation of some $660m.

As we were wishing the on-demand remote connectivity vendor a happy birthday, we couldn’t help but be struck by the fact that if LogMeIn were trying to go public just a year later, the offering would almost certainly look less attractive. We’ve noted that three of the recent tech IPOs (Motricity, Convio and TeleNav) have all priced below their expected ranges. (The discounting was fairly dramatic in the case of Motricity, which ended up raising just half the amount that it originally planned.)

Also, as we discussed in a special report on the IPO market, offering sizes have been coming down. LogMeIn was able to raise more than $100m, despite finishing the previous year at about $50m. (Granted, looking at a subscription-based company in terms of revenue – rather than bookings – isn’t the most accurate financial picture.) In comparison, Tripwire, which recently put in its prospectus, is half again as big ($74m in 2009 revenue) as LogMeIn. But the security management provider is looking to raise just $86m.

Rakuten buys beyond Asia

Contact: Jarrett Streebin

Japanese companies have never been known as serial acquirers, but Rakuten is certainly doing its best to stay busy. In each of the past two months, the Japanese conglomerate, which has a significant online retail operation, has spent a quarter-billion dollars in an effort to build up its Web retailing business. The deals represent significant bets by Rakuten to expand into new markets around the globe.

In its most recent acquisition, Rakuten said it will pay $245m for French e-tailerPriceMinister. According to one report, the purchase valued the 10-year-old target at 4 times trailing revenue and 24x trailing cash flow. The transaction comes one month after Rakuten said it will pay $250m in cash for Buy.com.

The deals make sense from a strategic view: Both Buy.com and PriceMinister are similar to Rakuten in that they act as aggregators for online shopping, connecting thousands of merchants to consumers. But these are Rakuten’s first significant steps toward expanding its online retail business outside of Asia. (It did make a sizable purchase of a New York City-based company, LinkShare, in September 2005, but that was primarily for sales and marketing analytics, rather than a consolidation move.) In the past, Rakuten has used joint ventures and acquisitions to expand its online retail capabilities in China, Indonesia, Taiwan and Thailand. And, we would add, the company still has the equivalent of hundreds of millions of dollars for shopping in other markets.

Cablevision breaks the mold with Bresnan acquisition

Ben Kolada

Contact: Ben Kolada

Marking a significant departure from its recent practice, Cablevision Systems said last week that it would hand over almost $1.4bn in cash and stock for Bresnan Communications. The deal by the Dolan gang is their first major telecom acquisition since they picked up a portion of Tele-Communications in 1998. And they certainly paid up for Bresnan.

Cablevision’s offer values Bresnan at about 3.4 times trailing revenue and just over 8x projected 2010 cash flow, according to our understanding. On a per-subscriber basis, the acquirer is paying $4,500 a head. Across the board, that’s a far richer valuation – in some cases, twice as rich – than fellow telco RCN got in its take-private in March. Buyout shop ABRY Partners paid $1.2bn for RCN, or roughly 1.6x trailing revenue (on an enterprise value basis) and $2,800 per subscriber.

Given the size of this deal, along with the fact that Cablevision used equity in the purchase, we don’t expect the Bresnan transaction to signal the beginning of a shopping spree. Indeed, Cablevision executives maintain that they are not looking for additional properties. After all, Cablevision doesn’t need to buy more systems – the Tele-Communications acquisition gave it sufficient economies of scale. The Bresnan buy is simply a rare opportunity to obtain upgraded systems with strong growth potential.

M&A: Cable comparison

Date announced
 Acquirer Target Deal value Price-to-sales multiple
March 5, 2010 ABRY Partners RCN $1.2bn 1.6
June 14, 2010 Cablevision Systems Bresnan Communications $1.4bn 3.4*

Source: The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase *451 Group Estimate

Twitter’s tiny transactions

1 Comment

Contact: Jarrett Streebin

Even though it’s one of the biggest properties on the Web, Twitter has only done small deals. Over the last two years, it has been steadily strengthening its platform with small acquisitions. The pace has picked up notably in the past half-year, with Twitter announcing four purchases in that time. Thanks to its shopping spree, the company has added search capabilities, location to tweets and mobile capabilities via an iPhone app and an SMS service.

Twitter’s latest move, the acquisition of Smallthought Systems earlier this month, continues the trend of tiny technology transactions. The target’s main offering is Dabble DB, which provides database software for managing large pools of data. At a rate of 65 million tweets per day, Twitter is overflowing with data. We see the Dabble DB buy as an effort to bolster the vendor’s still-nascent attempt to actually ring up some sales.

Twitter recently rolled out promoted tweets, through which advertisers will be able to place ads on the site. Along with its deal with Google, this is one of the firm’s first attempts at revenue. Smallthought’s Dabble DB should help Twitter to manage and interpret the massive amounts of user data, which should lead to better ad targeting. In that way, the deal flow at Twitter makes sense. The company’s first few buys were about building up its service and broadening its base of users. Now, it’s time to make money.