Category: Private Equity

A management ‘buy-under’ at Silicon Storage Technology?

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

In the third-quarter earnings report for Silicon Storage Technology at the end of October, chief executive Bing Yeh went out of his way to tout the vastly improving outlook for the flash memory vendor. Yeh noted that end-market demand had recovered and pricing had firmed up in what had been a pretty tough market. Third-quarter sales picked up sequentially and the company actually posted black numbers after three straight quarters of losses. The rebound was expected to continue in the fourth quarter, with a profit forecast for the period, as well.

And yet, the price that Yeh and his buyout partners at Prophet Equity bid for SST last week is actually lower than the vendor’s share price on the day Yeh made his comments about the rosy outlook for the company he heads. In fact, over the past two months, shares of SST have only traded below the proposed sale price of $2.10 in 11 of the 46 trading days. Looked at another way, the proposed management buyout (MBO) of SST represents a ‘take-under’ (rather than a takeover) when compared to the closing price in three out of four sessions since early September.

By their very nature, MBOs are fraught with conflict. In cases like SST, where executives plan to roll over their stakes in the company, the executives are effectively both buyers and sellers of the firm. (According to SST’s proxy, Yeh holds roughly 11% of all shares, making him the single-largest owner of the vendor.) The conflict emerges when we look at the basic economic self-interest on both sides of the transaction: The owners of SST (including Yeh) want to get as high a price as possible in the sale of their business, while the buyers (including Yeh) want to pay as low a price as possible to purchase the business.

Beyond the mismatch of motivation in MBOs, there’s also the thorny issue that executives almost certainly have insights on their business that aren’t available to other owners. We would guess that Yeh, who helped found SST 20 years ago and also serves as the chairman of the company’s board, probably knows more about the firm’s business and its prospects than anyone else on the planet.

At least one other insider at SST, however, didn’t share the support of the below-market MBO. Board member Bryant Riley, the founder of the Southern California investment firm B. Riley & Co., voted against the proposed buyout and then resigned from the board. (It’s worth noting that Riley got his seat in May 2008 only after agreeing to stop pestering the company about ‘strategic alternatives.’) Most SST investors – at least those who don’t stand to have a stake in the privately held company – have also voted against the deal. Shares have traded above the offer price since the bid was revealed November 12.

At long last, Kana gets gone

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Exactly three years ago, we bluntly wrote that there was no reason for Kana Software to be a public company, at least in its current form. Kana’s performance in the intervening 1,000 days since we published that report did nothing to change our view. If anything, as the red ink continued to gush at Kana, we became even more convinced of the need for a sale of the customer support software vendor. The sale finally happened Tuesday, with Accel-KKR agreeing to pay $49m in cash for most of Kana.

We were hardly alone in our assessment that Kana – a money-burning, Bulletin Board-listed company that also had negative working capital – should be cleared off the exchange. As we noted earlier this summer, Kana’s largest shareholder also wanted something to change at the company. KVO Capital Management, which had owned some 8.5% of the company, was pushing earlier this summer to get a director on the Kana board. KVO, which declined to comment, has agreed to back the sale to the buyout group, according to the release.

A PE rebound?

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

After the turmoil in the credit market essentially knocked PE shops out of tech M&A for much of the past two years, we’re hearing various indications that buyouts may be coming back. We recently noted the rumor in the market that in the coming weeks PE firm Francisco Partners will ink in the paperwork for a public offering for one of its portfolio companies, RedPrairie. And bankers indicate financial buyers are once again looking to add to their portfolios, rather than just support their existing investments.

Meanwhile, on the other end of the PE lifecycle, there’s also some bullishness for buyout funds from limited partners, at least according to one source. Marlin Equity Partners is said to have recently raised a $450m third fund – and even had commitments for up to $600m. Los Angeles-based Marlin, which last raised a $300m fund two years ago, didn’t return a call.

Of course, we have to look at any rebound in the overall LBO market in context. Certainly, we have seen some notable purchases this year by Symphony Technology Group, Vista Equity Partners and Thoma Bravo – as well as, of course, the pending carve-out of Skype, which is being led by Silver Lake Partners. But even with all of that, the value of tech LBOs announced so far in 2009 is only $12bn – just half the $23bn announced in the same period last year. And forget about the time when the buyout barons accounted for more that one-quarter of all tech M&A spending; so far this year, the share of PE firms of overall deal flow is just 11%.

Does Wall Street run through the RedPrairie?

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Along with the rising equity markets, there’s a new flow of companies that are planning to file their IPO paperwork in the next few weeks. For instance, we know of two venture-backed mobile vendors that have picked underwriters and plan to put in their prospectuses shortly. And we’re willing to bet that the expected strong offering from Fortinet, which initially filed in early August and is likely to debut before Thanksgiving, will catch the eye of quite a few VCs who have sizeable security providers in their portfolios.

Altogether, it looks like a decent IPO pipeline for VCs, as long as the equity markets hold. But what about their brethren at PE firms? We’ve seen the buyout barons file to flip a few non-tech holdings back onto the market, and the big offering from Avago Technologies (the carve-out of Hewlett-Packard’s semiconductor business by Kohlberg Kravis Roberts and Silver Lake Partners) has been above water since it hit the Nasdaq in early August. But there are still a lot of PE firms with pretty full portfolios that would like to post a realized gain – as opposed to ‘paper gains’ – before going out and raising a new fund.

So which PE-backed company is likely to hit the public market? Several sources have indicated that RedPrairie, an inventory management software vendor owned by Francisco Partners, has selected bankers and plans to ink an S-1 in the coming weeks. Francisco acquired RedPrairie in mid-2005, 30 years after the company was founded. Since the buyout, RedPrairie has rolled up six other companies. In 2008, the firm generated almost $300m in revenue. That puts RedPrairie’s revenue in the same neighborhood as rivals i2 and Manhattan Associates, but below the sales of JDA Software and Epicor Software.

A ‘new normal’ for tech M&A

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

With the third quarter now in the books, we’re busy tallying the buying that went on over the past three months. Not that it involves all that much work, actually. In fact, for all the talk of how much better off we are now than at this time last year, you wouldn’t know it from the M&A levels in the third quarter, which wrapped yesterday.

And just to qualify, when we say ‘better off,’ in most cases we mean ‘less worse off.’ It’s true, for instance, that jobless rates aren’t rising as fast as they once were, but they are still rising. That sentiment is mirrored in statistics covering many other areas of the economy as well, although is does go against the 15% rise in the Nasdaq over the summer.

So where do these currents and crosscurrents leave us in terms of numbers of third-quarter deals and the spending on them? In the just-completed July-September period, we recorded 740 transactions with an aggregate announced value of $34bn. That lines up nearly identically with the 733 deals worth $32bn in the third quarter of 2008, which saw the beginning of the historic credit crisis. Further, the third-quarter results continue the trend of measuring tech M&A spending in the tens of billions of dollars, compared to the $100bn quarters that we saw regularly during the boom years. Our take: there’s a ‘new normal’ in tech M&A.

Recent quarterly M&A activity

Period Deal volume Deal value
Q3 2009 740 $34bn
Q2 2009 767 $48bn
Q1 2009 654 $10bn
Q4 2008 725 $40bn
Q3 2008 733 $32bn
Q2 2008 719 $173bn
Q1 2008 836 $55bn

Source: The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase

Long an LBO target, ACS goes to Xerox

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Finally, Darwin Deason does his deal. The chairman and overwhelmingly largest shareholder of Affiliated Computer Services (ACS) has had the IT services company he founded in 1988 in play for some time now. The firm was approached by an unnamed private equity (PE) shop some four years ago, but talks were scrapped in January 2006. Then came Cerberus Capital Management, which put forward a $5.9bn bid in March 2007, only to pull it some three months later as the credit markets started tightening. Finally, on Monday, Xerox said it will buy ACS for $6.4bn in cash and stock. (Incidentally, Xerox shares were worth quite a bit less after the announcement, dropping 19% in Monday-afternoon trading.)

It’s noteworthy that a strategic acquirer has replaced PE shops as the buyer of the slow-but-steadily growing services company. We would chalk that up to the recent changes in the credit market. When debt was cheap and plentiful, buyout shops could afford to give up ‘synergies,’ knowing they could make a return because of the low cost of capital. (And the synergies can add up. Xerox expects to save $300-400m in the first three years by cutting duplicate costs and other financial advantages of the combination.) ACS has some $2.3bn in debt, which Fitch gives a ‘speculative’ rating of BB.

Although Deason stepped upstairs at ACS three years ago, he still controls some 44% of the voting stock in the company. (His outsized control in the vendor comes primarily through his ownership of all of the Class B shares of ACS, which carry 10 votes per share.) Looking at the rest of ACS’ board helps to explain at least one other part of the transaction as well, the fact that ACS was advised by Citigroup Global Markets. Longtime Citigroup executive Robert Druskin has served on the ACS board since March 2008. Additionally, Evercore Partners advised the board at ACS. On the other side, JP Morgan Securities and Blackstone Group advised Xerox.

M&A market timing at CA

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

After a two-year hiatus that ended last fall, CA Inc has returned to the market with newfound enthusiasm. With the vendor’s purchase on Monday of network performance management provider NetQoS, CA has now inked six acquisitions over the past 12 months. That comes after an extended period (September 2006 to October 2008) when the normally acquisitive company stepped out of the market entirely.

During that time, CA’s four large rivals (BMC, Hewlett-Packard, IBM and Symantec) announced a total of 61 transactions between them. Collectively, the quartet of buyers paid roughly 5.7 times trailing 12-month (TTM) revenue in the deals they did. (That’s the median valuation from the more than 20 transactions that either had terms disclosed or where we estimated the numbers.)

So from CA’s perspective, sitting out a period marked by historically high valuations might not be a bad thing at all. Consider this: CA’s purchase of NetQoS cost it $200m in cash, which worked out to 3.6x TTM sales. If we slap the prevailing multiple from the period CA was out of the market (5.7x TTM sales) onto CA’s most-recent deal, the price for NetQoS swells to $320m. Obviously, there were vastly different assumptions about growth rates in late 2006 and early 2007 than there are now, which goes a long way toward explaining the nearly 40% ‘discount’ that CA got by inking the NetQoS purchase on Monday rather than when the market was hot.

VeriSign’s bargain bin of deals

-Email Thomas Rasmussen

We’ve been closely watching VeriSign’s grueling divestiture process from the beginning. One year and $750m in divestitures later, VeriSign is largely done with what it set out to do. The company finally managed to shed its messaging division to Syniverse Technologies for $175m recently. Although we have to give the Mountain View, California-based Internet infrastructure services provider credit for successfully divesting nine large units of its business in about a year during the worst economic period in decades, we nonetheless can’t help but note that the vendor came out deeply underwater on its holdings. From 2004 to 2006 it spent approximately $1.3bn to acquire just shy of 20 differing businesses, which it has sold for basically half that amount. (Note that the cost doesn’t include the millions of additional dollars spent developing and marketing the acquired properties, nor the time spent on integrating and running them, which undoubtedly hurt VeriSign’s core business.)

Aside from the lawyers and bankers, the ones who really benefitted from VeriSign’s corporate diet were the acquirers able to pick up the assets for dimes on the dollar. And in most cases, the buyers of the castoff businesses were other companies since the traditional acquirers of divestitures (private equity firms) were largely frozen by the recent credit crisis. The lack of competition from PE shops, combined with the depressed valuations across virtually all markets, means the buyers of VeriSign’s divested businesses scored some good bargains. Chief among them are TNS and Syniverse, which picked up the largest of the divested assets, VeriSign’s communications and messaging assets, respectively. Wall Street has backed the purchases by both companies. Shares of TNS have quadrupled since the company announced the deal in March, helped by a stronger-than-expected earnings projections this year. More specifically, Syniverse spiked 20% on the announcement of its buy, which we understand will be immediately accretive, adding roughly $35m in trailing 12-month EBITDA.

VeriSign’s divestitures, 2008 to present

Date Acquirer Unit sold Deal value
August 25, 2009 Syniverse Technologies Messaging business $175m
May 26, 2009 SecureWorks Managed security services $45m*
May 12, 2009 Paul Farrell Investor Group Real-Time Publisher Services business Not disclosed
March 2, 2009 Transaction Network Services Communications Services Group $230m
February 5, 2009 Sinon Invest Holding 3united Mobile Solutions $5m*
May 2, 2008 MK Capital Kontiki Not disclosed
April 30, 2008 Melbourne IT Digital Brand Management Services business $50m
October 8, 2008 News Corporation Jamba (remaining 49% minority stake) $200m
April 9, 2008 Globys Self-care and analytics business Not disclosed

Source: The 451 M&A KnowledgeBase *451 Group estimate

Take-privates are taking more money

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Even though the volume of take-privates has plummeted this year, the deals that are getting announced appear to be far more competitive than they’ve ever been. At least that’s true after the LBO is announced. So far this year, we’ve seen terms get raised in four take-privates, due to either named or unnamed bidders.

The latest: On Tuesday, an unidentified private equity (PE) firm offered $8 for each share of MSC Software, topping the existing agreement for $7.63 per share that buyout shop Symphony Technology Group had with the maker of design software. The new bid added about $18m to the price of MSC. That follows post-announcement raises in the LBOs of I-many and Entrust, which increased the final purchase prices by $19m and $9m, respectively. And then there was the bidding war over SumTotal Systems between Vista Equity Partners and Accel-KKR that saw the final price come in 50% higher than the initial offer.

But in the case of MSC, we probably shouldn’t be surprised that the initial offer got bumped a bit higher. After all, it was only a scant 13% premium over the previous closing price. Shares of the company actually traded at the price proposed by Symphony just a month before the PE shop unveiled its bid. Although to be fair, much of the run had been triggered by speculation that hedge fund Elliott Associates, the vendor’s largest shareholder, was pushing for a sale of MSC. (Under the plan put forward by Symphony, Elliott would have rolled over its equity.) For the record, the proxy filed in connection with Symphony’s bid indicates that Elliott actually first broached the idea of a sale to MSC in February 2008, a time when shares were changing hands above $12 each.

Goodbye Montgomery, hello ArchPoint

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Following the historic upheaval at investment banks last fall, the changes have begun to filter down to the smaller firms, as well. For instance, Morgan Keegan & Co picked up tech boutique advisory shop Revolution Partners last December while hedge fund Ramius LLC has reached for Cowen Group in a deal that’s expected to close by the end of the year. And now we understand another change is set to play out in the tech banking business in the coming weeks.

A core quartet of bankers will be leaving Montgomery & Co to establish an independent tech M&A advisory firm, ArchPoint Partners. A source tells us that Rob Louv, Dan Williams and John Cooper will be ArchPoint’s managing partners, with Susan Blanco joining as a senior director. Initial plans call for San Francisco-based ArchPoint to possibly double its number of employees by the end of 2009, and perhaps double that figure again next year.

We are told the split from Montgomery will be pretty clean, with ArchPoint carrying over 10-20 existing clients. It has already brought in five or so clients on its own name, although the boutique won’t formally launch until next month. (ArchPoint already has its own license, and has no outside investors. Founders Cooper and Louv are backing the firm.) The split from Montgomery comes as the group has a bit of momentum behind it. Montgomery banked MX Logic in its sale to McAfee, the largest security transaction since last October and one that came with a refreshingly healthy multiple of 4 times MX Logic’s estimated sales.