Online video: boom and bust

-Contact Thomas Rasmussen

The over-hyped world of online video is going through massive turmoil at the moment. While most investors and companies agree that online video is likely the future of broadcasting, no one has been able to make any money from it so far. And it’s likely to get even harder due to tighter venture funding, the closed IPO window and next-generation Web 2.0 entrants such as Hulu and even Apple’s iTunes. These factors have left the online video players scrambling toward any exit, no matter how cheap.

Consider the case of CinemaNow, which was picked up by Sonic Solutions for a mere $3m last month. The portal never managed to turn a profit and had estimated revenue of less than $4m. Yet it secured five rounds of funding (totaling more than $40m) and brokered partnerships with major studios, VCs and strategic investors. When CinemaNow went to investors begging for another round a few months ago, it found that there was no money to be had and a quick exit became the only alternative. That’s a common occurrence these days, and may well have driven rival MovieLink to sell for a paltry $6.6m to Blockbuster last year. (Expect more of these types of deals next year. According to corporate development executives who completed our annual M&A outlook survey, lack of access to VC will be the major catalyst for deal flow in 2009.)

If this sounds eerily familiar, it’s because a similar situation played out during the music industry’s awkward and reluctant switch to digital a few years ago. Several startups, even major ones backed by large studios, tried to become the distributor of choice. Yet, many of those went away in scrap sales or had the plug pulled on them (Viacom’s Urge, Napster and Yahoo’s music service, to name just a few high-profile failures). We’re now left with just a handful of dominant distributors: iTunes, RealNetworks’ Rhapsody, Amazon and, to an increasing extent, MySpace’s heavily funded music effort. Many of these companies are likely to also dominate online video. In fact, add in Google and Microsoft, and you have a list of the companies that are likely to be buyers for the few remaining online video startups.

Recent online video M&A

Year Number of deals
2008 12
2007 10
2006 5

Source: The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase

NetApp: Barenaked savings

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

What do the Barenaked Ladies and SnapMirror for Open Systems have in common? Well, both have been canceled recently by NetApp in a bid to save money as growth rates at the storage giant continue to head south. The company is currently more than halfway through its fiscal year, which wraps at the end of April, and its projected growth rate of 9% is shaping up to be just half the level it was last year (18%), which was half the level it was the year before that (36%). And given the economic environment, estimates may well decline again between now and when it actually reports results.

Like many companies facing the current recession, NetApp’s answer has been to cut costs. In October, it scratched plans for its user conference, NetApp Accelerate (the Barenaked Ladies had been booked to play one night at the event, which was slated for February). And then last week, NetApp said in an SEC filing that it was shuttering the SnapMirror for Open Systems product line. It will take a charge of as much as $20m (roughly two-thirds of that as a straight write-down and one-third for possible payments for facilities closures and severance agreements).

SnapMirror came with NetApp’s pricey acquisition of Topio in November 2006. The company paid $160m for Topio, which we understand was generating less than $10m in sales. The curtain will fall on SnapMirror before the end of NetApp’s fiscal year, which should help its cost structure for the year. NetApp could certainly use a boost in this area. The company runs at just a 10% operating margin, and has seen the increase in operating expenses outstrip the increase in sales during the first two quarters of its current fiscal year.

Select NetApp acquisitions

Date Target Deal value Rationale
January 2008 Onaro $105m SAN management software
November 2006 Topio $160m Disaster-recovery software
June 2005 Decru $272m Storage security
November 2003 Spinnaker Networks $300m High-end storage

Source: The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase

Buyer’s market

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

It’s a sign of the (dismal) times when an acquirer can offer a 250% premium for the shares of a target, and the stock is below where the company started at the beginning of 2008. (It’s just that kind of year.) That was the case with Vodafone’s $29m offer for Wayfinder Systems, a Swedish company that trades on the hometown Nordic Stock Exchange. According to terms, the British wireless giant will hand over 12 Swedish crowns ($1.44) for each share of Wayfinder, which traded above 13 Swedish crowns back in January. The pairing makes a ton of sense, since Vodafone can use Wayfinder’s GPS technology to offer location-based services. Wayfinder currently has some 2.5 million subscribers.

Given the beaten-down equity markets across the globe, we expect deals like this to be much more prevalent in 2009. The reason? Shareholders have been burned too many times this year by corporate boards that reject offers, saying a bid ‘undervalues’ the company, only to see their share price get clubbed for months on end. (For more details on that, just ask any Yahoo shareholder.)

Although valuations in the private market typically lag those in the public market, the ‘correction’ in how much startups will sell for next year is expected to be severe. According to our ongoing survey of corporate development officers, nine out of 10 say they expect valuations of private companies to decline in 2009. Specifically, 42% say valuations will ‘decline substantially,’ with 45% saying they will ‘decline somewhat.’

GRC=Get Ready for Consolidation

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

After a pretty thin stretch of deals in the governance, risk and compliance (GRC) market, Thomson Reuters reached for startup Paisley Consulting last week. The deal comes after the two companies partnered for a year, but not in the conventional manner. Rather than the big company reselling the startup’s wares, Paisley actually resold Thomson’s tax and auditing product, Checkpoint. The two companies also had a fair number of joint customers.

We understand that Paisley wasn’t really looking for a deal. Founded in 1995, Paisley is still run – and was majority owned – by its founding husband-and-wife team of Tim and Stacey (née Paisley) Welu. (The pair will continue to run the business after the acquisition.) The Minneapolis–based company took only one round of outside money, a $10m slug in 2003 from Insight Venture Partners. Despite its beginnings, Paisley was no mom-and-pop shop. We understand the company is set to finish 2008 with sales of more than $40m.

The Thomson-Paisley pairing comes after several large software companies, which would be the most conventional buyers of GRC startups, inked deals of their own. Oracle stayed close to home, and grabbed existing GRC partner LogicalApps last year, while SAP made a big play for Virsa Systems in mid-2006. (As a side note on SAP’s move, we would mention that longtime Oracle executive Ray Lane sat on Virsa’s board and helped broker the initial partnership that led to the purchase.)

With Paisley gone, there are still a few high-profile GRC vendors in the market. BWise, which has its roots in the Netherlands, has a strong presence in Europe; OpenPages, which started life as a content management vendor before focusing on GRC; and a company that’s not unlike Paisley, Archer Technologies, which my colleague Paul Roberts recently profiled. We understand that both BWise and Archer, which is about half the size of Paisley, have been talking with potential suitors throughout the year. However, a month ago, Archer sold a 40% stake of the company to Bain Capital Ventures, which likely takes it off the block for now.

M&A ramp-up for Facebook?

-Contact Thomas Rasmussen

Facebook’s rumored offer for micro-blogging site Twitter had the Web all atwitter recently. The $500m bid was reportedly rejected because it came in the form of a stock swap, with Facebook inflated to the infamous $15bn valuation that the social network got in Microsoft’s investment a year ago. Judging from our talks with insiders throughout the year, everyone knows this is a ludicrous valuation. Still, we wonder why some people – including big media – are still bandying this around, and more to the point, why Facebook thought Twitter would buy into the valuation. (More realistically, bringing the valuation down to earth, the offer amounts to $100-130m.) Nevertheless, the rumored run at Twitter confirms our speculation in June that Facebook, which has hardly ever dabbled in M&A, is gearing up to go on a substantive shopping spree. If that’s the case, it could do a whole lot worse than roping in Loopt.

When we first reported on this possibility, we had heard that initial talks were under way. However, the less-than-stellar adoption of the overhyped location-based services (LBS) applications probably put a damper on the enthusiasm. Nonetheless, recent developments have made LBS an attractive area again: Android devices have hit the market, the iPhone continues to sell well and Nokia is rolling out its own sleek new smartphone. Granted, the degree to which people are interested in having friends and family track their every move is debatable. But for Facebook and other social networks, which essentially base their entire business models on our instinct to pry into each other’s business, adding Loopt’s service to its currently static desktop and mobile offering is a no-brainer. And if Facebook was willing to hand over north of $100m to acquire Twitter, spending the same amount on Loopt, which is roughly where we pencil out its valuation, would make a lot more sense.

Social network M&A, 2006-2008

Period Number of deals Total known deal value
2008 YTD 32 $98.3m
2007 12 $149.7m
2006 8 $31.1m

Source: The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase

Thain’s thin fees

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

In the combination of Merrill Lynch and Bank of America, it’s all over but the shouting. The banks held separate shareholder meetings Friday to take the pending deal to their respective shareholder bases, with both sides approving it. (Originally valued at some $50bn, the slump in shares of Bank of America has cut the final price of the all-equity transaction to less than half that amount.) The deal will officially close before year-end.

While all that seems straightforward enough, the shouting is coming from a showdown over (what else?) money. Specifically, the insistence by Merrill Lynch CEO John Thain that he’s due a $10m bonus for his work over the past year. We’ll leave the debate on ‘Wall Street greed’ to Lou Dobbs and others, and, similarly, will pass on offering thoughts on whether the bonus would make Thain overpaid or not. However, we would note that a $10m advisory fee for a $21bn deal is hardly exorbitant, as any banker would tell you.

Select 2008 deals for Merrill Lynch and Bank of America

Date Acquirer Target Deal value
October 2008 ebay (Merrill Lynch) Bill Me Later $945m
October 2008 Hewlett-Packard LeftHand Networks (Merrill Lynch) $360m
July 2008 Brocade Communications Systems (Bank of America) Foundry Networks (Merrill Lynch) $2.6bn
April 2008 Blue Coat Systems (Merrill Lynch) Packeteer $268m
March 2008 BMC Software (Merrill Lynch) BladeLogic $800m
January 2008 Microsoft FAST Search & Transfer (Merrill Lynch) $1.2bn

Source: The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase

Actuate: A bit or the whole thing?

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

It turns out that Actuate may have some competition for its own stock. A month ago, the enterprise reporting veteran announced plans to buy back some $60m worth of its own equity, at $3.15-3.40 per share (Jefferies & Co. is running the process). Under those terms, the buyback would have removed up to 19 million shares from a base of about 65.5 million.

However, since Actuate revealed the tender offer on November 5, the markets have continued to plummet, with the Nasdaq slumping almost 20%. Accordingly, Actuate trimmed the price it was willing to pay for its own shares to $2.20-2.60 each. On Thursday, it bumped up the range to $3.00-3.50. What prompted the boost? Was it a holiday gift from the company to its shareholders, who have seen their stock drop nearly 70% over the past year?

As it happens, Actuate raised the price of the planned buyback because an unnamed party offered $3.50 per share for the whole company. Actuate’s board said the unsolicited proposal, which would value the company at nearly $230m, is not in shareholders’ ‘best interests.’ While it’s uncertain how the mysterious unsolicited offer and the tender offer will play out, it seems pretty clear that one way or another, some Actuate shares are going to come off the board.

Corporate dealmaking

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Since our annual survey of corporate development executives is currently being filled out by those dealmakers, we thought we’d take a quick look at business there. (Note: If you are a corporate development officer and would like to take part in our survey, please email me and I will send you a copy. Those who participate will get a full look at the results, plus additional comparisons with the previous year’s findings. See that report here.)

At first glance, corporate spending looks pretty healthy, roughly matching the levels of the previous three years. (For our purposes, we searched our M&A KnowledgeBase for acquisitions announced this year by companies that trade on the Nasdaq or NYSE.) Our first observation is that US companies are pretty much the only ones doing any shopping. Their spending accounts for three-quarters of all tech M&A spending that we’ve tracked this year, compared to about half of the total in each of the past two years.

However, we would quickly add that (not surprisingly) deal flow has been drying up as the year has gone along. In the third quarter, the total value of acquisitions by US publicly traded acquirers hit just $16bn, down from $144bn in the second quarter and $38bn in the first quarter (second-quarter results were inflated because the four largest deals of the year, including three mammoth communications transactions, were announced in the summer). In the next week, we’ll tally what corporate development executives predict for 2009 and have a report on that.

Acquisitions by US listed companies

Period Deal volume Deal value
January-November 2005 945 $204bn
January-November 2006 1,084 $251bn
January-November 2007 961 $193bn
January-November 2008 793 $218bn

Source: The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase

Semi trouble

-Contact Thomas Rasmussen, Greg Quick

There are bargains aplenty in the semiconductor sector. From Integrated Device Technology’s $20m tuck-in of Silicon Optix last month to Sun Microsystems’ takeover last April of Montalvo Systems for an estimated $25m, we’ve seen a flurry of lowball purchases of semiconductor startups over the past year. The reason? These companies tend to have a high burn rate, without much revenue to offset that. (For instance, we estimate that Silicon Optix generated just $4m in sales in the year leading up to its acquisition, while Montalvo was still a pre-revenue company.)

Of course, the semiconductor industry has been slumping for several years, with a sharp decline in valuations. While the number of deals has been tracking steadily at around 180 per year recently (147 so far this year), the amount spent on deals – a far more important figure – is down almost 40% from last year, and close to 80% from 2006. Things are not getting any better, either, at least according to our recent Tech Banking Outlook Survey. Bankers rated the semiconductor industry the lowest in terms of anticipated M&A spending for next year.

This dour outlook is likely to have an extremely negative impact on the semiconductor startups still out there trying to make it. And there are a lot of companies, backed by a lot of venture capital, trying to crack into markets that have taken much longer to materialize than ever imagined. For example, in the promising category of 10Gbase-T physical layer technology, we wonder about the outlook for Teranetics and Solarflare Communications. Also, we recently wrote about the troubles in the highly crowded and fragmented 10-Gigabit Ethernet controller space. Although Intel, Broadcom and the overall market are starting to show signs of life, the situation for the many startups in the sector is not looking any better. In fact, we heard recently that Neterion’s president might have thrown in the towel and that the company could be on the block. Having wagered in the vicinity of $100m, investors will undoubtedly take a bath on this one.

Marvell in the land of milk and honey

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly, Gilad Nass

Having already handed over some shekels for Israeli companies in the past, Marvell Technology Group has reportedly gone on another shopping trip in the country. Israeli newspapers reported recently that Marvell has acquired Iamba Networks in a scrap sale. (Iamba, an optical semiconductor company, has its headquarters in Cupertino, California, but maintains a large R&D presence in Israel.) Reports put the purchase price of Iamba, which raised some $30m in funding, at $10m.

The pickup of Iamba, which Marvell declined to confirm, marks the company’s third purchase in Israel in recent years. In February 2003, Marvell paid $50m for Radlan Computer Communications. But Marvell’s big deal in the country came in late-2000, when it used a slug of its freshly minted IPO shares to buy Galileo Technology in a transaction initially valued at $2.7bn.

By the time the Galileo acquisition closed in January 2001, however, Marvell shares had lost more than half of their value. In fact, Marvell shares (on a split-adjusted basis) are currently trading only slightly above where they were when the company inked the Galileo purchase. Marvell shares closed at $5.09 on Tuesday, valuing the company at just slightly more than 1x its trailing sales.