Category: investment banking

Post-acquisition decapitation

Brenon Daly

The write-offs from wrong-headed acquisitions just keep coming. And we don’t mean just financial write-offs. Instead, we’re referring to the practice of a company’s board ‘writing off’ the executives who crafted a deal. This week’s high-profile example came when Alcatel-Lucent finally tossed overboard the two architects of ‘la grande fusion.’ Since that deal was announced in April 2006, the combination has incinerated some $20bn over shareholder value, leaving the telco equipment vendor with a market capitalization of just $13.6bn. (That’s less than the sales the company posted in 2007.) That two-year performance finally got Serge Tchuruk, the company’s chairman who represents the Alcatel side of the combination, and Patricia Russo, the Lucent legacy, shown the door.

This house-cleaning at Acaltel-Lucent comes just two weeks after AMD kicked Hector Ruiz upstairs. In virtually the same breath that AMD announced Ruiz would be relieved of his CEO post but continue as chairman, the company said it will divest much of the business it picked up with its $5.4bn purchase of graphics chip maker ATI Technologies. Announcing the deal two years ago, Ruiz said his combination offered ‘limitless’ possibilities for innovation. Instead, the future of AMD looks rather limited, in large part because of the $2.5bn it borrowed to cover its disastrous purchase of ATI. AMD’s total debt stands at $5bn, compared with just $1.6bn in cash.

Meanwhile, a chief executive who we’ve always thought must be on the hot-seat for a misguided acquisition appears to have gotten a bit of a reprieve this week. Symantec CEO John Thompson said Wednesday that fiscal first-quarter sales of its backup products outpaced overall revenue growth. That reverses the recent weakness in the company’s storage offering, which Symantec acquired with its $13.5bn purchase of Veritas in December 2004. Wall Street applauded the company’s report, with shares up about 10% since Wednesday. Still, Thompson has yet to recognize much value from the three-and-half-year-old purchase of Veritas. Symantec shares, which changed hands at $21.74 midday on Friday, are still about $6 below where they were when the company picked up Veritas. Perhaps that goes some distance to explaining the loose rumors this week that something big – possibly the much-discussed divestiture of the storage business or even an outright sale of the company – was brewing at Symantec.

Leading the acquisition

Deal Stock performance since deal Status of acquiring company CEO since deal
Symantec-Veritas, Dec. 2004 Down 35% John Thompson, CEO since April 1999, continues to serve
Alcatel-Lucent, April 2006 Down 61% CEO Russo and chairman Tchuruk ousted this week
AMD-ATI, July 2006 Down 77% Long-time CEO Hector Ruiz replaced in mid-July
Secure Computing-CipherTrust, July 2006 Down 51% Chairman and CEO John McNulty replaced in April

Source: Company reports, The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase

‘Cuil-ing’ off Google

In the lucrative world of search, not much has changed in recent years. Google is still running away with market share, handling an estimated two-thirds of all queries, followed – at a distance – by Yahoo and Microsoft. However, some changes may be coming, with a host of new search startups coming out of beta. The latest: Cuil. The highly touted and heavily funded startup created by some high-ranking former Google search employees hopes to dethrone Google. Do we believe it can accomplish that? Of course not; in fact, due to a less-than-stellar launch, it may have already lost.

Still, there is a small opening for Cuil and the other startups. Google has been mired in controversy for the past year over privacy concerns and regulatory hurdles, not to mention its ambitions to become a software application vendor. Those distractions at Google have encouraged venture capitalists, particular the more adventurous angels, to once again put money into search. Cuil has collected about $30m, while Blekko has received $6m. (The funding at Blekko comes despite the fact that the company, as it stands now, is nothing more than a promising idea from industry veterans and an empty webpage.)

Of course, the reason this new generation of search companies is getting VC attention is that there are natural acquirers for this technology. One example: Microsoft’s purchase of Powerset earlier this month for an estimated $100m. While that valuation may seem a bit low for Powerset, which was once as hotly hyped as Cuil, keep in mind that the price was essentially twice its post-money valuation in its latest round. Not great, but not bad in this market.

We suspect other search startups will ultimately sell for much the same reason that Powerset sold: scaling up these startups to deal with millions of users, and competing with multimillion-dollar R&D budgets of the ‘Big Search’ companies is not an easy or cheap task. With a proven willingness and desire of Yahoo, Microsoft and Google to make defensive or technology acquisitions in search, we believe the end game for Cuil, Mahalo, Blekko and the like will all be the same: acquisition. The bigger picture in the Cuil saga is that there is a batch of ex-Googlers up for grabs – Googlers who helped define the core technology of early Google search technology. Though Google is rumored to already be in engaged in talks with the company, how could Microsoft and Yahoo possibly resist swooping in for the coup?

Startup search engines

Company Year founded Funding
Cuil 2007 $30m
Mahalo 2007 $20m
Blekko 2006 $6m
ChaCha 2006 $16m
Hakia 2004 $21m

Source: Company reports

Sophos bags an elephant

Brenon Daly

In a twist on a private-public transaction, Sophos laid out on Monday a bold $340m plan to pick up Utimaco, an encryption vendor that trades on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange. Rather than rolling into the public company, Sophos plans to take Utimaco off the market. It plans to fund the acquisition by drawing on three sources. (My colleague, Nick Selby, has the details on the financing as well as the strategy.)

The financing is crucial because this deal is a whopper. If it goes through, it’ll be the largest IT security deal in seven months. More significantly, however, Sophos’ planned acquisition of Utimaco stands as the biggest purchase by a privately held security company. In fact, it’s nearly twice the size as the number two deal, Barracuda’s unsolicited run at Sourcefire. (And it’s not certain that deal will close at all. Sourcefire, which is slated to report second-quarter earnings on Thursday, has shot down the deal so far.)

Although Utimaco will be erased from the market, we view the disappearance as temporary. Once the two companies get through the integration, we expect Sophos to try to go public once again. (Recall that last fall, it announced plans to list on the London Stock Exchange but shelved them as the markets deteriorated.) Among the underwriters for the planned IPO was Deutsche Bank, which advised Sophos on the purchase of Utimaco. Indeed, it was the same DB banker on this deal that also co-advised on a very similar transaction last fall, McAfee’s $350m purchase of Dutch encryption vendor SafeBoot. (DB and UBS Investment Bank advised SafeBoot, while Morgan Stanley advised McAfee.)

A scratch-and-dent sale for Vignette?

Brenon Daly

With its shares currently bumping their lowest level in three years, Vignette has done little to help itself. In its second-quarter report Thursday, the dismaying decline in sales of its software continued. In the first half of 2008, Vignette has recorded just $20m in license sales, down from $30m in the first half of 2007. By way of understatement, CEO Mike Aviles acknowledged that Vignette’s software sales ‘are not where we want them’ but added additional marketing spending and recent changes in the company’s sales executives should help.

We’re not so sure those moves will help the struggling company. Vignette already spends one-third of its revenue on sales and marketing, and indicated that it may bump up that level for the rest of the year. (Not that the company has much insight into how business will run in the coming months. Consider its laughably broad guidance to Wall Street on its loss of the current quarter: It said it’ll lose something between 7 and 21 cents per share in the third quarter, representing a net loss in the period of $1.7-5m.)

One of the main reasons Vignette continues to struggle is that it’s going against some tough competition, including Oracle and IBM, as well as stand-alone content management players. For that reason, we could certainly see Vignette benefiting from being part of a larger company. And indeed, we’ve heard from two sources that the ongoing auction for Vignette has narrowed to two final parties. While we don’t know the specific names, we suspect Hewlett-Packard may well be one. (Don’t forget that the head of HP’s software division, Tom Hogan, knows Vignette intimately. Hogan served as CEO of the company from 2002-2006 before moving to HP.)

And the price for Vignette certainly isn’t prohibitive. With the stock having slid 40% over the past year, Vignette currently garners a market capitalization of just $280m. However, the debt-free company also has $90m in cash and equivalents in its bank account, lowering the net cost of Vignette to just $190m. That’s about the same level of sales it is likely to report this year. In the past, shoppers have paid 2.6 to 2.9 times enterprise value/revenue for their purchases of other publicly traded content management vendors. However, we doubt Vignette – with its slumping software sales and spendthrift marketing plans – will command that kind of multiple.

Selected significant content management deals

Date Acquirer Target Price EV/sales multiple
August 2006 IBM FileNet $1.6bn 2.6x
November 2006 Oracle Stellent $440m 2.9x

Source: The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase

Transatlantic cold front in M&A

Brenon Daly

In terms of North American tech companies shopping in Europe, the past year has been a case of overlooking deals rather than being over there looking for deals. Eastbound M&A (or North American acquirers of EU-based companies) totaled just $12.5bn from July 2007 through June 2008. That’s down two-thirds from the $45.2bn worth of deals inked from mid-2006 to mid-2007. The primary reason: a 15% decline in the Nasdaq and the US dollar (relative to the euro) over the past year that has sapped buying power.

Of course, the slumping greenback offered European acquirers a bit of a ‘rebate’ on their purchases. And they took advantage of that, pushing westbound M&A (or EU-based acquirers of North American companies) to a new record. From July 2007 through June 2008, European acquirers spent $30.2bn picking up North American-based companies, a 38% increase from $21.9bn in the same period in the previous year.

But even that record amount of eastbound spending wasn’t nearly enough to offset the utter disappearance of their North American counterparts. Overall spending on transatlantic tech M&A fell by more than one-third, dropping to $42.7bn from $67.1bn in the same period of the previous year. We look at the numbers and the trends in a full report that’s available here.

Transatlantic deals

Period EU to North America North America to EU Total
July 2005-June 2006 $14.5bn $19.4bn $33.9bn
July 2006-June 2007 $21.9bn $45.2bn $67.1bn
July 2007-June 2008 $30.2bn $12.5bn $42.7bn

Source: The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase

The Art of hosting

Art Zeile is at it again. The private equity arm of Wachovia recently bought privately held HostMySite for an estimated $60m. Wachovia Capital Partners has tapped Zeile and his management team to lead the company, and intends to aggressively grow the venture through further acquisitions. Despite an unfavorable market for M&As, both Wachovia and Zeile are very bullish about going on a shopping spree. And they have a pile of cash – to the tune upwards of $150m – to do so. We hear that talks are already under way. But while awaiting official word of forthcoming deals, we take a stab at identifying some potential candidates.

Although it’s in a unique position as one of the leaders in the niche managed dedicated hosting space, HostMySite is currently not a heavyweight by any means. It is running about $20-25m in revenue at the moment. Nonetheless, it is the future prospects and track record of the new management that have Wachovia and a few other undisclosed investors so willingly parting with their money. Zeile and his team founded Inflow Inc in 1997, successfully navigated it through the bubble era, and with a few strategic acquisitions turned it into a $70m company. Inflow was sold to SunGard Data Systems in early 2005 for almost $200m.

The managed dedicated hosting sector has seen a lot of consolidation over the past few years. One of the main reasons for this is the prevalence of on-demand and outsourced hosting. The dominant players in the space are looking to build up scale and expand geographically to better meet their customers’ increasing needs.

According to insiders, HostMySite is looking at buying up small to medium-sized companies with revenue greater than $10m, largely focused on managed dedicated hosting. It has a preference for companies based in the West and Midwest, for geographical diversity. The market is littered with hosting providers, but few that fit those parameters, especially ones focused mostly on managed dedicated hosting. We did manage to come up with a few potential targets: LiquidWeb, ServePath, and INetU. All three are making names for themselves in the managed dedicated hosting space – but with revenue between $10-20m, they’re still small enough for a potential acquisition.

Frankly we would be surprised if at least one of these companies wasn’t acquired in the near future, either by HostMySite or another company. In fact, given the revenue multiples typically applied to acquisitions in this space (between 2.5 to 3.5 times trailing 12-month revenue), all three could conceivably be bought for about $100m – leaving ample cash for future endeavors.

Recent select managed hosting acquisitions

Date Acquirer Target Deal value TTM revenue
April 2008 ABRY Partners Hosted Solutions $140m $39m*
December 2006 Fujitsu Services TDS AG $132m NA
June 2008 International Game Technology Cyberview Technology $76m $53m
February 2006 VeriSign 3united Mobile Solutions $65m NA
April 2008 Layered Technologies FastServers.Net $13.5m* $9.5m*

Source: The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase * official 451 Group estimate

Should Ask prepare to get Answers?

Ask.com – a subsidiary of IAC/InterActiveCorp – closed its acquisition of Lexico Publishing Group last week. The 16-person company, which includes Dictionary.com, Reference.com and Thesaurus.com, reportedly went for $100m in cash, representing a multiple that we estimate at 10 times its trailing twelve-months revenue, or more than $6 per monthly unique visitor. This acquisition comes after a tumultuous ride for the profitable Lexico. The company was almost acquired by Answers Corp (Answers.com) in 2007, but after Answers failed to drum up proper financing, the deal turned sour. It was officially terminated in February, presenting an opening for Ask.com to swoop in. Besides being a happy ending for Lexico, which has been chasing an exit for a while, this fits well with Ask.com’s restructuring strategy of returning to its roots as an answer facilitator after its short but decidedly failed attempt to out-Google Google in the search engine department. Ask.com has openly said that more acquisitions are forthcoming. So who might the company buy next?

Among others, we see Answers.com itself as a potential acquisition target. Despite a growing base of about 20 million loyal users, the provider has had a tough time monetizing its page views and has been bleeding cash for more than a year now. Incorporating Answers.com’s user base and content could solidify Ask.com as the leader in the answer-search business. And with Amazon and Yahoo moving in on Ask.com’s turf, it is necessary for the company to continue to grow its market share. Indeed, we’ve heard industry rumors that Ask.com had made overtures to its rival well before the failed Lexico deal. And interestingly, Redpoint Ventures recently pumped $6m (with an option for another $7m) into Answers.com. That is the same Redpoint Ventures that helped fund Ask.com during its early days and that still has a stake in the IAC division. Ask.com’s former CEO Jim Lanzone also happens to be an entrepreneur-in-residence at Redpoint.

Surely the struggling company could be had for much less than the revenue multiple accorded to Lexico, which reported a healthy EBITDA of about $3m for calendar 2006, the last data made public. While the revenue multiple and price-per-user metrics of the Lexico deal would suggest a $100m-plus valuation for Answers, the company, which reported an operating loss of about $3.7m in the first quarter of this year, is clearly going to be valued at a steep discount. It’s currently trading at a 52-week low, with a market cap of just above $23m, or just a bit more than two times trailing revenue and a little over a dollar per user. With more than three times the number of employees as Lexico, Answers clearly has a much more labor-intensive model than its peer. That may change, though. Answers.com’s fast-growing new WikiAnswers.com service offers a lower-cost community-based answer site and is expected to exceed the more labor-intensive Answers.com service in revenue by the second half of 2008.

At a minimum, we estimate that Ask.com would have to shell out somewhere in the neighborhood of $30m, or roughly $3.80 per share, for the company – a 30% premium to the current price. It’s certainly not a question of whether IAC can afford the deal – it currently has a little more than $1.2bn in cash and a market cap of $4.7bn – but how much it could leverage the deal by cutting costs, monetizing the user base and expanding the WikiAnswers business. Indeed, for Answers.com, an acquisition by Ask.com may be just what the company and its desperate shareholders have been looking for.

On a final note, Ask.com’s new strategy of no longer trying to beat Google at its own game is in stark contrast to that of Microsoft, whose recent investments and acquisitions put it on a head-on collision course with Google. However, Microsoft’s recent acquisition of Powerset at least gives it technology that is capable (within Wikipedia, at least – it is yet to be tested publicly on a large corpus) of providing answers to both questions and keyword queries and could end up being a major challenge to the Q&A format Ask.com favors. That is, of course, if it doesn’t get lost in the mix if Microsoft should buy Yahoo’s search business.

The ‘new’ Old Media

-by Brenon Daly, Yulitza Peraza

With investment bank Allen & Co opening its annual conference on July 9 in Sun Valley, Idaho, we thought we’d take a look at what sort of shopping the traditional media companies, which make up most of the confab’s attendees, have been doing recently. The short answer: They’ve been busy. And a lot of the buying has been Old Media picking up New Media. (We’ve noted in the past how Allen & Co has re-tooled its business to meet the change in deal flow.)

In the first half of this year, traditional media companies have spent more on Internet content companies than during any other comparable period. Just Tuesday, for instance, Gannett picked up the chunk of ShopLocal that it didn’t already own. Additionally, NBC took a majority stake in Web content and broadcast sports provider World Championship Sports Network for an undisclosed sum last month. (This acquisition, the network’s fourth since 2006, comes just in time to help bolster its upcoming coverage of the Olympic Games in Beijing.) Also, CBS paid $1.8bn in May for CNET, one of the original online information sites. Altogether, since 2002, Old Media has put more than $13bn toward online purchases.

If anything, we expect the pace to pick up in the second half of 2008, as media companies continue to expand their digital offerings. The shopping spree, however, is a bit late because the model has been broken for a long time. It used to be that traditional media companies could run fatly profitable by simply trading their information and entertainment for your dollars, whether the payment came through subscription or advertising. That exchange worked as long as the information and entertainment could be kept closely controlled. In other words, it worked until the Internet came along.

Acquisitions of content companies by media outlets

Period Deal Volume Deal Value
Jan-June 2002 9 $424,000
Jan-June 2003 7 $106m
Jan-June 2004 3 $87m
Jan-June 2005 10 $1.11bn
Jan-June 2006 26 $1.18bn
Jan-June 2007 32 $2.07bn
Jan-June 2008 38 $2.18bn

Source: The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase

Courting deals

Brenon Daly

Just how often is legal discovery a form of M&A due diligence? We asked ourselves that question on July 2 when IBM shelled out an undisclosed amount of money for Platform Solutions (PSI) after the two companies had battled each other in the courtroom since late 2006. Big Blue’s initial suit alleged patent infringement, while PSI’s countersuit raised questions of antitrust concerns.

Of course, we would never suggest that Big Blue simply bought off PSI, using its vast cash reserves to quiet a critic. And even if that was IBM’s motivation, we can hardly fault the company for determining that money spent to move its mainframe business ahead through acquisition has a higher potential ROI than just writing checks to lawyers.

With that case closed (as they say in the courtroom), we wonder if a similar scenario will play out at i2 Technologies. As we’ve noted in the past, the supply chain software vendor has run into a heap of problems, prompting it a year ago to hire JPMorgan to advise it on ‘strategic alternatives.’ One of those problems got resolved recently when SAP agreed to fork over $83m to settle a nearly two-year-old patent infringement suit. (To put i2’s legal windfall into perspective, consider that the settlement is twice as much as the company has earned in the past two years combined.) While we initially figured a buyout shop as the likely acquirer for i2, we now wonder if the settlement from SAP is merely a down payment on an acquisition of i2.

Courtroom drama

Parties Legal issue Outcome
IBM-Platform Solutions Patent infringement IBM acquires PSI, undisclosed amount
SAP-i2 Patent infringement SAP pays $83m settlement, all charges dropped

Source: The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase and SEC

Location-based stalking?

2 Comments

Nokia has been going navi-crazy lately. Last week, the Finnish conglomerate bought location-based social networking company Plazes for an estimated $30m. This comes as the company is wrapping up the largest acquisition in its history – the $8.1bn purchase of Navteq. We believe this is just the beginning for Nokia and others in the excessively hyped mobile location-based services (LBS) space. The question arising from this acquisition, as well as Vodafone’s $48.7m acquisition of Zyb in May, is what these acquisitions mean for the rest of the market. One implication is already clear: GPS technology has been commodified. (Just ask shareholders of Garmin, who have seen the stock skid to a two-year low.) With this technology popping up on dozens of devices, we expect hardware vendors to be even more active in snapping up LBS startups.

Nokia plans to roll Plazes into its Nokia Maps division, which itself was formed from the acquisition of gate5 in late 2006. It is part of Nokia’s overall strategy to have GPS technology play a large role in expanding beyond just being a mobile hardware company. Nokia claims it will sell upward of 37 million GPS-enabled handsets this year alone. The approaching worldwide release of the GPS iPhone, as well as Research in Motion’s push to include the technology in most of its BlackBerry devices, make it clear why high-profile backers such as KPCB and Sequoia Capital are so excited about LBS applications.

Beyond being a simple technology purchase, however, Plazes and other future deals will likely bring another important component to the apps: users. Despite their hype and position as leaders in the space, services such as Palego’s Whrrl, Loopt and Brightkite have fewer than a million users combined. Compare that to the hundreds of millions of users that ‘traditional’ social-networking sites such as Facebook and MySpace command, and one wonders what the hype is all about. By pairing up with larger companies, however, the services get instant access to millions of users. It is the technology and expertise that rumored suitors such as Facebook, Microsoft, Google and now the mobile carriers and hardware manufacturers are interested in. With continued consolidation, the fear of being left behind in a potentially important market will drive many to acquire first and ask questions later. Nokia might have just lit the fire in the M&A race to dominate the LBS market.

Seven signs of a consolidating LBS industry

Announced Acquirer Target Deal value
June 2008 Nokia Plazes $30m*
June 2008 Polaris Hughes Telematics $700m
May 2008 Vodafone Zyb $48.7m
October 2007 Nokia Navteq $8.1bn
July 2007 TomTom Tele Atlas $2.8bn
July 2007 Springbank Resources Location Based Technologies (fka PocketFinder) $50m
August 2006 Nokia gate5 $250m*

*estimated, Source: The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase