Author: Brenon Daly

Small software buys big, but…

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

The little brothers of the software industry have stepped in front of their bigger brothers in the M&A market. Medium-sized public software companies have been inking uncharacteristically large acquisitions this year, even as the well-known vendors have been fairly reserved. And while these midmarket software firms have been big spenders recently, the deals are often missing a zero or even two compared with prices the industry bellwethers have paid in years past for some of their purchases. That has helped knock overall software M&A spending to its lowest level in four years, according to 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase.

As an example of the shift in buyers, consider Oracle. The software giant has averaged at least one transaction valued at more than $1bn each year over the past decade, according to the M&A KnowledgeBase. Yet this year, it hasn’t gotten anywhere close to doing a 10-digit deal, and, in fact, hasn’t announced any acquisitions since April. On the other side, several software companies that have only a fraction of the size and resources of Oracle have thrown around a lot more money on recent transactions than they ever have before. A few prints captured over the past few months in the M&A KnowledgeBase clearly show the trend of M&A inflation among the midmarket software buyers:

-At $275m in cash and stock, Guidewire Software’s reach for Cyence in October is $100m more than the SaaS provider has ever spent on any other transaction.
-Both of the largest purchases by security software vendor Proofpoint have come in the past month. Its $60m pickup of Weblife.io in late November and $110m acquisition of Cloudmark in early November compare with an average price tag of just $20m on its previous 12 deals done as a public company from 2013-16.
-Doubling the highest amount it has ever paid in a transaction, serial acquirer CallidusCloud spent $26m for Learning Seat earlier this month.
-In a pair of deals announced earlier this year, RealPage dropped more than a quarter-billion dollars on both of its targets, after not spending more than $100m on any of its previous two dozen acquisitions.
-Upland Software announced in mid-November the purchase of Qvidian for $50m, which is twice as much as the software consolidator has spent on any of its other nine acquisitions since coming public in November 2014.

These deals by midmarket software vendors (as well as other similarly sized buyers) go some distance toward making up for the missing big names. Yet they won’t fully cover the shortfall this year. Partially due to this change in acquirers, spending on software M&A in 2017 is tracking roughly one-third lower than it has been over the previous three years, according to the M&A KnowledgeBase.

TITUS goes from bootstrapped to buyout with Blackstone

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Private equity (PE) firm Blackstone Group has picked up a majority stake in TITUS, marking an unconventional bootstrapped-to-buyout exit for the 12-year-old data classification startup. Terms weren’t revealed. With the acquisition, PE shops have now purchased more cybersecurity vendors in 2017 than any year in history, according to 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase (see graphic below).

The transaction comes two years after Microsoft made a similar data security move, reaching for Israel-based startup Secure Islands. (Although the price of that deal wasn’t disclosed, subscribers to the M&A KnowledgeBase can see our proprietary estimate on terms.) However, Secure Islands was a much smaller company than TITUS, both in terms of revenue and technology. Secure Islands focused primarily on extending security for Microsoft technology, specifically Office 365 and SharePoint, while TITUS has a broader technology platform. Also, according to our understanding, profitable TITUS generates more than four times the sales that Secure Islands did at the time it was acquired.

For Blackstone (in this case, through its Tactical Opportunities team), the purchase of TITUS represents a return to the information security (infosec) market, with a platform that lends itself to additional bolt-on acquisitions. (The firm used the buy-and-build strategy with infosec reseller/service provider Optiv before selling it to Kohlberg Kravis Roberts a year ago.) Once TITUS is in the portfolio, which should come before the end of the year, Blackstone could help cover the costs of buying into markets where TITUS currently partners. Specifically, markets such as data-loss prevention and archiving would be logical adjacent sectors for Blackstone-backed TITUS to look to shop in.

Cybersecurity turns into a busy bazaar

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

The holiday shopping season kicked off last week, and for one tech sector, it was a particularly bountiful time for picking up some companies. Information security (infosec) acquirers announced an unprecedented seven transactions during the week that started on Cyber Monday. The pace represented a dramatic acceleration from the year-to-date average of just two deals announced each week.

With last week’s flurry, the number of infosec acquisitions in 2017 has already eclipsed last year’s total, even as overall tech M&A volume this year is heading for a mid-teens percentage drop from last year, according to 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase. (This year already ranks as the second-busiest year for infosec, with deal volume tracking to roughly 50% higher than the start of the decade.) Probably more important than the sheer number of transactions was who was doing the dealing:

-McAfee announced its first purchase since throwing off the shackles of full ownership of Intel last year. By all accounts, McAfee’s step back into the M&A realm with cloud security startup Skyhigh Networks came at a sky-high price.
-An infrequent acquirer, Trend Micro reached for a small application security startup based in Montreal, IMMUNIO. It is only the third acquisition the Japan-based company has done since 2011.
-Thoma Bravo continued this year’s record level of infosec M&A by private equity (PE) firms, taking Barracuda Networks private for $1.6bn. The M&A KnowledgeBase indicates that 2017 is on pace for more PE purchases in this market than any year in history, likely to come in about quadruple the number of sponsor-backed infosec deals in 2012.

Expanding the timeframe beyond just last week, we see a number of other trends this year that have contributed to strong infosec deal volume in 2017, which should continue in 2018. For starters, the industry’s largest stand-alone vendor has stepped back into the market in a big way. Symantec has inked five transactions so far in 2017, more than it has done, collectively, in the previous half-decade. Meanwhile, other infosec providers have either reemerged as buyers (Juniper acquiring Cyphort after a four-year infosec M&A hiatus) or started their own acquisition program (Qualys has announced two deals in the past four months, after printing just one transaction since the company’s founding in 1999).

November tech M&A slumps to pre-boom levels

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Dealmaking in 2017 is going out with a whimper. Acquirers in November spent just $15.7bn on tech transactions across the globe, the lowest monthly total in three years, according to 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase. The sluggish November activity comes after a similarly anemic October, with both months coming in only about half of the average monthly spending for the first nine months of 2017. Also, the number of deals announced in the just-completed month slumped to its lowest level of the year.

Even as November featured a decidedly lackluster level of overall M&A activity, a few transactions stood out, including:
-After entirely sitting out the wave of semiconductor consolidation in recent years, Marvell Technology Group shelled out $6bn in cash and stock for Cavium. The deal stands as the largest tech transaction in November, topping the collective spending on the next four biggest acquisitions last month.
-The information security industry saw its largest take-private, as buyout firm Thoma Bravo paid $1.6bn for Barracuda Networks in a late-November deal. A single-digit grower that throws off $10-20m in free cash flow each quarter, Barracuda has long been considered a candidate to go private as it works through a transition from on-premises products to cloud-based offerings.
-Richly valued startup Dropbox stepped back into the M&A market in November for the first time since July 2015, purchasing online publisher Verst. From 2012-15, the unicorn (or more accurately ‘decacorn’) had inked 23 acquisitions, according to the M&A KnowledgeBase.

The recent tail-off in acquisition spending has left the value of announced tech transactions so far this year at just $302bn, according to the M&A KnowledgeBase. With one month of 2017 remaining, this year is all but certain to come in with the lowest annual M&A spending since 2013. This year is tracking to a 34% decline in deal value compared with 2016 and an even-sharper 45% drop from 2015.

Bull market bypasses tech IPOs

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Although there’s still a month remaining in 2017, most startups thinking about an IPO – even those already on file ‘confidentially’ – have already turned the calendar to 2018. The would-be debutants want to have results from the seasonally strong Q4 to boast about during their roadshow with investors, as well as toss around a bigger ‘this year’ sales figure to hang their valuation on. There’s no compelling reason to rush out an offering right now.

That’s true even though the tech IPO market has been pretty active recently. By our count, a half-dozen enterprise-focused tech vendors have come public in just the past two months. (To be clear, that tally includes only tech providers that sell to businesses, and leaves out recent consumer tech companies such as Stich Fix and CarGurus.) The total of six enterprise tech IPOs since October is already higher than the full Q4 2016 total of four offerings.

While there has been an uptick in IPO activity, shares of the newly public companies haven’t necessarily been ticking higher, at least not dramatically so. There hasn’t been a breakout offering. Based on the first trades of their freshly printed shares, not one of the recent debutants has returned more than 20%. Half of the companies are trading lower now than when they debuted. Meanwhile, investors who aren’t interested in these new issues can’t seem to get enough of stocks that have been around a while, bidding the broad market indexes to record high after record high this year. The much-desired IPO ‘pop’ has gone a little flat here at the end of 2017, which might have some startups slowing their march to Wall Street in early 2018.

 

Thoma Bravo goes fishing, lands a Barracuda

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

After four underwhelming years as a public company, Barracuda Networks will step off the NYSE in a $1.6bn take-private with Thoma Bravo. The all-cash transaction, which is expected to close within three months, is one of those rare deals that appears to fit both the buyer and the seller in equal measure. With $17bn sloshing around, private equity firm Thoma Bravo needs to put money to work and has made the information security market a favorite shopping ground, having previously taken four infosec vendors private.

For Barracuda, the proposed leveraged buyout (LBO) wraps a period of not truly finding a home on Wall Street. As a public company, Barracuda posted just one-third the return of the Nasdaq Composite over the same period. The $27.55 per share that Thoma Bravo is paying represents the highest price for Barracuda stock in two and a half years. At one point in 2015, shares of Barracuda changed hands above $40.

Part of the reason why Barracuda fell out of favor with investors is the company’s ongoing transition from an on-premises business to more of a cloud focus. The so-called ‘legacy’ revenue – much of which is tied to appliances – has been shrinking every quarter, but still represents roughly one-third of sales. Deemphasizing that business has boosted Barracuda’s operating margins, but has slowed overall revenue growth to the single digits. Going private to complete the transition to a higher-margin software business, while continuing to throw off $10-20m of free cash flow each quarter, makes sense for Barracuda.

On the other side, Thoma Bravo pays essentially a market multiple for a company that has figured out a way to turn a profit selling into the underserved SMB market. (The enterprise value of Thoma Bravo’s bid stands at $1.48bn, or 4x trailing 12-month sales at Barracuda. That roughly matches the 4.4x TTM sales/EV multiple that Thoma Bravo paid in its most recent infosec LBO, Imprivata.) Further, Thoma Bravo has some growth opportunities once it adds Barracuda to its portfolio, both in terms of products (for instance, the target’s managed security service) and markets (Barracuda still generates 70% of its revenue in the US).

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.

Piling up the chips

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

Unveiling what would be the largest tech transaction in history, Broadcom said it is prepared to hand over $103bn in cash and stock, and assume some $25bn in debt, for Qualcomm. The unprecedented 12-digit pairing represents a consolidation of the two consolidators behind the semiconductor industry’s two largest consolidations.

To get a sense of the sheer scale of Broadcom’s ambitions, consider that this single deal would roughly match spending on all acquisitions in the chip industry from 2008-14, according to 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase. However, regulatory challenges mean this marriage of giants highly is unlikely to go through. And that assumes Qualcomm even picks up negotiations with Broadcom and its relatively low opening bid.

Thus far, Qualcomm has pretty much dismissed Broadcom’s offer. That doesn’t mean Broadcom, which is being banked by six separate firms, won’t push the deal.

Broadcom is negotiating from a position of strength, while Qualcomm is suffering through a well-publicized legal fight with major customer Apple and has still come up empty in its high-risk effort to buy its way into new growth markets. (Qualcomm originally hoped to close its $39.2bn purchase of NXP Semiconductors, which makes chips for cars and Internet of Things deployments, by the end of this year. That appears unlikely, and Broadcom has said it wants to acquire Qualcomm whether NXP closes or not.)

Broadcom’s relative strength also comes through in the pricing of the transaction as it is currently envisioned. At an enterprise value of $130bn, Broadcom is valuing Qualcomm at just 3.9x its pro forma 2017 sales of $33bn. (That assumes Qualcomm, which will put up about $24bn in sales in 2017, does buy NXP, which will generate $9bn in sales.) That’s substantially lower than the 5.5x sales Qualcomm plans to pay for NXP on its own, and a full three turns lower than the nearly 6.9x 2017 sales where Broadcom trades on its own.

Tech M&A stumbles out of summer

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

This summer’s momentum in the tech M&A market petered out as autumn arrived. Spending in the just-completed month of October slumped to its second-lowest monthly total of the year. Across the globe, acquirers announced just $17bn worth of tech and telco purchases in October, equaling only slightly more than half the average monthly deal value in the nine previous months, according to 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase.

October’s spending represents a sharp decline from September and, more broadly, the entire third quarter. (See our full Q3 report.) Spending on tech deals in September, which featured this year’s two largest acquisitions, came in more than three times higher than October. The September surge helped boost overall Q3 deal value to a quarterly level more in-line with the boom years of 2015 and 2016. (The two previous years stand out as banner years for tech M&A. At this point in the year, deal makers had spent 85% more in 2015 and 50% more in 2016 than they have so far in 2017.)

However, deal makers abruptly hit the brakes in October, particularly when shopping for big-ticket targets. Our M&A KnowledgeBase records just three transactions last month valued at $1bn or more, down from a monthly average of five 10-digit deals so far in 2017. Without a continuation of those billion-dollar deals, the start of Q4 is tracking much more closely to the first two quarters of this year, rather than the breakout Q3. Overall, with 10 months now in the books, 2017 is on pace for about $340bn in full-year M&A spending, which would represent the lowest annual total in four years.

VCs aren’t buying what VCs are selling

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

VCs aren’t buying what other VCs are selling, slamming shut a once-reliable exit door for startups. The recent shift in M&A has left the number of VC-to-VC acquisitions down about 40% so far this year compared with the previous three years, according to 451 Research’s M&A KnowledgeBase. The current weekly pace of two sales of VC-backed companies to other VC-backed companies would put this year’s total at about 105, representing the lowest full-year number of exits since the start of the decade.

There are several reasons for the decline in intra-industry deals, depending on the stature of the acquiring startup. In the rarified land of unicorns, there is a prevailing focus for VC portfolio companies on operational improvements, rather than inorganic expansion. Unlimited spending – whether it’s on KIND bars or Y Combinator graduates – has fallen out of fashion.

For instance, the M&A KnowledgeBase lists 24 acquisitions for Dropbox, which has raised more than $2bn in debt and equity. However, not one of those purchases has come in the past two years. It’s a bit different for Uber, which has its own ‘operational improvements’ to make. That besieged startup hasn’t done any deals in 2017, after doing two in each of the two previous years, according to the M&A KnowledgeBase.

Beneath that top tier of once-active, big-name startups is a fatter slice of VC-backed companies that have also cut their shopping, but for a different reason. In many cases, the startups simply don’t have the money for M&A because they haven’t been able to raise any new funding. This year is on pace to feature the fewest number of startups receiving venture investment since 2012, according to trade group National Venture Capital Association.

SailPoint sets sail for land of unicorns

Brenon Daly

Contact: Brenon Daly

In what would be one of the few private equity-backed tech companies to go public, SailPoint Technologies has put in its paperwork for a $100m IPO. The identity and access management (IAM) vendor, which has been owned by buyout shop Thoma Bravo for three years, should debut on Wall Street with a valuation north of $1bn. That is, unless SailPoint gets caught up in the current M&A wave that has seen a number of big buyers pick up identity-related security firms.

SailPoint reported $75m in revenue for the first half of 2017, an increase of 32% over the same period last year. Assuming that pace holds, the Austin, Texas-based company would finish this year with about $175m in sales. Depending on the product, SailPoint sells both licenses and subscriptions to its software. Subscriptions to its cloud-based offering, IdentityNow, are outpacing on-premises software sales, and currently account for some 42% of total revenue. License sales generate 34% of overall revenue, with the remaining 24% coming from services.

Transitioning to more subscription sales will undoubtedly boost SailPoint’s valuation. (Wall Street tends to appreciate the predictability that comes with multiyear subscriptions. In the case of IdentityNow, SailPoint indicated in its prospectus that the standard contract lasts three years.) That’s not to suggest that SailPoint will get the same platinum valuation as a pure SaaS provider such as Okta. That cloud-based IAM vendor, which went public in April, currently commands a $2.75bn market cap, or 11x this year’s sales. Of course, Okta is larger than SailPoint and growing at twice the pace.

Instead, we would look to some of the recent M&A pricing in the active IAM market to inform SailPoint’s valuation. For example, we understand that SecureAuth traded at more than 6x revenue in its sale in September to buyout firm K1 Investment Management. Ping Identity – which, like SailPoint, was in transition from license sales to subscriptions – also sold for about 6x sales last year. SailPoint is substantially larger than either of these fellow IAM firms, and is growing solidly. That should garner it a premium. But even using a conservative valuation multiple of 6x sales gets SailPoint into the land of the unicorns.

For more real-time information on tech M&A, follow us on Twitter @451TechMnA.