Category: VC

The ever-increasing appetite of salesforce.com

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Salesforce.com just keeps taking bigger bites. The company announced Wednesday that it will hand over $326m ($276m in cash and $50m in stock) for social-media monitoring company Radian6. Not only is it salesforce.com’s highest-priced acquisition, it also likely brings more revenue than any other deal the company has done, at least based on our estimates for previous transactions and the company’s guidance for Radian6. Salesforce.com indicated that the Canadian startup would contribute about $50m in sales during the current fiscal year, which is about two months old.

The purchase, which is expected to close by July, also puts an exclamation point on the changes in dealmaking at salesforce.com. The 11-year-old SaaS pioneer stayed out of the M&A market for the first half of its corporate life. And even when it started doing deals in 2006, the first half-dozen or so acquisitions were all small, valued in the low tens of millions of dollars. Salesforce.com only started announcing major purchases last year, with its $142m reach for Jigsaw Data followed by its $249m takeout of Heroku.

As sizeable as the deal is inside saleforce.com, it also looms pretty large inside the burgeoning social CRM market. Consider this: at roughly one-third of a billion dollars, salesforce.com’s pickup of Radian6 is more than 50 times larger than the acquisition of another social CRM startup just last week. Privately held Meltwater Group paid just $6m for JitterJam to bolster its social CRM offering, which the company hopes to be a $100m business within three years.

Cornerstone: the newest — and priciest — HCM vendor

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

So much for the ‘debut discount.’ Cornerstone OnDemand hit the market Thursday at an eye-popping valuation, going against the recent trend toward conservative pricing for new issues. The human capital management (HCM) vendor priced its shares at $13 each, above the indicated range of $9-11 each. (Goldman Sachs & Co and Barclays Capital are leading the IPO.) By early afternoon Thursday, the stock was changing hands at about $19.

The offering gives Cornerstone one of the richest valuations of any recent IPO. At $19 per share, the company’s market cap is roughly $900m. That’s 15 times trailing bookings (not sales) and likely in the neighborhood of 9x projected bookings. (Our math: Cornerstone reported 2010 bookings of $61m, up 74% from the previous year. Assuming that the growth rate comes down a smidge to 60-65% for 2011, that would put Cornerstone’s full-year bookings at $100m, give or take.)

Cornerstone’s valuation vastly outstrips what the market says rival Taleo is worth, and even puts it ahead of SuccessFactors, which had been the HCM industry’s ‘favorite child.’ (That’s been the view on Wall Street, anyway.) SuccessFactors, which went public in late 2007, currently garners a $2.7bn market cap, roughly 10.5x trailing bookings and about 8x projected 2011 bookings. We should note that both SuccessFactors and Taleo are about four times the size of their newest rival on the public market. But for now, both of them are looking up at Cornerstone.

Big Data means Big Dollars for VCs

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Just since last summer, the data-warehousing industry has seen a wave of consolidation sweep most of the sizable startups into the portfolios of larger vendors. While dramatically reshaping the industry, the concentrated dealmaking has also generated outsized returns for venture firms that have put money into some of the startups that are tackling the problems of ‘big data.’ By our calculation, the four recent data-warehousing exits – on average – have been 10-baggers for their backers.

The eight-month M&A spree started last July, when EMC reached for Greenplum. Two months later it was IBM’s turn to take out Netezza, the sole data-warehousing startup that had actually made it to the public market in recent years. In mid-February, Hewlett-Packard reversed its long-held strategy to stay with internal data-warehousing development and gobbled up Vertica Systems. And then just last week, the granddaddy of the industry, Teradata, snagged Aster Data Systems.

This run of deals has been a welcome development for venture capitalists, who have been starved recently for moneymaking exits. Consider this: the quartet of data-warehousing startups that have been snapped up have returned some $2.5bn to their investors, an astonishing 10 times the $245m that they collectively raised. (The total funding for the startups comes from The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase, which recently added venture information to many of the deal records.) Taking a dime and turning it into a dollar is a pretty nifty trick – and it’s one that most VCs haven’t been able to pull off across any sector of enterprise IT in a long, long time.

Select recent data-warehousing deals

Date announced Acquirer Target Price VC raised by target
March 3, 2011 Teradata Aster Data Systems $295m $57m
February 14, 2011 HP Vertica Systems $275m* (excluding earnout) $25m
September 20, 2010 IBM Netezza $1.8bn $73m
July 6, 2010 EMC Greenplum $400m* $90m

Source: The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase *451 Group estimate

SolarWinds looks to shine in other markets

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Having built a billion-dollar market cap through a cheap and easy offering for network management, SolarWinds is looking to take that approach to new markets through small acquisitions. Exactly a year ago, the company picked up Tek-Tools to add storage management to its portfolio, and now it steps fully into application performance management (APM) and virtualization management with its reach for Hyper9. SolarWinds is handing over $23m in cash for Hyper9, with terms also providing for a possible $7m earnout.

The addition of the small Austin, Texas-based startup, which had only about $2m in sales, gives SolarWinds its first stand-alone virtualization offering as well as a shoring up its APM product. (In the past, SolarWinds had a much less robust APM offering as a module to its flagship Orion product.) The moves also brings the company into more direct competition with management giants such as Hewlett-Packard, CA Technologies and Quest Software, among others.

In terms of competition, we would note with some irony that in a recent technology bakeoff that a nationwide grocery chain held for a monitoring product, Hyper9 got the nod ahead of SolarWinds, among other vendors. (See the full details in our User Deployment Report). So maybe part of the thinking at SolarWinds for the deal was if you can’t beat them, buy them

Adobe backs up Omniture buy with more SaaS

Brenon Daly

Contact: Kathleen Reidy

Continuing to show its interest in the online marketing realm, Adobe has announced that it will buy SaaS startup Demdex for an undisclosed sum. Demdex was founded in 2008 with the goal of capturing behavioral data across websites to help advertisers better segment and target ads. It had raised $7.5m in seed and series A rounds from Shasta Ventures, First Round Capital and Genacast Ventures.

This is the first deal Adobe has done explicitly in support of Omniture, which it acquired for $1.8bn in September 2009. It certainly seems like a transaction Omniture would have done, since it had been an active acquirer itself as an independent. (The company announced four purchases in 2007 alone.) Demdex will join other technologies from Touch Clarity, Offermatica, Visual Sciences and Mercado Software in the Omniture portfolio, which is now dubbed the ‘Adobe Online Marketing Suite, powered by Omniture.’ Omniture was also Adobe’s first big SaaS buy so Demdex brings it another SaaS offering, as well.

The only other acquisition Adobe has made since buying Omniture was its $242.7m pickup of Day Software last July. There are certainly connections between Day’s on-premises Web content management products and Omniture’s SaaS Web analytics and online marketing tools, but Adobe had broader reasons for buying Day and so far, seems to position Day more alongside its on-premises content management product, Adobe LiveCycle.

Sourcefire’s risky bet to re-spark its M&A program

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

As deals go, Sourcefire’s first acquisition hardly set the world on fire (if you will). Back in August 2007, the open source security vendor picked up the open source ClamAV project. The deal only set Sourcefire back $3.5m, but not much has been heard from the project since the acquisition. Undeterred, Sourcefire stepped back into the M&A market on Wednesday with an even larger – and (potentially) much more significant – transaction.

Sourcefire is paying $17m in cash for Immunet, a cloud-based anti-malware provider. (Immunet could also pocket a $4m earnout, which depends on the company hitting some product milestones, as well as a smidge of Sourcefire equity.) It’s still early days for Immunet, which raised just one round of funding and only started generating revenue last year. (The company claims some 750,000 users, but we suspect that the vast majority of those would be using Immunet Protect, which is available for free.)

There’s always a risk when a company reaches for an early-stage startup like Immunet, which has yet to really prove itself commercially. That risk is somewhat mitigated, however, by the fact that the two companies had worked together for almost a year, and all of the Immunet employees, including the founders, will be joining Sourcefire.

But, as my colleague Andrew Hay notes in his report, the deal brings a much bigger risk: Can Sourcefire, which is primarily focused on network security with its well-known Snort product, step into the endpoint security market without a stumble? How will it fare in selling antivirus against giant rivals that generate more revenue each quarter than Sourcefire has in its entire history? Sourcefire has fought through some tough setbacks in its history, including a broken sale to Check Point Software and breaking issue in its IPO. Now, with Immunet, it needs to show that it can actually pull off an acquisition.

Secondaries are primary for recent IPOs

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

The IPO window may be slammed shut right now, but the few tech companies that have managed to make it public have found the window wide open when it comes to selling more shares. In the past week or so, QlikTech, RealPage and IntraLinks have all priced their secondary sales. All three companies only came public last summer and have had strong runs since their debuts.

Recall that QlikTech priced its IPO above the expected range, something of a rarity in the current climate. After coming public in mid-July at $10, the stock traded above $20 two months later and has held that level. Shares in the analytics company closed at $23.79 on Tuesday. Incidentally, the company didn’t sell any shares in the offering. Instead, the three main backers (Accel Partners, Jerusalem Venture Partners and Stiftelsen Industrifonden) are all lightening their holdings in the 11.5-million-share secondary.

Meanwhile, rental property software provider RealPage put in the paperwork for its follow-on offering just three months after first selling shares to the public. The company sold four million shares, raising about $98m. Another 6.35 million shares came from selling shareholders, notably Apax Partners. Although RealPage initially came public below its expected range at $11, the shares have traded at twice that level since mid-October. RealPage closed Tuesday at $27.90, giving the company a market cap of about $1.8bn.

And IntraLinks priced its 10-million-share offering at $20 each. That’s up substantially from the $13 that the on-demand document management company first sold shares to the public back in early August. IntraLinks is selling two million shares, with the remaining eight million coming from its backers. The stock closed Tuesday at $19.16.

Google’s growing video ambitions

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly, Jim Davis

More than four years after Google acquired YouTube, the video content site is either putting up black numbers, or is very close to it. That’s according to hints offered recently by the company, although Google has often appeared unconcerned about the profitability of the wildly popular site that the search giant picked up in its second-largest acquisition. (YouTube could have slipped to Google’s third-largest deal, but it appears that rumored talks with Groupon have come to nothing.)

Just how popular is YouTube? Google recently indicated that a day’s worth of video (a full 24 hours) is uploaded every single second to the site. And while profitability has not been an immediate concern for YouTube, Google has nonetheless demonstrated that it is committed to online video – and that it is willing to put even more money behind the effort. Just late last week, Google picked up Widevine Technologies.

As my colleague Jim Davis notes, Widevine gives Google technology used to underpin both online and broadcast premium TV services through the use of software-based DRM systems. This means the company – with its recently launched Google TV product, as well as Android-powered phones and laptops running Chrome – will be able to offer secure premium content on any of these platforms and enable subscription and video-on-demand services, as an example.

For instance, YouTube could now charge for access to live events that it has broadcast on occasion, including a U2 concert last year and the Indian Premier League cricket matches this year. Until recently, YouTube had used CDN services from Akamai for live broadcasts. But just in the past few months, YouTube has started testing its own live-streaming services platform (and has hired a number of former Akamai employees to boot). If Google continues to develop a secure and scalable content delivery platform, CDN vendors may well feel the pinch.

Juniper back in the market — and how

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Just nine months after Juniper Networks picked up a small stake in Altor Networks through the startup’s second round of funding, the networking giant decided Monday to take home the whole thing. Juniper will hand over $95m in cash for the rest of the virtual firewall vendor. (Altor had raised around $16m in backing, including the undisclosed investment from Juniper.) At the time of the investment, Juniper said it planned to develop an ‘even closer’ relationship with Altor, its primary virtualization security partner. See our full report on the deal.

The purchase of Altor stands as Juniper’s fifth acquisition this year, and brings its M&A spending to almost $400m so far in 2010. That’s fairly remarkable activity, considering that Juniper had been out of the market for a half-decade. And with the exception of its recent pickup of Trapeze Networks, Juniper’s buys have been big bets on small companies. The networking giant has paid $70m-100m each for Ankeena Networks, SMobile Systems and Altor – and we gather that all three of the target companies were running in the single digits of millions of dollars.

Recent Juniper acquisitions

Date Target Deal value Rationale
December 6, 2010 Altor Networks $95m Virtualization security
November 18, 2010 Blackwave (assets) Not disclosed Internet video content delivery
November 16, 2010 Trapeze Networks $152m Wireless LAN infrastructure
July 27, 2010 SMobile Systems $70m Mobile device security
April 8, 2010 Ankeena Networks $69m Online media content delivery

Source: The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase

BMC adds to automation capabilities

Brenon Daly

by Brenon Daly

BMC Software hopes its latest purchase will make life easier for database administrators (DBAs) and systems operations. The management giant on Friday picked up longtime partner GridApp Systems, adding the startup’s database automation offering to its broader automation and management portfolio. GridApp automates tasks such as database provisioning and patching – mundane and time-consuming chores for DBAs, but ones that are critical for security and compliance reasons. Additionally, it enhances BMC’s full-stack automation capabilities.

The importance of this technology was highlighted (in part, at least) by another acquisition earlier this year. In late August, Hewlett-Packard reached for Stratavia, a startup that had begun life as a database management vendor but expanded into application-layer automation as well. (Pacific Crest Securities advised Stratavia, while GrowthPoint Technology Partners banked GridApp.) Even if the technology in the two deals doesn’t line up exactly, we understand that the valuations are nearly identical. Both GridApp and Stratavia, which were small, nonetheless garnered a 10 times multiple.