Meru: Nasdaq or bust

Brenon Daly

At the rate networking companies are consolidating, there may be no one left to buy Meru Networks. Earlier this week, Hewlett-Packard satisfied its appetite for WLAN equipment by acquiring Colubris Networks. That deal comes just two months after rival Trapeze Networks got snapped up by Belden, a cable and wiring company.

But the deal that probably scotched any potential trade sale for Meru was Brocade’s $3bn gamble on Foundry. The reason: Foundry has an OEM arrangement with Meru and was viewed as the most-likely acquirer of the WLAN equipment startup. We’re guessing Brocade probably figures it has its hands full with integrating Foundry’s existing business without adding additional pieces. Also, we view the planned Brocade-Foundry pairing as focused primarily on the datacenter, which wouldn’t have much use for WLAN equipment.

The only suitor we can put forward for Meru at this point is Juniper Networks. While Meru’s enterprise focus would fit well with Juniper, we understand the two companies kicked around a deal in 2005, at a reported $150m, but talks didn’t go far. Besides, a Meru source indicated recently that the company is plugging away on an IPO for next year. (We’ve heard that from the company for more than two years , but maybe 2009 will be the year.)

For Meru to go public at a decent valuation, however, it needs both a healthy IPO market and a healthy comparable, Aruba Networks. That company is currently trading at half the level it was at the start of the year, following a blown quarter in February. Aruba will have a chance to make amends in two weeks, as it will report results from its fiscal year on August 28.

Recent WLAN deals

Date Acquirer Target Price
Aug. 2008 HP Colubris Not disclosed
June 2008 Belden Trapeze Networks $133m
July 2008 Motorola AirDefense $85m*
*Estimated      

Source: The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase

Changing channels

Brenon Daly6 Comments

In the hyper-competitive storage market, it seems that one vendor’s pain is another vendor’s gain. We’ve heard from three market sources recently that Dell’s largest-ever acquisition — its $1.4bn purchase of EqualLogic — has hit some difficulties around defections and uncertainties from the SAN vendor’s existing channel partners. Resellers who pushed EqualLogic’s offering in the past are worried about being crushed by Dell’s powerful direct-sales machine, as has happened to some of Dell’s ‘partners’ in the past.

Based on the recent numbers posted by rival SAN vendor Compellent Technologies, there may be something to those concerns. Compellent, which recently signed up its 1,000th customer, said second-quarter sales surged 74% to $21m — which is about what they were for the first two quarters of 2007 combined. (The performance, along with the forecast for profitability for the rest of the year, helped spark a 20% rally in the company’s shares over the past month.) At a recent investment banking technology conference, Compellent CEO Phil Soran told us he’s looking to poach EqualLogic’s channel partners. We’ve heard similar plans coming from rival storage player Lefthand Networks.

How well Dell is able to balance the sales channels for EqualLogic will go a long way toward determining how much of a boost the acquisition will give to its emerging push into storage. Already, the return on EqualLogic is made more challenging by the fact that Dell bought it literally at the top of the market. The day that Dell announced the acquisition, the Nasdaq hit a level it hadn’t seen since early 2001. (The index is currently off 14% since then, after having dropped as much as 23% from its early-November highs.) To make its high-priced acquisition of EqualLogic pay off, Dell is going to have to work hard to keep its new SAN rivals from siphoning off channel sales.

UBS: You buy us?

Brenon Daly

As it reported an ‘unsatisfactory’ loss of hundreds of millions of dollars, UBS AG also said Tuesday that it will carve off its investment banking business. The move represents a retreat from the ‘universal bank’ model the Swiss giant has pursued. And despite management’s statements, it makes a sale of the banking unit more likely. (Just as Time Warner splitting AOL’s legacy Internet access division from its online advertising business clears the way for a sale of the dial-up unit. That is, if there are any AOL subscribers left to sell.)

Washed away by the gallons of red ink spilling from the investment banking department is that UBS actually has a fairly robust advisory business, particularly for transatlantic tech deals. In terms of deal value, it ranked fifth in our recent league tables covering transactions between North America and the EU from mid-2007 to mid-2008. The previous year, UBS placed fourth. (An executive summary of the report is available here; download the full report here.)

Far and away, UBS was the busiest bank, advising on 13 transatlantic transactions over the past year. Both Lehman Brothers and Deutsche Bank advised on eight transactions. And UBS has kept its momentum, already claiming another tombstone since we closed our survey period on June 30. (UBS served as sole adviser for IBM in its purchase of Paris-based ILOG for $340m.) But given how things stand now, the next big deal UBS advises on could be the sale of its own banking business.

Selected UBS-advised transatlantic deals

Date Acquirer Target Price
July 2008 IBM (sole UBS mandate) ILOG $340m
April 2008 Apax Partners TriZetto Group (sole UBS mandate) $1.4bn
Feb. 2008 Reed Elsevier (co-adviser UBS) ChoicePoint $4bn
April 2008 Diodes (sole UBS mandate) Zetex Semiconductors $176m

Source: The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase

Beijing: unsporting laws on M&A

Brenon Daly

The opening of the 2008 Beijing Summer Olympics today has the world’s sporting eyes on China. Of course, global dealmakers had their sights on the large (and growing) Chinese markets long before Beijing landed the Olympics. However, as my colleague Anita Cheung notes, those efforts suffered a setback last week when China passed the latest and strictest set of regulations on foreign investment and M&A in 15 years.

The new regulations give the federal government more control over direct foreign investment and take off the table virtually any acquisition of a Chinese company by a foreign firm. Chinese regulators cite national security and antitrust concerns for these recent actions. This is a distressing development for the idea of a global M&A marketplace. While other countries have certainly used regulation to block ‘sensitive’ acquisitions, few have succeeded with a blanket policy blocking essentially all deals.

In the months before these new regulations took effect, several US media and technology companies were able to ink purchases of Chinese companies. For instance, Hearst Business Media acquired ee365.cn, a technology news website for engineers, last month. Also, CNET acquired Beijing-based 55BBS.com in June, while Google picked up Chinese search engine 265.com one month before. And deals aren’t just being inked by US companies. In June, one of Australia’s largest telecommunications companies, Telstra, picked up a controlling stake in two large Chinese Internet companies, Norstar Media and Autohome/PCPop.

Rather than those transactions being models for future M&A activity in China, we would expect to see more deals break down because of politics. In other words, more deals like February’s aborted $2.2bn leveraged buyout of 3Com, which was led by Bain Capital, with minority participation by Chinese networking equipment vendor Huawei Technologies. In that proposed transaction, US regulators got all worked up over the possible threats to US national security of having partial Chinese ownership of 3Com’s TippingPoint Technologies business. The fear was that the Chinese might be able to spy on the US by using TippingPoint’s intrusion-prevention system to gain access to networks. As silly as that seems, it was enough to sink the deal. And unfortunately, China seems to have adopted that as policy.

Recent foreign deals in China

Date Acquirer Target
July 2, 2008 Hearst Business Media ee365.cn
June 27, 2008 Telstra Norstar Media; Autohome/PCPop
June 17, 2008 CNET 55bbs.com
May 26, 2008 Google 265.com

Source: The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase

What’s brewing at Cisco?

Brenon Daly3 Comments

Although Cisco chief executive John Chambers has thrown cold water on speculation about a large acquisition, the market continues to buzz about possible deals by the networking giant. Observers who think Cisco is big-game hunting point to a number of unusual moves from the company, which – with a bit of reading between the lines – appear to suggest something big is brewing.

For starters, they point to the fact that Cisco has largely stepped out of dealflow, inking just two deals so far in 2008. (We recently noted Cisco’s conspicuous absence, just a day before it announced its $120m purchase of network device configuration vendor Pure Networks.) In comparison, this time last year Cisco had inked nine acquisitions. Additionally, Cisco has drastically scaled back its share repurchase program, perhaps suggesting the company is stockpiling cash for a big deal.

Of course, most of the rumors have concerned a possible pairing of Cisco and EMC, largely so Cisco could get its hands on VMware. (EMC sports a market capitalization of $30bn.) This comes on the heels of earlier rumors that Cisco might be looking at Citrix, largely so it could get its hands on XenSource.

We have a new name to toss into the Cisco M&A rumor mill: McAfee, which has a $6bn market cap. Speculation has recently surfaced that the networking company is eyeing the largest IT security pure play, a combination that would allow Cisco – for the first time – to have control over endpoints. It would pick up a solid portfolio of security products from McAfee, notably encryption and port and device control offerings, as well as potentially salvaging Cisco’s disastrous NAC effort. (And as an added bonus with the deal, Cisco could stick it to Symantec. Cisco has little love for Symantec.)

Whether a deal materializes, or even is being considered, we would expect Cisco to emphasize security much more in the future. It recently handed the division over to Scott Weiss, who came with the January 2007 acquisition of IronPort Systems. A VC who has invested in Weiss’ companies over the years (Weiss also ran Hotmail) said he wouldn’t be surprised if Cisco turned over the entire business to Weiss when Chambers decides to step down.

Ailing AOL no closer to a sale

Although CEO Jeff Bewkes and his Time Warner (TWC) cohorts put a positive spin on the company’s second-quarter results Wednesday, we’d sum up the call as bafflingly uneventful. The company highlighted gains in its TV and movie operations, while remaining virtually silent on its plans for AOL’s legacy Internet access business. If anything, the news concerning the ailing AOL division worsened, with Time Warner indicating that the AOL split is not set to occur before early 2009. The lack of urgency on the part of Bewkes amid declining AOL subscriber count and revenue is extremely disheartening.

Subscriber count at the legacy AOL division fell to 8.1 million subscribers from 10.9 million a year ago. This continues the trend of a year-over-year decline of an average 20-25% since 2003. For the first time in AOL’s history, revenue from advertising tops revenue from its subscription business ($530m and $491m, respectively). Operating income for the AOL division is $230m, one-third of which we estimate comes from subscriptions. This is in contrast to Earthlink (ELNK), which has seen its operating income steadily increase quarter-over-quarter for the past year. EarthLink’s operating income from its most recent quarter was $64m, despite having only 3.3 million subscribers. Clearly, AOL is failing to properly make money from its subscribers. We suggest the company turn the business over to someone who can do that as soon as possible.

Fortunately, there appears to be a suitor for the AOL legacy business. EarthLink CEO Rolla Huff has said he’s ready to discuss a deal. Time Warner should take him up on that immediately. If AOL’s subscriber base continues to decline (and there is no reason to believe it won’t), by the time Bewkes is ready to negotiate a sale, it will be in the six million range. Our advice to Bewkes: Put together a deal book on AOL and get out of the subscription business while you can.

AOL ISP divestitures

Announced Target Acquirer Deal value Price per subscriber
Oct. 2007 Albanian ISP business Telekom Slovenije $5.6m $2,489
Oct. 2006 UK ISP business Carphone Warehouse $712m $339
Sep. 2006 French ISP business Neuf $365m $730
Sep. 2006 German ISP business Telecom Italia $878m $366
Dec. 2005 Argentinean ISP business Datco $1m $67
Feb. 2004 Australian ISP business Primus $18m $200

Source: The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase

Try, try again — then liquidate

Brenon Daly

Born from the ashes of a burned-out company, agami Systems may well have landed back in an ash heap. Several reports have indicated the NAS storage specialist wound down operations recently. (We were unable to raise anyone in several calls to their Sunnyvale, California, headquarters.) Just before agami emerged from stealth three years ago, we noted that the company’s core IP – along with a pair of primary VCs and handful of employees – came from NAS startup Zambeel. That company flamed out in 2003, after burning through some $72m in funding. (For its part, agami incinerated about $85m, which included $45m raised earlier this year.)

If indeed agami has gone the way of Zambeel, we highly doubt the sale of agami assets (if that comes) will go the way of Zambeel’s assets. Having lost now on both go-rounds with this technology, Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers and New Enterprise Associates probably aren’t interested in stepping in for a third time.

Still, there’s undoubtedly some interesting technology at agami, particularly for block-level vendors that have ambitions for their own NAS products. For instance, Dell, which recently made a significant push into storage, might want to look at agami’s IP. The same is probably true for Compellent Technologies, which has a heap of money from its IPO last year, and for fast-growing LeftHand Networks, a privately held company with some 3,300 customers.

Meanwhile, NetApp, which agami sought to undercut on price, might want to do a ‘buy & bury’ to knock out any future threat. (Keep in mind that NetApp has done graveside deals for NAS technology in the past, buying the patent portfolio of Auspex five years ago during a bankruptcy auction.) In any case, whoever picks up the bits of agami that come up for sale is likely to get a bargain. In fact, we’d be surprised if agami garnered even one-tenth of the $85m that went into it over the past three years.

Selected NAS deals

Date Acquirer Target Price
Sept. 2007 Sun Microsystems Cluster File Systems undisclosed
August 2007 F5 Networks Acopia $210m
Nov. 2003 NetApp Spinnaker $300m
June 2003 NetApp Auspex (patents) $9m

Source: The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase

Steady flow of online video deals

Emerging online video markets have been keeping investors and acquirers busy, with Google making the latest move through its recent purchase of tiny startup Omnisio. The California-based startup, which received seed funding from Y Combinator, launched in March and offers an online video editing widget that enables users to slice and mash existing online videos, add text and audio commentary and create proprietary slideshow presentations. Google plans to integrate Omnisio’s technology and its three Australian ex-pat founders into its YouTube platform.

In the past two years, companies have spent more than $7bn on more than 50 deals in the (broadly defined) online video space. The largest of these was Google’s purchase of YouTube for $1.65bn in October 2006. Rival Yahoo has also been active. It picked up video sharing site Jumpcut two years ago, as well spending $160m for video distribution platform Maven Networks earlier this year and a total bill of nearly $1bn for related advertising networks BlueLithium and Right Media in 2007.

Meanwhile, traditional media bigwigs are also banking on online video and advertising markets. In March, News Corp and NBC launched their $100m joint TV venture, Hulu, just month after picking up Chinese startup Mojiti, which serves as the TV streaming platform for Hulu. Although professional video streaming services such as Hulu are expected to be able to secure ad dollars quicker than user-generated video sites, it’s still early in that market.

One market where we see tremendous opportunity is for ad-based mobile services. Consider nine-year-old MobiTV, which has been streaming to mobile devices since 2003. Operating on a subscription-based revenue model, MobiTV claims profitability. Last year, the company received $100m in its latest round of VC funding, and is actively looking to use that cash to buy its own advertising network. In this crowded and bustling marketplace, the top Internet and media behemoths would do well to pay attention to well-footed upstarts like MobiTV.

Selected online video deals

Date announced Acquirer Target Deal value
July 30, 2008 Google Omnisio $15m (reported)
Feb. 12, 2008 Yahoo Maven Networks $160m
Sept. 12, 2007 Hulu Mojiti not disclosed
Oct. 9, 2006 Google YouTube $1.65bn
June 27, 2006 Yahoo Jumpcut not disclosed

Big Blue shops across the pond

Brenon Daly

Despite a lingering cold front in transatlantic M&A, IBM recently announced plan to shell out $340m for ILOG. We noted in a mid-year report that spending by North American acquirers of EU-based targets has declined by roughly two-thirds from mid-2007 to mid-2008 compared to mid-2006 to mid-2007. The reason: the slumping dollar and grinding bear market that has cut the value of acquisition currencies for U.S. companies. (Both the greenback and the Nasdaq have lost about 15% of their value over the past year.)

Big Blue’s purchase of the Paris-based vendor of business rules engine technology isn’t likely to signal a rebound in ‘eastbound’ M&A, at least not a significant one. My colleague Adam Phipps notes the IBM-ILOG deal isn’t even among the Top 10 transactions, when ranked by deal size. The proposed combination comes in twelfth place in terms of purchases made by North American companies of EU-based companies over the past year.

Post-acquisition decapitation

Brenon Daly

The write-offs from wrong-headed acquisitions just keep coming. And we don’t mean just financial write-offs. Instead, we’re referring to the practice of a company’s board ‘writing off’ the executives who crafted a deal. This week’s high-profile example came when Alcatel-Lucent finally tossed overboard the two architects of ‘la grande fusion.’ Since that deal was announced in April 2006, the combination has incinerated some $20bn over shareholder value, leaving the telco equipment vendor with a market capitalization of just $13.6bn. (That’s less than the sales the company posted in 2007.) That two-year performance finally got Serge Tchuruk, the company’s chairman who represents the Alcatel side of the combination, and Patricia Russo, the Lucent legacy, shown the door.

This house-cleaning at Acaltel-Lucent comes just two weeks after AMD kicked Hector Ruiz upstairs. In virtually the same breath that AMD announced Ruiz would be relieved of his CEO post but continue as chairman, the company said it will divest much of the business it picked up with its $5.4bn purchase of graphics chip maker ATI Technologies. Announcing the deal two years ago, Ruiz said his combination offered ‘limitless’ possibilities for innovation. Instead, the future of AMD looks rather limited, in large part because of the $2.5bn it borrowed to cover its disastrous purchase of ATI. AMD’s total debt stands at $5bn, compared with just $1.6bn in cash.

Meanwhile, a chief executive who we’ve always thought must be on the hot-seat for a misguided acquisition appears to have gotten a bit of a reprieve this week. Symantec CEO John Thompson said Wednesday that fiscal first-quarter sales of its backup products outpaced overall revenue growth. That reverses the recent weakness in the company’s storage offering, which Symantec acquired with its $13.5bn purchase of Veritas in December 2004. Wall Street applauded the company’s report, with shares up about 10% since Wednesday. Still, Thompson has yet to recognize much value from the three-and-half-year-old purchase of Veritas. Symantec shares, which changed hands at $21.74 midday on Friday, are still about $6 below where they were when the company picked up Veritas. Perhaps that goes some distance to explaining the loose rumors this week that something big – possibly the much-discussed divestiture of the storage business or even an outright sale of the company – was brewing at Symantec.

Leading the acquisition

Deal Stock performance since deal Status of acquiring company CEO since deal
Symantec-Veritas, Dec. 2004 Down 35% John Thompson, CEO since April 1999, continues to serve
Alcatel-Lucent, April 2006 Down 61% CEO Russo and chairman Tchuruk ousted this week
AMD-ATI, July 2006 Down 77% Long-time CEO Hector Ruiz replaced in mid-July
Secure Computing-CipherTrust, July 2006 Down 51% Chairman and CEO John McNulty replaced in April

Source: Company reports, The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase