Category: investment banking

The end of a bull run in tech M&A?

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

After sprinting at a record rate of M&A spending in 2015, tech dealmakers and investment bankers are planning to catch their breath. In the just-completed M&A Leaders’ Survey from 451 Research and Morrison & Foerster, a record low percentage of respondents forecasted an uptick in their acquisition activity over the next six months, while a record high number predicted a decrease.

Overall in the latest edition of the survey, the bulls were only slightly less bullish, while the bears were dramatically more bearish. The 44% of tech acquirers projecting an acceleration in M&A is only a handful of points below the previous low-water mark, but the 24% indicating a slowdown is more than twice the average negative forecast over the previous seven surveys.

Now in its eighth edition, the M&A Leaders’ Survey from 451 Research and Morrison & Foerster has now registered two ‘outlier’ results – one on the upside, back in spring 2014, and in the current survey, one on the downside. Back in our April 2014 survey, a record 72% of respondents forecasted an acceleration in M&A activity. That clear indication by the main tech buyers and their advisers to get busier did indeed come through in the prints. In the six quarters since that record forecast, the average quarterly spending on tech M&A stands at $120bn, almost exactly twice the average quarterly spending in the preceding six quarters, according to 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase.

In our just-completed survey, we now have a similar – though inverse – significant deviation in responses. Recall that one-quarter of respondents predicted a decline in M&A activity through next spring, which is by far the highest level we’ve ever seen. The wisdom of the crowd, which comes through in our survey results, more or less accurately anticipated the start of a bull run in tech M&A a year and a half ago. In the latest survey, the crowd’s sentiment appears to have swung in the other direction. We’ll have a full report on the latest M&A Leaders’ Survey from 451 Research and Morrison & Foerster on our website later today and in tomorrow’s 451 Market Insight.

M&A spending outlook for the next six months

Survey date Increase Stay the same Decrease
October 2015 44% 32% 24%
April 2015 61% 30% 9%
October 2014 48% 36% 16%
April 2014 72% 24% 4%
October 2013 50% 43% 7%
April 2013 54% 27% 19%
October 2012 49% 34% 17%
April 2012 59% 33% 8%

Source: M&A Leaders’ Survey from 451 Research / Morrison & Foerster

Securing an IPO pipeline

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

As we saw in the recent lackluster debut of Pure Storage, there isn’t much demand on Wall Street for new offerings. The fast-growing storage startup became only the fifth enterprise tech vendor to go public in 2015. Virtually all of the tech IPOs, including Pure Storage, have broken issue, often falling below the valuation they achieved as private companies, when they were smaller and more speculative investments. However, there is one exception to the generally dismal tech IPO market: information security.

Consider the standout offering from Rapid7 . Since debuting three months ago, the threat-detection provider has not only delivered a tidy return to its earlier investors, but has also traded relatively strongly in the aftermarket. And it is doing all that while maintaining a rather rich valuation. Investors value Rapid7 at about $840m, roughly 8x the $100m or so in sales this year that the company will put up.

As with any market that indicates demand, supply will look to satisfy that demand. We understand there are at least three information security firms currently on file and hoping to go public before the end of the year:

  • Veracode: The code-scanning startup is rumored to have picked J.P. Morgan Securities to lead its offering. We gather the company ran a dual-track process, but is now set to go public. It raised a late-stage round about a year ago, bringing its total to about $120m.
  • LogRhythm: The SIEM vendor has navigated through the consolidation that has thinned the number of sizable independent vendors to just a handful. An IPO from LogRhythm would come almost eight years after rival ArcSight went public.
  • SecureWorks: We noted in May that Dell’s managed security service division is looking at spinning off a minority stake of the company. The move would give SecureWorks currency to pick up other MSSPs, as well as (possibly) raise money for Dell as it looks to pay for the largest-ever tech acquisition.

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

Buyout barons pay up in big tech prints

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Once again, the buyout barons are paying up in their big bets. The latest example of private equity (PE) largess came in the proposed SolarWinds take-private, with Silver Lake Partners and Thoma Bravo teaming up on a $4.5bn offer. That’s a fairly steep price for a company growing sales in the high teens to about $500m this year. On a cash-flow basis, SolarWinds is getting a vertigo-inducing valuation of 27x EBITDA.

While SolarWinds’ valuation is certainly richer than other significant PE deals, this year has nonetheless seen financial buyers ready to pay above-market prices. For instance, Informatica, which put up about $1bn in sales, went private earlier this year for more than $5bn. On a smaller scale, we understand that’s exactly the same valuation Thoma Bravo paid in its purchase of privately held healthcare analytics vendor MedeAnalytics.

Altogether, the PE shops involved in the 10 largest transactions in 2015 have paid an average of 3.4x trailing sales, according to 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase . (To be clear, that’s based on the enterprise value of the targets.) For comparison, that’s a full turn higher than the average valuation for big PE prints over the previous three years. Of course, buyers in the previous years didn’t necessarily have to worry about an imminent raise of interest rates, which might be spurring some of the activity now.

Significant PE deal valuations, 2012-15*

Year Average enterprise value/sales ratio Select transactions
YTD 2015 3.4x SolarWinds LBO, Informatica LBO, Solera Holdings LBO
2014 2.9x TIBCO LBO, Riverbed LBO, Compuware LBO
2013 2x Dell LBO, BMC LBO, Active Network LBO
2012 2.4x Getty Images, Misys LBO, Ancestry.com LBO

Source: 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase *Average enterprise value-to-sales ratio of the 10 largest transactions in each of the years

Can Dell safeguard the VMware ‘crown jewels’ in EMC acquisition?

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

In announcing the largest-ever tech transaction, both Dell and EMC repeatedly assured the market that VMware, which has consistently accounted for an outsized chunk of EMC’s overall valuation, would retain its status as ‘first among equals’ in the EMC federation. Roughly speaking, VMware generates only about one-quarter of EMC sales, but accounted for three-quarters of the EMC’s overall value before the acquisition. VMware was rightfully termed the ‘crown jewel’ of the landmark transaction.

However, despite those intentions, VMware has nonetheless lost some of its luster due to the pending acquisition, at least in two key constituencies. Both IT buyers and Wall Street investors are more than a little bearish on Dell owning the virtualization kingpin. Since the acquisition was announced, VMware’s market value has fallen by as much as $5bn. (That decline is also pulling down the overall value of the transaction because part of the consideration is in the form of tracking stock.) VMware shares have slumped to their lowest level since mid-2013.

To understand why Wall Street is selling the Dell-EMC deal, we have to look to the ultimate arbiters of value for any company: customers. And based on 451 Research’s survey of nearly 450 IT decision-makers, Dell has a lot of work to do to ease the concerns that it will mishandle EMC and its ‘crown jewel.’ In our survey, four of 10 IT pros who currently buy EMC products, but do not buy Dell products, gave the proposed acquisition a ‘thumbs down.’ That was almost three times higher than the percentage of pessimistic Dell-only customers. The main reason cited by EMC-only customers for their bearishness? They still view Dell as dealing in commodity technology. Obviously, with that perception, it’s going to be extremely challenging for Dell to hit its target of $1bn ‘revenue synergies’ through its EMC acquisition.

VMW rev 2010-15

Barrage of blockbusters pushes tech M&A spending to post-Bubble high

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Fittingly for a year that has seen an unprecedented number of blockbuster transactions, Dell’s $63.1bn reach for EMC pushed 2015 into record territory for recent spending on tech, media and telecom (TMT) transactions. According to 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase, acquirers around the globe have spent $475bn on TMT deals so far this year. That handily tops the previous full-year total of $420bn from 2007, which had marked the highest level of spending since the Internet bubble burst in 2000.

Overall, 2015 has seen two of the three largest TMT transactions recorded in the KnowledgeBase over the past 15 years. In addition to Dell’s planned purchase of EMC, this year also featured Charter Communications’ $56.7bn acquisition of Time Warner Cable in May. Other big prints in 2015 include Avago’s $37bn pickup of Broadcom in May (the semiconductor industry’s largest-ever consolidation) and $17bn deals from both Intel and Nokia.

So far in 2015 we’ve tallied 63 transactions valued at more than $1bn in the KnowledgeBase. That exactly matches the number of billion-dollar deals during the same period in the previous record year of 2007. However, there’s a lot more money attached to this year’s transactions. The median price for each of the big prints in 2015 is $2.5bn, compared with just $2bn for each deal in 2007. Skewed by these blockbuster TMT transactions, M&A spending is now tracking to about $600bn for the full year. That would shatter 2007’s previous record for spending by a full 40%.

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

Dell looks to become ‘indelible’ IT vendor with EMC

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly Simon Robinson

Announcing the largest tech deal since the Internet bubble burst, Dell plans to pay approximately $63.1bn for EMC. The debt-laden combination would create a sprawling IT giant with multibillion-dollar businesses in many of the primary enterprise technology markets, including storage, information security, IT services, servers and PCs. (For context, the combined Dell-EMC entity would be larger than Hewlett-Packard Enterprise (post-split), NetApp, Juniper Networks and Symantec combined.) Dell’s bold transformational transaction is not coming cheap, however. The company is valuing EMC significantly more richly than it valued itself when it went private two and a half years ago.

Further, Dell’s relatively pricey bulking up comes at a time when a number of rival enterprise IT vendors are slimming down. More to the point, several of these competitors are unwinding earlier blockbuster acquisitions they made in hopes of staying more relevant in a shifting IT market. The arrival of the public cloud has siphoned off billions of dollars that once flowed unimpeded to Dell, EMC and other first-generation technology firms. However, IT customers increasingly lack the appetite to buy, install and manage dozens of ‘piece parts’ and mold them into a cohesive whole. As a result, we can look at the combination of Dell and EMC as essential if the traditional IT model is to survive the onslaught from public cloud providers, most notably Amazon Web Services.

Though Dell has been on a path to build a ‘better together’ story for almost a decade, it clearly hasn’t been enough. In its effort to buy its way out of the commodity PC business, the company stitched together a patchwork of properties. However, the resulting ‘big picture’ has still not materialized. Dell has lacked a core focus point, as well as the heft and scale in any one market to dominate. Further, it has so far not sufficiently penetrated the large enterprise segment, or moved beyond its two longtime key verticals of healthcare and the public sector. Against this backdrop, it’s easy to see the attraction of EMC, which brings large enterprise credibility in storage, perhaps the industry’s most focused and effective sales operation and, in VMware, still one of the most strategic entities on the market.

EMC’s attractiveness also shows through in the valuation that Dell is paying, if not when viewed against the broader tech M&A market than certainly when put against Dell’s own worth. According to terms, Dell is paying 2.5x trailing sales and 11.5x trailing EBITDA for EMC. For comparison, in orchestrating the take-private of his namesake company, Michael Dell and his consortium paid just one-quarter the price-to-sales multiple of EMC and half the cash-flow multiple. Dell’s LBO, which stands as the third-largest private equity tech transaction in history, valued the company at just 0.5x trailing sales and 5.2x trailing EBITDA.

Look for a full report on the proposed Dell-EMC pairing later today on our website and in tomorrow’s 451 Market Insight.

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

In the red-hot SaaS SI market, which is the next shop looking to sell?

Brenon Daly

 

Contact: Brenon Daly

With IBM picking up Meteorix, we hear there’s another Workday-focused SI currently on the market. CPSG, a Dallas-based shop, is slightly bigger than Meteorix, as well as much more profitable, according to our understanding. And it’s seeking a much richer valuation on its exit.

CPSG posted $25m in revenue in 2014, and the company is reportedly forecasting $35-40m for full-year 2015. Unlike other software implementation firms, however, CPSG throws off a fair amount of cash. It should generate more than $10m of EBITDA this year.

The growth and cash flow at CPSG have the company and its advisers at Robert W. Baird & Co. looking for a top-dollar exit. Current second-round bids are coming in at roughly $140m. (For comparison, subscribers to 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase can see our estimate for the valuation IBM paid for Meteorix.)

Assuming CPSG does print, it would be the latest in a string of SaaS application implementation vendors to sell. Just in the past two months, we have seen three significant SIs snapped up by major service providers in a shopping spree that totals more than $600m. Moreover, these buyers are paying 2-3x their own valuations in their acquisitions, reflecting just how desperate they are to bulk up their practices in the fast-growing SaaS space.

Recent SaaS-focused SI M&A

Date announced Acquirer Target Description Deal value
August 11, 2015 CSC Fruition Partners ServiceNow SI See 451 Research estimate
September 15, 2015 Accenture Cloud Sherpas Salesforce, ServiceNow SI Not disclosed
September 28, 2015 IBM Meteorix Workday SI See 451 Research estimate

Source: 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

As black swans darken summer sky, Q3 tech M&A gets grounded

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Tech acquirers’ confidence eroded unmistakably in mid-August as equity markets around the world got routed, with some indexes tumbling hundreds of points in a single session. As the economic outlook dimmed around the globe, valuations for buyers and their holdings dropped as well. If the stock market uncertainty didn’t knock buyers out of the tech M&A market entirely, it at least caused them to scale back their acquisitions. Just seven of Q3’s largest 20 deals came after the mid-August turmoil, according to 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase. Spending in the back half of the quarter fell 20% compared with the first half.

Slowed by the mid-quarter bear market, spending on tech, telecom and media (TMT) transactions across the globe in the July-September period totaled $81bn. Although that amount is a fairly representative quarterly total for 2013-14, it represents a dramatic slowdown from earlier this year. Q3 spending stands at less than half the level of M&A spending in Q2 and one-third lower than Q1, which kicked off 2015’s record run. On a comparative basis, the value of acquisitions in both Q1 and Q2 surged about 50% from the same quarters in 2014, while spending in the just-completed Q3 declined 21% compared with Q3 2014.

Viewed more expansively, the Q3 slowdown might have pushed back the date when spending in 2015 on TMT transactions sets a new post-bubble record, but the record will nonetheless fall this year. (Indeed, if this summer had simply continued the average monthly M&A spending we had seen in the first half of the year, 2015 would have already topped the recent record of $420bn set in the prelapsarian year of 2007.) As it stands, dealmakers have spent $407bn on TMT acquisitions so far this year, just a few big prints shy of the highest level of spending since 2000, according to 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase.

See our full report on both M&A and IPO activity in Q3, as well as a look ahead to activity through the rest of 2015.

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

Recent quarterly deal flow

Period Deal volume Deal value
Q3 2015 1,115 $81bn
Q2 2015 1,056 $205bn
Q1 2015 1,032 $120bn
Q4 2014 1,028 $65bn
Q3 2014 1,049 $102bn
Q2 2014 1,005 $141bn
Q1 2014 854 $82bn
Q4 2013 787 $64bn
Q3 2013 859 $73bn
Q2 2013 760 $48bn
Q1 2013 798 $65bn
Q4 2012 824 $65bn
Q3 2012 880 $39bn
Q2 2012 878 $44bn
Q1 2012 920 $35bn

Source: 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase

Where does the tech M&A market go from here?

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

In both August 2015 and August 2011, concerns about slowing global economies knocked stock markets around the world into a tailspin, while also ratcheting up volatility. Intuitively, we would assume that both conditions, which introduce more variance and uncertainty, would make it more difficult to do deals. But is that actually the case? And if so, what can the whipsawing markets from four years ago tell us about how M&A activity might play out for the rest of 2015?

To get a sense, we split 2011 into a ‘pre-turmoil’ period of January through August, and then a ‘post-turmoil’ period of September through December (which is roughly the same four-month block that remains in 2015). When we ran the numbers in 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase, we got a pretty clear picture of acquisition activity in the two periods of 2011: the M&A market never got back on track after the summer upheaval.

Through the first eight months of 2011, dealmakers averaged $22.3bn in spending on tech, media and telecom (TMT) transactions each month. For the remaining four months of 2011, average spending dropped about 40% to just $13.6bn per month. Further, it wasn’t just a case of where a deal or two in the front half of the year skewed the total. Instead, it was pretty even spending on significant transactions. There were eight separate acquisitions announced in the first eight months of 2011 valued at more than $4bn, while not a single deal that size hit the tape in the last four months of the year.

We have noted how the black swans have already befouled the M&A market in the short term. (Spending on TMT transactions dropped a staggering 80% in the second half of August, according to the KnowledgeBase.) If past is precedent, the rest of 2015 won’t be as bad as that, but it also won’t be anywhere near as good as it has been. A 40% decline – like we saw at the close of 2011 – would mean each of the remaining months would come in at roughly $30bn in average monthly spending, compared with the monthly average since the start of 2015 of nearly $50bn.

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

Black swans roil tech M&A market

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

During the six-year bull run on Wall Street, corporate treasuries have been as flush with cash as executive offices have been flush with confidence. Put those two factors together and we have the makings of an M&A boom like the one that has put spending on tech acquisitions so far this year already twice as high as it was in the recession years.

Remove either of the crucial components of cash and confidence, however, and deals don’t get done. It’s hard to go shopping when your head is spinning with volatility and your guts are clenched in uncertainty. That hesitancy comes through clearly when we look at the prints for August.

In the first two weeks of the month, it was business as usual. Private equity shops and corporate buyers around the globe announced 172 tech, media and telecom (TMT) transactions with an aggregate value of $21.6bn, according to 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase. In the two weeks that followed, as black swans flew above the equity markets around the world, dealmakers announced just 145 acquisitions worth $4.6bn. As uncertainty erased trillions of dollars of stock market capitalization over the past two weeks, spending on M&A plunged almost 80%.

Heavily skewed to the first half of the month, August spending totaled $26.2bn, which is roughly half the average amount for the previous seven months of 2015. Yet even with the mini-recession in tech M&A since mid-August, spending on 2015 deals overall is still tracking to its highest level since 2000. Through eight months of the year, dealmakers have announced transactions valued at about $375bn, roughly $45bn short of the $420bn recorded in 2007.

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

Wall Street confidence July 2015